Theories Behind Freedom of Expression - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Theories Behind Freedom of Expression

Description:

Theories Behind Freedom of Expression Attainment of truth The free exchange of ideas allows people to get their message out. Free speech contributes to democratic ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: Stephen827
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Theories Behind Freedom of Expression


1
Theories Behind Freedom of Expression
  • Attainment of truth
  • The free exchange of ideas allows people to get
    their message out.
  • Free speech contributes to democratic government
  • By allowing people to participate in the
    political debate
  • Check on government power
  • By allowing people to criticize the government
  • Allows power transitions with stability
  • By allowing people seeking influence to do so
    peacefully through speech
  • Individual fulfillment

2
Constitutional Provisions and Government
Regulation of Speech
  • The first Amendment, of course, is the source of
    the free speech right.
  • The First Amendment applies to the states through
    the due process clause of the Fourteenth
    Amendment.
  • The Fifth Amendment also guarantees some aspects
    of free speech through its criminal procedure
    protections and due process clause.
  • As a general principal, the constitutional
    protections apply only to government action.
    Unless made illegal by law, a private company or
    landowner can stifle speech in its office or on
    its property.

3
Regulation of Politically Motivated Speech
  • This is the hardest speech for the government to
    regulate.
  • For content-based restrictions, the regulations
    must pass strict scrutiny.
  • For content-neutral restrictions, the
    restrictions (sometimes referred to as time,
    place and manner restrictions ) serve an
    important government purpose but leave open other
    adequate methods to communicate the ideas.
  • Any law that limits speech is invalid if it is
  • too vague for a reasonable person to understand
    what speech is allowed and what is prohibited or
    if it is
  • Overbroad in that it prohibits speech that is
    protected by the Constitution in addition to
    speech that is not

4
Examples of Laws Struck Down forVagueness or
Overbreadth
  • Communications Decency Act, which prohibited
    peddling indecency to children, was struck down
    because
  • 1) It was too vague as to what indecency meant
    and
  • 2) It was overbroad because it prohibited
    indecent expression by adults in some cases as
    well.
  • A U. of Michigan policy prohibiting racist or
    sexist speech in certain contexts was vague and
    overbroad.

5
Speech that is not Protected
  • Incitement
  • If its intended to cause imminent lawless action
    and is likely to cause such imminent lawless
    action.
  • Obscenity
  • Certain forms of commercial speech
  • Commercial speech is protected, but not to the
    same extent as politically motivated speech.
  • Fighting words and threats
  • These are basically irrelevant because laws that
    prohibit these are usually too vague or
    overbroad.
  • Defamation
  • Prohibited speech whose prohibition passes strict
    scrutiny

6
Rights Included in Freedom of Speech
  • Politically motivated speech (as discussed)
  • Publishing any material that can be said orally
  • Freedom of Association
  • Even if that association is based on
    discrimination or hatred
  • Receiving information
  • The First Amendment also protects the rights of
    people to read and hear what others have to say.
  • Soliciting funds
  • Though this can be, and often is, subject to
    reasonable time, place and manner restrictions
  • Freedom from being compelled to speak
  • i.e.. Children may refrain from citing the pledge
    of allegiance in public school if they so choose.

7
Speech Restrictions in Public forums
  • This is the hardest place to regulate speech.
  • As discussed before, content-based regulations
    here require the regulation to pass strict
    scrutiny.
  • What is a public forum?
  • Anything publically owned, including
  • Streets and parks
  • Public schools and universities
  • The airwaves and newspapers and the internet
  • The government is under no duty to fund speech,
    but once it does so, it must do so in a
    viewpoint neutral manner.

8
Speech Restrictions in non-Public forums
  • What is a non-public forum?
  • Any place that is not traditionally reserved for
    the exchange of ideas including
  • Public airports
  • Most government buildings
  • Military bases
  • In a non-public forum, the government may
    institute content-based restrictions, as long as
    they are viewpoint neutral.
  • Regarding private forums (privately owned malls
    and stores, etc.), theres no freedom of speech
    so the government can enforce a private property
    owners demand that speech not take place on his
    or her property.

9
Free Speech Application to Others (1)
  • Government Employees
  • A government employee may accept payment for
    speaking.
  • However, the government can restrict employees
    from revealing confidential information, like any
    other employer.
  • Government officials or employees can be
    restricted in terms of their political
    participation while holding a government job.
  • Whistleblowers are protected under general
    federal laws.
  • Students
  • There is freedom of speech for public school
    students, though it is more limited.
  • It can be prohibited if it is disruptive,
    obscene, etc.
  • School publications can be censored in the best
    interest of all students.
  • Even off-campus speech can be punished if it is
    disruptive.

10
Free Speech Application to Others (2)
  • Corporations
  • Enjoy similar free speech rights as individuals,
    including news networks, etc.
  • Commercial speech can be limited by some
    advertising rules or the SEC, FDA, etc.
  • Press
  • They enjoy basically the same free speech rights
    as individuals and get some extra protections
    (especially in defamation suits).
  • Broadcasters
  • If they use public airwaves, their content can be
    restricted more than individuals and they must
    follow FCC rules.

11
Free Speech Application to Others (3)
  • Cable Operators
  • Often not subject to FCC rules because they dont
    use public airwaves.
  • Still, their freedom of speech is more limited
    than publishers.
  • Telephone companies
  • In todays day and age, theres little difference
    between them, and cable companies, and
    individuals, as theyre not regulated monopolies
    like they once were.
  • Internet
  • Users enjoy the full freedoms available to any
    communication. It cannot be regulated like
    over-the-air television.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com