Title: and finally
1and finally
- 5) Conservatism stifles progress
- Burkes closed society does not allow for
existing moral and social paradigms to be
challenged as this would lead to instability. - Pinchin uses the example of clashes between
science and the church. - If moral certainty is to be preserved then the
outcome of such an exchange may not be the truth.
- 6) Inaccurate diagnosis of human nature?
- Burke has little faith in mans capability as a
rational animal this forms the basis of his
rejection of Enlightenment thought. Instead he
argues that humans are governed by emotion
instinct. - Yet, is he right to be so sceptical? Liberals
such as Mill will argue that individuals are able
to apply reason in order to work out what is best
for them. NB Liberalism is very much an
Enlightenment project. - Further, anarchists will also insist that humans
are capable of self government and should not be
restricted by external influence.
2Liberalism
- Many commentators differentiate between
political and economic liberalism. Economic
liberalism is sometimes referred to as
libertarianism and is embraced by most Liberals
and Conservatives. It advocates proliferation of
the free market economy. Classical political
liberalism, as advocated by J S Mill, focuses on
individual freedom, expressed primarily in terms
of freedom of speech and action. It is concerned
with negative freedom, though recent
manifestations advocate the positive e.g. Welfare
Liberalism (Rawls Original Position).
Neo-liberalism is a term associated with the
promotion of global free trade and rabid
capitalism (guess where I pin my colours?!)
3John Locke
- Key Work Two Treatises of Civil Government.
- Ideology Locke believed that the rights of
individuals to life, liberty and estate come
before the rights of society. He advocated a
Social Contract Theory where the individual
surrenders to the community his natural right to
enforce the law of nature, in return for the
preservation of life, liberty and estate by the
community. Lockes theory of government also
established the Separation of Powers
legislative, executive and judicial.
4Locke Quotes
- "Government has no other end but the
preservation of property." - "Where law ends, tyranny begins."
- The end of law is not to abolish or restrain,
but to preserve and enlarge freedom. For in all
the states of created beings capable of law,
where there is no law, there is no freedom. - All mankind... being all equal and independent,
no one ought to harm another in his life, health,
liberty or possessions. - Every man has a property in his own person. This
nobody has a right to, but himself. - Not hugely relevant, but one I like! -Education
begins the gentleman, but reading, good company
and reflection must finish him.
5The significance of law
- Each individual is aware of natural laws that
include the right to liberty, equality, and
self-preservation. - Natural Laws are ordained by God and understood
by all rational beings. - Yet, each man will interpret the natural law
differently, some using it to justify personal
vendettas/ambition. - As such, a social contract is again required to
protect. - Once entered, the social contract is totally
binding and enforced by law. All who live under
it are bound by it. - The contract is established primarily to protect
individual rights to life, liberty property and
is enforced by a limited government. - As Nozick observes, Locke limits the State to
that of a protection agency.
6The central importance of Property
- Locke argues that in the state of nature, God
gave the earth to all human beings. - Men are free to make use of the earths
resources. - All humans are held to own their own bodies.
- When they mix their labour with nature, that
which they are utilising becomes their property
and is no longer part of the common store.
Consequently, humans can claim a natural right to
property, upheld by the natural law. - Lockean provisos i) no one should take more than
they can make use of, ii) one must leave enough
and as good for others.
7Some Criticisms
- Nozick argues that it is difficult to justify the
idea that mixing ones labour with land gives one
indefinite rights to that land If I own a can
of tomato juice and spill it in the sea so that
its molecules mingle evenly throughout the sea,
do I thereby come to own the sea? (Reductio ad
absurdum) - A right to inheritance of that land is even more
difficult to uphold if all is inherited, how
can future generations mix their labour?) here
it would seem that property is theft!
(Proudhon) - For Locke, property rights are an integral part
of human freedom. Inequality simply reflects the
way in which God rewards the industrious. - Yet, such inequality surely excludes many from
the freedoms that Locke appears to hold dear and
does not satisfy any reasonable doctrine of
distributive justice.
8John Stuart Mill
- Committed Utilitarian, economist, activist,
academic and MP, Mill had a considerable impact
on the world in which he lived and continues to
exert significant influence in political thought
today. - Despite his obvious distaste for the conservatism
of his day, modern conservatism exhibits many
liberal traits particularly economic ones.
The quote in full "I never meant to say that
the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant
to say that stupid people are generally
Conservative. I believe that is so obviously and
universally admitted a principle that I hardly
think any gentleman will deny it."Letter
9Combining with Utilitarianism
- For Mill, his concept of freedom is underpinned
by the principle of utility i.e. the experience
of liberty inevitably leads to maximal happiness.
- This places enormous faith in the individual
knowing what will make them happy. - Yet, there is an apparent contradiction here
Mills writings on democracy suggest that the
majority of people require representation as they
do not always know what is good for them. - Plus his qualitative utilitarianism appears
paternalistic. - That said, many critics have also argued that On
Liberty focuses too much on negative freedom and
fails to recognise the need to protect
individuals from exploitation Rawls later seeks
to address this.
10Negative Freedom
- The only part of conduct of any one, for which
he is amenable to society, is that which concerns
others. In the part, which merely concerns
himself, his independence is, of right, absolute.
Over himself, over his own body and mind, the
individual is sovereign. (On Liberty) - Mill is obviously more concerned with freedom
from (negative) rather than freedom to
(positive). - The extent to which Mill was prepared to allow
individual liberty was shocking to his
contemporaries. - He advocated the experiment of living which
serves to enliven both the individual and society
- Liberty is also required if society is to resist
stagnation.
11The harm principle
- My freedom to swing my fist ends where your face
begins (Berlin summarising Mill) - This quote sums up Mills central doctrine that
the individual has liberty in every aspect of
existence other than that which causes harm to
others. - This emphasises negative, rather than positive
freedom. Consequently, paternalism is rejected
(though possible contradiction with writings on
authority see earlier notes) - But what is harm? A strong criticism of the harm
principle is that it fails to make clear what
counts as harm. - Physical harm is clear, but what of psychological
damage?
12Rights
- Mill agrees with Benthams diagnosis of natural
nights as nonsense on stilts. - He argues that freedom is not a natural right,
but a right born of utilitarian justification
i.e. reason is required to apply the principle of
utility to the idea of a free future. It is only
because freedom is advocated by this principle
that it should be considered a right. - NB Bentham believed Utilitarianism to be a
scientific theory and rejected the idea the
reason was required to implement it.
13Freedom of Speech and Action (Fallibility Thesis)
- If all mankind minus one were of one opinion,
and only one person were of the contrary opinion,
mankind would be no more justified in silencing
that one person, than he, if he had the power,
would be justified in silencing mankind. (On
Liberty) - Controversial opinions/actions should never be
suppressed as - 1, they may be right
- 2,even if wrong, discussion encourages better
understanding - 3, if some truth is contained, discussion will
enable it to come out.
14Infallibilism
- Mill claims that any attempt to suppress opinion
is tantamount to claiming infallibility. - He held a deep conviction that humans ought to
pursue the truth and that this could not take
place unless we open ourselves up to the
possibility that we may be wrong and allow for
change. - Such a vision of the open society would obviously
not be acceptable to conservatives such as Burke
or absolutists such as Plato.
15Gibbs against the infallibility argument
- Gibbs criticises Mills infallibility argument
to remove freedom of speech infers infallibility.
He argues that it is acceptable for a ruler to
protect the public from dangerous opinion e.g.
that British foreign policy is threatening
national security. - A ruler might silence an opinion without
assuming himself to be infallible, without even
assuming that he knows this particular opinion to
be false. He might know it to be true, and
silence it because it is dangerous. - Such a perspective obviously runs contrary to
Mills need for the truth. - Many would rather be subject to the consequences
of the truth than have it denied them. (think Tom
Cruise vs Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men!) - For others Ignorance is bliss (think Cypher in
The Matrix I dont get out much!)
16Gibbs on truth
- Gibbs also criticises Mills commitment to
truth - For Mill, the truth is always better than
falsehood. - This seems to contradict Mills commitment to a
connection between utility and truth. - Gibbs agrees that the truth is important, but
claims that it should not take precedence over
all else One would obviously have the - Yet, Gibbs fails to show why this is the case.
17Law
- Mill very much directs his writing in favour of
legal positivism. Morality is considered to be a
private affair, not de jure (according to law). - This stands in contrast to a more conservative
perspective that advocates the overlapping thesis
and commitment to a natural law theory. - Mill also guards against the tyranny of the
majority social pressure to conform.
Individuals should not have their freedom of
speech/expression curtailed by the indignation of
the masses yes Mark, its alright to wear your
mums Sunday dress. That said, there is no
compulsion to approve of the behaviour/words of
others.
18Devlin
- Devlins ideas were formed in response to the
Wolfenden Report (1959) which recommended the
decriminalisation of homosexuals. - He argued that the idea of private morality harms
society. - Laws must reflect the moral values of citizens
- In this sense, he is advocating an overlapping
thesis (akin to natural law) - The law ought to protect against vice!
- Thus, Mills position on freedom of expression is
challenged though we could argue that Devlin is
simply redefining the harm principle.
If prostitution isnot the laws business, what
concern has the law with the ponce or the
brothel-keeper?
19Where to draw the line?
- What counts as harm? Physical violence is
reasonably clear cut, but what of my subscription
to Mammoth Melons Monthly? - For Mill, being offended does not count as harm.
Does he understate the reality of psychological
harm? It seems that sustained exposure to
disturbing imagery can cause significant damage
to the individual and those around. - Child psychologist Dr Tanya Byron has recently
argued for tighter controls on censorship,
particularly with use of video games.
20Hart The Concept of Law
- Hart famously reacted to Devlins conservative
position, claiming that the State has no business
interfering in peoples personal lives. - Hart offers a defence of legal positivism. He
restates Mills position, arguing that the moral
majority should not be able to suppress
individual expression. - Actual harm must be evident and demonstrated by a
panel of experts before human expression is
subjugated. - Is anyone so qualified to offer expert advice
of this nature? - To reduce application of the law to cover only
actual harm may well lead to the continued
suffering of many. E.g. what of my neighbours
desire to play Val Doonican LPs at 3am every
night? do I experience actual harm?
21Welfare Liberalism
- Key Work John Rawls - A Theory of Justice
- Ideology Contemporary libertarian and social
contract theorist. Arguably the most important
political philosopher of the 20th century, Rawls'
guiding idea is that in a just society the laws
and institutions would not confer advantages on
some people at the expense of others based on
natural and social contingencies that are
arbitrary from a moral standpoint. - In developing his own account of "justice as
fairness," Rawls asks us to imagine ourselves
choosing principles of justice from an original
position of equality in which we lack knowledge
of our social and economic standing, race, sex,
natural abilities, and other socially relevant
facts. - Rawls argues that we would put priority, first,
on providing equal liberties and fair
opportunities for all and, second, on maximizing
the share of income and wealth of those least
advantaged.
22The Revolutionary Image (Socialism)
- Pinchin focuses primarily on Marx, though he is
not the only, nor the first socialist. Yet, it is
difficult to deny that he has been the most
influential. - Marx was inevitably influenced by a rich period
of German philosophy that had preceded him.
German Idealism had directed European philosophy
in the 18th century with thinkers such as Kant,
Schopenhauer, Hegel dominating the landscape. - In particular, the ideas of Hegel and the
materialist, Feuerbach, helped shape Marxs
philosophical vision.
23John Rawls
- Quotes Ideally citizens are to think of
themselves as if they were legislators and ask
themselves what statutes, supported by what
reasons satisfying the criterion of reciprocity,
they would think is most reasonable to enact. - The principles of justice are chosen behind a
veil of ignorance.
Space for a humorous interlude man goes to the
zoo. Theres only one dog there. Its a Shih
Tzu.
24Anarchy, State and Utopia
- This is the title of Robert Nozicks influential
reply to his Harvard colleague, Rawls. - Nozick argues that the state should not interfere
with individual liberties, particularly economic
freedoms. - He refutes Proudhons claim that property is
theft, believing instead that most property has
been acquired fairly. - Nozick is obviously a supporter of individualism.
Welfare provision is rejected, with even income
tax rejected as a type of forced labour -
individuals are compelled to spend some time
working to pay the government. - Market forces should be left unhindered. Wealth
should be distributed according to merit and good
fortune. - It is difficult to see how such a system could
ever be considered just or, indeed, tolerated by
the majoritybut it is!
25John Donne no man is an island
- Donne rejects individualism, considering us to
be defined beyond material terms - "All mankind is of one author, and is one
volume when one man dies, one chapter is not
torn out of the book, but translated into a
better language and every chapter must be so
translated...As therefore the bell that rings to
a sermon, calls not upon the preacher only, but
upon the congregation to come so this bell calls
us all but how much more me, who am brought so
near the door by this sickness....No man is an
island, entire of itself...any man's death
diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind
and therefore never send to know for whom the
bell tolls it tolls for thee. - This leads us nicely to
26Marx Quotes
- "The history of all hitherto existing societies
is the history of class struggle." - From each, according to his ability to each,
according to his need. - The theory of the Communists may be summed up in
the single sentence Abolition of private
property - The proletarians have nothing to lose but their
chains. They have a world to win.
27Hegelian Dialectic Feuerbachs materialism
- From Hegel, Marx developed the idea of history as
process. Hegel viewed this as a spiritual
process, involving thesis, antithesis and
synthesis. - Marxs reading of Feuerbach enabled him to
decouple Hegels dialectical process from his
idealism. It also fuelled his atheistic ideas and
helped him to develop a material view of history
as process. - Feuerbach viewed expressions of spirituality as
mythical. Marx believed that such expressions
were the product of mans alienation from his
true humanity and revealed a hope for a better
life post mortem Religion is the sigh of the
oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless
world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is
the opium of the people.
28Dialectical Materialism
- Marx viewed history as an economic process a
cycle whereby an underclass would rise up against
their masters, overthrow them and then become the
new ruling class. - This is represented in the form of
Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis. - For Marx, this is a scientific process. He viewed
history as subject to deterministic economic
laws. Changes are inevitable and ideas are
reflections of economic interests. - Marx identifies four great changes in history,
each with a modal point (point of change).
29Dialectic in process
- Nomadic and pastoral era. Modal point soil
cultivation and domestication of animals. - Classical period concentrated wealth and
slavery. Stability and development of the arts.
Modal point big, hairy Barbarians with sharp
pointy sticks, too many orgies (what is too
many?!) need for decentralisation. - Feudalism conflict between land owners and
serfs. Modal point Industrialisation - need for
urban workforce - Capitalism and the Liberal ideology that supports
Democracy. Conflict between bourgeoisie
(industrialists etc) and proletariat (workers).
Modal point the peasants are revolting! the
proletariat become conscious of exploitation and
seek to overthrow the ruling class, resulting in
30Communism
- This will result in the abolition of private
property and the creation of a truly socialist
society. Modal point none! Communism will
signal the removal of the means of antagonism and
conflict i.e. capitalism. - Communism brings an end to the pre-history of
mankind. - Initially, the overthrow of capitalism will
result in antagonisms and a brief dictatorship
of the proletariat will be required. Once the
class system has been abolished, the state will
wither away - Yet, history has not borne this out Russia etc
- NB Fukuyama saw things differently advent of
libertarianism end of history?!