How to Respond to a DBQ - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

How to Respond to a DBQ

Description:

How to Respond to a DBQ Mr. Collins – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: TechRes6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How to Respond to a DBQ


1
How to Respond to a DBQ
  • Mr. Collins

2
Read the Prompt
  • Circle instruction words(usually verbs)
  • Underline Key terms that you will need to
    understand in order to address all aspects of the
    prompt.

3
Read all the Context statements
  • Make sure you understand the historical context.
  • This is usually provided before the actual
    documents, but can sometimes be found at the end
    of each document
  • Sometimes both

4
Read the documents
  • Read all the documents
  • Write a summary statement that captures the core
    meaning of the text
  • Write it in one sentence
  • Group the documents (remember the shoes)

5
Write a concise SOAPSTONE _at_ doc. phrases that
tag
S O A P S T
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
6
Drafting
  • Intro paragraph
  • Three body paragraphs
  • conclusion

7
Intro Paragraph
  • Engaging opening sentence with some explanation
  • Set the stage
  • Write 3-5 sentences that introduces your audience
    to the historical context
  • First, this is done with broad strokes
  • Then as you approach the end you become more
    specificfunnel design
  • Finally leading to your thesis, which should be
    one to tow sentences at the end of your
    introductory paragraph.

8
Intro cont. thesis
  • Thesis
  • Time and Place
  • It has a topic and a certain argument about
    that topic
  • That argument about the topic is your Claim -
    what your paper should prove
  • Claim cannot be wishy-washy, you cannot simply
    restate the prompt, or simply provide categories.
    No lame claims!
  • Break the claim into meaningful categories that
    preview (introduces) your body paragraphs your
    grouping strategy.

9
Intro thesis examples
  • Try creating a thesis with a subordinate clause
  • E.g.
  • While Confucianism and Legalism are clearly
    responses to the warring states period, one can
    argue that Daoism was as much a response to
    Confucianism as the Warring States Period
  • You want to characterize things in terms of the
    the relative degree of influence.
  • You might also qualify your thesis by specifying
    that the response of the schools had a different
    impact in terms of the kinds of order and relief
    categorized into social, political, econ etc.

10
Body Pargraph
  • Topic sentence is a mini thesis, where you
    introduce readers to what you will discuss in
    this paragraph
  • Explain, dont simply summarize or merely restate
    the document
  • But explain by
  • Tagging core meaning
  • Discussing the document in relation to
  • the prompt (key terms philosophical schools,
    view of human nature, systems of order, etc.,
  • Historical context Warring states and times of
    schools
  • your thesis topic sentence.

11
Body Paragraph (main parts) cont.
  1. Topic Sentence
  2. Discuss Document 1 by
  3. Intro Doc 1(1-2 sentences)
  4. Explain central meaning of Doc. 1 (1-3
    sentences)
  5. Explain/Discuss document in relation to
    prompt,thesis, Topic sentence (address the prompt
    and all its aspects) 1-3 sentences
  6. POV Point of view statement how different
    features of SOAPSTONE Influence what is said
    and reliability of document (1-2 sentences)
  7. Repeat step two for next two documents
  8. Close with answering What other documents will
    give an alternative perspective and why.

12
Body Pargraph cont
  • 3. POV Statement
  • What it does-
  • Clearly and specifically evaluates the level of
    trust one can justifiably grant the information
    in the document.
  • Discusses what is really going on
  • Uses multiple features of SOAPSTONE to ground
    the claim establishing POV
  • Compares and contrasts authors point of view
    with views of others.

13
Body par Cont. POV
  • POV How
  • You want to show how
  • Speakers background
  • The Occasion
  • Purpose
  • Audience
  • Influences the content of the document (strong
    claim)
  • Or is reflected in the document (weaker claim,
    but can be acceptable depending how it is
    handled)

14
POV in brief
  • Get points by
  • Explaining the relationship of the authors POV
    to authors religion, occupation, time period,
    gender etc. OR
  • Assessing the reliability of the source OR
  • Explaining that different kinds of documents
    serve different purposes OR
  • Analyze tone or intent of documents

15
Body par. Cont.
  • Repeat the previous s 2 3 for each document
  • 2- explanation 1-3 sentences
  • 3 POV statement 1-3 sentneces
  • 4. Conclude with answering the following
    question What other documents will help you
    understand what youre trying to address in this
    paragraph. (What will provide a new perspective
    that will help to balance the picture)

16
Conclusion Significance
  • Importance influence on people who lived
    through event or times
  • Profundity how deeply affected by the event(s)
  • Quantity How many people affected
  • Durability How long - ripple effect
  • Relevance how it helps historians understand the
    events in question
  • You do not points for the last one relevance
    unless you meaningfully address 1. Meaningfully
    means being specific , not just labeling.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com