Implementation of physical Sensors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Implementation of physical Sensors

Description:

Implementation of physical Sensors Jesse McVaney BME281 URI Modern Sensors 1917 - Langevin uses piezoelectric effect to create sonar. 1925 Dr. Tsuji develops the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: Kgallant
Learn more at: https://www.ele.uri.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Implementation of physical Sensors


1
Implementation of physical Sensors
  • Jesse McVaney
  • BME281 URI

2
Modern Sensors
  • 1917 - Langevin uses piezoelectric effect to
    create sonar.
  • 1925 Dr. Tsuji develops the first combustible
    gas monitor.
  • 1958 Kilby develops first integrated circuit
    for Texas Instruments making it possible to
    significantly reduce the size of circuits.

3
Sensor Types
  • Motion/ Position
  • Force
  • Temperature
  • Vibration
  • Current/ Resistance
  • Light
  • Chemical

4
Examples
www.sparkfun.com
5
Homemade Sensors
6
Standards
  • Sensors may have to comply with strict standards
    to be implemented for medical use.
  • Degree of accuracy, maintenance schedule,
    material all factor in to how a sensor may be
    implemented.
  • American National Institute Standard code ANSI
    Z540 covers these requirements

7
  • Instruments may have to undergo periodic
    calibrations (Annual, monthly, Case per Case)
  • Calibrations may require a standard at least ten
    times as accurate as the instrument under test
    (Fluke)
  • Implantable sensors may need to be constructed of
    certain materials to avoid toxicity, allergic
    reaction, or to withstand the environment they
    are operating in.

8
Cost
  • Prices vary widely depending on the material,
    intended use and liability coverage.
  • ANSI codes are meant to protect patients but may
    consequently make some procedures or equipment
    unaffordable.

9
Future
  • Less expensive synthetic material.
  • Clearer transmission signals
  • Faster sample rates
  • Smaller implantable/wearable devices
  • Fewer Calibrations needed.

10
Sources cited
  • Image 08880-03-L ltwww.sparkfun.com/products/8880gt
  • Image 08685-03-L ltwww.sparkfun.com/products/8685gt
  • Image 09265-1 ltwww.sparkfun.com/products/9265?gt
  • Fluke "Why calibrate test equipment?. FLUKE
    Corporation, 2004.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com