Title: Intro to Comparative Politics
1Intro to Comparative Politics
2Lecture Overview
- Focus of comparative politics
- The science of political science?
- Quick history of comparative politics
3Focus of Comparative Politics
- What is the focus of comparative politics?
4Focus of Comparative Politics
- Internal Power Structures
- Comparative politics does not ignore external
influences on internal structures, but its
ultimate concern is power configurations within
political systems (Caramani, 2008 3).
5Focus of Comparative Politics
- often simply means studying foreign countries
- the use of case studies
- area specialists
- It need not be explicitly comparative.
- The editor of our textbook doesnt endorse such
an approach (Caramani, 2008 4).
6Focus of Comparative Politics
- A comparative study may focus on a small number
of countries (two or more) or it may attempt to
incorporate the analysis of a very large range of
countries. - Countries, in fact, need not be the unit of
analysis, sub-national regional political units
or supra-national units may be the focus.
7The science of political science?
- the intent of comparative politics is that of a
rigorous scientific and empirical field of study
description, explanation, and prediction
(Caramani, 2008 20). - Is political science a science?
- Do social sciences differ from natural sciences?
How and why?
8The science of political science?
- Daniele Caramani suggests (2008 3) that,
Whereas political theory deals with normative
questions (about equality, democracy, justice,
etc.), comparative politics deals with empirical
questions. - Even though comparative political scientists are
of course concerned also by normative questions,
the discipline as such is empirical and
value-neutral
9The science of political science?
- Is it possible to create a value-free or
neutral political science? - Is it desirable to create a value-free or
neutral political science?
10Origins of comparative politics
- Plato and Aristotle, while usually considered
political theorists, were engaged in the process
of comparing different political regimes - aristocracy, oligarchy, democracy, tyranny
11Origins of comparative politics
- Modern comparative politics can be traced back to
(among others) - Machiavelli, The Prince, 1532.
- Montesquieu, On the Spirit of the Laws, 1748
- Alexis de Tocqueville, On Democracy in America,
1835
12Formal-legal, institutional approach
- First half of the 20th century, the emerging
discipline of political science focused on the
formal-legal institutions of the state.
13Political Behaviour, Political Culture
- In the 1950s and 60s, attention turned toward the
study of the political behaviour and political
attitudes of the public. - The behavioural revolution
- This was facilitated by developments in survey
techniques and emerging computerization. This
greatly increased the possibility for
number-crunching among social scientists.
14The reaction against the behavioural revolution
- The new form of empirical political science still
has its proponents today, but by the late 1960s
it was under attack from a variety of directions
and for a variety of reasons.
15The Politics of Political Science Methodology
- York University, 1969
- Fifty student radicals converged on a meeting of
the Canadian Political Science Associationto
denounce what they called the methodology of
political science. - Protesters walked into the Vanier College dining
hall carrying balloons, flowers and signs
denouncing David Eastons systems analysis
theory. - See http//imprint.uwaterloo.ca/pdfarchive/1969-7
0_v10,n06_Chevron.pdf
16A Return to Institutions
- By the 1980s, various scholars were attempting to
bring the state back in to the centre of their
analysis. - This form of institutionalism often portrays
state actors as having a degree of autonomy and
different state structures as influencing
political outcomes.
17B. Guy Peters, chapter 2 (next week)
- The 5 Is
- Institutions,
- Interests,
- Ideas,
- Individuals,
- International environment
- a bonus, 6th - interactions