Title: Methods of researching things that haven
1Methods of researching things that havent
happened especially good things and bad things
- Michael Wood
- Portsmouth Business School
- michael.wood_at_port.ac.uk
- http//userweb.port.ac.uk/woodm/NotHappened.ppt
- Slightly revised after comments from PBS Research
Conference - 8 June 2010
2Abstract
- My aim in this talk is twofold. First, I will
argue that most management research gives too
much status to facts and observations, focusing
on what has happened in the past on transcripts
of people saying what theyve done or what they
think, or on subtle statistical distinctions
between one aspect of past history and another.
Such data may be important, but the danger is it
encourages us to ignore the potentially much more
interesting task of exploring possibilities
what could be or what should be and predicting,
or shaping, or making recommendations about, the
future. Second, I will tentatively suggest
some approaches for doing such research these
include methods involving experimentation,
mathematics, modeling and simulation, works of
fiction (including thought experiments), analysis
of common sense data and hypothetical surveys.
(The presentation will be on the web at
http//userweb.port.ac.uk/woodm/NotHappened.ppt
.)
3Where am I coming from?
- Vague feeling that I really dont care about
endless empirical data, but Im more interested
in new, exciting possibilities. - What might be instead of what is or was.
- (Perhaps I just dont like the real world?)
- Im often asked how big should a sample be ...
Expected answer is 30 or 50, so its rather fun
to say 0! - I suspect everything I want to say is entirely
obvious, except possibly to those who know a
little about research methods. - Not about OR and economics, which already have a
tradition of being flexible with the facts - Not final word in the spirit of anarchistic
epistemology (Feyerabend, 1993 and Law, 2004)
4I will
- Discuss what I mean and why its important
- Suggest some approaches for researching important
things that havent happened - Consider one or two case studies, with a class
exercise
5What hasnt happened?
- In one sense everything in the future hasnt
happened yet researching this is very important
... and obviously difficult! - But if we can assume future is similar to past,
then we can study past happenings to try to learn
about the future. But ... - May be difficult to find past examples
- Talebs black swans and the fate of the turkey
(Taleb, 2008) - If future happenings are not likely to be similar
to past happenings then we have a problem!
6Things that havent happened that are worth
studying include
- Things that may happen in the future that arent
obviously similar to things that have happened in
the past (and about which we can find get data) - Especially
- Good things, that we want to recommend or help to
happen - Bad things, that we would like to avoid (e.g.
typical risk analysis) - (Also counterfactuals to understand the past ?)
7Typical MBA project research into how to improve
X
- 1 Investigate the current problems with X.
- 2 Investigate how other organisations deal with X
- 3 Taking account of the findings from (1) and
(2), and the literature and any ideas within the
organisation, and any other sources of
inspiration, produce some recommendations for
improving X - 4 Test the proposals to see how they work
8The research bit of this project is normally seen
as 1 and 2 only
- The rhetoric of research methods (books, courses,
etc) focuses on Steps 1 and 2 because these
concern facts or observations about what has
happened in the past methods typically viewed
as qualitative or quantitative - Management tries to be scientific which
supposedly means that we must focus on the
facts about what has happened in the past. Hence
the obsession with data, questionnaires
(dismissed as autoerotic fantasies by Salancik,
1979), interview transcripts, etc.
9But
- This ignores Steps 3 and 4 in which we want to
formulate some recommendations for the future and
test them - This is surely the main problem with management
research how to investigate things which
havent yet happened answer in a minute, but
first
10Taken-for-granted assumptions of research
methods
- Empiricism everything must be based on facts
ie on surveys, interviews, observations - Methodism approved methods only must be used
- These assumptions seem to outlaw research on
things that havent happened like Steps 3 and 4
11Facts and empiricism in physics
- Physics often seen as the exemplar for science,
and Emc2 is probably the most famous result in
physics. However - unlike results in management, this is assumed to
hold everywhere and for all time - it summarises an infinite collection of possible
events, most which havent happened. E.g. my
conversion to energy (about 20,000 million
million KwH) - it was derived from thought experiments and only
indirectly from observations, and certainly not
on the basis of a statistical survey of matter in
the universe.
12Methods of researching things that havent
happened in management
- Not easy for obvious reasons
- May be design or invention, rather than discovery
(e.g. Ackoffs idealized design) - What follows is just some ideas. Not
comprehensive or fully worked out
13Methods might be based on ...
- Experimentation ranging from informal to
randomized controlled trials (see Ayres (2007)
for examples) - Mathematics (which is a way of exploring
possibilities without trying them eg stock
control formulae) - the subject in which we never know what we are
talking about, nor whether what we are saying is
true (Russell, 1901) - Modelling and simulation (another way of
exploring possibilities without trying them)
e.g. Simulating reactions to disasters, or sales
situations - Scenario planning work out details of
possibilities - Works of fiction (including thought experiments,
hypothetical examples, fables, utopias,
dystopias) - Analysis of common sense data (if simple called
philosophy, if more complicated called maths) - Surveys asking what would you do if ...?
14Any others methods of researching things that
havent happened ?
15Case study 1 Alternative vote (AV) vs first past
the post (FPP)
- This case is fictional Im making it up rather
than looking at a real project, but does this
matter?
16Method of researching what has happened
- Interview key stakeholders to get their opinions
about FPP and AV - Survey voters views about FPP and AV
- Look at other countries
- Typical management research stops here!
- But if people havent experienced AV will they
have a useful opinion? This does not really give
adequate information about the new system ...
17Methods of researching what hasnt happened
- Mathematical analysis of properties of different
systems (Method Type 2 eg the GibbardSatterthwai
te theorem) - Simulate different voting patterns and compare AV
with FPP (Method Type 3) - Ask a sample of people how they would have voted
under AV (get them to vote) and compare results
with actual results (Method Type 7)
18Case study 2 Problems and opportunities of
blackberries for WLB
19Methods of researching what has happened
- Interviews with 12 blackberry users
- But not much information on possible serious
problems, or useful innovations. Small snapshot
of typical present uses. - Perhaps research should aim to go past this ...
- What would you do?
20Methods of researching what hasnt happened
- Experimentation ask people to not use a
blackberry, use it in a particular way etc (Type
1) - Fiction imagine extreme scenarios involving
blackberries and WLB (Type 5) - Ask people what they would do if ... to explore
things that havent happened to them (Type 7) - Mathematical modelling of WLB and blackberries
...? (Type 2) - These allow research to explore future
possibilities
21Very tentative math approach to WLB and
Blackberry use
- For each email away from work devise a way of
measuring (relative to work) - Disruption caused
- Time off work gained
- Response time improvement
- Look at patterns and thus model uses which
havent happened
22In conclusion
- The most difficult and important thing for
management research is investigating things that
havent happened - Obsessively cataloguing views of what has
happened can only help to a limited extent - So need to be imaginative
- Any further thoughts tomichael.wood_at_port.ac.uk
please.
23References
- Ayres, I. (2007). Super crunchers how anything
can be predicted. London John Murray. - Feyerabend, P.K. (1993) Against method an
outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge
(3rd edition) London Verso. - Law, J. (2004) After method mess in social
science research. Abingdon and New York
Routledge. - Salancik, G. R. (1979) Field stimulations for
organizational behavior research. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 24, 638-649. - Russell, B. (1901) 'Recent Work on the Principles
of Mathematics', International Monthly, 4, 84. - Taleb, N. N. (2008). The black swan the impact
of the highly improbable. London Penguin.