Methods of researching things that haven - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Methods of researching things that haven

Description:

Methods of researching things that haven t happened especially good things and bad things Michael Wood Portsmouth Business School michael.wood_at_port.ac.uk – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Staf130
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Methods of researching things that haven


1
Methods of researching things that havent
happened especially good things and bad things
  • Michael Wood
  • Portsmouth Business School
  • michael.wood_at_port.ac.uk
  • http//userweb.port.ac.uk/woodm/NotHappened.ppt
  • Slightly revised after comments from PBS Research
    Conference
  • 8 June 2010

2
Abstract
  • My aim in this talk is twofold. First, I will
    argue that most management research gives too
    much status to facts and observations, focusing
    on what has happened in the past on transcripts
    of people saying what theyve done or what they
    think, or on subtle statistical distinctions
    between one aspect of past history and another.
    Such data may be important, but the danger is it
    encourages us to ignore the potentially much more
    interesting task of exploring possibilities
    what could be or what should be and predicting,
    or shaping, or making recommendations about, the
    future. Second, I will tentatively suggest
    some approaches for doing such research these
    include methods involving experimentation,
    mathematics, modeling and simulation, works of
    fiction (including thought experiments), analysis
    of common sense data and hypothetical surveys.
    (The presentation will be on the web at
    http//userweb.port.ac.uk/woodm/NotHappened.ppt
    .)

3
Where am I coming from?
  • Vague feeling that I really dont care about
    endless empirical data, but Im more interested
    in new, exciting possibilities.
  • What might be instead of what is or was.
  • (Perhaps I just dont like the real world?)
  • Im often asked how big should a sample be ...
    Expected answer is 30 or 50, so its rather fun
    to say 0!
  • I suspect everything I want to say is entirely
    obvious, except possibly to those who know a
    little about research methods.
  • Not about OR and economics, which already have a
    tradition of being flexible with the facts
  • Not final word in the spirit of anarchistic
    epistemology (Feyerabend, 1993 and Law, 2004)

4
I will
  • Discuss what I mean and why its important
  • Suggest some approaches for researching important
    things that havent happened
  • Consider one or two case studies, with a class
    exercise

5
What hasnt happened?
  • In one sense everything in the future hasnt
    happened yet researching this is very important
    ... and obviously difficult!
  • But if we can assume future is similar to past,
    then we can study past happenings to try to learn
    about the future. But ...
  • May be difficult to find past examples
  • Talebs black swans and the fate of the turkey
    (Taleb, 2008)
  • If future happenings are not likely to be similar
    to past happenings then we have a problem!

6
Things that havent happened that are worth
studying include
  • Things that may happen in the future that arent
    obviously similar to things that have happened in
    the past (and about which we can find get data)
  • Especially
  • Good things, that we want to recommend or help to
    happen
  • Bad things, that we would like to avoid (e.g.
    typical risk analysis)
  • (Also counterfactuals to understand the past ?)

7
Typical MBA project research into how to improve
X
  • 1 Investigate the current problems with X.
  • 2 Investigate how other organisations deal with X
  • 3 Taking account of the findings from (1) and
    (2), and the literature and any ideas within the
    organisation, and any other sources of
    inspiration, produce some recommendations for
    improving X
  • 4 Test the proposals to see how they work

8
The research bit of this project is normally seen
as 1 and 2 only
  • The rhetoric of research methods (books, courses,
    etc) focuses on Steps 1 and 2 because these
    concern facts or observations about what has
    happened in the past methods typically viewed
    as qualitative or quantitative
  • Management tries to be scientific which
    supposedly means that we must focus on the
    facts about what has happened in the past. Hence
    the obsession with data, questionnaires
    (dismissed as autoerotic fantasies by Salancik,
    1979), interview transcripts, etc.

9
But
  • This ignores Steps 3 and 4 in which we want to
    formulate some recommendations for the future and
    test them
  • This is surely the main problem with management
    research how to investigate things which
    havent yet happened answer in a minute, but
    first

10
Taken-for-granted assumptions of research
methods
  • Empiricism everything must be based on facts
    ie on surveys, interviews, observations
  • Methodism approved methods only must be used
  • These assumptions seem to outlaw research on
    things that havent happened like Steps 3 and 4

11
Facts and empiricism in physics
  • Physics often seen as the exemplar for science,
    and Emc2 is probably the most famous result in
    physics. However
  • unlike results in management, this is assumed to
    hold everywhere and for all time
  • it summarises an infinite collection of possible
    events, most which havent happened. E.g. my
    conversion to energy (about 20,000 million
    million KwH)
  • it was derived from thought experiments and only
    indirectly from observations, and certainly not
    on the basis of a statistical survey of matter in
    the universe.

12
Methods of researching things that havent
happened in management
  • Not easy for obvious reasons
  • May be design or invention, rather than discovery
    (e.g. Ackoffs idealized design)
  • What follows is just some ideas. Not
    comprehensive or fully worked out

13
Methods might be based on ...
  • Experimentation ranging from informal to
    randomized controlled trials (see Ayres (2007)
    for examples)
  • Mathematics (which is a way of exploring
    possibilities without trying them eg stock
    control formulae)
  • the subject in which we never know what we are
    talking about, nor whether what we are saying is
    true (Russell, 1901)
  • Modelling and simulation (another way of
    exploring possibilities without trying them)
    e.g. Simulating reactions to disasters, or sales
    situations
  • Scenario planning work out details of
    possibilities
  • Works of fiction (including thought experiments,
    hypothetical examples, fables, utopias,
    dystopias)
  • Analysis of common sense data (if simple called
    philosophy, if more complicated called maths)
  • Surveys asking what would you do if ...?

14
Any others methods of researching things that
havent happened ?
15
Case study 1 Alternative vote (AV) vs first past
the post (FPP)
  • This case is fictional Im making it up rather
    than looking at a real project, but does this
    matter?

16
Method of researching what has happened
  • Interview key stakeholders to get their opinions
    about FPP and AV
  • Survey voters views about FPP and AV
  • Look at other countries
  • Typical management research stops here!
  • But if people havent experienced AV will they
    have a useful opinion? This does not really give
    adequate information about the new system ...

17
Methods of researching what hasnt happened
  • Mathematical analysis of properties of different
    systems (Method Type 2 eg the GibbardSatterthwai
    te theorem)
  • Simulate different voting patterns and compare AV
    with FPP (Method Type 3)
  • Ask a sample of people how they would have voted
    under AV (get them to vote) and compare results
    with actual results (Method Type 7)

18
Case study 2 Problems and opportunities of
blackberries for WLB
  • Actual MBA project

19
Methods of researching what has happened
  • Interviews with 12 blackberry users
  • But not much information on possible serious
    problems, or useful innovations. Small snapshot
    of typical present uses.
  • Perhaps research should aim to go past this ...
  • What would you do?

20
Methods of researching what hasnt happened
  • Experimentation ask people to not use a
    blackberry, use it in a particular way etc (Type
    1)
  • Fiction imagine extreme scenarios involving
    blackberries and WLB (Type 5)
  • Ask people what they would do if ... to explore
    things that havent happened to them (Type 7)
  • Mathematical modelling of WLB and blackberries
    ...? (Type 2)
  • These allow research to explore future
    possibilities

21
Very tentative math approach to WLB and
Blackberry use
  • For each email away from work devise a way of
    measuring (relative to work)
  • Disruption caused
  • Time off work gained
  • Response time improvement
  • Look at patterns and thus model uses which
    havent happened

22
In conclusion
  • The most difficult and important thing for
    management research is investigating things that
    havent happened
  • Obsessively cataloguing views of what has
    happened can only help to a limited extent
  • So need to be imaginative
  • Any further thoughts tomichael.wood_at_port.ac.uk
    please.

23
References
  • Ayres, I. (2007). Super crunchers how anything
    can be predicted. London John Murray.
  • Feyerabend, P.K. (1993) Against method an
    outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge
    (3rd edition) London Verso.
  • Law, J. (2004) After method mess in social
    science research. Abingdon and New York
    Routledge.
  • Salancik, G. R. (1979) Field stimulations for
    organizational behavior research. Administrative
    Science Quarterly, 24, 638-649.
  • Russell, B. (1901) 'Recent Work on the Principles
    of Mathematics', International Monthly, 4, 84.
  • Taleb, N. N. (2008). The black swan the impact
    of the highly improbable. London Penguin.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com