Quality Teaching - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Quality Teaching

Description:

Quality Teaching The aim of this workshop is to describe the key characteristics of expert teachers of numeracy. Naturally most of these characteristics will be ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:141
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: AnnaT
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quality Teaching


1
Quality Teaching
2
  • The aim of this workshop is to describe the key
    characteristics of expert teachers of numeracy.
    Naturally most of these characteristics will be
    transferable to teaching other areas of the
    curriculum.
  • During the course of the workshop you will be
    presented with suggestions on how to facilitate
    the ideas with other teachers. This will enable
    you to construct your own workshop or staff
    meeting programme.

3
How important is good teaching?
  • The first question to consider is, How much
    difference to student achievement do teachers
    actually make?

4
  • In the next frame there is a pie chart from
    research by Professor John Hattie, from the
    University of Auckland. He quantifies the overall
    effect on student achievement of these factors
  • Students (Personal characteristics like
    intelligence, co-operation, effort)
  • Home (Expectations for success, intellectual
    support, appropriate physical and emotional care)
  • Teachers (Types of actions taken, expectations,
    effort)
  • Peers (Expectations, support for each others
    efforts)
  • Schools (Organisational structure, quality of
    resources)

5
Factors contributing to achievement
  • Match the five sectors of the achievement pie
    with the factors below
  • Students
  • Home
  • Teachers
  • Peers
  • Schools

6
How big is the impact of teaching?
  • Hatties analysis of thousands of research
    studies show this combined effect

Teachers
Students
Schools
Home
Peers
7
  • Adrienne Alton-Lee, from the Ministry of
    Education, suggests that the proportion of
    student achievement due to teaching effect varies
    between 15 and 60 depending on the context.
    Hatties is a combined figure.
  • Under what circumstances do you think the effect
    due to teaching would be high?

8
Is the effect uniform?
  • The effect due to teaching is most significant in
    situations where the learning is least supported
    by the students everyday environment. An obvious
    case is learning specialised subjects at senior
    secondary and tertiary level, e.g. calculus or
    Japanese as a second language.
  • The teaching effect is also very high for younger
    students whose home environment least supports
    them educationally. Almost uniformly there is a
    connection between socio-economic status of
    caregivers and the achievement of students.

9
  • To summarise Teachers make a significant
    difference to student learning and they do so
    most in situations where the students are needy.

10
Characteristics of quality teachers?
  • So what is it that quality teachers do that makes
    the difference?
  • A good place to start is to ask your colleagues
    the following question
  • You observe a teacher in action. The lesson is
    sensational, the best you have seen in your
    career. There is so much going on that it is hard
    to describe why the lesson is so good. You decide
    to focus on the teachers behaviour.
  • What characteristics does this teacher have that
    make her an expert?
  • Write down a few characteristics that you think
    an expert teacher has.

11
  • Good management is a necessary but not sufficient
    condition
  • Often responses to the previous question are
    about classroom management. For example, the
    teacher
  • Is well organised
  • Ensures that students listen to instructions
  • Provides appropriate work
  • Develops orderly routines

12
  • These logistical characteristics are important
    but they are not enough. Hattie distinguishes
    experienced teachers, that is those who can
    manage classrooms well, from expert teachers,
    that is those who optimise their students
    learning. To be an expert teacher you must have
    much more!

13
Clusters of quality practice
  • The characteristics of expert teachers of
    numeracy can be grouped in these clusters
  • 1. Relationships with students
  • 2. Planning and assessment
  • 3. Problem focus
  • 4. Connections
  • 5. Instructional responsiveness
  • 6. Student empowerment
  • 7. Equity
  • This workshop will discuss each cluster.

14
Relationships with students
  • Russell Bishop, from The University of Waikato,
    lead a project called Kotahitanga aimed at
    improving the achievement of Maori student. A key
    finding of the project was that students achieved
    best in classrooms where the teacher related well
    to them as individuals and valued their cultural
    identity.

15
  • Bishops work also focused on teachers
    attribution for the achievement of Maori
    students. Effective teachers had high but
    realistic expectations for all their students and
    conveyed their expectations to students. These
    teachers believed that what they did made a
    difference. Ineffective teachers attributed lack
    of achievement to students background or
    constraints imposed by the school system.

16
Planning and assessment
  • A critical part of effective teaching is mapping
    out anticipated learning trajectories for
    students to learn a particular idea, and
    providing sufficient appropriate experiences to
    support this learning. Quality teachers choose
    activities for a learning purpose and are
    transparent with their students about this
    purpose.

17
  • Expert teachers apply a dynamic relationship
    between their assessment of students learning
    and their planning of the next learning step.
    They employ a variety of assessment techniques,
    particularly their own observations, and regard
    any particular assessment as formative, a
    landmark on a journey rather than an endpoint in
    itself. Planning is responsive to assessment and
    vice versa.

18
Problem Focus
  • Studies into student achievement in mathematics
    across countries have compared the practice of
    teachers in nations that produce high
    achievement. The most astounding result has been
    that lessons in particular countries have
    considerable similarity. Each country appears to
    have a prevalent teaching culture.

19
  • The teaching cultures of the high performing
    nations are similar only in the high proportion
    of class time thats students are engaged in
    problem solving as opposed to listening to
    teacher explanations or practicing.

20
  • In these countries, such as Korea, The
    Netherlands, Slovakia, Japan, and Singapore, the
    problems presented are carefully structured and
    sequenced. Students work co-operatively or
    individually on the problems, often encountering
    difficulty, before the processing of solutions
    collectively with the support of the teacher.

21
Connections
  • Expert teachers have strong pedagogical-content
    knowledge (PCK). PCK is a term used by Lee
    Schulman to describe what a teacher needs to know
    in order to teach a topic effectively. In
    numeracy, this involves knowing the mathematical
    idea, how it connects to other mathematical
    ideas, what contexts and representations could be
    used to present it and the cognitive obstacles
    and misconceptions students commonly encounter in
    learning it.

22
  • Mike Askew and Margaret Brown, from Kings
    College in London, studied over 700 numeracy
    lessons and concluded that the expert teachers
    were those who were connectivist. These
    teachers used their strong PCK to help their
    students make connections for themselves. Later
    in the workshop there are suggestions for
    developing teachers PCK through a workshop.

23
Instructional responsiveness
  • Responsiveness implies that teachers are prepared
    to alter the course of a lesson or sequence of
    lessons based on the needs of students. To do so
    expert teachers actively listen to their students
    and mentally process the responses. To do so
    expert teachers create environments where
    students feel confident to take risks, pose
    conjectures and explain their ideas to others.

24
  • Active listening to the ideas of students and
    acting from these ideas is a critical aspect of
    responsiveness. Paul Cobb described this as the
    creation of socio-mathematical norms. While
    expert teachers value all ideas from their
    students, they also see their role as the
    development of mathematical power. Do not treat
    all ideas as equal because they are not. A
    critical role of teachers is to help students
    evaluate the relative strengths of ideas and
    explanations.

25
Student Empowerment
  • Students perception of responsibility for their
    own learning links strongly to high achievement.
    Expert teachers develop independence through
    sharing learning outcomes with their students,
    requiring students to make their own
    instructional decisions, providing regular
    personalized feedback and encouraging
    meta-cognition (thinking about thinking).

26
  • Expert teachers also provoke high order thinking,
    such as analysing, justifying and synthesising
    through the questions they ask.

27
Equity
  • Success for all students involves catering for
    diverse needs. Quality teaching involves careful
    allocation of resources, particularly time, to
    maximise learning opportunities. Expert teachers
    provide additional resources for students with
    high needs.

28
  • Students learn best in situations where they
    either ask questions of others or respond to the
    questions of others. Expert teachers employ a
    variety of instructional groupings so students
    can learn from each other.

29
Improving classroom teaching
  • A growing body of research into change management
    in schools is highlighting the importance of
    de-privatising classrooms. Situations where
    teachers observe colleagues teaching, provide
    feedback, and are observed by others has shown
    considerable potential to enhance classroom
    practice.

30
  • In Victoria, Australia, Hillary Hollingsworth has
    used the analysis of videoed lesson footage as a
    key strategy for getting teachers to reflect on
    their practice. The dimensions of quality
    teaching discussed above provide an important
    observational framework for such peer
    observation.

31
An observational framework
  • The first step in the process is for the teacher
    observed to nominate one or two clusters that he
    or she feels are an area of focus. This happens
    before the observation.

32
  • The observer then notes events that occur during
    a lesson segment against the appropriate habit/s.
    It is important that the notes are factual
    statements about what occurred rather than
    opinions or interpretations.
  • Use video to capture the lesson segment so that
    the noted events can be replayed several times.

33
Follow-up Discussions
  • The post-observation discussion focuses on the
    teacher examining the events, discussing the
    rationale for the instructional decisions made,
    and considering the future implications of the
    observations.

34
  • Experience has show that observers need practice
    in avoiding judgmental comments and actively
    listening to the explanations of the observed
    teacher. It is vital that clear goals are set
    from the discussion and both parties follow up
    these goals through more observations.

35
Workshop Ideas
  • A Peer observation
  • Video part of a mathematics lesson. Make sure
    that the tape is no longer than 10 minutes.
  • Nominate a cluster that you want them to observe.
  • Play the video as they record comments.
  • Role-play an observer conducting the follow-up
    discussion using the video to recall events.
  • Challenge the teachers to nominate a peer with
    whom they will have a mutual observation
    arrangement. Get them to timetable when the
    observations and discussions will occur.
  • Schedule a staff or syndicate meeting to review
    the success of the observations.

36
Answer these questions together
  • B Pedagogical-Content Knowledge for Fractions
  • To make teachers aware of the dimensions of
    pedagogical-content knowledge
  • What do the parts of a fraction symbol, like ,
    mean?
  • The denominator (bottom number) means?
  • The numerator (top number) means?
  • The vinculum (line) means?
  • How might a fraction like relate to other
    mathematical ideas like
  • Decimals and percentages, i.e. 0. and 66.
  • Ratios, i.e. 21
  • Angles (turns), i.e. 120
  • Measurements, i.e. metres 666 millimetres
  • Division, i.e. 23

37
  • What contexts from the everyday world of students
    can we use to teach fractions?
  • a. What representations (equipment,
    diagrams, words, symbols) can we use in
    teaching fractions?
  • b. What advantages/disadvantages do these
    representations have?
  • What misconceptions do students develop about
    fractions, usually by over-generalising what
    happens with whole numbers?

38
Readings
  • The following screens list some readings that you
    may find useful related to the topic of quality
    teaching.

39
  • Alton-Lee, A. (2003). Quality teaching for
    diverse students in schooling best evidence
    synthesis. Ministry of EducationWellington.
  • Hattie, J (2002). What are the attributes of
    excellent teachers? In New Zealand Council for
    Educational Research Annual Conference.
    NZCERWellington
  • Bishop, R., Berryman, M., Richardson, C.,
    Tiakiwai, S. (2003). KotahitangaThe experiences
    of year 9 and 10 Maori students in mainstream
    classes. WellingtonMinistry of Education.
  • Stigler, J. Hiebert, J. (1997) Understanding
    and Improving Classroom Mathematics Instruction
    An Overview of the TIMSS Video Study, In Raising
    Australian Standards in Mathematics and Science
    Insights from TIMSS, ACERMelbourne
  • Clarke, D., Hoon, S.L. (2005) Studying the
    Responsibility for the Generation of Knowledge in
    Mathematics Classrooms in Hong Kong, Melbourne,
    San Diego and Shanghai, In Chick, H. Vincent,
    J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of
    the International Group for the Psychology of
    Mathematics Education July 10-15, 2005, PME
    Melbourne

40
  • Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., William, D.
    Johnson, D. (1997). Effective Teachers of
    Numeracy, Kings College, University of London
    London.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching
    Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard
    Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
  • Brophy, J., Good, T. (1986). Teacher behaviour
    and student achievement. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.),
    handbook of research on teaching, 3rd ed. (pp.
    328-375). New York MacMillan.
  • Slavin, R.E. (1996). Research on co-operative
    learning and achievement What we know and what
    we need to know. Contemporary Educational
    Psychology, 21, 43-69.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com