Title: Aucun titre de diapositive
1Analytical theory for planar shock wave
focusing through perfect gas lens 1
M. Vandenboomgaerde and C. Aymard CEA, DAM, DIF
1 Submitted to Phys. Fluids
marc.vandenboomgaerde_at_cea.fr
IWPCTM12, Moscow, 12-17 July 2010
01/14
2Convergent shock waves
- Spherical shock waves (s.w.) and hydrodynamics
instabilities are involved - in various phenomena
- Lithotripsy Astrophysics Inertial
confinement fusion (ICF) - There is a strong need for convergent shock wave
experiments - A few shock tubes are fully convergent AWE,
Hosseini - Most shock tubes have straight test section
- Some experiments have been done by adding
convergent test section
AWE shock tube 2
IUSTI shock tube 3
GALCIT shock tube4
IWPCTM12, Moscow, 12-17 July 2010 02/14
2 Holder et al. Las. Part. Beams 21 p. 403
(2003) 3 Mariani et al. PRL 100, 254503 (2008)
4 Bond et al. J. Fluid Mech. 641 p. 297 (2009)
3- Efforts have been made to morph a planar shock
wave into a cylindrical one
- Zhigang Zhai et al. 5
- Shape the shock tube to make the incident s.w.
convergent - The curvature of the tube depends on the initial
conditions (one shock tube / Mach number) - Theory, experiments and simulations are 2D
- Dimotakis and Samtaney 6
- Gas lens technique the transmitted s.w.
becomes convergent
IMAGE Zhai
IMAGE Dimotakis
5 Phys. Fluids 22, 041701 (2010) 6
Phys. Fluids 18, 031705 (2006)
IWPCTM12, Moscow, 12-17 July 2010
03/14
4Present work a generalized gas lens theory
- The gas lens technique theory is revisited and
simplified - Exact derivations for 2D-cylindrical and
3D-spherical geometries - Light-to-heavy and heavy-to-light configurations
- Validation of the theory
- Comparisons with Hesione code simulations
- Applications
- Stability of a perturbed convergent shock wave
- Convergent Richtmyer-Meshkov instabilities
- Conclusion and future works
IWPCTM12, Moscow, 12-17 July 2010
04/14
5Bounds of the theory
- Theoretical assumptions
- Perfect and inviscid gases
- Regular waves
- Dimensionality
- All derivations can be done in the symmetry plane
(Oxy) - 2D- cylindrical geometry 3D- spherical
geometry
IWPCTM12, Moscow, 12-17 July 2010
05/14
6Derivation using hydrodynamics equations (1/3)
- The transmitted shock wave must be circular in
(Oxy) and its center is O - The pressure behind the shock must be uniform
- Eqs (1) and (2) must be valid regardless of q
gt
IWPCTM12, Moscow, 12-17 July 2010
06/14
7Derivation using hydrodynamics equations (2/3)
- The transmitted shock wave must be circular in
(Oxy) and its center is O - The pressure behind the shock must be uniform
- Eqs (1) and (2) must be valid regardless of q
gt
IWPCTM12, Moscow, 12-17 July 2010
06/14
8Derivation using hydrodynamics equations (3/3)
- As we now know that C is a conic, it can read as
- All points of the circular shock front must have
the same radius at the same time - Eqs. (4) and (5) show that the eccentricity of
the conic equals -
IWPCTM12, Moscow, 12-17 July 2010
07/14
9To summarize and another derivation
- It has been demonstrated that
-
- The same shape C generates 2D or 3D lenses
- C is a conic
- The eccentricity is equal to Wt/Wi gt
- C is an ellipse in the light-to-heavy (fast-slow)
configuration - and an hyperbola, otherwise.
- The center of focusing is one of the foci of the
conic - Limits are imposed by the regularity of the waves
gt a lt acr gt q lt qcr - Derivation through an analogy with geometrical
optics - Equation (3) can be rearranged as
- This is the refraction law (Fresnels law)
- with shock velocity as index
IMAGE Principles of Optics
IWPCTM12, Moscow, 12-17 July 2010
08/14
10Numerical simulations have been performed with
Hesione code
- Hesione code
- ALE package
- Multi-material cells
- The pressure jump through the incident shock wave
is resolved by 20 cells - Mass cell matching at the interface
- Initial conditions of the simulations
- First gas is Air
- Mi 1.15
- 2nd gas is SF6 or He gt e 0.42 or e 2.75
- Height of the shock tube 80 mm
- qw 30o
IWPCTM12, Moscow, 12-17 July 2010
9/14
11Validation in the light-to-heavy (fast-slow) case
- Morphing of the incident shock wave
- Focusing and rebound of the transmitted shock
wave (t.s.w.)
- The t.s.w. is circular in 2D as in 3D
- The t.s.w. stay circular while focusing
- Spherical s.w. is faster than cylindrical s.w.
- P 41 atm is reached in 3D near focusing
- P 9.6 atm is reached in 2D near focusing
- Shock waves stay circular after rebound
-
Wedge
Cone
Wedge
Cone
IWPCTM12, Moscow, 12-17 July 2010
10/14
12Validation in the heavy-to-light (slow-fast) case
- Morphing of the incident shock wave
- Focusing and rebound of the transmitted shock
wave (t.s.w.)
- The t.s.w. is circular in 2D as in 3D
- The t.s.w. stay circular while focusing
- Spherical s.w. is faster than cylindrical s.w.
- P 6.9 atm is reached in 3D near focusing
- P 2.9 atm is reached in 2D near focusing
- Shock waves stay circular after rebound
-
Wedge
Cone
Wedge
Cone
IWPCTM12, Moscow, 12-17 July 2010
11/14
13The stability of a pertubed shock wave has been
probed in convergent geometry
- We perturb the shape of the lens in order to
generate a perturbed t.s.w. - with a0 2.871 10-3m and m 9
- Focusing and rebound of the perturbed t.s.w.
-
- The t.s.w. is perturbed in 2D and in 3D
- The t.s.w. stabilizes while focusing
- Near the collapse, the s.w. becomes circular
- These results are consistent with theory 7
- The acoustic waves do not perturb s.w.
- Shock waves stay circular and stable
- after the rebound
7 J. Fusion Energy 14 (4), 389 (1995)
IWPCTM12, Moscow, 12-17 July 2010 12/14
14Richtmyer-Meshkov instability in 2D cylindrical
geometry
- We add a perturbed inner interface Air/SF6/Air
configuration -
-
- with a0 1.665 10-3m and m 12
- Richtmyer-Meshkov instability due to shock and
reshock -
- A RM instability occurs at the 1rst passage of
- the shock through the perturbed interface
- The reshock impacts a non-linear interface
- Even if the interface is stopped, the
instability - keeps on growing
- High non-linear regime is reached (mushroom
- structures)
IWPCTM12, Moscow, 12-17 July 2010 13/14
15Conclusion and future works
- We have established an exact derivation of the
gas lens tehnique - The shape of the lens is a conic
- Its eccentricity is Wt/Wi
- The conic is an ellipse in the light-to-heavy
case, and hyperbola otherwise - The focus of the convergent transmitted shock
wave is one of the foci of the conic - The same shape generates 2D and 3D gas lens
- These results have been validated by comparisons
with Hesione numerical simulations - The transmitted shock wave is cylindrical or
spherical - The acoustic waves do not perturb the shock wave
- The shock wave remains circular after its
focusing - This technique allows to study hydrodynamics
instabilities in convergent geometries - Numerical simulations show that the RM non-linear
regime can be reached - Implementation in the IUSTI conventional shock
tube is under consideration a new test section
and new stereolithographed grids 8 for the
interface are needed
8 Mariani et al. P.R.L. 100, 254503 (2008)
IWPCTM12, Moscow, 12-17 July 2010 14/14