Groundwater Pollution - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Groundwater Pollution

Description:

Geophysical Methods Ground penetrating radar Electromagnetic Induction Electrical resistivity Seismic reflection Geophysics suite Sampling the gas phase Soil gas ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:302
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: col6116
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Groundwater Pollution


1
Groundwater Pollution
  • Week 5 0407 Investigating the Site and
    Monitoring

2
  • Some Notes derived from
  • 1.34 Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
    , As taught in Spring 2004, by Dr. Peter
    Shanahan , MIT OpenCourseWare, Creative Commons
    License, http//ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Civil-and-Envi
    ronmental-Engineering/1-34Spring2004/CourseHome/

3
  • revision of previous week

4
  • Information to help with the clean-up of
    contamination can be found at http//clu-in.org/
    .
  • For example http//clu-in.org/characterization/tec
    hnologies/solvr.cfm
  • helps decide what is the best characterization
    technique.

5
(No Transcript)
6
  • You can click on the different technologies for
    more information.

7
(No Transcript)
8
  • You can also look at each method.

9
  • We then investigate the contaminant.
  • Where is the contaminant plume?
  • What is in the plume?
  • How big is the plume?
  • How long has it been there?
  • Where is it going?
  • How fast will it go?

10
  • Q. What is a contaminant plume?

11
  • The contaminant plume is where the contaminant is
    dissolved in the ground water.

12
  • Usually - The contaminant plume is where the
    contaminant is dissolved in the ground water.
  • Sometimes - It can also mean where the vapor is
    dissolved in the air.

13
  • Q. Give a meaning for phase.

14
  • Vadose zone
  • Floating
  • Groundwater

The phases are when the pollutant is solid (solid
phase), liquid (liquid phase), vapor (gaseous
phase), or dissolved in the water (aqueous phase).
15
  • In the vadose zone contaminants could be present
    as
  • Vapors in the void (??)
  • Free product in the void
  • Dissolved in the soil moisture (??)
  • Adsorbed (????) onto the soil matrix
  • Floating on top of the capillary fringe
  • Q. Draw a picture of each of the above.

16
  • Collecting vapor samples from contaminated areas
    in the unsaturated zone

http//toxics.usgs.gov/photo_gallery/photos/bimidj
i/bimidji10_lg.jpg
17
  • Adsorption (n.)(?? ) is when molecules of gas,
    liquid, or dissolved solids stick to a surface.
  • Adsorb (v)
  • Adsorbed (v. and adj)

18
Sorption
19
  • Contaminants could be in the saturated zone as
  • Dissolved (???) in the groundwater
  • Adsorbed onto the aquifer material
  • Sitting on top of the bedrock (for dense
    nonaqueous phase liquids DNAPLs)
  • Q. Draw diagrams of each of these.

20
NAPLs coat the Soil Particles
21
NAPLs fill the Voids
22
The first steps are called remedial (???)
investigation (??) (RI) activities (??)
  • Removal of contamination sources
  • Doing some soil borings (????)
  • Making groundwater monitoring (???) wells
  • Soil sample collection and analysis
  • Groundwater sample collection and analysis
  • Aquifer testing

23
  • Questions to be answered by site
  • characterization
  • Nature and extent of contamination
  • where is it?
  • What is future migration and control
  • where is it going?
  • What are receptors and their risk
  • what harm will it do?
  • What are technical options for remediation
  • how do we fix it?

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
24
  • Data needed from site characterization
  • 1. Contaminant sources research history as well
    as collect samples
  • 2. Extent of contamination need to understand
    transport as well
  • 3. Hydrogeologic setting use to understand
    items 1 and 2
  • 4. Restoration potential how easy is it to
    clean up?

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
25
  • Stages of investigation
  • Stage 1 scoping study
  • Is there a problem? How bad is it?
  • Stage 2 prepare field study plan
  • Includes sampling and analysis, health and
    safety, and quality assurance plans
  • Stage 3 conduct on-site sampling and analysis
  • Stage 4 interpretation, assessment, modeling
  • (Stages 3 and 4 may be repeated several times)
  • Stage 5 design remedial action

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
26
  • First steps in understanding a site
  • 1. Understand geographic setting, topography,
    nearby water bodies
  • 2. Get background geologic data
  • Consult ground-water atlas of the area.
  • Get reports on geology, hydrology, meteorology
  • Check for reports from government geological
    surveys

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
27
  • First steps in understanding a site
  • 3. Understand site use and history
  • Where were chemicals handled or disposed?
  • What site structures or activities are potential
    sources?
  • What chemicals are and were handled?

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
28
  • The following types of data are collected
  • Types of contaminants present in soil and
    groundwater
  • Concentrations of contaminants in the samples
  • Vertical and areal spread of contaminant plumes
    in soil and groundwater
  • Vertical and areal spread of free-floating
    product or the DNAPLs
  • Soil characteristics including the types of soil,
    density, moisture content, etc.
  • Groundwater elevations
  • Drawdown data collected from aquifer tests

29
http//mn.water.usgs.gov/bemidji/results/fact-shee
t.pdf
30
  • Engineering calculations help site remediation.
  • These could include
  • Mass and volume of soil removed during tank
    removal
  • Mass and volume of contaminated soil left in the
    vadose zone
  • Mass of contaminants in the vadose zone
  • Mass and volume of the free-floating product
  • Volume of contaminated groundwater
  • Mass of contaminants in the aquifer
  • Groundwater flow gradient and direction
  • Hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer

31
  • Understanding the geology and physical
    contaminants.

32
  • Geophysical Methods

Method Object
Electrical resistivity Map conductive or nonconductive contaminants stratigraphy
Electromagnetic induction Map conductive or nonconductive contaminants metal objects stratigraphy
Seismic refraction Stratigraphy (top of bedrock) depth to ground water
Seismic reflection High resolution mapping of top of bedrock
Ground penetrating radar (GPR) Buried objects (plastic and metal) stratigraphy depth to ground water
Magnetometry Buried metal objects
Gravity survey Overburden thickness landfill boundaries
Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
33
  • Ground penetrating radar

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
34
  • Electromagnetic Induction

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
35
  • Electrical resistivity

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
36
  • Seismic
  • reflection

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
37
  • Geophysics
  • suite

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
38
  • Sampling the gas phase

39
  • Soil gas sampling system

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
40
  • Output from field GC

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
41
  • Soil gas survey results

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
42
  • There are two main methods of getting into the
    ground.
  • - Drilling
  • - Direct Push

43
Drilling deep test hole http//nevada.usgs.gov/ad
rs/images/photos/studyareas/StudyAreasandExperimen
talS/study9.html
44
(No Transcript)
45
  • Drilling techniques

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
46
  • Hollow Stem Auger

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
47
  • Direct-push
  • technology
  • (Geoprobe)

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
48
  • Direct-push monitoring well

Waste Containment and Remediation Technology
49
  • Direct push - Advantages
  • Inexpensive to install, replace and abandon
  • Minimal waste cuttings
  • Fewer well development wastes
  • Rapid installation and site characterization
  • Less worker exposure to contaminants
  • Representative chemistry and field parameter
    measurements
  • Improved landowner relations

50
  • Direct push - Disadvantages
  • Not applicable when cobbles or consolidated
    materials are present
  • May not be accepted for long term monitoring in
    most states
  • Debate remains regarding aquifer testing
    capabilities
  • Well diameter limitations
  • Pump diameter limitations
  • Potential for higher turbidity in wells with no
    filter pack

51
Demonstration/Validation of Long-Term Monitoring
Using Wells Installed by Direct Push Technologies
and Enhanced Low-Flow Groundwater Sampling
Methods. DoD 2009
52
  • Percentage Savings for DP Well Installations
    Based on Well Diameter and Depth.

Demonstration/Validation of Long-Term Monitoring
Using Wells Installed by Direct Push Technologies
and Enhanced Low-Flow Groundwater Sampling
Methods. DoD 2009
53
  • http//www.frtr.gov/decisionsupport/index.htm
  • http//www.clu-in.org/characterization/technologie
    s/solvr.cfm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com