Compensating Wage Differentials - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Compensating Wage Differentials

Description:

Title: CHAPTER 8 - - COMPENSATING WAGE DIFFERENTIALS Author: S. Fred Gohmann Last modified by: ecu-home Created Date: 10/28/1996 2:24:38 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 63
Provided by: SFredG5
Learn more at: https://ux1.eiu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Compensating Wage Differentials


1
Chapter 8
  • Compensating Wage Differentials

2
What affects occupational choice?
  • wages
  • non-pecuniary characteristics
  • since jobs have both of these attributes, people
    face tradeoffs between them

3
Compare two jobs - - Both pay 7.50/hour
  • Firm X is offering an office job as a file clerk
  • Firm Y is an asphalt company who needs workers to
    help pave roads
  • Which firm will attract more applicants at a wage
    of 7.50?
  • What will have to happen at Firm Y to attract
    more workers?

4
The extra wage that is paid to attract workers
into paving roads is called the compensating wage
differential
  • workers require "combat pay" for undesirable
    working conditions
  • on the other hand, the pleasant atmosphere of
    desirable jobs must be bought by the workers
    through lower pay

5
Compensating Wage Differentials
  • the price at which various qualitative job
    characteristics are bought and sold
  • BADS result in positive differentials (higher
    wages)
  • GOODS result in negative differentials (lower
    wages)

6
Holding worker characteristics constant,
employees in bad jobs receive higher wages than
those working under more pleasant conditions.
7
What are these worker characteristics?
  • skill
  • age
  • sex
  • race
  • marital status
  • education
  • geographic region
  • union status

8
We will assume
  • workers maximize utility
  • workers have perfect information about their jobs
  • workers have mobility

9
Utility Maximization
  • if we used income maximization, the worker would
    take the highest paying job regardless of
    attributes
  • this is likely not the case with most workers

10
Perfect Information
  • workers are aware of the job characteristics and
    the wages paid
  • this may not always be true
  • for example, workers did not use to know the
    adverse effect of asbestos

11
Worker Mobility
  • workers have a range of jobs to choose from and
    can look for a new job while working
  • median job tenure in the U.S. is 3.5 years

12
When graphing worker preferences for wages vs.
job characteristics, we use indifference curves
  • we will put the wage on the y-axis
  • we will put the risk of injury on the x-axis
  • since risk is a bad, these indifference curves
    will have an unusual shape
  • the indifference curves will be upward-sloping
    and convex

13
The indifference curves will be upward-sloping
  • to accept more risk, an individual will require a
    higher wage to remain equally satisfied
  • this is because the workers utility is lowered
    if they incur an injury

14
U1
15
Suppose a person is currently at point A. If the
risk of the job rises to R1, the person will only
remain equally satisfied if...
U1
A
w0
R0
R1
16
his wage increases to w1.
U1
w1
w0
R0
R1
17
U2 represents a higher level of utility than U1
U2
U1
18
At risk level R0, w2 gt w1. Thus, A must be
preferred to B.
U2
U1
A
w2
w1
B
R0
19
The indifference curves will be convex
  • at low risk of injury, the person is not as
    willing to accept a lower wage for an additional
    decrease in risk, relative to when risks are high

20
.
U1
Given that risks are low, the worker requires
only a small increase in wage to accept
additional risk
W0
R0
21
U1
When risk is higher, the worker will require a
larger increase in wage to accept additional risk
W1
R1
22
Tom
Joe
The steeper the curve, the more risk averse the
worker. Joe is more risk averse than Tom.
23
Tom
Joe
What is it worth to these men to have risk
lowered from R0 to R1?
w0
R0
R1
24
Tom
Joe
Joe is willing to accept a much lower wage than
Tom to have risk reduced from R0 to R1
w0
w1T
w1J
R1
R0
25
Isoprofit Curves
  • are different across employers
  • reflect the combinations of risk and wage that
    result in the same level of profit for the firm
  • are upward-sloping and concave

26
?0
Isoprofit Curve
27
Isoprofit curves are upward-sloping
  • since reducing risk is costly to the firm, it
    will be willing to pay higher wages as jobs
    become more risky
  • thus, there should be a positive relationship
    between risk and wage reflected in the isoprofit
    curve

28
A firm is equally profitable at A or B. Note
that higher risk allows the firm to pay higher
wages.
?0
B
w1
A
w0
R0
R1
29
Isoprofit curves are concave
  • this is due to diminishing marginal returns to
    reducing risk
  • at first, firms will use safety measures that can
    be done so most easily and inexpensively
  • the more safety measures employed by a firm, the
    more expensive and difficult additional measures
    will be

30
Risk can be reduced more cheaply at R1 than R0
?0
w1
w0
R0
R1
31
Firms with steeper isoprofit curves find it more
costly to reduce risks.
?2
w0
?1
R0
32
To reduce risk from R0 to R1 and keep profit
constant, Firm 1 would have to lower wages only
to w1 while Firm 2 would have to lower wages to
w2. Thus, Firm 1 can reduce the risk at
lower relative cost.
?2
w0
?1
w1
w2
R0
R1
33
The zero profit isoprofit curve is most often the
only relevant isoprofit curve.
  • Why?

34
Equilibrium
  • occurs where the isoprofit curve is tangent to
    the indifference curve
  • this means that the slope of the isoprofit curve
    is equal to the slope of the indifference curve
  • the rate at which the firm is able to trade wages
    for risk is equal to the rate at which workers
    are willing to trade wages for risk

35
U0
?0
36
U0
?0
w
r
37
Given isoprofit and indifference curves, we can
show that
  • more risk averse workers will work at less risky
    jobs that pay lower wages
  • firms with higher costs of reducing risks will
    pay higher wages

38
UB
UA
Indifference curves for two workers Worker A
and Worker B
39
Isoprofit curves for two firms Firm X and Firm Z
?X
?Z
40
UA
?X
?Z
wA
RA
41
UB
UA
?X
wB
?Z
wA
RA
RB
42
Wages Rise With Risk
  • workers with strong preferences for safety are
    willing to accept lower wages
  • workers with strong preferences for safety will
    take jobs where safety can be generated at a
    lower cost

43
How do government programs controlling risk
affect workers utility?
  • The federal government set safety standards for
    many occupations through OSHA (Occupational
    Safety and Health Administration)

44
Suppose a firm is threatened with large fines by
the government if they do not comply to safety
standards. If the firm complies with the
standards, are the workers better off?
  • not if the workers know the risks
  • the workers may be better off if they are unaware
    of the risks
  • we can use our model to show this

45
U0
?0
w0
R0
46
Suppose that R is the minimum acceptable amount
of risk allowable by government standards
U0
?0
w0
R0
R
47
The firm will only offer a wage of w (any higher
wage would reduce profit)
U0
?0
w0
w
R0
R
48
To remain equally happy, the worker would need a
wage of wR
U0
?0
w0
wR
w
R0
R
49
What happens to worker utility at R?
U0
?0
w0
w
R0
R
50
Utility falls from U0 to U
U0
U
?0
w0
w
R0
R
51
Has government intervention helped?
52
No, the worker is made worse off
53
What happens when the worker does not know the
true level of risk?
  • In this case, government intervention can make
    the worker better off

54
Unknown Risk
  • Suppose a worker receives a wage of w0 and thinks
    that the risk level is R0
  • the worker thinks that his utility level is U0
  • but, if the actual risk is Ra, the actual utility
    level is Ua

55
U0
The worker thinks that he is at point G
?0
G
w0
R0
56
U0
But the worker is actually at point A...
?0
A
G
W0
R0
Ra
57
U0
Ua
at utility level Ua
?0
A
G
w0
R0
Ra
58
Government intervention can help in this case
  • if the government sets the allowable risk level
    between Ra and Rb,workers will actually end up on
    a higher indifference curve.
  • the workers may perceive that they are worse off
    (because their wage will be lower) when in fact
    they have been made better off (because the level
    of risk has been reduced)

59
U0
Ua
?0
w0
R0
Ra
60
U0
Ua
?0
w0
R0
Ra
Rb
61
U0
Ua
Suppose the government chooses R as the minimum
amount of risk that is acceptable
?0
w0
R0
Rb
Ra
R
62
U0
Ua
U1
The firm pays the worker a wage of w and the
worker ends up on indifference curve U1
?0
w0
w
R0
Rb
Ra
R
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com