Title: CHAPTER 3 LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION
1C H A P T E R
8
Occupational Wage Differentials
2OVERVIEW OF CHAPTER
- The Pattern of Occupational Earnings
- Compensating Wage Differentials
- Occupational Licensing
- Occupational Attainment and Earnings of Men and
Women
3OCCUPATIONAL DIFFERENTIALS
- Occupational differentials capture the influence
of several of the principal determinants of
earnings in the labor market (education,
training, status, prestige, quality of working
conditions) - Theory of compensating wage differentials has two
applications - Governmental regulation of occupation safety and
health conditions - Factors that influence the mix of fringe benefits
and wages in the compensation packages offered to
workers by firms
4THE PATTERN OF OCCUPATIONAL EARNINGS
- Table 8.1 Median weekly earnings by gender in
select occupations - Key points
- Higher paid occupations generally are found in
fields classified as professional or managerial - Weekly earnings for women are generally less than
those of men - Due to occupational attainment.
- Even when in same occupations, women earn less.
5Median Weekly Earnings of Full-Time Wage and
Salary Workers in Selected Occupations by
Gender, 2001
Source Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment
and Earnings (January 2002), Table 39.
Table 8.1
6THE PATTERN OF OCCUPATIONAL EARNINGS
- Adam Smith
- Market forces pecuniary aspects of occupations,
including skills necessary - Institutional forces govt policies that affect
entrance of people into occupations - Sociological forces tastes for certain
occupations - People choose occupations based on the whole
package of attributes we consider all advantages
and disadvantages.
7COMPENSATING WAGE DIFFERENTIALS
- Differences in pay represent compensating wage
differentials in the sense that they equalize the
net attractiveness of each occupation - Job attributes
- Agreeableness
- Disagreeableness
- Figure 8.1 The compensating wage differential
for a disagreeable occupation (psychic wage)
8The Compensating Wage Differential for a
Disagreeable Occupation
Figure 8.1
9COMPENSATING WAGE DIFFERENTIALS
- The smaller the probability of success, the
higher must be the wage in the occupation for the
expected value of the lifetime stream of income
to equal that in an occupation in which success
is assured - Differences in tastes and abilities
- Figure 8.2 Heterogeneity of tastes and
abilities and the size of compensating wage
differentials - The size of the compensating wage differential
for a particular occupation depends on the
strength of labor demand - Economic rent payment above the factor inputs
minimum asking price.
10Heterogeneity of Tastes and Abilities and the
Size of Compensating Wage Differentials
Figure 8.2
11COMPENSATING WAGE DIFFERENTIALS
- Unemployment and noncompeting groups
- John Stuart Mill criticized the theory of
compensating differentials as not being
consistent with observed reality - Economy operates below full employment
- Monopolies
- Class system
- Difficult for unskilled workers to earn HK
- Prejudice
- Figure 8.3 The effect of unemployment and
noncompeting groups on the size of compensating
wage differentials
12The Effect of Unemployment and Noncompeting
Groups on the Size of Compensating Wage
Differentials
Figure 8.3
13THE HEDONIC THEORY YOU MAY SKIP THIS SECTION
14THE ECONOMICS OF EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
- There has been a large increase in fringe
benefits - Table 8.2 Benefits in employee compensation,
2001 - 1/3 of benefits are govt mandated (SS UI)
- Large firms and union firms have greater benefits
than small firms and non-union firms - Pensions are deferred compensation.
15THE RELATIVE COST OF EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
- Figure 8.7 Wage/fringe isoprofit indifference
curves - Characteristics of isoprofits
- Those further to right represent higher costs,
lower profits - Negative slope tradeoff between wages and
benefits - Steepness reflects relative costs
- Referred to as an offer curve
16Wage/Fringe Isoprofit and Indifference Curves
Figure 8.7
17THE ECONOMICS OF EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
- The preferences of employees
- IC is convex to origin
- Cash can be spent on anything, but tax advantages
to benefits - Flatter IC prefers wages steeper IC prefers
benefits
18The Equilibrium Combination of Wages and Benefits
Figure 8.8
19IMPLICATIONS
- In a competitive market, there is an inverse
relationship between benefits and wages - An equilibrium level of benefits will occur
without govt intervention - Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
- Figure 8.9 The provision of maternity leave
benefits
20The Provision of Maternity Leave Benefits
Figure 8.9
21OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING
- Govt policies may promote or restrict labor
supply in certain occupations through licensing - Who is licensed?
- Over 700 occupations are licensed
- Examples?
- Many licensing boards may have a conflict of
interest because they regulate themselves.
22THE BENEFITS OF LICENSING
- Protect consumers
- Difficult for consumers to differentiate the
quality of service and competency of
practitioners - Purchase could harm others
- Individuals systematically underestimate risk to
themselves
23The Effect of Occupational Licensing on Wages
and Employment
Figure 8.10
24OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING AS A SOURCE OF MONOPOLY
RENTS
- Licensing my benefit the practitioners of the
occupation more than the consumers - Monopoly rent a wage that is artificially
higher than the competitive level - Raising minimum standards
- Raise standards of new entrants, but usually
grandfather clause for current members
25OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING AS A SOURCE OF MONOPOLY
RENTS
- Restrictions on interstate mobility
- Many states only license in their state, no
reciprocity - Restrictions on training
- Limit number of new entrants through restrictions
on training and education (AMA, ABA)
26OCCUPATIONAL ATTAINMENT AND EARNINGS OF MEN AND
WOMEN
- Women earn 76 of what men earn
- Gender differences in occupational attainment
- Majority of working women are in lower paying
occupations - Occupational segregation or concentration is
pervasive - Largest increase for women in professional,
white-collar jobs little change in blue-collar
jobs.
27Percentage of Female Workers in Traditionally
Male and Female Occupations in 1960, 1970, 1980,
1990, 2000, and 2001
Source Bureau of the Census, Census of the
Population (Washington, D.C GPO, 1960, 1970,
1980) and Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment
and Earnings (January 2001), Table 39.
Table 8.3
28REASONS FOR OCCUPATIONAL SEGREGATION
- The discontinuous pattern of female participation
- Decreasing returns to human capital and value of
OJT - Firms want to increase return for specific OJT so
they hire more men and this can create a vicious
cycle - Gender roles sociological forces have a strong
influence - Discrimination firms hiring patterns
29IN THE NEWS WHY MORE WOMEN MANAGERS AND
EXCUTIVES ARE PUTTING THEIR CAREERS ON HOLD
30POLICY APPLICATION 8-1 GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
- Competitive forces vs. govt intervention
- Increased injury rates in 1960s led to more govt
regulation - More concern over diseases
31THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970
- Created OSHA under the Department of Labor
- Large focus today on ergonomics
- The case for and against government regulation
- Need to consider competitiveness and availability
of information - The size of compensating wage differentials
- Can workers actually measure risk?
32The Impact of Market Imperfections on the
Wage/Risk Equilibrium
Figure 8.11
33OSHA
- Issues in safety and health regulation
- The optimal level of regulation economists say
measure costs and benefits - The method of enforcement
- Many written standards, most inflexible
- Fines are minimal, compliance can be expensive
34EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE 8-1 COMPENSATION FOR
REPUTATION
35Compensating Wage Differentials andOccupational
and Employer Social Responsibility
SOURCEÂ Adapted from Robert H. Frank, What Price
the Moral High Ground? Southern Economic Journal
63 (July 1996) 117, Figure 2.
Figure 8.12
36EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE 8-2 OCCUPATIONAL SEGREGATION
AND MALE/FEMALE EARNINGS DIFFERENTIALS
37The Relationship Between Occupational Earnings
and Percentage of Females
SOURCEÂ Authors calculations based on results
found in Michael Baker and Nicole M. Fortin,
Gender Composition and Wages Why Is Canada
Different from the United States?, Mimeo,
University of Toronto (September 1998).
Figure 8.13
38E N D