Unnatural selection: adaptive evolution driven by chemical pollution - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Unnatural selection: adaptive evolution driven by chemical pollution

Description:

Title: No Slide Title Author: Joe Staton Last modified by: Biological Sciences Created Date: 3/7/2000 8:06:03 PM Document presentation format: 35mm Slides – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: JoeSt68
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Unnatural selection: adaptive evolution driven by chemical pollution


1
Unnatural selection adaptive evolution driven by
chemical pollution
  • Bruce C. Coull
  • Dean, School of the Environment
  • University of South Carolina,
  • Columbia

2
Evolution occurs via Natural Selection
  • Darwin (1859) first noted the link between
    heredity of traits and their impact on
    survivorship in perpetuating a population
  • Rediscovery of Gregor Mendels work on garden
    peas established the nature of inheritance
  • Neodarwinists investigate biological adaptation
    to the physical world

3
Different types of natural selection
  • Response to environmental stress
  • Temperature
  • Light
  • Space
  • Food
  • Sexual selection
  • Mate choice
  • Territoriality

4
Human impact on increase
  • Increased contaminants
  • Point source
  • Non-point source
  • Global warming
  • Habitat alteration
  • Erosional processes
  • Altered hydrology
  • Increasing development

5
Organisms respond to new stresses
  • Non-adaptive
  • Increased tumor frequencies in natural
    populations (e.g., mammals, fish, and copepods)
  • Endocrine disruption (e.g., Tributyltin in
    snails, ?-estradiol mimics in plastics)
  • Adaptive
  • Antibiotic resistance in bacteria
  • Pesticide resistance in insects

6
What is evolution?
  • In the broadest sense, genetic change
  • More narrowly, changes in genetic frequency in a
    population

7
Any change is evolution
  • Whether it is directly selected or a product of
    random chance

8
Case study of estuarine copepod
  • Use of a neutral genetic marker for
    toxicological study

9
Model Organisms Copepods
Microarthridion littorale (Poppe 1881)
10
Cytochrome b apoenzyme
  • Gene in the mitochondrial genome
  • involved in electron transport chain
  • maternally inherited clonal
  • no introns or recombination
  • Evolves relatively rapidly
  • many silent mutations at third positions
  • good population genetic marker

11
Cytochrome b variants within SC
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Stronger correlation for pollution than
geographic distance
15
Can we recreate this pattern in the lab?
  • Use samples from a site with nearly equal group
    distributions
  • Establish mixed pesticide levels (CHPY/DDT) to
    induce selection
  • Test for differential survival of groups

16
?
17
What do we expect?
  • Pesticide exposed treatments survived to 15
    levels of controls
  • Following results are for survivors only
  • From field data Group I individuals should
    increase-- Groups II III should decrease
    compared with controls

18
Group I increases ( basis) and others decrease
relative to controls (?0.05)
19
Conclusions and Considerations
  • Variation at a single locus (Cyt b) is related to
    pollution history in the field and lab
  • Some groups marked by Cyt b are better survivors

20
However some organisms directly respond to
chemical threats
21
Examples of organisms adapting to chemical threats
  • Changes in grasses on mine tailings (Antonovics)
  • Changes in oligochaetes in response to heavy
    metals (Maritinez and Levington)
  • Resistance to antibiotics by Streptococcus and
    Tuberculosis
  • Mosquito resistance to dieldrin (cyclodiene)

22
Thus Pollutants are an increasingly important
evolutionary force
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com