Arctic National Wildlife Refuge - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

Description:

... grizzly bears, and countless bird species use area for breeding and feeding Oil would take ten years to hit market Even at peak production, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:156
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: AlexW83
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Arctic National Wildlife Refuge


1
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
  • Alex Wolff
  • Stephanie Wege
  • Laura Hart
  • Bari Greenfeld
  • Shannon Cullen

2
  • History of ANWR
  • Pro-drilling view
  • Government
  • Oil companies
  • Local population
  • Anti-drilling
  • Environmentalists
  • Local Population

3
History of ANWR
  • 1960 - Arctic National Wildlife Range created by
    Secretary of the Interior, Fred Andrew Seaton
  • 1980 - Alaska National Interest Lands
    Conservation Act enlarges protected area and
    renames ANWR
  • Conserve fish/wildlife populations and habitats
  • Fulfill U.S. international fish/wildlife treaty
    obligations
  • Provide continued subsistence use by locals
  • Ensure water quality/quantity within Refuge

4
  • 1.5 million acres of coastal plain called 1002
    area
  • Mandated studies of natural resources of the area
  • Congressional authorization required for oil
    drilling

5
(No Transcript)
6
  • Managed by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  • Habitat for 36 land mammals, 36 fish, 9 marine
    mammals, 160 bird species
  • Five ecological regions
  • Coastal marine
  • Coastal plain
  • Alpine tundra
  • Forest-tundra transition
  • Boreal forest

7
Pro-drilling Government view
  • anywhere from 6 to 16 billion barrels would
    decrease middle east reliance
  • Creation of jobs
  • At 100/barrel, would eliminate 1.6 billion in
    imported oil
  • Federal revenue would increase 4.2 billion in
    five years
  • 152-237 billion over life of project
  • Most of proposed oil located in west near already
    established oil fields

8
  • Fifty miles from mountains
  • No trees, deep water lakes
  • No sunlight for 56 days a year
  • .01 of ANWR land would be drilled
  • 20 of our daily consumption
  • ice roads would be used, would melt in spring
  • Prudhoe Bay oilfields within Central Arctic Herd
    area, where herds have increased from 5,000 in
    1977 when oil drilling began to 31,000 today

9
(No Transcript)
10
Local Support
  • Inupiat of Kaktovik
  • Only village within boundaries of ANWR
  • More westernized than other locals
  • Represents opportunity for economic growth
  • Add jobs and increase standard of living
  • Concerned that drilling could affect hunting and
    fishing abilities

11
Oil Companies
  • profit potential
  • Surprisingly, however, most big oil companies
    have pulled out of lobbying for ANWR drilling

12
Environmentalist Opposition
  • would affect animal population migration patterns
  • No requirement that 2,000 acres be contiguous
  • Companies would have right to drill anywhere
  • Roads, etc. would have to be built to get oil out
  • Porcupine and Central Arctic herd
  • Use area to give birth and raise young
  • Polar bears, grizzly bears, and countless bird
    species use area for breeding and feeding

13
Green-winged teal
Long-billed dowitcher
Peregrine falcon
14
  • Oil would take ten years to hit market
  • Even at peak production, would only be 3 of US
    oil consumption
  • If used as 5 of US daily consumption, would last
    around 12 years
  • If used as 100, would last around a year
  • Would cause around 1 cent drop of price for a
    gallon of gasoline
  • BP, ConocoPhillips, and ChevronTexaco have pulled
    out (oil companies dont even want to drill
    there)
  • Takes focus off of real problem, our
    overconsumption issues and lack of sustainability
  • THE ANIMALS!

15
Local Opposition
  • Gwichin, live further south
  • Rely heavily on hunting, fishing, and whaling
  • Rely mostly on porcupine caribou who rely on
    coastal plain in ANWR
  • Have heavily opposed drilling with protests and
    lobbying
  • Present evidence that not everyone around the
    area is on board

16
Important Notes
  • Each side will use numbers that support their
    claims more directly
  • If you torture data long enough, theyll admit
    to anything
  • Each claim has a counterclaim
  • Ie. Gwichin sold their land for oil exploration
    in the 1980s and now they oppose drilling in
    ANWR, where they dont even live
  • Fields will affect animals vs. other areas drill
    already and animal populations have grown over
    time

17
Current Developments
  • 2000, passed by Hour of Representatives
  • Rejected by Senate in 2002
  • 2005, passed by Senate as part of federal budget
    resolution
  • Removed during reconciliation process by
    Democrats in House who signed a letter pledging
    to reject anything including ANWR drilling
  • 2005, drilling amendment attached to defense
    spending bill
  • Group of Democratic senators successfully
    filibustered bill
  • Currently still unable to drill there

18
  • As of three days ago, President Bush held a press
    conference urging Congress to open ANWR
  • Chastised House and Senate, making claims of
    lower gas prices and reduced reliance on middle
    East for energy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com