Diapositiva 1

1
METHODOLOGICAL APPROCH
Identification and collection of the Best
Practices
1) OBJECTIVES
2) STRUCTURE
3) ANNEX
2
1) OBJECTIVES

• Presentation of the MMOVE Methodology and
  approach
• Sharing and validation of the Best Practices
  template
• First reflections on Study Visits template and
  feasibility study contents
• Timeline of the next steps
• Open discussion.

3
2) STRUCTURE

• MAIN DOCUMENTS TO DEBATE
• POWER POINT PRESENTATIONS
• General Approach
• BPs template
• Gantt chart

4
2) STRUCTURE

• General focus of the project best
  practices exchange.
• Specific focus of the project deepen
  and better understand the reasons which leaded
  the undertaken mobility interventions, their
  impacts and the citizens mobility choices.
• EMPIRICAL
• Approach
• THEORETICAL
• Logical framework DPSIR model (Driving forces,
  Pressure, State, Impact and Response), conceived
  from the EU Institution as a relevant tool for
  the assessment and identification of policies
  development purposes
• provide information on the different elements of
  DPSIR chain related to MMOVE project
• to demonstrate the connections among each
  element
• to estimate the effectiveness of the responses
  given.

5
2) STRUCTURE
DPSIR model Bearing in mind the project aims, a
model based on the concept of causality chains
for data synthesis, could provide an useful
approach for understanding the impact of existing
sustainable mobility actions and for identifying
appropriate solutions
6
2) STRUCTURE

• Identification and collection of the Best
  Practices (1st Phase)
• This first step is aimed to identify 30 best
  practices in total, 20 from the partnership and
  10 from other EU countries in order to
• benchmark the process
• learn from the previous experiences
• develop practical data indicators to improve the
  learning process for the involved organizations
• enhance the discussion
• assess the quality of findings
• provide more comparable results
• provide practical outcomes of the project
• provide input to develop a guide / tool for
  similar contest (MMOVE Policy tool box)
•  
• According to this approach, the BP collection
  will be realized submitting a standardized and
  shared format/ template (subsequently in detail
  ppt)

7

• Study Visits

2) STRUCTURE

• 2. Study Visits (2nd Phase)
• The best practices collected will be shared among
  the project partners during the Best Practices
  Network Meeting.
• The six best practices selected, two for each
  strand, will be analyzed in a larger detail
  through Study Visits.
• 3. Feasibility studies to assess the
  transferability of good practices (3rd phase)
• After the selection phase each project partners
  assesses that the identified policy is applicable
  on its area. Afterwards, the good practices
  transferability will be assessed preparing
  feasibility studies and verifying the necessary
  adaptations.

8
2) STRUCTURE
9
2) STRUCTURE

• This three-phase process will contribute to set
  up the MMOVE Policy Tool Box aims to
• allow user to evaluate the impacts of existing
  actions on sustainable mobility
• identify appropriate technologies, policies
  and/or institutional management options to point
  the citizens mobility choices taken under a given
  set of conditions
• became an useful support for policy makers might
  to review the policies are carrying out and to
  drive next strategy and practices
• identify both potential benefits and problems
  for each of the defined practices and options for
  enhancing or alleviating the potential effects.

10
2) STRUCTURE
MMOVE Tool Box, model proposed
The first step has the aim to favor a previous
screening among the features (the Driver) and the
main urban and social-economics topics in
relation to the macro-policies implemented in the
field of mobility and transport. For each
problems the MMOVE Policy toolbox will indicate
the set of actions more suitable to facing
them Step 2 propose a systematic approach. It
will suggest the better intervention for each
segments of demand (the Response). Proposed
leverage has an own set of implementing tools (1,
2, 3, )
Step 1
Step 2
11
2) STRUCTURE
Step 1
. to next slide ..
12
. from previous slide
Step 2
13
2) STRUCTURE
Details Annex 1 - Best Practices Collection
Template Annex 2 - Study Visits Template (Part1,
2, 3) Annex 3 - Feasibility Study Template
Discussion on Best Practise Template Annex 4 -
Component 3_Gant Chart
14
2) STRUCTURE
Annex 2 - Study Visits Template (Part1, 2, 3)
(November 2009 April 2010)
Selection criteria TWG role an support What
TWG and SAG expect from you
15
2) STRUCTURE
Annex 2 - Study Visits Template (Part1, 2, 3)

• Some suggestion for the elaboration of the SV
  template
• SV TEMPLATE PART 1 SUBMISSION for HOSTING THE
  VISIT
• (Filled out by the partner interested in host the
  visit in his municipality)
• Subject identify the BP and the thematic related
• Reason why this case is important for the
  project
• Schedule favourite dates for the visit
• Activities what we would like to show during the
  visit (objectives, programme...)
• Involved actors who the participant partners
  will meet and will be able to interview during
  the visit (politicians, technical experts,
  decision makers, transport users)
• Staff exchange (if applicable) short description
  of the staff exchange programme and organization
  we would like to organise also a staff exchange
• Dissemination how we will be able to disseminate
  the visit results at local level

16
2) STRUCTURE
SV TEMPLATE PART 2 APPLICATION FORM (filled
out by the partner interested in take part to the
visit) Selection of the visit which visit we
would like to join and which BP we would like to
deepen Expectations from the visit what we hope
to learn from the visit Portability your opinion
about the portability of the BP in your
town Dissemination how we will disseminate the
visit results to our municipalities  
17
2) STRUCTURE

• SV TEMPLATE PART 3 FINAL REPORT
• (Section A filled out by the partner that hosted
  the visit, Section B filled out by all the
  participant partners)
• SECTION A general description of the visit
  (when, how, where,...)
• further relevant technical elements not already
  described in the BP collection template
• SECTION B feedback from the partners took part
  in the visit
• what we learned from the visit
• how we will disseminate the results of our visit
  to our municipalities
• your opinion about the portability of the BP in
  your town.

18
2) STRUCTURE
Annex 3 - Feasibility Study Template (April 2010
September 2011)

• Problem Transfer one of the best practice saw
  during the SV to a local context
• Which kind MMOVE will analyze only light
  interventions practices, not involving
• infrastructural hard measures, within the
  following themes
• Communication awareness raising
• Parking and traffic management and control
• Public collective transport.
• Tool Transferability/feasibility study (level of
  intensity it should represent a good basis for
  each partner to negotiate the future development
  of regional and local sustainable mobility
  policies and it will provide recommendations for
  transferring and implementing the intervention in
  its own area, using own cost).
• Who All the Project Partners in two different
  phases.

19
2) STRUCTURE
Annex 3 - Feasibility Study Template (April 2010
September 2011)

• Phases
• Three city leaders will start the process of
  studying the transferability of the practice to
  their local situation
• Each of the city leaders will host a meeting with
  other partners interested in that theme
  explaining the process of transferring one
  practice to their local situation
• Each partner (not leader) will start the
  Transferability/feasibility study following the
  example of the three city leaders with the
  support of TWG.

20
2) STRUCTURE
Annex 3 - Feasibility Study Template (April 2010
September 2011)
Proposed feasibility study tasks
a) Summarize local plans and policies collecting of existing plans and policies
b) Status analysis provide a comprehensive quantified baseline of the current status of mobility
c) Scenario development develop prospective scenarios inform and stimulate the discussion among stakeholders
d) Vision, objectives and targets develop a common vision between all local stakeholders, defining a clear, measurable and shared objectives
e) Action and budget plan choose set of policies and measures from the BPs collection and study visit results, suitable for your local situation, planning the allocation of resources (human, knowledge, funds) and the time framework.
No
Are all data available?
Yes
Study adoption
21
2) STRUCTURE
Annex 3 - Feasibility Study Template (April 2010
September 2011)

• Main activities
• Self evaluation
• For each activity ask yourself which critical
  success factors (Ref. Section C of MMOVE Best
  Practice Template, pag. 17) are more relevant for
  the action, if they are present and how to
  reinforce them.
•  
• a) Summarize local plans and policies
• Research and analysis of policy and procedure
  documents on the local and regional transport and
  mobility.
• Research and analysis of planning documents and
  studies on the local transport and mobility.
• b) Status analysis
• Retrieval of available data and their synthesis
  (care about town planning too).
• Select suitable indicators (preferably pick over
  the BPs indicators).
• Complementary data collection.
• Interpretation of results (correlations and
  comparisons).

22
2) STRUCTURE

• c) Scenario development
• Elaborate development trends and programmed
  measures.
• Formulate hypotheses for scenario building
  together with stakeholders (fi. do nothing, top
  and bottom scenario).
• Modelling of different scenarios.
• d) Vision, objectives and targets
• Provide basic information to stakeholders.
• Realisation of stakeholder meetings, focus group,
  interviews ....
• Finalize specific and concrete mobility
  objectives referred to the vision.
• Adoption of indicators that are representative
  for the objectives set.
• e) Action and budget plan
• Select and design measures strategies,
  instruments, tools, starting from the BPs and the
  Study Visits results and with the TWG and MMOVE
  PP support
• Plan the timing, the technical and the budget
  issues of measures (keep in mind the self
  evaluation output to allocate budget an resource,
  and the skills point out from the BPs collection
  in an analogous context).
• Presentation and discussion of the action plan
  with the stakeholders and citizen.

23
2) STRUCTURE
24
CONTACTS

• Erika Fulgenzi
• Marche Region
• SVIM Sviluppo Marche S.p.A
• Tel. [phone]
• Fax [phone]
• e-mail efulgenzi_at_svimspa.it

• Giovanni Romanini
• Marche Region
• SVIM Sviluppo Marche S.p.A.
• Tel. [phone]
• Fax [phone]
• e-mail gromanini_at_svimspa.it

25
Thank you for your attention!!