title.open ( ); revolution {execute}; - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 56
About This Presentation
Title:

title.open ( ); revolution {execute};

Description:

Title: title.open ( ); revolution {execute}; Last modified by: atd2k Document presentation format: A4 Paper (210x297 mm) Other titles: Times New Roman Arial Wingdings ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:197
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 57
Provided by: gridppAc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: title.open ( ); revolution {execute};


1
Tony Doyle
GridPP Oversight Committee 15 May
2002
2
Document Mapping
  • Exec Summary
  • Goals
  • Metrics for success
  • Project Elements
  • Risks/Dependencies (and mechanisms)
  • Summary
  • PMB-02-EXEC
  • PMB-01-VISION
  • PMB-02-EXEC
  • Gantt Charts, PMB-05-LCG,
    TB-01-Q5-Report, TB-02-UKRollout,
    PMB-06-TierAstatus, PMB-04-Resources
  • PMB-03-STATUS, PMB-07-INSTRUMENTS
  • PMB-02-EXEC

3
Outline
  • The Vision Thing
  • Grid
  • Scale
  • Integration
  • Dissemination
  • LHC Analyses
  • Other Analyses
  • DataGrid
  • LCG
  • Interoperability
  • Infrastructure
  • Finanaces
  • Summary

4
GridPP Documents
5
GridPP Vision
  • From Web to Grid - Building the next IT
    Revolution
  • Premise
  • The next IT revolution will be the Grid. The
    Grid is a practical solution to the
    data-intensive problems that must be overcome if
    the computing needs of many scientific
    communities and industry are to be fulfilled over
    the next decade.
  • Aim
  • The GridPP Collaboration aims to develop and
    deploy the largest-scale science Grid in the UK
    for use by the worldwide particle physics
    community.

Many Challenges.. Shared distributed
infrastructure For all experiments
6
GridPP Objectives
  • 1. SCALE GridPP will deliver the Grid software
    (middleware) and hardware infrastructure to
    enable the testing of a prototype of the Grid for
    the LHC of significant scale.
  • 2. INTEGRATION The GridPP project is designed to
    integrate with the existing Particle Physics
    programme within the UK, thus enabling early
    deployment and full testing of Grid technology
    and efficient use of limited resources.
  • 3. DISSEMINATION The project will disseminate
    the GridPP deliverables in the multi-disciplinary
    e-science environment and will seek to build
    collaborations with emerging non-PPARC Grid
    activities both nationally and internationally.
  • 4. UK PHYSICS ANALYSES (LHC) The main aim is to
    provide a computing environment for the UK
    Particle Physics Community capable of meeting the
    challenges posed by the unprecedented data
    requirements of the LHC experiments.
  • 5. UK PHYSICS ANALYSES (OTHER) The process of
    creating and testing the computing environment
    for the LHC will naturally provide for the needs
    of the current generation of highly data
    intensive Particle Physics experiments these
    will provide a live test environment for GridPP
    research and development.
  • 6. DATAGRID Grid technology is the framework
    used to develop this capability key components
    will be developed as part of the EU DataGrid
    project and elsewhere.
  • 7. LCG The collaboration builds on the strong
    computing traditions of the UK at CERN. The CERN
    working groups will make a major contribution to
    the LCG research and development programme.
  • 8. INTEROPERABILITY The proposal is also
    integrated with developments from elsewhere in
    order to ensure the development of a common set
    of principles, protocols and standards that can
    support a wide range of applications.
  • 9. INFRASTRUCTURE Provision is made for
    facilities at CERN (Tier-0), RAL (Tier-1) and use
    of up to four Regional Centres (Tier-2).
  • 10. OTHER FUNDING These centres will provide a
    focus for dissemination to the academic and
    commercial sector and are expected to attract
    funds from elsewhere such that the full programme
    can be realised.
  • (. WHAT WE SAID WE COULD DO IN THE PROPOSAL)

7
Grid A Single Resource
GRID A unified approach
  • Many millions
  • of events
  • Many samples
  • Various conditions

GRID A unified approach
  • Peta Bytes of data storage

Distributed resources
  • Many 1000s of computers required

Worldwide collaboration
  • Heterogeneous operating systems

8
Grid - Whats been happening?
GRID A unified approach
  • A lot
  • GGF4, OGSA and support of IBM (and others)
  • as opposed to .NET development framework and
    passports to access services
  • Timescale? September 2002
  • W3C architecture for web services
  • Chose (gzipped) XML as opposed to other solutions
    for metadata descriptions and web-based
    interfaces
  • linux
  • as opposed to other platforms lindows??
  • C (experiments) and C, Java (middleware) APIs
  • mono - Open Source implementation of the .NET
    Development Framework??

9
GridPP Context
Provide architecture and middleware
Future LHC Experiments
Running US Experiments
Build Tier-A/prototype Tier-1 and Tier-2 centres
in the UK and join worldwide effort to develop
middleware for the experiments
Use the Grid with simulated data
Use the Grid with real data
10
EDG TestBed 1 Status
GRID A unified approach
  • Web interface showing status of (400) servers
    at testbed 1 sites

GRID extend to all expts
11
LHC computing at a glance
1. scale
  • The investment in LHC computing will be massive
  • LHC Review estimated 240MCHF (before LHC delay)
  • 80MCHF/y afterwards
  • These facilities will be distributed
  • Political as well as sociological and practical
    reasons

Europe 267 institutes, 4603 users Elsewhere
208 institutes, 1632 users
12
GridPP funded Staff at CERN
7. LCG
  • IT/ADC
  • Ian Neilson from 16th April. Working on
    certificate authority then scaling up EDG
    testbed.
  • IT/API
  • Jacek Generowicz from 1st Feb. Working on GEANT4,
    in particular, tracking visualisation
  • Maria Girone from 1st April. Settling in.
  • IT/FIO
  • John Hearns from 1st April. Configuration
    installation management relates to WP4 effort
    and LCFG.
  • Bill Tomlin from 16th April. State Management.

Little acorns..
13
RTAG Status
7. LCG
  • 6 RTAGs created to date
  • RTAG1 (Persistency Framework status completed)
  • RTAG2 (Managing LCG Software status running)
  • RTAG3 (Math Library Review status running)
  • RTAG4 (GRID Use Cases status starting)
  • RTAG5 (Mass Storage status running)
  • RTAG6 (Regional Centres status starting)
  • Two more in advanced state of preparation
  • Simulation components
  • Data Definition Tools

14
Applications area has momentum
7. LCG
  • Torre Wenaus started as Area Manager in March.
  • Activities in the Applications area are now well
    organised. See http//cern.ch/lcg/peb/applications
    .
  • Weekly Applications area meetings initiated
    together with Architects Forum.
  • Active work for Software Process and Persistency.
    Work plan must be developed for SC2 approval.

15
Fabrics Grid Deployment
7. LCG
  • LCG Level 1 Milestone deploy a Global Grid
    Service within 1 year
  • sustained 24 X 7 service
  • including sites from three continents
  • identical or compatible Grid middleware and
    infrastructure
  • several times the capacity of the CERN facility
  • and as easy to use
  • Ongoing work at CERN to increase automation and
    streamline configuration, especially for
    migration to RedHat 7.2.
  • Aim to phase out old CERN solutions by mid-2003.

16
LCG Timeline
1. timescale
Prototype of Hybrid Event Store (Persistency
Framework)
Hybrid Event Store available for general users
applications
Distributed production using grid services
Full Persistency Framework
Distributed end-user interactive analysis
LHC Global Grid TDR
grid
50 prototype (LCG-3) available
LCG-1 reliability and performance targets
First Global Grid Service (LCG-1) available
17
Be a part of this?
  • Notes
  • 1. The minimum period for LTA is 3 months. It is
    expected that a work programme will be typically
    for 6 months (or more).
  • 2. Prior DataGrid and LHC (or other) experiments'
    Grid work are normally expected.
  • 3. It is worthwhile reading
  • http//cern.ch/lcg/peb/applications
  • in order to get an idea of the areas covered, and
    the emphasis placed, by the LCG project on
    specific areas (building upon DataGrid and LHC
    experiments' developments).
  • 4. Please send all enquiries and proposals to
  • Tony Doyle lta.doyle_at_physics.gla.ac.ukgt and
  • Tony CASS lttnt_at_mail.cern.chgt
  • LCG Development
  • Long Term Attachment at CERN
  • This will enable Grid developments in the UK to
    be (more) fully integrated with long-term Grid
    development plans at CERN.
  • The proposed mechanism is
  • 1. submit a short one-page outline of current and
    proposed work, noting how this work can best be
    developed within a named team at CERN, by e-mail
    to the GridPP Project Leader (Tony Doyle) and
    GridPP CERN Liaison (Tony Cass).
  • 2. This case will be discussed at the following
    weekly GridPP PMB meeting and outcomes will be
    communicated as soon as possible by e-mail
    following that meeting.

18
Summary of LCG
7. LCG
  • Project got under way early this year
  • Launch workshop and early RTAGs give good input
    for high-level planning
  • to be presented to LHCC in July
  • New plan takes account of first beam in 2007
  • No serious problems foreseen in synchronising LCG
    plans with those of the experiments
  • Collaboration with the many Grid projects needs
    more work
  • Technical collaboration with the Regional Centres
    has to be established
  • Recruitment of special staff going well (but need
    to keep the recruitment momentum going)
  • Serious problem with materials funding

19
Building upon Success
6. DataGrid
  • The most important criterion for establishing the
    status of this project was the European
    Commission review on March 1st 2002.
  • The review report of project IST-2000-25182
    DATAGRID is available from PPARC.
  • The covering letter states As a general
    conclusion, the reviewers found that the overall
    performance of the project is good and in some
    areas beyond expectations.
  • The reviewers state The deliverables due for the
    first review were in general of excellent
    quality, and all of them were available on time
    All deliverables are approved. The project is
    doing well, exceeding expectations in some areas,
    and coping successfully with the challenges due
    to its size.

20
6. DataGrid
21
WP1 Workload Management (Job Submission)
6. DataGrid
1. Authentication grid-proxy-init 2. Job
submission to DataGrid dg-job-submit 3.
Monitoring and control dg-job-status dg-job-canc
el dg-job-get-output 4. Data publication and
replication (WP2) globus-url-copy, GDMP 5.
Resource scheduling use of CERN MSS JDL,
sandboxes, storage elements
Important to implement this for all
experiments
22
WP2 - Spitfire
6. DataGrid
23
WP3 - R-GMA
6. DataGrid
24
WP4 - LCFG
6. DataGrid
25
WP5 Storage Element
Data Flow Diagram for SE
6. DataGrid
  • A consistent interface to MSS.
  • MSS
  • Castor
  • HPSS
  • RAID arrays
  • SRM
  • DMF
  • Enstore
  • Interfaces
  • GridFTP
  • GridRFIO
  • /grid
  • OGSA

26
WP6 - TestBed 1 Status
6. DataGrid
  • Web interface showing status of (400) servers
    at testbed 1 sites

GRID extend to all expts
27
WP7 Network Monitoring
6. DataGrid
28
WP7 - EDG Authorisationgrid-mapfile generation
VODirectory
AuthorizationDirectory
6. DataGrid
29
WP8 - Applications
6. DataGrid
  • 1. Realistic Large-Scale Tests
  • Reliability! Need reliable dg-job- command suite
  • 2. Data management
  • Reliability! Need reliable gdmp- command suite,
    file-transfer commands
  • 3. Mass Storage Support
  • Working access to MSS (CASTOR and HPSS at CERN,
    Lyon)
  • 4. Lightweight User Interface
  • Put on a laptop or std. Desktop machine
  • 5. Portability
  • Demonstrable portability of middleware a) use
    other resources, b) debugging
  • 6. Scratch Space
  • Job requests X amount of scratch space to be
    available during execution, system tells job
    where it is
  • 7. Output File Support
  • JDL support for output files specify where
    output should go in JDL, not in job script

30
Expt. Feedback
4. and 5. Expts
31
5. Other Expts
8. Interoperability
Minimal e-Bureaucracy
32
GRID JOB SUBMISSION External User Experience
5. Other Expts
33
Things Missing, apparently
5. Other Expts
34
Expt. Feedback
4. and 5. Expts
35
GridPP Poster
3. Dissemination
36
Tier 1/A EDG Poster
3. Dissemination
37
BaBar Poster
3. Dissemination
38
LHCb Poster
3. Dissemination
39
ScotGRID Poster
3. Dissemination
40
Identifiable Progress...
3. Dissemination
t0
t1
41
WebLog
Allows every area/sub group to have its own
'news' pages
42
GridPP Core e-Science Centres
3. Dissemination
Written formally to all e-Science centres
inviting contact and collaboration with GridPP.
  • NeSC
  • Close ties, hosted 2nd GridPP Collaboration
    Meeting, Collaboration on EDIKT Project?
    Training...
  • Belfast
  • Replied but not yet up and running.
  • Cambridge
  • Close ties, hosted 3rd GridPP Collaboration
    Meeting. Share one post with GridPP. Will
    collaborate on ATLAS Data Challenges.
  • Cardiff
  • Replied - contacts through QM (Vista) and Brunel
    GridPP Group.

43
GridPP Core e-Science Centres
3. Dissemination
  • London
  • No formal reply but close contacts through IC HEP
    Group. IC will host 5th GridPP Collaboration
    Meeting.
  • Manchester
  • No collab. projects so far. Manchester HEP Group
    will host 4th GridPP Collaboration Meeting.
  • Newcastle
  • In contact - Database projects?
  • Oxford
  • Close ties, collaboration between Oxford HEP
    Group and GridPP on establishment of central
    Tier-2 centre? CS/Core-GridPP-EDG links? Probably
    host 6th GridPP Collaboration Meeting.
  • Southampton
  • Replied but no collaboration as yet.

44
GridPP Context (Externally)
8. Interoperability
45
GLUE
8. Interoperability
  • How do we integrate with developments from
    elsewhere in order to ensure the development of a
    common set of principles, protocols and standards
    that can support a wide range of applications?
  • GGF
  • Within the Particle Physics community, these
    ideas are currently encapsulated in the Grid
    Laboratory Uniform Environment (GLUE).
  • Recommend this as a starting point for the wider
    deployment of Grids across the Atlantic. See
    http//www.hicb.org/glue/GLUE-v0.1.doc (Ruth
    Pordes et al.)

46
8. Interoperability
47
UK Tier-A/prototype Tier-1 Centre
9. Infrastructure
  • Roles
  • Tier-A Centre for BaBar
  • EDG testbed(s)
  • LCG prototype Tier-1 Centre
  • prototype Tier-1 for LHC experiments (Data
    Challenges independent of LCG development)
  • Interworking with other UK resources (JIF, JREI,
    eSC) UK portal
  • existing LEP, DESY and non-accelerator
    experiments
  • Purchases
  • First year Hardware Advisory Group (HAG1)
  • Determine balance between cpu, disk, and tape
  • Experts on specific technologies
  • Propose more HAGs (2 and 3)..
  • Needs to be successful in all roles...

48
UK Tier-A/prototype Tier-1 Centre
9. Infrastructure
  • Equipment delivered and under user test
  • 895K committed, 700K spent
  • The 156 dual cpu 1.4GHz rack mounted systems
  • integrated into the existing CSF cluster
  • A special queue for testing
  • BaBar have tested a number of their programs.
  • 23 disk servers 2x800GB usable each
  • 3 servers in use by BaBar
  • CMS cannot use (due to licence problems Obj on
    RH7.2)
  • 24 port Gbit switch in addition to existing one
  • Extra STK 9940 tape drive
  • Start this years tender much earlier.
  • Need guidelines from PMB for how we release

49
Rollout of the UK Grid for PP
9. Infrastructure
  • Operational stability of GridPP middleware
    Testbed team
  • The gang of four Andrew McNab, Steve Traylen,
    Dave Colling (other half) and Owen Moroney
  • Ensures the release of Testbed quality EDG
    software
  • documentation
  • lead for other system managers in terms of
    implementation
  • pre-defined software cycle releases (2 months..)
  • Subject of the Rollout Plan Planning for EDG
    Testbed software deployment and support at
    participating UK sites (Pete Clarke, John
    Gordon)
  • LCG is the proposed mechanism by which the EDG
    testbed at CERN becomes an LCG Grid Service. The
    evolution of the EDG testbed to the LCG Grid
    Service will take account of both EDG and US grid
    technology. Need to take account of this..

50
Longer Term..
9. Infrastructure
  • LCG Grid Service
  • Takes account of EDG and US grid technology
  • A large-scale Grid resource, consistent with the
    LCG timeline, within the UK.
  • Scale in UK? 0.5 Pbytes and 2,000 distrib.
    CPUs GridPP in Sept 2004
  • 50 prototype

51
17m 3-Year Project
Dave Britton
10. Finances
  • Five components
  • Tier-1/A Hardware ITD Support Staff
  • DataGrid DataGrid Posts PPD Staff
  • Applications Experiments Posts
  • Operations Travel Management e Early
    Investment
  • CERN LCG posts Tier-0 e LTA

52
1. Recruitment
  • EDG Funded Posts (Middleware/Testbed)
  • All 5 in post 1 additional
  • EDG Unfunded Posts (Middleware/Testbed)
  • 15 out of 15 in post
  • GridPP Posts (Applications Tier1/A)
  • Allocated Dec 2001
  • 13 out of 15 in post
  • CERN Posts
  • First Round 105 Applicants, 12 Offers, 9
    Accepted
  • 4 in Applications, 2 Data Management, 3 Systems
  • Second Round 140 applicants, 9 Offers
  • Third Round 70 Applicants
  • Aim 28 posts

53
2. Monitoring Staff Effort SM
Robin Middleton
54
3. Progress towards deliverables..
Pete Clarke
55
-1. Next steps..
10. Finances
  • O(100k)
  • e CLRC support through to Sept 04
  • Other experiments unfunded in peer review
    process
  • Tier-2 centres unfunded initially
  • 2.3m
  • eDIKT (e-Data, Information and Knowledge
    Transformation) SHEFC Particle Physics
    application area - assignment of two (of twelve)
    FTEs in initial planning. Discussions ongoing
    with EPCC.
  • O(100m)
  • The first call for Framework VI will be early
    next year.
  • Call out now for expressions of interest for new
    networks and integrated projects.
  • Draft document led by David Williams (CERN)
    Enabling Grids and e-Science in Europe plans
    to extend the current paradigms with CERN at its
    focus as the European e-Science Centre.
  • We believe this is the right approach.
  • Incorporates the UKs e-Science agenda, adding a
    European dimension. It also recognises the
    central role of CERN and builds upon the recent
    successes of EDG.
  • PPARC Contact Neil Geddes

56
Testbed Status Overview
  • Metrics

Green Dot G1.1.3 G2.0(b) EDG-CE Babar-CE Bir
mingham y y y Bristol y y y y y Brunel y y
Cambridge y Edinburgh y y Glasgow y y Imperial
y y y Lancaster y y Liverpool y y Manche
ster y y y y y Oxford y y QMUL y y y RAL y y
y y RHUL y y UCL y
Andrew McNab - Manchester HEP - 10 May 2002
57
  • Metrics

What is in place in the UK testbed? (an RB
centric view of the world) Only GridPP and Babar
VOs
Bristol
Replica Catalogue
58
Grid Support Centre
8. Interoperability
  • UKHEP CA uses primitive technology
  • It works but takes effort
  • 201 personal certs issued (98 still valid)
  • 119 other certs issued (93 still valid)
  • GSC will run a CA for UK escience CA
  • Uses openCA Registration Authority uses web
  • We plan to use it
  • Namespace identifies RA, not Project
  • Metrics
  • UK
  • e-Science
  • Certification
  • Authority
  • Through GSC we have access to skills of CLRC eSC
  • Use helpdesk to formalise support later in the
    rollout

59
Summary
  • A vision is only useful if its shared
  • Grid success is fundamental for PP
  • Scale in UK? 0.5 Pbytes and 2,000 distrib. CPUs
  • GridPP in Sept 2004
  • Integration ongoing..
  • Dissemination external and internal
  • LHC Analyses ongoing feedback mechanism..
  • Other Analyses closely integrated using EDG
    tools
  • DataGrid - major investment must be (and is
    so far) successful
  • LCG Grid as a Service
  • Interoperability sticky subject
  • Infrastructure Tier-A/1 in place, Tier-2s to
    follow
  • Finances (very well) under control
  • Next steps on framework VI..
  • CERN EUs e-science centre?
  • Co-operation required with other
    disciplines/industry
  • Monitoring mechanisms in place
  • Emphasis on deliverables

60
Executive2 Summary
  • Significant progress...
  • Project is now well defined in a broad sense and
    is progressing on a series of fronts.
  • We have responded and outlined our plans to
    address the concerns of the last OC concerning
  • WP5
  • Rollout plan
  • Monitoring instruments
  • Metrics for success.
  • The project has demonstrated progress in
  • Widespread deployment of EDG testbeds in the UK
  • Integration with specific experimental areas
    (BaBar, UKDMC and LISA) and
  • Demonstrating Grid deployment in the UK at the
    NeSC opening.
  • We see various challenges ahead
  • Development of more detailed metrics and
    monitoring of outputs
  • Management of changes due to external
    developments (e.g. OGSA)
  • Development of Tier-2 deployment
  • Engagement of the UK HEP community and
  • Future funding initiatives such as Framework VI.

61
UML Diagram
GRID A unified approach
True Vision??
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com