Theology (1) Lecture Part I: Studying God - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Theology (1) Lecture Part I: Studying God

Description:

Title: Author: Dr. Jintae Kim Last modified by: Dr. Jintae Kim Created Date: 11/22/2006 5:23:52 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:611
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 58
Provided by: Dr661
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Theology (1) Lecture Part I: Studying God


1
Theology (1) Lecture Part I Studying God
  • Jintae Kim, PhD
  • Alliance Theological Seminary
  • Nyack, NY 10960
  • (845) 770-5762
  • E-mail Jintae.kim_at_nyack.edu
  • Website http//all4jesus.net

2
Chapter 1What is theology?
3
Common Features of Religion (Christian Theology,
18)
  • (1) Belief in a Supreme Being or Concept
  • (2) It involves a world-life view.
  • (3) A Life Style based upon the view

4
What is religion? (19-20)
Definition Remarks
Doctrine The middle ages through 18th century, particularly in the West. A set of belief. Philosophy.
Feeling Friedrich Schleiermacher. 19th c. through 20th c.
Morality Albert Ritschl, What is Christianity?
All of these Doctrine, Religious feeling, Ethical dimension
5
Religion and Theology (21)
  • The actual living-out and personal practice of
    religion, including the holding of doctrinal
    beliefs, occur on the level of primary experience.
  • Theology is the second-level activity. It
    concerns with describing, analyzing, criticizing,
    and organizing the doctrines.

6
 The Definition of Theology (Introducing,16)
Source Biblical The primary source of its content is the canonical Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments using the tools and methods of biblical research.
Method (1) Systematic It draws upon the whole of the Bible to coalesce the varied teachings into some type of harmonious or coherent whole.
(2) Philosophical Relates to the issues of general culture and learning.
7
Application (1) Contemporary Without distorting the biblical materials, it uses language, concepts , and thought forms that make some sense in the context of the present time.
(2) Practical. Theology relates to living rather than merely to belief.
8
Theological Studies
Biblical Studies Biblical Theology
Historical Studies Historical Theology
Doctrinal Studies Systematic Theology Scripture, God, man, Sin, Christ, Salvation, Church, Last Things (8 Loci)
Practical Studies Philosophical Theology
9
The Necessity for Theology (17)
  • (1) Is there really a need to study doctrine?
  • (2) Isnt it sufficient if I simply love Jesus?
  • (3) Doesnt it just cause division among
    Christians?

10
3 Reasons to study theology (17)
  • (1) Correct doctrinal beliefs are essential to
    the relationship between the believer and God.
  • (2) because of the connection between truth and
    experience.
  • (3) because there are many secular and religious
    systems of thought that compete for our devotion
    these days.

11
2 Questions - Starting Point of Theology
  • (1) Should theology begin with proving the
    existence of God?
  • (2) Can we do theology without examining the the
    nature of revelation in the Scripture?

12
  • A. H. Strong The idea of God is a first truth.
    It is a rational intuition. It is not a piece of
    knowledge written on the soul, but an assumption
    which is so basic that all other knowledge
    depends upon it.

13
3 Presuppositions in doing theology
  • (1) God exists This point is assumed as a first
    truth or established by an empirical proof.
  • (2) God has specially revealed himself in the
    Bible.
  • (3) This special revelation must be investigated
    in order to determine what God has revealed.

14
Theology vs Science
Augustine He preferred the term sapientia (wisdom) to scientia (knowledge). Sciences dealt with temporal things, wisdom related to the eternal matters, specifically to God as the highest good.
Thomas Aquinas Theology came to be thought of as the queen of the sciences. It is a derived science.
Karl Barth He argued vigorously for the autonomy of theology.
15
6 Criteria of H. Scholz for theology to be science
  • It must be free from internal contradiction.
  • There must be a unity or coherence in its
    propositions.
  • Its statements must be susceptible to testing.
  • It must make no assertion which is physically and
    biologically impossible.
  • It must be free from prejudice.
  • Its propositions should be capable of being
    broken up into axioms and theorems and
    susceptible of proof on that basis.

16
Theology as a science
17
Critique of Sholz
  • (1) The definition which virtually restricts
    science to natural science, and which then tends
    to restrict knowledge to science, is too narrow.

18
5 Evidences for theology as science (Doctrine, 35)
  • (1) It has a definite subject matter to
    investigate.
  • (2) It deals with objective matters. It does not
    merely give expression to the subjective feelings
    of the theologian or of the Christian.

19
  • (3) It has a definite methodology for
    investigating its subject matter.
  • (4) It has a method for verifying is
    propositions.
  • (5) There is coherence among the propositions of
    its subject matter.

20
Common Grounds with other sciences (Doctrines,35
Introducing, 18)
  • (1) It is subject to certain basic principles or
    axioms.
  • (2) It involves communicability.
  • (3) It employs methods employed by other specific
    disciplines.
  • (4) It shares some subject matter with other
    disciplines.

21
Why The Bible?(Doctrines, 36-7)
  • (1) Christianity is a movement which follows
    Jesus Christ. We would then logically look to him
    to state what is to be believed and what is to be
    done. We have very little information outside of
    the Bible regarding what Jesus taught and did.

22
  • (2) In making the Bible the primary or supreme
    source of our understanding, we are not
    completely excluding all other sources. But these
    will be secondary to the Bible.

23
Theology and Philosophy
24
5 Views on Relation between Theology and
Philosophy (Doctrines, 40-42)
25
  • (1) No relation Tertullian (c. 160-230), "What
    is there in common between Athens and Jerusalem?"
  • (2) Theology elucidated by philosophy Augustine
  • (3) Theology established by Philosophy Thomas
    Aquinas
  • (4) Theology judged by philosophy Deism.
    Modernists.
  • (5) Theology supplied by philosophy Hegel

26
Some 20th Century Philosophies (Doctrines,
42-53)
  • (1) Pragmatism - American, John Dewey, James
    Stuart Mill
  • (2) Existentialism
  • (3) Analytical Philosophy Bertrand Russell,
    Comte
  • (4) Process Theology - Alfred North Whitehead
  • (5) Deconstruction - postmodernity

27
Pragmatism
  • (1) American John Dewey, James Stuart Mill
  • (2) No absolute truth. Truth experiencing
    consequences. Emphasis on the present.
  • (3) Not Is it true that God exists? but Is it
    useful to believe that God exists?

28
Existentialism
  • (1) Origin Soren Kierkegaard Reacting against
    Hegels rational philosophy and Nietzsches
    atheistic emphasis upon the human will.
  • (2) Philosophers De Cartes, Martin Heidegger,
    Jean-Paul Sartre, Karl Jaspers

29
  • (3) Is it? is far more important than What is
    it?
  • Limitation of human senses, Focusing in an
    individual, freedom, subjectivity.
  • (4) Influence to Karl Barth, Emil Brunner, Paul
    Tillich and Rudolph Bultmann

30
Analytical Philosophy
  • (1) Logical Positivism - Bertrand Russell, Comte
  • (2) While traditional Philosophy focuses on What
    is right, What is true, and What is beautiful?,
    A.P. focuses on What do you mean by that?
  • (3) Logical Positivism relying only on
    mathematical data and empirical data.

31
Process Theology
  • (1) Alfred North Whitehead
  • (2) Change is the key to understanding of
    reality, in fact, that change is reality.

32
Deconstruction
  • (1) Derrida. Postmodernity
  • (2) A rejection of any attempt to discover and to
    express an underlying pattern of reality.

33
The 2 Principles in the Use of Philosophy
(Doctrines, 53-8)
  • (1) Revelation rather than philosophy supplies
    the content of our theology.
  • (2) Philosophy is a thought process, a thinking
    activity rather than a body of truths. The
    methodology is supplied by philosophy.

34
The Method of Theology (Doctrines, 59-80)
35
The Theological Scene Today
  • (1) The tendency for theologies to have brief
    life-spans.
  • (2) The demise of great schools of theology as
    such.
  • (3) Disappearance of theological giants.

36
3 Lessons
  • (1) We should beware of too close an
    identification with any current mood in culture.
  • (2) A degree of eclecticism is both possible and
    desirable.
  • (3) It is important to maintain a degree of
    independence in ones approach to doing theology.

37
The Process of Doing Theology (Introducing, 19-22)
38
  • (1) Collection of the Biblical materials.
  • Identify all the relevant biblical passages
    dealing with the topic being investigated and
    then to interpret them very carefully using the
    very best of theological tools and methods.

39
  • (2) Unification of the Biblical materials.
  • This assumes the unity and coherence among
    the several biblical materials and biblical
    witnesses.

40
  • (3) Analysis of meanings of biblical teachings
    Historical meaning
  •     
  • (4) Examination of Historical Treatments     
  • (5) Identification of the Essence of the Doctrine
    Divine meaning

41
  • (6) Illumination from Sources Beyond the Bible
    Natural sciences, particularly geology
    archaeology.
  • (7) Contemporary Expression of the Doctrine.
  • Once we have determined the abiding essence
    or permanent content of the doctrine (divine
    meaning), we must express it in a fashion that is
    reasonably accessible to persons of our day.

42
  •  (8) Development of a Central Interpretive Motif
  •     
  • (9) Stratification of the Topics.
  •       

43
Chapter 2 Contemporizing the Christian Message
44
3 Views on Contemporizing (Introducing, 25-26)
45
  • (1) We should present biblical concepts in
    biblical terminology.

46
  • (2) Portions of the biblical view are obsolete
    and therefore must be eliminated.

47
  • (3) They desire to retain the essential content
    of the biblical teaching and restate it or
    translate it into more modern concepts, to find
    contemporary equivalents for the concepts drawn
    from the biblical era.

48
The Locus of Permanence in Christianity (26-27)
  • The question is how to identify the unchangeable
    factor.
  •  

49
  • (1) Institutional Roman Catholic
  • What is permanent and persistent throughout
    time is the institution of the Catholic church.

50
  • (2) Experience H. E. Fosdick (Social Gospel)
  • Abiding experiences which are expressed in
    changing categories. Idea of evolution.

51
  • (3) Certain actions or a certain type of living
    Kant, Ritschl, W. Rauschenbusch.
  • It is the teachings of Jesus regarding ethical
    living and the kingdom of God.
  • (4) Doctrine J. G. Machen

52
Two approaches to Contemporizing Theology  
  • transformer? or translator?
  •  

53
  • (1) If doctrine is the unchangeable factor in
    Christianity, it should be apparent that we
    advocate the approach of the translators. The
    process, however, is not as simple as finding
    21st c. equivalents for 1st c. concepts.

54
  • (2) Difficulty in translation -  It is impossible
    to find a perfect semantic equivalent in another
    language.

55
  • (3) The contemporizing of the Bible messages is
    often explained as a method used in a teaching of
    languages.
  •  

56
  • (4) Then we should distinguish between the
    permanent or abiding essence of a concept and its
    temporary forms of expression. (ex God dwells in
    heaven ? transcendence of God) 

57
The 5 Criteria of Permanence (28-30)
  • (1) Constancy across cultures
  • (2) Universal setting
  • (3) A recognized permanent factor as a basis
  • (4) Indissoluble link with an essential
    experience
  • (5) Final position within progressive revelation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com