Title: LCS
1LCS CBM Program Implementation
2The LCS Ship design Objectives
- High level of ship mission availability while
performing any one of the three reconfigurable
mission capabilities - Anti Submarine Warfare
- Mine Warfare
- Surface Warfare
- Aggressive Total Ownership Cost (TOC)
- LCS crew of 40 will be approximately 33 the size
of that found aboard comparably sized vessels
3Critical Requirements to Address LCS Sustainment
Challenges
- Failure Prevention During Mission Periods
- Continuous equipment condition and system risk
visibility - Early detection of machinery condition and
predicted risk change - Failure Risk prediction accounting for planned
operating tempo - Advance Planning Scheduling of Pre-Planned Work
to be Performed During In-Port Periods - Define what (specific work action) needs to be
done with at least an 80 confidence factor - Define when ( which availability or period of
convenience) the work needs to be done - Define why (equipment risk to mission) the scope
needs to be done - Limited Ship-board Operators and Maintainers
- Failure prevention and reaction during mission
periods - OPNAV Newly Defined LCS Specific Metrics
- Materiel Reliability
- Materiel Availability
- Mean Down Time
- TOC
4LCS Sustainment Initiative Reliability
Engineering Based CBM
- The required engineering and information
infrastructure to allow execution of LCS
Sustainment CONOPS within a unit level
Reliability Engineering Based CBM Process that
will also - Conform to the published CBM Policies and the
SURFOR CBM Top Level Requirements - Take advantage of Programs of Record developments
related to next generation ICAS and MELS - Take advantage of available GOTS and COTS
technologies supporting the implementation of CBM
- Take advantage of the Distance Support
infrastructure
5LCS CBM Approach Machinery Reliability
Management Systems (MRMS)
- MRMS is an integration of Navy program of record
and COTS technology in order to - Continuously acquire machinery operating and
event data - Continuously assess the current condition of
critical equipment - Estimate the probability of future failure risk,
when operated within a planned operating profile - Provide the machinery current condition,
predicted failure risk probability, to the LCS
Reliability Engineer for maintenance decision
management support - Receive conditions found and work accomplished
information related to the recommended
maintenance action to validate risk models - Compute Sustainment Process Metrics relative to
the selected critical ship-board systems
6Continuous Reliability Management
7Phase 1 Remote Monitoring Risk Prediction
- SYSTEMS
- SSDG
- MPDE
- GTM
- Reduction Combining Gears
- Lube Oil Line Shaft Bearings
- Water Jets
- AC Plants
- MPACs
- Machinery Condition and Predicted Reliability
Assessment for 8 systems - Current Health
- Predicted failure risk (30/60/90/180 days)
- Remote monitoring capability (shore side) through
DS connectivity between on-board data acquisition
and data filtering (DQE) and the Navy Maintenance
Engineering Library Server (MELS) - Establishment of the CLSRN N4R, Reliability
Engineer, position to implement and manage the
CBM Process for LCS sustainment
7
7
8Phase 2 Ship-Board Reliability Management
- Shipboard views of shore-side Phase 1 implemented
MRMS screens (same 8 systems) - Operational recommendations to minimize equipment
degradation - Machinery alignment recommendations
- O-Level maintenance recommendations
- Operating range recommendations
- Onboard application What-if Calculation
Engine - Calculates predicted future machinery failure
risk based on current health, planned maintenance
and mission operating profile - Provides for evaluation of speculative changes to
operational profile (environment, speed, load,
line-up) as it might affect system reliability
8
8
9Concept of Operation
- Material Readiness Assessment
- Equipment failure mode conditions will be
assessed using available data transmitted through
Distance Support - Overall equipment current health (readiness)
assessed as a roll-up of failure mode conditions - Failure Risk Forecasting
- Equipment failure mode predicted risk (residual
useful life) will be assessed using current
health, historical performance and duty cycle
data and forecasted for 30/60/90/120 day span - Mission Risk Assessment
- Based on the predicted failure mode risk levels
at the prescribed time span, an assessment
against Mission Risk will be estimated for the
applicable systems
10(No Transcript)
11Phase 3 Reliability Engineering Data
Integration System (REDI) Using Enterprise
Service Bus
- Provides framework to automate the Sustainment
Process Work-Flow to improve process
effectiveness and reduce cost within manning
constraints - Support feedback loop to validate/update
diagnostics and risk prediction algorithms
through information from conditions found and
maintenance actions taken - Predictive risk based logistics model for
effective advance planning, using HME system
reliability analysis results - Links to applicable Navy and ISP systems to
automate data sharing and continuous process
validation (metrics) and improvement
11
11
12LCS Machinery Condition Reliability Displays
13LCS Machinery Condition Reliability Displays
14The Reliability Engineering Based CBM
- Web enabled application to facilitate distance
support - Extensive HME data collection
- Allows for a shift from periodically scheduled
Preventive Maintenance (PM), ICMP, and failure
based Corrective Maintenance to a maintenance
strategy based on predicted machinery failure
risk - Reduces the dependence on shipboard manpower and
will support achieving the LCS design objectives
of - Increased equipment readiness through a higher
systems availability gained by more effective
availability planning prior to mission operating
periods - Reduced cost of O-Level and shore side on-shelf
spares and maintenance tasks since a better
awareness of equipment health at all times allows
for very effective logistic planning
15CBM Value to the Fleet
- Will provide the decision management support for
execution of effective LCS life cycle sustainment - Will provide the means to establish more accurate
budget forecasts - Ship operators will achieve
- Reduced dependence on shipboard manpower through
more effective utilization of Distance Support - Operator awareness of impending equipment risks
to prevent cascading and collateral failures - Increased equipment readiness gained by more
effective availability planning prior to mission
operating periods