Title: Truss Design Project
1Truss Design Project
- Kevin LaBeau
- Thao Lai
- EGR 209
- Dr. Reffeor
- October 27, 2003
2Problem Statement
- Apply Math and Science skills to
- Create a 24m bridge in West Point Bridge Designer
(WPBD) - Costs around 1500-2500
- Compute tensile and compressive strengths
- Calculate internal forces for the bridge
- Calculate the factors of safety
- Find a standard hex bolt to withstand the forces
3 Final Truss Bridge Design
Results and Analysis
4 Tensile and Compressive Strengths
- Strengths related to
- Material High-Strength Low-Alloy Steel
- Size of member
- Solid Bars Vs. Hollow Tubes
5- Tensile and Compressive Strengths
Member Member Size (mm) Length (m) Compressive Strength (kg) Tensile Strength (kg)
AB 170 x 170 x 8 4.0 1235 1699
AH 65 x 65 5.5 77.20 1385
BC 170 x 170 x 8 4.0 1235 1699
BH 120 x 120 x 6 2.9 647.4 896.7
CD 170 x 170 x 8 4.0 1235 1699
CH 120 x 120 x 6 4.3 463.4 896.7
CI 120 x 120 x 6 4.3 464.4 896.7
DE 170 x 170 x 8 4.0 1235 1699
DI 120 x 120 x 6 4.3 464.4 896.7
DJ 120 x 120 x 6 4.3 464.4 896.7
EF 170 x 170 x 8 4.0 1235 1699
EJ 120 x 120 x 6 4.3 464.4 896.7
EK 120 x 120 x 6 4.3 463.4 896.7
FG 170 x 170 x 8 4.0 1235 1699
FK 120 x 120 x 6 2.9 647.4 896.7
GK 65 x 65 5.5 77.20 1385
HI 65 x 65 5.3 81.40 1385
IJ 65 x 65 4.0 145.3 1385
JK 65 x 65 5.3 81.40 1385
6 Self-weight of truss members
W ?s Am L where, ?s the density of the
material Am the cross-sectional area of the
member L the length of the member
Sample Calculation for Member AB
7 Self-Weight of Members
Member Self-Weight (kN)
AB 1.601
AH 1.775
BC 1.601
BH 0.592
CD 1.601
CH 0.885
CI 0.883
DE 1.601
DI 0.883
DJ 0.883
EF 1.601
EJ 0.883
EK 0.885
FG 1.601
FK 0.592
GK 1.775
HI 1.727
IJ 1.294
JK 1.727
8- Total factored dead load on any joint
Load factor 1.25 for self weight given by WPBD
9 Sample Calculations for Joint A
Member identification
10 Dead load diagram
11 Situation 1
12 Situation 2
13 Situation 3
14 Member Forces (T) Tension (C)
Compression All forces in kN
Member AB AH BC BH CD CH CI
Situation 1 880.0 (C) 1017 (T) 785.0 (C) 360.8 (C) 701.1 (C) 11.01 (C) 196.2 (C)
Situation 2 1051 (C) 1214 (T) 967.0 (C) 318.6 (C) 940.0 (C) 143.6 (C) 290.3 (C)
Situation 3 930.2(C) 1075 (T) 892.4 (C) 143.8 (C) 1045 (C) 286.6 (C) 139.5 (C)
DE DI DJ EF EJ EK FG FK
600.1 (C) 28.28 (T) 186.4 (C) 333.8 (C) 67.03 (T) 307.5 (C) 296.0 (C) 143.8 (T)
786.2 (C) 61.26 (T) 265.5 (C) 454.4 (C) 110.4 (T) 366.7 (C) 416.5 (C) 143.8 (T)
950.7 (C) 96.96 (C) 298.5 (C) 574.9 (C) 107.6 (T) 425.9 (C) 537.1 (C) 143.8 (T)
GK HI IJ JK Ax Ay Gy
342.0 (T) 807.7 (T) 687.8 (T) 578.8 (T) 5.10E-14 748.5 241.6
481.3 (T) 1096.0 (T) 911.2 (T) 747.5 (T) 5.56E-14 678.6 311.4
620.6 (T) 1131 (T) 1091 (T) 916.2 (T) 8.44E-14 608.8 381.2
15 Structural Adequacy
Member Factor of Factor of Factor of
Safety Safety Safety
Situation 1 Situation 2 Situation 3
AB 1.403 1.175 1.328
AH 1.362 1.141 1.288
BC 1.573 1.277 1.384
BH 1.794 2.032 4.502
CD 1.762 1.314 1.182
CH 42.089 3.227 1.617
CI 2.367 1.600 3.329
DE 2.058 1.571 1.299
DI 31.708 14.638 4.790
DJ 2.491 1.749 1.556
EF 3.700 2.718 2.148
EJ 13.378 8.122 8.334
EK 1.507 1.264 1.088
FG 4.172 2.965 2.299
FK 6.236 6.236 6.236
GK 4.050 2.878 2.232
HI 1.715 1.264 1.225
IJ 2.014 1.520 1.269
JK 2.393 1.853 1.512
- Average Factor of Safety
- 4.122
16 Bolt Size
- Bolt grade 10.9
- Tensile strength 1040 MPa
- Shear stress .5tensile strength
- 520MPa
- minimum bolt diameter 55mm
- standard bolt diameter 56mm
where, V the shear force A the
cross-sectional area of the bolt
17 Bridge Costs (minus cost of bolts)
Type of Cost Product Cost Calculation Cost
Material Cost High Strength Steel Bars (851.2 kg) x (0.48 per kg) 408.60
High Strength Steel Tubes (1647.1 kg) x (0.72 per kg) 1,185.91
Connection Cost (11 Joints) x (25.00 per Joint) 275.00
Product Cost 8 - 120 x 120 x 6 High-Strength (100.00 per Product) 100.00
Low-Alloy Steel Tubes
6 - 170 x 170 x 8 High-Strength (100.00 per Product) 100.00
Low-Alloy Steel Tubes
5 - 65 x 65 High-Strength (100.00 per Product) 100.00
Low-Alloy Steel Bars
Total Cost 2,169.51
18 Geometric Stability
Discussion
- Triangle most stable truss formation
- evenly distributes forces through members
- vertical forces unevenly distributed on the
square. - squares can also pivot and collapse
19 Geometric Stability
- Arches
- High resistance to the forces that will put
stress on the bridge - The force will act in the direction of the member
and on the joint itself - Stronger bridge structure smaller members
lower costs
20Conclusion
- Designs based on mathematical and physical
concepts - Triangles are stronger than squares.
- Arches evenly distribute forces for more
stability. - Real life issues costs materials account for
the design process - Important to keep costs at a minimum, but
essential to never compromise safety - Engineers apply physical and mathematical models
to design and build projects suitable for lives
to use. - While working on this project, Kevin understands
why - SHEER STRESS Thao