Title: The Value of Reflective Wall Coatings
1The Value of Reflective Wall Coatings
- André Desjarlais
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- 17 February 2011
2Presentation summary
- Is energy efficiency in buildings and walls
important? Some statistics - What research is going on to measure energy
benefits of Cool walls? - What are the energy savings of this technology?
3Energy is the defining challenge of our time
Global energy consumptionwill increase 50 by
2030
- The major driver for
- Climate change
- National security
- Economic competitiveness
- Quality of life
- Incremental changes to existing technologies
cannot meet this challenge - Transformational advancesin energy
technologiesare needed - Critically dependent on the best science and
technology
3 Managed by UT-Battellefor the Department of
Energy
4North American countries can improve their
efficiency
Norway
Sweden
United States
Canada
Italy
Japan
Czech Republic
Russia
Chile
China
Source Energy Information Administration and
United Nations Statistics Division
5Improvements in energy efficiency of the economy
have been essential to the stabilization of U.S.
energy consumption . .
Estimated energy savings
Non-hydro renewables
Quadrillion Btu
Nuclear
Natural gas
Hydro
Petroleum
Wood
Coal
Source Energy Information Administration, U.S.
Bureau of Economic Analysis
6Buildings energy use is large and growing
40 of U.S. Primary Energy Consumption (39 of
U.S. Carbon Emissions)
Industry 377 MMTC (25)
Buildings 658 MMTC (43)
Source 2007 Buildings Energy Data Book. Tables
1.1.3, 1.2.3, 1.3.3
7The building envelope is the key!!
8Quiz
With Comfort and Energy Efficiency in mind, which
car do you select to drive during the summer?
9Proof of concept
10Solar energy spectrum
11Critical properties
Reflectance (rsolar) Emittance (eIR)
12rsolar and eIR are both very important!
Total Solar Irradiation
Convection
Net Infrared Radiation
hair(tair-ts)
rsolar It Reflected
It
eIRDR
with DRs(Ts4-Tsurr4 )
(asolarIt Absorbed)
Net Heat Flux into Building
13Camouflage invisible to night vision
Near Infrared Film
Conventional Film
14Conventional vs. infrared pigments
15Higher reflectance without sacrificing color
choice
Regal White
Rawhide
Slate Blue
Standard SR .67 Cool SR .72
Standard SR .47 Cool SR .56
Standard SR .21 Cool SR .33
Slate Bronze
Brick Red
Charcoal Gray
Hartford Green
Standard SR .08 Cool SR .26
Standard SR .14 Cool SR .28
Standard SR .11 Cool SR .28
Standard SR .25 Cool SR .30
16Solar energy spectrum
17Overview scope of work
- Compare thermal performance of walls with cool
(high infrared reflectance) and standard colors
18ORNL test site
- IR coating on right stud space and upper half of
middle Non-IR coating on rest except for strip
of uncoated primer at bottom
19ORNL test site
- Data acquisition continuous for three years
- Check consistency of data with program to
estimate wall properties from temperature and
heat flux measurements. Data very consistent from
month to month - Behavior of solar radiation control on vertical
walls more complicated than low-slope roofs.
Difficult to generalize simply
20ORNL test site Non vs IR -- summer day
Non Outside
Wall Solar
Non Inside
Non Heat Flux
IR Outside
IR Heat Flux
IR Inside
Air
Heat Flux,
2
Solar/100
1
Temper- ature (F)
Btu/(hft²)
0
- Air temp warmer but wall solar lower vs 4/16/05
- Behavior of Non and IR again same at night
- Peak temps again consistent with coatings over
primer
-1
130
110
-2
90
70
50
30
24
0
4
8
12
16
20
Hours into July 25, 2005
21Model for wall behavior
- Seek a model that can be generalized to give
results for whole buildings - Have done extensive validation of a model in DOE
2.2 for a 1100 ft² ranch house
Conventional Wood-Framed Construction
- Heat/cool with heat pump 68F winter 76F
summer size heat pump for climate - Occupy with 3 people Building America energy
use profiles
22Model for wall behavior
- To validate model, generate climatic data from
ORNL weather station records for year of test - Use properties of wall materials along with
construction details for test section
Texcote coatings with different solar reflectance
Fiberglass batt (R-11)
Measured temperatures
Gypsum wallboard
Stucco (1 in.)
Measured heat flux
Non-vented air space
Extra gypsum layer (only for validation)
Oriented strand board
23Model generalizations
- Building America Performance Analysis Resources
at http//www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/building_a
merica/pa_resources.html gives energy use
profiles for three occupants (3 BR home). Choose
to heat and cool with air-to-air heat pump (76F
cooling 68F heating no setup or setback) - Choose seven different climates to show response
of typical house to cooling and mixed climates of
interest
4500
CDD65 (F-day)
4000
HDD65 (F-day)
3500
Average Daily Solar (Btu/ft²)
3000
2500
2000
- Cities arranged by decreasing cooling degree
days
1500
1000
500
0
Miami
Phoenix
Las Vegas
Richmond
Knoxville
Bakersfield
Sacramento
24Model generalizations
- IR reflective coating on conventional walls saves
cooling energy. Savings are 4 to 9 compared to
non-IR reflecting walls
6000
Annual Electricity for Cooling (kWh)
Walls Wood Studs R-11 Batts
4.2
Non Walls
5000
5.0
IR Walls
4000
Savings for IR Walls
5.3
3000
6.2
2000
7.6
7.1
9.0
1000
0
Miami
Phoenix
Knoxville
Las Vegas
Richmond
Bakersfield
Sacramento
25Model generalizations
- IR reflective coating on CMU walls shows larger
savings of cooling energy. Savings are 6 to 13
compared to cooling energy with non-IR reflecting
walls
6000
Annual Electricity for Cooling (kWh)
Walls 8 in. CMU R-5 Foam
6.4
6.9
Non Walls
5000
IR Walls
4000
Savings for IR Walls
6.7
3000
8.6
2000
11.0
10.4
13.0
1000
0
Miami
Phoenix
Knoxville
Las Vegas
Richmond
Bakersfield
Sacramento
26Project summary
- Full year of ORNL data validated DOE 2.2 model
- Complexity of real wall applications (different
orientations, shading and construction) makes
generalization very difficult - DOE 2.2 whole building annual energy estimates
for ranch house show that IR reflecting pigments
save 4 to 13 of cooling energy
27The Value of Reflective Wall Coatings