Title: Information Feedback Family
1Information Feedback Family
- Intrinsic Feedback
- Extrinsic Feedback
2Intrinsic Feedback
- internal feedback that is received during and
after a movement is executed - e.g., Proprioceptive Feedback
- Muscle Spindles
- Golgi Tendon Organs
- Joint Receptors
3Extrinsic Feedback
- usually augmented feedback provided during or
after a response from an individual or device - Knowledge of Performance
- Knowledge of Results
4Knowledge of Results (KR)
- Is augmented, verbal or verbalizable information
that refers to the attainment of an environmental
goal. (Did the response accomplish the intended
movement goal?) - e.g., the ball rolled two inches to the right of
the pin
5Knowledge of Performance (KP)
- Is augmented information that refers to the
actual movement pattern that produced an action.
Information is received about the actual
performance execution of the movement, often
presented in relation to a standard of
correctness. - e.g., your arm was not extended when you hit
that overhead
6Knowledge of Results How Important?
- Focus of attention work
- Wulf Weigelt, 1997 Wulf, Hoss Prinz, 1998
Wulf, Lauterbach, Toole, in press - Erroneous KR
- Buekers, Magill, Hall (1992)
7Bilodeau, Bilodeau, Shumsky (1959)
- In terms of absolute error, performance improved
(particularly in earlier trials) only after
trials with KR were provided. - On trials following KR presentation, there was no
performance effect due to the relative frequency.
(trials without KR showed no performance
increase) - Concluded that learning is related to the
absolute frequency not the relative frequency
of KR.
8Fading of KR
- Is a schedule which provides feedback (KR) more
frequently early in practice, and then gradually
reduces the number of trials for which feedback
is provided
9Fading KR
Absolute Error
Acquisition Trials
Retention
10Summary KR
- Is a format of presenting knowledge of results in
which a predetermined number of trials is
completed before knowledge of results is
presented for that set
11Summary-KR
- SUMMARY T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 KR1 KR2 KR3 KR4 KR5
- IMMEDIATE T1 KR1 T2 KR2 T3 KR3 T4 KR4 T5 KR5
12Gable, Shea, Wright (1991)
Absolute Constant Error (N)
SUMMARY CONDITION
13Schmidt et al. (1990)
0 deg
180 deg
14Optimum Summary Length
KR 5/5
KR1/1
Score
KR10/10
KR15/15
ACQUISITION TRIAL BLOCK
RETENTION
15Bandwidth KR
- Involves setting some criterion range of errors
within which knowledge of results (KR) is not
provided and outside of which KR is provided
16Bandwidth KR (10)
KR Presented
360 ms
400 ms
No KR Presented
440 ms
KR Presented
17Bandwidth KR (Sherwood, 1988)
- With larger bandwidths there is a improvement in
consistency (VE) - With larger bandwidths have a reduction in
relative frequency of KR
18Temporal Components of KR
Inter-Response Interval
KR n
Trial n
Trial n1
KR-delay
Post KR delay
19KR Trials Delay
Trials-Delay 1 T1 T2 KR1 T3 KR2 T4 KR3 T5
KR4.......... Immediate T1 KR1 T2 KR2 T3
KR3 T4 KR4 T5..........
20Lavery Suddon (1962)
Total Error (cm)
Acquisition Trial Block
Retention
21Guidance Hypothesis Negative Effects
- Subjects may become reliant on the guiding
properties of KR - Eliminate the need to process a variety of task
related cues - Encourages trial to trial instability