OVERVIEW OF LABOR LAW - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

OVERVIEW OF LABOR LAW

Description:

OVERVIEW OF LABOR LAW Labor Law United States Private Sector in the U.S. National Labor Laws Public Sector in the U.S. State Labor Laws Canada Provincial labor laws ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:125
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: Lab2150
Learn more at: https://www.msu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: OVERVIEW OF LABOR LAW


1
OVERVIEW OF LABOR LAW
2
Labor Law
  • United States
  • Private Sector in the U.S.
  • National Labor Laws
  • Public Sector in the U.S.
  • State Labor Laws
  • Canada
  • Provincial labor laws govern labor relations
    except for certain industries

3
Private Sector
  • National Labor Laws in United States
  • National Labor Relations Act
  • In general, covers all private sector except
    railroads and airlines
  • Will discuss coverage of law later
  • Railway Labor Act
  • Covers railroad and airline industry

4
Basic Principles of Private Sector Labor Law in
United States
  • Creates Basic Structure of U.S. Industrial
    Relations System
  • Basic Principles
  • Decentralized System
  • Employee Choice (with constraints)
  • Majority Rule
  • Exclusive Representation
  • Written, Legally Enforceable Contracts
  • Similar principles govern Canadian labor law

5
Decentralized System
  • System is organized by bargaining units may be
  • Firm
  • Plant/Facility
  • Craft
  • Department
  • Multi-Firm
  • if all parties agree
  • construction, longshoring, trucking
  • Representation continues in the unit, even if
    employees change over time

6
Employee Choice
  • Employee Choice
  • Employees in a unit choose whether they wish a
    union (labor organization) to represent them
  • Which union will represent them
  • No official enterprise unions
  • No union registration with government
  • No imposed representation
  • No presumption that employees should be
    represented by a union
  • Procedures for employee deunionizing at specified
    intervals

7
Majority Rule
  • Choice of union or or no union is by a majority
    of employees in unit
  • If majority select representation, employees in
    unit are represented by a union
  • If majority do not select representation,
    employees in unit are not represented by a union

8
Exclusive Representation
  • If a union is chosen by a majority of employees,
    it represents all employees in the unit, whether
    they voted for union or not
  • Employer must negotiate with that union
  • No other union may represent those employees

9
Collective Agreements
  • Almost always written
  • Legally enforceable in court
  • Usually enforced by final and binding arbitration

10
Basic Legal Framework (cont.)
  • Unfair Labor Practices
  • Bargaining
  • Limited to terms and conditions of employment in
    U.S.
  • Broader in Canada
  • Outcomes determined by economic strength and,
    occasionally use of economic weapons
  • Administration by an administrative agency
  • NLRB in U.S.
  • Comparable bodies in Canadian

11
THREE DISTINCT ERAS
  • Pro-Employer Tilt 1806-1926/35
  • Pro-Union Tilt 1926/1935-1947
  • Government as Umpire? 1947- Present

12
Pro-Employer Tilt 1806-1926/35
  • 1806-42 Conspiracy Doctrine Established
  • Cordwainers Case in 1806
  • Any Combination to Raise Wages Unlawful
  • 1842-1932
  • Conspiracy Doctrine Rejected (Commonwealth v.
    Hunt)
  • A pro-union exception to the generally
    pro-employer period
  • Focus on Tactics
  • Through Early 1870s - Damage Suits Against Unions

13
Pro-Employer Tilt 1806-1926/35(continued)
  • Starting in 1870s - Injunction
  • Impairs union activity at its inception
  • Generally enjoined picketing at or near the
    employer's place of business
  • Anti-Trust Laws
  • Sherman Act (1890) prohibited combinations and
    conspiracies in restraint of trade
  • Union activity construed as a combination in
    restraint of trade

14
Pro-Employer Tilt 1806-1926/35(continued)
  • Clayton Act (1914) attempt to exclude union
    activity from anti-trust
  • Narrow interpretation (Duplex case)
  • unions permitted to carry out legitimate
    objective
  • actions in restraint of trade not legitimate
  • No protection for workers from employer
    retaliation for union activity
  • No vehicle for formal recognition of unions
  • Strikes were generally recognition strikes
  • Brandeis in dissent in Duplex case I have come
    to the conclusion that both the common law of a
    state and a statute of the United States declare
    the right of industrial combatants to push their
    struggle to the limits of the justification of
    self-interest . . . (254 U.S. 443, 488)

15
Clayton Act of 1014
  • Sec. 17. - Antitrust laws not applicable to labor
    organizations
  • The labor of a human being is not a commodity or
    article of commerce. Nothing contained in the
    antitrust laws shall be construed to forbid the
    existence and operation of labor . . .
    organizations, instituted for the purposes of
    mutual help, . . . or to forbid or restrain
    individual members of such organizations from
    lawfully carrying out the legitimate objects
    thereof nor shall such organizations, or the
    members thereof, be held or construed to be
    illegal combinations or conspiracies in restraint
    of trade, under the antitrust laws

16
Pro-Union Tilt 1926/1935-1947
  • Railway Labor Act of 1926
  • covered labor relations in rails
  • developed by agreement of carriers and rail
    unions
  • rail strikes of concern due to impact of strikes
    on commerce
  • Created a National Mediation Board
  • Recognition
  • Settlement of Disputes

17
Pro-Union Tilt 1926/1935-1947(continued)
  • Norris La-Guardia Act of 1932
  • Removed Authority from Federal Courts to Issue
    Injunctions in Labor Disputes
  • Many states passed Little Norris La-Guardia
    Act
  • National Industrial Recovery Act (1933)
  • Section 7(a)
  • Participation in Program contingent on
    recognizing rights of employees to organize
  • Difficulty in enforcement
  • Limited to Participants

18
Pro-Union Tilt 1926/1935-1947(continued)
  • National Labor Relations (Wagner) Act of 1935
  • Provides structure of IR system
  • Still in Existence Today
  • Basic Principles
  • Procedures to determine whether ees wish to be
    represented by a labor organization (union)
  • Exclusive Representation
  • Unfair Labor Practices
  • National Labor Relations Board

19
Pro-Union Tilt 1926/1935-1947(continued)
  • Structure of Wagner Act
  • Section 1 - Findings and Policies
  • Section 2 - Definitions
  • Employer, Employee, Labor Organization
  • Section 3 - Creates a National Labor Relations
    Board
  • at time 3 members, 3 yr terms, appt. by President
    with consent of Senate
  • Section 4,5 - NLRB pay and location
  • Section 6 - Rule Making Authority

20
Pro-Union Tilt 1926/1935-1947(continued)
  • Wagner Act (continued)
  • Section 7 - source of employee rights
  • self organization
  • form, join, assist labor orgs
  • bargain collectively through reps
  • other concerted activities for mutual aid or
    protection

21
Pro-Union Tilt 1926/1935-1947(continued)
  • Wagner Act (continued)
  • Section 8 - Unfair Labor Practices by Employers
  • 8(1) no interference, restraint, or coercion
  • 8(2) no domination of labor organization
  • 8(3) no discrimination in regard to employment
    for purpose of encouraging or discouraging
    membership
  • 8(4) no discrimination for involvement in NLRB
    procedures
  • 8(5) may not refuse to bargain collectively with
    representative of ees

22
Pro-Union Tilt 1926/1935-1947(continued)
  • Wagner Act (continued)
  • Section 9
  • Selection of Representatives (through procedures
    determined by Board)
  • Appropriate Unit (determined by Board)
  • Section 10
  • Prevention of UFLPs
  • Board may issue complaints, compel evidence,
    decide cases, and petition courts for enforcement
  • Section 11
  • NLRB has investigatory authority

23
Pro-Union Tilt 1926/1935-1947(continued)
  • Wagner Act (continued)
  • Section 12 - Fines for impairing Board Action
  • Section 13 - Right to Strike

24
Summary of Wagner Act
  • Pro Union
  • Focused on
  • Employee Rights to organize
  • Employer Actions that may impair that right

25
Government as Umpire? 1947- Present
  • Taft-Hartley Act of 1947
  • Addressed many employer concerns about Wagner Act
  • What did T-H do?

26
Government as Umpire? 1947- Present (continued)
  • Increased size of NLRB from 3 to 5 members
    (Section 3)
  • Board may delegate authority to 3-member panel
    (quorum)
  • Created a General Counsel as an independent
    prosecutorial arm of NLRB (Section 3)
  • Provided employees with the right to refrain from
    union activity (Section 7)

27
Government as Umpire? 1947- Present (continued)
  • Created a series of union UFLPs
  • Prohibition on Restraining or Coercing employees
    or employers
  • Limitations on secondary activity (pressure on
    employees of uninvolved employers)
  • Prohibitions on featherbedding (pay for no work)
  • Prohibited hot cargo agreements
  • Outlawed closed shop
  • Permitted union shop if employer and union agree
  • States permitted to enact right-to-work
    statutes (Sec. 14b)
  • Permitted Employer free speech (Sec. 8c)

28
Government as Umpire? 1947- Present (continued)
  • Defined duty to bargain
  • Defined evidentiary obligations of Board
  • Made elections the preferred method of
    determining representation
  • Placed some constraints on Boards unit
    determination authority
  • Excluded supervisors from coverage of the Act
  • Created a Federal Mediation and Conciliation
    Service
  • National Emergency Dispute Provisions
  • imperil the national health or safety

29
Government as Umpire? 1947- Present (continued)
  • Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of
    1958
  • Main purpose was to regulate internal union
    affairs
  • Amended NLRA
  • placed limits on recognitional/organizational
    picketing by unions
  • 8(b)(7)
  • closed loopholes in secondary activity
    provisions
  • -8(b)(4)

30
Government as Umpire? 1947- Present (continued)
  • Health Care Amendments of 1974
  • Brought nonprofit health care institutions under
    the NLRA
  • Special measures to reduce possibility of strikes

31
Procedures in Board Cases
  • Charge (C) Cases
  • charge to Board
  • Regional office
  • investigation by a field examiner
  • complaint if charge has merit
  • No complaint issued if charge has no merit
  • hearing before ALJ (formerly TX)
  • To Board
  • To Court of Appeals
  • To SC, if Court grants cert.

32
Procedures in Board Cases (continued)
  • Representation (R) Cases
  • To regional director
  • Will order an election if there is a showing of
    substantial interest
  • 30 of employees in a unit
  • Addresses unit dispute (if any)
  • Settlement
  • Hearing in front of field examiner with decision
    by regional director on behalf of Board
  • No direct appeal to courts, but employer may
    refuse to bargain if employees choose
    representation
  • Election
  • May be delayed if there is a UFLP charge
  • Regional office may entertain objections to
    outcome based on conduct during election

33
Unsuccessful Attempts to Amend NLRA
  • Advocated by Unions, Opposed by Employers
  • 1975 Common Situs Picketing
  • 1977-78 Rights to Organize, faster elections,
    increase penalties on employers
  • 1990 and 1993 Ban employers from hiring perm.
    replacements during strikes
  • Advocated by Employers, Opposed by Unions
  • 1996 Ease restrictions on employee involvement
    programs

34
Current Bills
  • Advocated by unions, opposed by employers
  • Employee Free Choice Act
  • Certification without elections
  • First contract mediation and arbitration
  • Priority handling to discharge cases
  • Current co-sponsorship (as of August, 2006)
  • 43 senators, 215 representatives
  • Advocated by employers, opposed by unions
  • Secret Ballot Protection Act
  • Require a majority vote by employees in a
    bargaining unit to establish a collective
    bargaining relationship
  • Current co-sponsorship (as of August, 2006)
  • 6 senators, 97 representatives
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com