Title: CubeSat Design for Solar Sail Testing Platform
1CubeSat Design for Solar Sail Testing Platform
- Phillip Hempel Paul Mears
- Daniel Parcher Taffy Tingley
December 5, 2001
The University of Texas at Austin
2Presentation Outline
Introduction
Tracking
Electronics
Structure Deployment
Propulsion
Orbital Simulation
Budget
Conclusion
3Project Goal
- Design a Test Platform for Solar Sail Propulsion
Technology - Measure thrust
- Measure solar sail efficiency
- Model satellite orbit
4Constraints
- CubeSat Prescribed Constraints
- 10cm sided cube
- 1 Kg weight
- Timing system to delay power-on
- Space-flown or approved materials
- Adopted Constraints (for simplicity and
reliability) - No attitude control
- No powered systems (except required timer)
- No communications systems
5Laser Ranging
- Information needed for thrust analysis
- Orbital position for a significant portion of the
satellites orbit - Rotation rates and angles over that time
- A corner cube reflector (CCR) consists of
three orthogonal mirrors that reflect light back
to source
6Laser Ranging
- McDonald Observatory Laser Ranging (MLRS)
- Satellite visibility sufficient
- Can provide position to within 1 centimeter
7Laser Ranging Specifics
- Four CCRs will define sail plane
- Defines position and attitude
- Double sided glass arrays with 3mm corner cubes
(custom design) - Design impact
- Volume and weight
- Laser pulse force 9.5e-26 N
8Electronics
- Rocket Data Acquisition System
- Input - 10.7 V at 9-10 mA
- Output- time coordinated voltages
- Three UltraLife Lithium Ion Polymer Batteries
- Output- 3.8V for 530 mAh
- Thermal Analysis
9Presentation Outline
Introduction
Tracking
Electronics
Structure Deployment
Propulsion
Orbital Simulation
Budget
Conclusion
10Mechanical SystemsPhillip Hempel
Structural Design and Solar Sail Deployment
11Satellite Components
- Frame/ Corner Cube Reflectors
- Satellite Components
- Kill Switch
- Timer
- Sail
- Capillaries
- Inflation Capsule
- Hardening Strips
12Mechanical Overview
- Satellite Components
- Weight and Volume Budgets
- Component Placement
- Solar Sail Deployment / Model
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15Satellite Assembly
16Sequence of Events
- CubeSat Released / Deactivate Kill Switch
- Timer Waiting Period
- Unlock Side Panels
- Begin Inflation
- Inflation Ends / Rigidization Occurs
- Final shape
17PropulsionTaffy Tingley
Solar Sail Design and Finite Element Simulation
18Solar Sail Description
19Solar Sail Material
20Solar Sail Configuration
21Finite Element Model Configuration
22FE Test 1Direct Exposure Neglect Coupled
Thermal Stresses
23Test 2Direct Exposure Include Thermal
Stresses
24Test 3Asymmetric Thrust
25Test 4Unevenly Distributed Load
26Test 5Unevenly Distributed Load
27FE Conclusions
- Thermal Loading Not Worth Cost
- Hardening Strip Corrections
- All Deflections are Reasonable
- FE Model Can Be Used for Future Analysis
- Recommendation Crack Propagation
28Orbital Trajectory SimulationPaul Mears
29Simulation Topics
- Review Four Body Problem with Thrust
- Review Initial Conditions
- Rotating Thrust Vector
- Umbra and Penumbra
- Results Orbits
- Measuring Thrust with Observations
and Simulations
30Four Body Problem with Thrust
- Physics Models
- Newtons Law of Gravitation
- Earth orbit perturbed by the Sun and the Moon
- Solar Radiation Pressure
- Generates thrust based on distance from Sun and
sail attitude - Other Orbital Mechanics
- Initial Conditions, Sun and Moon Position Vectors
31Initial Conditions
- CubeSat requires low altitudes due to cost
- Perigee
- LEO altitude
- Highest velocity
- Apogee
- GEO altitude
- Lowest velocity
- Result Highly eccentric orbit (e0.74)
32Rotating Thrust Vector
- Thrust acts along the sail normal vector.
- Sail normal is rotated in three dimensions.
33Umbra and Penumbra
- When the sail enters the Umbra, thrust is zero
- Penumbra effects are ignored
34Results Thrust
- Thrust Generated by Solar Radiation Pressure is
35Results - Orbit1 No Rotation
36Orbit 3 Rotating Thrust Vector
37Orbit 4 Rotating Thrust Vector
38Orbit 5 Rotating Thrust Vector
39Measuring Thrust
- Purpose of simulation is to compare simulated
orbit to observed orbit - Two possible situations
- Thrust accurately predicted by sail manufacturer.
- Observed orbit equals simulated orbit
- Thrust generated is different from prediction.
- Comparison of simulated and observed orbits to
determine thrust
40Comparison Technique
- Make several observations of position and
attitude - Calculate orbit and sail rotation rate
- Simulate orbit for known orbital elements and
rotating sail normal - Extract thrust vector from equations of motion
- Calculate the magnitude of the thrust vector
41Presentation Outline
Introduction
Tracking
Electronics
Structure Deployment
Propulsion
Orbital Simulation
Budget
Conclusion
42Budget Summary
- Personnel Costs 15,000
- Materials Electronics 06,500
- Testing (CalPoly) 02,000
- Launch 50,000
- Total 73,500
43Conclusion
- PaperSat has developed a picosatellite design for
the CubeSat program - Design will test solar sail propulsion technology
- Design will not incorporate attitude control
- Position, acceleration, and orientation will be
measured from ground stations - Solar sail will be reflective on both sides with
tear strips, hardening strips and inflation
capillaries - Orbital simulation provides prediction of
satellite orbit for thrust determination - http//www.ae.utexas.edu/design/papersat/
44Acknowledgements
- Dr. Wallace Fowler
- Dr. Cesar Ocampo
- Dr. Eric Becker
- Meredith Fitzpatrick
- Previous CubeSat Design Groups
45Questions