Title: Dam Safety in the 21st Century
1The Reality of Risk
Dam Safety in the 21st Century
- PFMA as a Dam Safety Tool Joe Ehasz
- FERC Regulator Perspective Doug Johnson
- USACE Perspective Doug Boyer
- Owner Perspective - Bill Christman
Portland, OR February 19, 2013
2The Reality of Risk
Dam Safety in the 21st Century
The PFMA Process as a Dam Safety Tool
Joe Ehasz URS Energy
Construction, Inc
Portland, OR February 19, 2013
3The Reality of Risk
Potential Failure Mode Analysis (PFMA)
- The process utilized to determine the Potential
Failure Modes - pertinent to the dam under investigation
- Essentially asks the Question
- How could this dam fail
- What happens if it does
- Are the identified potential failure modes
recognized - What actions can be taken to reduce the dam
failure likelihood
4The Reality of Risk
- Presentation of Three Actual Dam Failures that
- Were scheduled to have PFMA performed
- Failed prior to PFMA
- Failure could have been avoided if PFMA process
had been done
5The Reality of Risk
- Three Actual Dam Failures
- Swift 2 Forebay Dam Washington - Failed
April 21,2002 - Silver Lake Michigan - Failed May 14, 2003
- Taum Sauk Upper Reservoir Dam Missouri -
Failed Dec. 14, 2005
6The Reality of Risk
Swift No. 2 Hydroelectric Project
Forebay Dam Failure
April 21, 2002
7The Reality of Risk
Swift No.2 Hydro Project
- Constructed - 1957 1958
- Length of water supply canal 3 miles
- Impoundment - 2400 ac-ft
- Embankment height in forebay 93 ft
- Max water depth 53 ft
8The Reality of Risk
Operating History
- Considerable leakage upon first filling
- Cracks and sinkholes in canal bottom
- Mud boils below canal levels
- Portions of dike removed and filter placed in
canal bottom - No further distress until 2002 when failure
occurred
9The Reality of Risk
- Sinkholes developed in forebay at 300 AM
- Blowout followed at toe of embankment
- Orifice expanded upstream
- Embankment breached at about 630 AM
- Flooding destroyed powerhouse
- Discharge contained in the lower reservoir
10The Reality of Risk
April 21, 2002 Failure
11The Reality of Risk
- Sinkholes developed in forebay at 300 AM
- Blowout followed at toe of embankment
- Orifice expanded upstream
- Embankment breached at about 630 AM
- Flooding destroyed powerhouse
- Discharge contained in lower reservoir
12The Reality of Risk
Potential Things That Could Have Been Done to
Recognize the Problem?
- Periodic (annual) draining and inspection of the
forebay and canal - Install piezometers beneath the basalt to
measure pressures - Develop a complete water balance to establish
the total loss of canal water - More study and critical review of construction
conditions and photos - Perform a PFMA to develop the possible failure
modes with consideration of the construction and
series of repairs that were required upon first
filling and later
13The Reality of Risk
Silver Lake Failure May 14, 2003
- High Rainfall Period
- Fuse Plug Failure
- Fuse Plug Foundation Eroded
- Entire Lake Empted
- Flooding Downstream Facilities
14The Reality of Risk
Silver Lake Reservoir
May 13, 2003
15The Reality of Risk
May 14, 2003
16The Reality of Risk
May 14, 2003
17The Reality of Risk
May 14, 2003
18The Reality of Risk
Taum Sauk Pumped Storage Project
- 450 MW Pumped Storage Project
- Located in Reynolds County, Missouri
- One of the First PSP, Started in 1963
- Licensed by FPC in August 1965
- Owned and Operated by Ameren UE
- Upper Dam is a Continuous Dike 6,562 Ft. Long
- Upper Reservoir Water Level Overtopped the Dam
- Upper Reservoir Dam Failed on December 14, 2005
19The Reality of Risk
Taum Sauk Upper Reservoir
Power Tunnel
Powerhouse
20The Reality of Risk
- Dumped and Sluced Rockfill
- Upstream Reinforced Concrete Lining
- Parapet Wall Placed atop the Rockfill Dam
- Underdrainage Concerns Upon First Filling
- Continued High Levels of Leakage Through Dam
- Large Settlements and Movements of Dam and Wall
- Relining in 2004 to Reduce Seepage
- Revised Water Level Instrumentation in 2004
21The Reality of Risk
Do you Really Operate This Full?
Taum Sauk Upper Reservoir Full
22The Reality of Risk
December 14, 2005
23The Reality of Risk
Potential Failure Mode Analysis (PFMA)
- Is a Good process because it does ask the tough
questions - How could this dam fail
- What happens if it does
- Are the identified potential failure modes
recognized - What actions can be taken to reduce the dam
failure likelihood
Because of that, I believe that it actually can
minimize or even eliminate failures
24The Reality of Risk
Discussion Later!