Ethics in Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Ethics in Research

Description:

Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research in cyberspace (a report ... Respect for human dignity (Deontology) Major principles underlying modern codes ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: PunyaM7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ethics in Research


1
Ethics in Research
  • The Ethical Standards of the American
    Psychological Association http//www.apa.org/ethi
    cs/ (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,
    2003)http//www.apastyle.org
  • Ethics in Cyberspace Research Consent, Privacy
    and Contribution http//www.rider.edu/users/suler
    /psycyber/ethics.html
  • Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects
    research in cyberspace (a report from the
    American Association for the Advancement of
    Science)
  • http//www.aaas.org/spp/dspp/sfrl/projects/intres
    /main.htm

2
Ethics for Social Scientists / psychologists
  • General Standards
  • Evaluation, assessment, or intervention
  • Advertising and other public statements
  • Therapy
  • Privacy and confidentiality
  • Teaching, training supervision, research, and
    publishing
  • Forensic activities
  • Resolving ethical issues

Thanks to Lawrence R. Gordon, University of
Vermont (http//www.uvm.edu/lgordon/)
3
Research Ethics (background)
  • Where it comes from
  • Cost-benefit considerations (Utilitarianism)
  • Respect for human dignity (Deontology)
  • Major principles underlying modern codes
  • Respect for persons - autonomy/consent
  • Beneficence - max benefit and min harm
  • Justice - benefits and burdens distributed fairly

4
Ethics of Human Research
  • We cant just do whatever we want!
  • Protocols prepared and submitted to the
    Institutional Review Board (IRB) for approval
  • IRB needs to give you permission to do your study

5
What Is the IRB?
  • Committee responsible for reviewing all proposed
    research involving human participants at all
    schools receiving federal funds for research
  • Members include faculty members from different
    departments, at least one community member, at
    least one nonscientist (at least 5 total members)

6
IRB _at_ MSU (UCRIHS)
  • At MSU, The Office of Research Ethics and
    Standards (ORES), houses among other things, the
    human subjects review
  • IRB at MSU is called UCHRIHS (University
    Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects)
  • http//www.msu.edu/user/ucrihs/
  • Contains forms, FAQ, Tutorials, Regulations and
    contant info.

7
What the IRB Does
  • Its chief function Considers costs and benefits
    of the research
  • Is the research question worth the use of human
    participants?
  • Because human participants do not need to
    participate in studies, their rights are the
    highest priority

8
Issues
  • Voluntary participation
  • Informed consent
  • need to know what might keep them for consenting
  • need to be able to consent
  • need to know the right to withdraw
  • Coercion
  • vulnerable populations
  • payment/compensation

9
Issues
  • Deception
  • Is the value of the study worth it?
  • Alternatives? Must be last alternative!
  • Needs to be explained ASAP Dehoaxing
  • Debriefing
  • Explain purpose of study
  • remove bad feelings Desensitizing
  • get information
  • thank participants

10
Informed consent
  • Documented agreement with participants
  • clarifies the nature of the research and the
    responsibilities of each party
  • Use language that is reasonably understandable
  • Obtained prior to any data collection
  • Explain significant factors that may influence
    the person's willingness to participate
  • risks, discomfort, adverse effects, or
    limitations on confidentiality and other aspects
    about which the person may inquire.
  • Tell participants that they can withdraw from the
    research at any time
  • If participants are legally incapable of giving
    informed consent, provide an appropriate
    explanation, obtain the person's consent, AND
    obtain permission from a legally authorized
    person
  • Inform participants of how data will be used
    (privacy/confidentiality)
  • Provide an opportunity to the participants to
    obtain information about research findings
  • Give contact information for researcher and IRB
    official

11
Issues
  • Experimenter conduct
  • PI has assumes all responsibility for fair
    treatment of participants (e.g. by assistants)
  • 6 Ps of conduct
  • Present
  • Prompt
  • Prepared
  • Polite
  • Private
  • Professional

12
Submitting Protocols
  • Exempt from review
  • Expedited review
  • Full review

13
Full review
  • Full review
  • study of vulnerable populations
  • use of physically invasive techniques (e.g.
    drugs, exercise, x-rays)
  • psychological or emotional distress
  • behavior manipulation (includes ALL deception)
  • sensitive data (with ID) (e.g. drugs, sex, crime)
  • videotaping (potential for ID)

14
Expedited review
  • Expedited review
  • voice recordings (e.g. study of speech defects)
  • studies of behavior w/o manipulation or stress
  • study of existing documents that are not publicly
    available
  • use of noninvasive clinical assessments (such as
    weight, sensory acuity, EKG, but NOT x-rays)

15
Exempt from review
  • Exempt from review
  • Educational practices
  • Anonymous survey, interview, or naturalistic
    observation (no identifiers)
  • Study of existing data, documents, or archival
    records that are publicly available (no ID)
  • Consumer surveys (ex. Quality of dining hall
    food)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com