Title: Leading by Example: Californias Energy Goals and Policies
1Leading by Example Californias Energy Goals
and Policies
- Presentation to the UCLA Energy Forum
- 11/29/06
- Laura R. Doll
- Deputy Executive Director
- California Public Utilities Commission
- San Francisco
2Worlds Largest GHG Emitters
- USA..5,661...19
- China2,795...02
- Russia..1,437...10
- Japan1,186...09
- India..1,073...01
- Germany.787...10
- UK569...09
- Canada437...13
- California.430...12
- Italy..429....07
- South Korea...428....09
- 12. Mexico.425....04
2000 Emissions Per Capita (Mt CO2)
Emissions
Sources Courtesy of CalEPA Research conducted
by Oak Ridge National Lab The Tellus Institute
3Californias Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Source CA Energy Commission
4California versus U.S. Electricity Supply
Renewables
1.6
Imports
Oil
3.3
Hydro
NG 15
8.5
25.5
Hydro 33
Coal 52
19.4
Nuclear
Renewables
8.4
Hydro
14.8
Natural Gas
14.8
Nuclear
12.4
50.2
Coal
Natural Gas
37.6
California (2000)
US (1999)
284 TWh
3,752 TWh
Source CA Energy Commission
5California versus U.S. Electricity Consumption
Source CA Energy Commission
6California GHG Targets
- 2010 emissions at 2000 levels
- 2020 emissions at 1990 levels
- 2050 emissions 80 below
- 1990 levels
- Kyoto goal for U.S. would be 7 below 1990
levels by 2012 - 6/05 Executive Order created Governors Climate
Action Team, led by the California EPA, continued
in 10/06 Executive Order Codified in AB32 from
September 2006
Approximately 59 Million Tons Emission
Reductions, 11 Below business as usual
Approximately 145 Million Tons Emission
Reductions, 25 Below business as usual
7http//www.climatechange.ca.gov/climate_action_tea
m/reports/2006-04-03_FINAL_CAT_REPORT.PDF
8Emissions Reductions from CPUC Programs
9CPUC Policy Priorities
- Energy Action Plan I II set policies
- Energy Efficiency
- Renewables
- Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Regulation
- Environmental risk adder
- Emissions Performance Standard (EPS)
- Load-Based Emissions Cap
10http//www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUBLISHED/REPORT/51604.htm
11Energy Action Plan Goals for Efficiency
- Adopted by CPUC and CEC May 2003 EAP II in
October 2005 - Establishes a loading order of energy resource
procurement - 1. Energy efficiency and conservation, plus
demand response - 2. Renewable generation, including distributed
generation - 3. Cleanest available fossil resources
- Goal Decrease per capita energy use and reduce
toxic emissions and greenhouse gases through
increased conservation, efficiency, and renewable
resources. Balance cost impacts, resource
diversity, and environmental responsibility,
including climate change. - The EAP can be found at www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUBLISHE
D/REPORT/28715.htm
12Committed to All Cost Effective Energy Efficiency
- Utilities must meet at least 50 load growth
through energy efficiency - EE savings are real and verifiable, just like
supply side resources - Aggressive Savings Goals
- Adopted EE savings goals 2002-2012, with annual
saving requirements. - Utilities must include savings in demand
forecast and procurement plans. - Funding 400 million utility procurement
spending, in addition to Public Goods Charge
funding of 280 million annually.
13The Most Aggressive EE Program in the Nation
- Energy Efficiency goals (2004-2013)
- 26,506 GWh/year
- 5,000 MW off-peak
- 444 Million therms/year
- Eliminates need for 10 new power plants
- Eliminates 9 million tons of CO2 emissions
(equal to 1.8 million cars) - 10 billion in net savings to consumers
14Energy Efficiency
15Annual Energy Savings from EE Programs and
Standards
Source Rosenfeld, California Energy Commission
16Californias Green Building Initiative
- Governors Executive Order S-20-04
- Sets a goal of reducing energy use in state-owned
buildings by 20 by 2015 - Encourages the private commercial sector to set
the same goal
17http//www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/eeactionplan.htm
18Renewable Portfolio Standard
- Geothermal, Biomass, Wind, Solar, small Hydro
- Original 2002 statute 20 of electricity
delivered by 2017 - 33 goal by 2020 would require legislative
changes - Energy Action Plan and new law (SB 107)
accelerated 20 goal to 2010 - Annual Solicitations
- - Open Issues Transmission, Tradeable RECs and
tracking, Muni participation
19Solar Initiative
- 10 year program adopted January 2006 with 3000
MW statewide installation goal - Budget is approximately 2.8 billion over ten
years - CPUC administers existing residential and
commercial - CEC administers residential new construction
program - Subsidies decline over time, starting at 2.50
per watt in 2007 - Incentives paid on system performance, not
capacity - Set-asides for low-income and affordable housing
20Environmental Risk Adder
- aka carbon adder
- CPUC requires utilities to include an 8/CO2 ton
proxy for carbon based resources when evaluating
procurement choices. - First step to require utilities to internalize
carbon cost.
21GHG Emissions Performance Standard
- CPUC adopted policy statement in October, 2005.
CA Energy Commission adopted in 2005 Integrated
Energy Policy Report. Now codified as SB 1368. - Requires IOU energy contracts and generation
sources to meet or beat GHG emissions levels of a
combined-cycle natural gas turbine for all
long-term procurement activities (over 5 years)
for baseload generation. - CPUC currently conducting proceeding to decide
how to implement the standard on an interim
basis decision expected by 2/1/07 CEC will
conduct proceeding to determine how to apply to
municipal utilities.
The GHG Performance Standard Policy Statement is
posted at www.cpuc.ca.gov/word_pdf/REPORT/50432.d
oc
22GHG Interim EPS Staff Proposal
- Designed to prevent backsliding from current
profile - Applied
- To all jurisdictional load-serving entities
- At time build or buy commitment is proposed
- To baseload resources with capacity factors of
60 or greater - To all new utility commitments of five years or
longer and 25 MW or greater - Emissions limited to 1100 pounds of CO2 per MWh
- Potential RD exemptions on case by case basis,
(e.g., for advanced coal proposals) - No offsets or market price safety valves during
interim period - Report is posted at http//www.cpuc.ca.gov/publis
hed/REPORT/60350.htm
23Load-Based GHG Cap Decision
- February 2006 Decision adopted load-based GHG
emissions cap for all load-serving entities - chose load-based cap to avoid leakage issues
- Decision made initial calls on implementation
issues - Emissions allowances based on tons of CO2
equivalent for all six GHGs - Baseline established on historical year basis,
with 1990 as the preference year to comport with
Kyoto and Governors GHG targets - Emissions allowances to be allocated
administratively (not auctioned) - Flexible compliance to be allowed (details to be
worked out), based on verifiable and feasible
reductions - Preference for allowing alternative compliance
payments, as well as sales of excess allowances
for shareholder profit - Approach will need to be docked with statewide
reporting and compliance regime under AB32
Decision is posted at www.cpuc.ca.gov/word_pdf/FI
NAL_DECISION/53720.doc
24Possible Sequencing of Load-Based Cap
Implementation Topics
- Likely to proceed over next two years (in
R.06-04-009) beginning October 2006 - Reporting requirements
- Baseline development
- Structure (size and slope) of cap ratchet
- Flexible compliance mechanisms
- Modeling of costs and benefits specific to energy
sector - Final decision on energy sector cap, in
cooperation with Air Resources Board timing
25Mandatory vs. Market-Based Solutions
- Mandatory
- Renewables Portfolio Standard
- Energy Efficiency
- Environmental Risk Adder
- GHG Performance Standard
- Market-based
- Load-based GHG cap
26Interaction of Cap with Other Policy Initiatives
Represents GHG emissions cap
Emissions Reductions
Time
Current System
Initial GHG Cap
First GHG Cap Ratchet
27(No Transcript)
28Contact information
- Laura Doll
- Rich Oppenheim
- California Public Utilities Commission
- Emails lrd_at_cpuc.ca.gov
- rto_at_cpuc.ca.gov
- Web site www.cpuc.ca.gov