Leading by Example: Californias Energy Goals and Policies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Leading by Example: Californias Energy Goals and Policies

Description:

6/05 Executive Order created Governor's Climate Action Team, led by the ... 1990 as the preference year to comport with Kyoto and Governor's GHG targets ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: DKM8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Leading by Example: Californias Energy Goals and Policies


1
Leading by Example Californias Energy Goals
and Policies
  • Presentation to the UCLA Energy Forum
  • 11/29/06
  • Laura R. Doll
  • Deputy Executive Director
  • California Public Utilities Commission
  • San Francisco

2
Worlds Largest GHG Emitters
  • USA..5,661...19
  • China2,795...02
  • Russia..1,437...10
  • Japan1,186...09
  • India..1,073...01
  • Germany.787...10
  • UK569...09
  • Canada437...13
  • California.430...12
  • Italy..429....07
  • South Korea...428....09
  • 12. Mexico.425....04

2000 Emissions Per Capita (Mt CO2)
Emissions
Sources Courtesy of CalEPA Research conducted
by Oak Ridge National Lab The Tellus Institute
3
Californias Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Source CA Energy Commission
4
California versus U.S. Electricity Supply
Renewables
1.6
Imports
Oil
3.3
Hydro
NG 15
8.5
25.5
Hydro 33
Coal 52
19.4
Nuclear
Renewables
8.4
Hydro
14.8
Natural Gas
14.8
Nuclear
12.4
50.2
Coal
Natural Gas
37.6
California (2000)
US (1999)
284 TWh
3,752 TWh
Source CA Energy Commission
5
California versus U.S. Electricity Consumption
Source CA Energy Commission
6
California GHG Targets
  • 2010 emissions at 2000 levels
  • 2020 emissions at 1990 levels
  • 2050 emissions 80 below
  • 1990 levels
  • Kyoto goal for U.S. would be 7 below 1990
    levels by 2012
  • 6/05 Executive Order created Governors Climate
    Action Team, led by the California EPA, continued
    in 10/06 Executive Order Codified in AB32 from
    September 2006

Approximately 59 Million Tons Emission
Reductions, 11 Below business as usual
Approximately 145 Million Tons Emission
Reductions, 25 Below business as usual
7
http//www.climatechange.ca.gov/climate_action_tea
m/reports/2006-04-03_FINAL_CAT_REPORT.PDF
8
Emissions Reductions from CPUC Programs
9
CPUC Policy Priorities
  • Energy Action Plan I II set policies
  • Energy Efficiency
  • Renewables
  • Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Regulation
  • Environmental risk adder
  • Emissions Performance Standard (EPS)
  • Load-Based Emissions Cap

10
http//www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUBLISHED/REPORT/51604.htm
11
Energy Action Plan Goals for Efficiency
  • Adopted by CPUC and CEC May 2003 EAP II in
    October 2005
  • Establishes a loading order of energy resource
    procurement
  • 1. Energy efficiency and conservation, plus
    demand response
  • 2. Renewable generation, including distributed
    generation
  • 3. Cleanest available fossil resources
  • Goal Decrease per capita energy use and reduce
    toxic emissions and greenhouse gases through
    increased conservation, efficiency, and renewable
    resources. Balance cost impacts, resource
    diversity, and environmental responsibility,
    including climate change.
  • The EAP can be found at www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUBLISHE
    D/REPORT/28715.htm

12
Committed to All Cost Effective Energy Efficiency
  • Utilities must meet at least 50 load growth
    through energy efficiency
  • EE savings are real and verifiable, just like
    supply side resources
  • Aggressive Savings Goals
  • Adopted EE savings goals 2002-2012, with annual
    saving requirements.
  • Utilities must include savings in demand
    forecast and procurement plans.
  • Funding 400 million utility procurement
    spending, in addition to Public Goods Charge
    funding of 280 million annually.

13
The Most Aggressive EE Program in the Nation
  • Energy Efficiency goals (2004-2013)
  • 26,506 GWh/year
  • 5,000 MW off-peak
  • 444 Million therms/year
  • Eliminates need for 10 new power plants
  • Eliminates 9 million tons of CO2 emissions
    (equal to 1.8 million cars)
  • 10 billion in net savings to consumers

14
Energy Efficiency
15
Annual Energy Savings from EE Programs and
Standards
Source Rosenfeld, California Energy Commission
16
Californias Green Building Initiative
  • Governors Executive Order S-20-04
  • Sets a goal of reducing energy use in state-owned
    buildings by 20 by 2015
  • Encourages the private commercial sector to set
    the same goal

17
http//www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/eeactionplan.htm
18
Renewable Portfolio Standard
  • Geothermal, Biomass, Wind, Solar, small Hydro
  • Original 2002 statute 20 of electricity
    delivered by 2017
  • 33 goal by 2020 would require legislative
    changes
  • Energy Action Plan and new law (SB 107)
    accelerated 20 goal to 2010
  • Annual Solicitations
  • - Open Issues Transmission, Tradeable RECs and
    tracking, Muni participation

19
Solar Initiative
  • 10 year program adopted January 2006 with 3000
    MW statewide installation goal
  • Budget is approximately 2.8 billion over ten
    years
  • CPUC administers existing residential and
    commercial
  • CEC administers residential new construction
    program
  • Subsidies decline over time, starting at 2.50
    per watt in 2007
  • Incentives paid on system performance, not
    capacity
  • Set-asides for low-income and affordable housing

20
Environmental Risk Adder
  • aka carbon adder
  • CPUC requires utilities to include an 8/CO2 ton
    proxy for carbon based resources when evaluating
    procurement choices.
  • First step to require utilities to internalize
    carbon cost.

21
GHG Emissions Performance Standard
  • CPUC adopted policy statement in October, 2005.
    CA Energy Commission adopted in 2005 Integrated
    Energy Policy Report. Now codified as SB 1368.
  • Requires IOU energy contracts and generation
    sources to meet or beat GHG emissions levels of a
    combined-cycle natural gas turbine for all
    long-term procurement activities (over 5 years)
    for baseload generation.
  • CPUC currently conducting proceeding to decide
    how to implement the standard on an interim
    basis decision expected by 2/1/07 CEC will
    conduct proceeding to determine how to apply to
    municipal utilities.

The GHG Performance Standard Policy Statement is
posted at www.cpuc.ca.gov/word_pdf/REPORT/50432.d
oc
22
GHG Interim EPS Staff Proposal
  • Designed to prevent backsliding from current
    profile
  • Applied
  • To all jurisdictional load-serving entities
  • At time build or buy commitment is proposed
  • To baseload resources with capacity factors of
    60 or greater
  • To all new utility commitments of five years or
    longer and 25 MW or greater
  • Emissions limited to 1100 pounds of CO2 per MWh
  • Potential RD exemptions on case by case basis,
    (e.g., for advanced coal proposals)
  • No offsets or market price safety valves during
    interim period
  • Report is posted at http//www.cpuc.ca.gov/publis
    hed/REPORT/60350.htm

23
Load-Based GHG Cap Decision
  • February 2006 Decision adopted load-based GHG
    emissions cap for all load-serving entities
  • chose load-based cap to avoid leakage issues
  • Decision made initial calls on implementation
    issues
  • Emissions allowances based on tons of CO2
    equivalent for all six GHGs
  • Baseline established on historical year basis,
    with 1990 as the preference year to comport with
    Kyoto and Governors GHG targets
  • Emissions allowances to be allocated
    administratively (not auctioned)
  • Flexible compliance to be allowed (details to be
    worked out), based on verifiable and feasible
    reductions
  • Preference for allowing alternative compliance
    payments, as well as sales of excess allowances
    for shareholder profit
  • Approach will need to be docked with statewide
    reporting and compliance regime under AB32

Decision is posted at www.cpuc.ca.gov/word_pdf/FI
NAL_DECISION/53720.doc
24
Possible Sequencing of Load-Based Cap
Implementation Topics
  • Likely to proceed over next two years (in
    R.06-04-009) beginning October 2006
  • Reporting requirements
  • Baseline development
  • Structure (size and slope) of cap ratchet
  • Flexible compliance mechanisms
  • Modeling of costs and benefits specific to energy
    sector
  • Final decision on energy sector cap, in
    cooperation with Air Resources Board timing

25
Mandatory vs. Market-Based Solutions
  • Mandatory
  • Renewables Portfolio Standard
  • Energy Efficiency
  • Environmental Risk Adder
  • GHG Performance Standard
  • Market-based
  • Load-based GHG cap

26
Interaction of Cap with Other Policy Initiatives
Represents GHG emissions cap
Emissions Reductions
Time
Current System
Initial GHG Cap
First GHG Cap Ratchet
27
(No Transcript)
28
Contact information
  • Laura Doll
  • Rich Oppenheim
  • California Public Utilities Commission
  • Emails lrd_at_cpuc.ca.gov
  • rto_at_cpuc.ca.gov
  • Web site www.cpuc.ca.gov
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com