Antitrust Law Made Dangerously Simple

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Antitrust Law Made Dangerously Simple

Description:

Capitation Contracts. Withhold Arrangements. Policy Statements ... Fees; Conversion; Factors; Discounts Capitation Amounts; and Other Terms ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: robertjm

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Antitrust Law Made Dangerously Simple


1
Antitrust Law Made Dangerously Simple
  • GSRMC MEDICAL STAFF
  • QUARTERLY MEETING
  • April 8, 1999
  • Robert J. Milligan
  • GallagherKennedy

2
People of the same trade seldom meet
together, even for merriment and diversion, but
the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the
public or some contrivance to raise
prices. Adam Smith
3
The Basic Rules
  • The Antitrust Laws Prohibit
  • Conspiracies in restraint of trade
  • Price fixing
  • Group Boycotts
  • Market Division
  • Monopolization

4
The Sherman Act
  • Section One
  • Every contract, combination ... or conspiracy in
    restraint of trade is hereby declared to be
    illegal.
  • It takes two to conspire
  • Unreasonable restraint of trade

5
The Sherman Act Humbug based on economic
ignorance and incompetence.
  • Justice O.W. Holmes, The Holmes-Pollock
    letters, page 163(Howe, ed. 1941)

6
Antitrust Law in a Nutshell
7
Three Tucson Dentists Guilty in Price Case
  • Physicians convicted for conspiring to fix
    co-payment fees paid by patients who were members
    of prepaid dental plans
  • Potential penalties
  • Up to three years imprisonment
  • Fines up to 250,000/Double damages

8
Collective Bargaining and Section One of the
Sherman Act
  • Group Practice (Subject to monopoly constraints)
  • Physician Networks Under the DOJ/FTC Policy
    Statements
  • State Action Immunity
  • National Labor Relations Act

9
The DOJ/FTC Policy Statements
  • Size limitations
  • Exclusive 20
  • Non-exclusive 30
  • Operational Requirements
  • Substantial Financial Risk
  • Clinical Integration
  • Messenger Model
  • Some or All of the Above

10
Policy Statements
  • Substantial Financial Risk
  • Capitation Contracts
  • Withhold Arrangements

11
Policy Statements
  • Do Withhold Arrangements cause physicians in a
    network to share substantial financial risk?
  • Who holds the withhold?
  • How much is withheld?
  • How are goals set?
  • How/When are funds distributed?
  • To whom are funds distributed?

12
Policy Statements
  • Messenger Model
  • In the absence of sufficient risk sharing or
    clinical integration
  • Physician networks can employ a messenger to
    facilitate communication with payors

13
Messenger Model
  • Role of the Messenger
  • Third party
  • Obtains acceptable contract terms from providers
    on an individual basis
  • Communicates information to payors
  • Communicates offers to providers on an individual
    basis
  • Providers accept or reject on an individual basis

14
Messenger Model The Governments View
  • If the messenger coordinates individual
    providers responses to a particular
    proposal,disseminates to members other providers
    views or intentions, acts as an agent for
    collective negotiation and agreement by the
    providers or otherwise
  • serves to facilitate collusive behavior among
    network participants,network participants will
    run a serious antitrust risk
  • FTC Advisory Opinion
    NNOSA, July 11,1995

15
Messenger Model The FPD View
  • The union would negotiate contracts for all
    members using the messenger model. The idea is
    that an organization representing all orthopaedic
    surgeons would have bargaining leverage. Dr.
    Connair
  • Remember that the Third Party Messenger Model
    is only effective if everyone participates.
    Dr. Newcomb
  • United States v. Federation of Physicians and
    Dentists

16
United States vs.Federation of Physicians and
Dentists
  • Alleges a violation of the Sherman Act
  • Seeks injunction against FPD or its
    representatives acting as messenger
  • No damages claimed, so no treble damage potential
    (Good news/Bad News)

17
Who is right?
  • My opinion If it is effective to negotiate
    better contracts, it is illegal
  • Practical Consideration
  • If the Department of Justice says it is illegal,
    do you want to lead the charge?
  • If so, at least get indemnification

18
(No Transcript)
19
State Action Immunity
  • Texas House Bill 3039An Act Relating to the
    Regulation of Physician Collective Negotiation
  • Where a payor has substantial market power
    (gt15) physicians may collectively negotiate
  • Fees Conversion Factors Discounts
    Capitation Amounts and Other Terms

20
So where does that leave us...
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)