Suspension Feeding - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Suspension Feeding

Description:

benthic. phyla. More terms and concepts. BEWARE of 'volume filtered' or 'volume cleared. ... Benthic suspension feeders where Cxu is high. Benthic suspension ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:174
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: petej2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Suspension Feeding


1
Suspension Feeding
  • Mostly mechanics and foraging theory

2
Terms
  • Definition feeding on particles by removing
    them from suspension
  • Active create own feeding currents
  • Passive use ambient fluid motion and (or)
    gravity
  • Beware of classifications/dichotomies
  • Nobody make a living by swallowing seawater.
    Good particles must be concentrated.

3
Suspension, like Deposit, Feeding Says How, not
What
  • Phytoplankton
  • Detritus
  • Bacteria
  • Protists
  • Animals
  • More than one of the above
  • One or more from column A, plus something
    acquired in another feeding mode (e.g., deposit
    feeding or osmotrophy)

4
Passive Active SF
Many benthic phyla
Many benthic phyla
In the plankton, thecosome pteropods
In the plankton, copepods, salps, some fishes,
etc.
5
More terms and concepts
  • BEWARE of volume filtered or volume cleared.
  • It comes from the practice of measuring C(t). If
    you know C (x) and C (x y), then from the
    geometric mean concentration over the interval y
    and the time y and the volume of the experimental
    container you can calculate what volume has been
    cleared of cells in that time.
  • Just because you can do the calculation does not
    mean that the animal actually filters that volume.

6
Where to forage
  • Planktonic suspension feeders, where C is high,
    but observation is that they forage where
    production is high.
  • Benthic suspension feeders where Cxu is high
  • Benthic suspension feeders cant chase patches

7
What Particles to Take
  • For feeders on living organisms, take particles
    larger than the mean size
  • For detritivores, take smaller particles and ones
    lower in specific gravity
  • If sorting is moderately expensive, show partial
    preference
  • Sorting may be an issue for benthic suspension
    feeders that experience high concentrations of
    poor foods

8
How Fast to Feed
Recall the digestion lectures and reprints
Filter only fast enough to keep the gut full
9
Cautions
  • Aerosol filtration theory (Rubenstein and Koehl
    1977) has a different goal and flow geometry
  • The flow is often unbounded in filtration of
    hydrosols by suspension feeders
  • Beware of early aquatic applications that focus
    on efficiency of encounter and fail to use excess
    particle density

10
Flow and Collector Geometry
11
Direct Interception
The only mechanism that does not cross streamlines
12
Inertial Impaction
Fl 2Culs lc . ls lt rc
Fl 2Curc lc . ls rc
13
Gravitational Deposition
14
Diffusional Deposition
15
Issues
  • The mechanisms can be interactive rather than
    additive (but often one will be so dominant that
    it does not matter).
  • The mechanisms are linear in particle
    concentration.
  • The velocity you need is a face velocity, not a
    bulk velocity.
  • The concentration you need is local to the
    collector.
  • Per particle, bacteria are hard to encounter by
    any mechanism.

16
Fenchel Closes the Microbial Loop (Bombannes 1982)
17
But leaves out fluid motion
Shimeta and Jumars (1993) added shear, and
showed as is true for most suspension feeders
and sit-and-wait predators that an intermediate
shear rate maximizes rate of ingestion
(effective encounter).
18
Exceptions to the 5-10 µm rule for bacterivory
  • Tunicates that use very fine meshes and so have a
    small pressure drop (and other thin mucus strand
    makers)
  • Viruses
  • Shear from decaying turbulence pushes it up
  • Ability to use ambient flow (benthos)
  • FW daphnids (charge effects?)

19
For benthos, encounter and ingestion rates hard
to match
  • Local u and C poorly known
  • Re often gt 1
  • Vertical gradients are strong, and food can be
    depleted near the bed by dense assemblages of
    suspension feeders.
  • Unsteady, active motions can be important for
    encounter
  • Calculated rates do match for one brittlestar
    species and some protists

20
Bivalves are a mess
  • There are no intelligible, mechanistic models of
    encounter.
  • Particle detection and unsteady motion is
    involved but not modeled.
  • Controversy over mechanisms and rates has raged
    for gt 20 yr

21
Medium-scale flow issues
  • Rejection (exhalent) jets fast high
  • Induced flow (Venturi effect)
  • Lee feeding
  • Vortex trapping
  • Induced resuspension
  • Location relative to obstacles bedforms
  • Depleted boundary layers
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com