SOCIAL HOPES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

SOCIAL HOPES

Description:

Contingency, Irony and Solidarity (1989) ... 2. IRONY AND TRUTH. BEYOND THE CORRESPONDENCE THEORY OF TRUTH ... Irony. PUBLIC SPHERE. PRIVATE SPHERE. AESTEHTICS ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: renega
Category:
Tags: hopes | social | irony

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SOCIAL HOPES


1
SOCIAL HOPES
2
  • 1. BEYOND EPISTEMOLOGY
  • Is there an alternative for traditional
    philosophy?
  • 2. IRONY AND TRUTH
  • What is the relation between irony and truth?
  • 3. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
  • How to conceive of social hope?

3
1. BEYOND EPISTEMOLOGY
4
RICHARD RORTY (1930-2004)
  • BIOGRAPHICAL NOTIONS
  • 4 October 1931 born in New York City.
  • 1946-1952 studied Philosophy at the University
    of Chicago.
  • 1952-1956 PhD. at Yale University.
  • 1961-1982 professor of philosophy at Princeton
    University.
  • 1982-1998 professor of the Humanities at the
    University of Virginia.
  • 1998-2007 professor of Comparative Literature at
    Stanford University.
  • 8 June 2007 death.

5
IMPORTANT PUBLICATIONS
  • Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979).
  • Consequences of Pragmatism (1982).
  • Contingency, Irony and Solidarity (1989).
  • Objectivity, Relativism and Truth Philosophical
    Papers I (1991).
  • Essays on Heidegger and Others Philosophical
    Papers II (1991). Limited Inc (1990).
  • Achieving Our Country Leftist Thought In
    Twentieth Century America (1998).
  • Truth and Progress Philosophical Papers III
    (1998).
  • Philosophy and Social Hope (2000).
  • The Future of Religion (with Gianni Vattimo)
    (2005).
  • Philosophy as Cultural Politics Philosophical
    Papers IV (2007).

6
PHILOSOPHICAL STYLE
  • From the analytical article to the philosophical
    essay.
  • Argumentative and evocative.
  • Provocative one-liners or titles.
  • Examples Solidarity or Objectivity? and The
    Priority of Democracy to Philosophy.
  • Open encounter with different vocabularies.

7
THE LEGACY OF DEWEY
  • Most of what I have written in the last decade
    consists of attempts to tie in my social hopes
    hopes for a global, cosmopolitan, democratic,
    egalitarian, classless, casteless society with
    my antagonism towards Platonism. These attempts
    have been encouraged by the thought that the same
    hopes, and the same antagonism, lay behind many
    of the writings of my principal philosophical
    hero, John Dewey.
  • Neopragmatism gt the provision of new vocabularies
    that help us to understand or solve a given
    problem.

8
BEYOND METHAPYSICS
  • Metaphysics
  • - to construct a perspective from outside as an
    attempt to escape from time, i.e. to view Sein
    as something that has little to do with Zeit.
  • - the construction of the eternal in order to be
    free from the contingency, the uncertainty, and
    the fragility of the human condition.
  • Criticism
  • - there is no non-linguistic, pre-cognitive
    access to an already present Being that
    underscores some narrative.
  • - people are enmeshed in final vocabularies that
    present Being in diverse and incommensurable
    ways.
  • - there is no meta-vocabulary to distinguish the
    adequacy of one final vocabulary above others.
  • What can be done? Analyse the heuristic value of
    metaphors!

9
METAPHORS
  • Metaphors gt are literally not truth, but have a
    meaning (example René is a pig).
  • Central question which metaphors broaden our
    horizon?
  • Two functions of a metaphor
  • 1. Semantic filter gt foreground background.
  • 2. Relates is and ought gt mixture of facts
    and values.

10
THE MIND AS MIRROR
  • The picture which holds traditional philosophy
    captive is that of the mind as a great mirror,
    containing various representations some
    accurate, some not and capable of being studied
    by pure, nonempirical methods. Without the notion
    of the mind as mirror, the notion of knowledge as
    accuracy of representation would not have
    suggested itself.
  • Philosophy is often seen as reflection.
  • Epistemology gt depends upon a picture of the mind
    as trying tot represent (i.e. mirror) a
    mind-independent external reality.

11
PHILOSOPHICAL TARGETS
  • Rorty attacks
  • - Platonic essentialism.
  • - Cartesian foundationalism.
  • - A specific conception of philosophy.
  • Foundationalism gt to avoid the regress inherent
    in claiming that all beliefs are justified by
    other beliefs gt some beliefs must be
    self-justifying and can be the foundations of all
    knowledge.
  • Sellars critique of the Myth of the given there
    is no given in sensory perception.
  • Philosophy is dissolving rather than solving
    problems.

12
2. IRONY AND TRUTH
13
BEYOND THE CORRESPONDENCE THEORY OF TRUTH
  • Truth is not that what corresponds to reality.
  • Truth is the qualification of opinions as
    justifiedor legitimate.
  • Use truth as an adjective (a truth story) and not
    as a substantive (the Truth).
  • Semantic holism gt the meaning of words and
    sentences are related to the meaning of other
    sentences and not to the non-linguistic world.
  • We change our vocabularies and ideas about the
    truth because of changed habits.

14
IRONY AS THE ROAD TO THE TRUTH
  • Socrates gt irony as a mean to figure out what is
    the truth.
  • Forms of irony
  • 1. Exaggeration understatement.
  • 2. Repetition.
  • 3. Say the opposite what you mean.
  • Question what is seen as self-evident.
  • Ironist are persons that see that central aspects
    in life are contingent.

15
CONTINGENCIES
  • Contingency gt what is by accident so as it is
    something which could have been otherwise.
  • Three contingencies
  • 1. The contingency of language.
  • 2. The contingency of selfhood.
  • 3. The contingency of a liberal community.

16
THE CONTINGENCY OF LANGUAGE
  • Beyond a fixed idea about language.
  • Vocabularies change over time.
  • You are thrown in a specific way of dealing with
    language.

17
THE CONTINGENCY OF SELFHOOD
  • The selfhood is the product of upbringing and
    educational background.
  • People are not fully conscious about who they are
    gt Freud.
  • Beyond the autonomous selfhood.

18
THE CONTINGENCY OF A LIBERAL COMMUNITY
  • Because the selfhood is contingent the community
    life is also contingent.
  • If we accept that, we should not look for the
    essence of the community.
  • A liberal community is open to the future and
    promotes conversation and not violence.

19
3. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
20
CRUELTY
  • What are the driving forces for our political
    engagement?
  • Justice or Equality? No!
  • Cruelty gt how to avoid it?
  • Solidarity with all those who are the victims of
    cruelty.
  • People should become sensitive to the way people
    get hurt.
  • Why are people not susceptible to the global
    injustice?

21
TWO SPHERES
22
AESTEHTICS AND MORAL THEORY
  • Beyond the classical dichotomy of aesthetics
    (private) and moral theory (public).
  • The relation between literature and morality is
    complex.
  • At first glance there are a lot of differences
    between Nabokov and Orwell.
  • Nabokov and Orwell gt both give expression to
    cruelty and deal with the tension between private
    irony and liberal hopes.

23
PATRIOTISM
  • Reiteration of the work of John Dewey and Walt
    Whitman in order to criticize anti-liberal and
    defeatist intellectuals.
  • Patriotism gt hold on to the liberal tradition.
  • To sides of left 1) critical left and 2)
    progressive left.
  • To renew the progressive (i.e. pragmatic) left.
  • Beyond culturalism.

24
SOCIAL HOPE
  • It is a disaster when people grow up without
    hope.
  • Social cohesion is based upon shared vocabularies
    and hope.
  • Philosophy can help to (re)create oneself and is
    therefore a resource for hope.
  • The main trouble is that you might succeed, and
    your success might let you imagine that you have
    something more to rely on than the tolerance and
    decency of your fellow human beings. The
    democratic community of Deweys dreams is a
    community in which nobody imagines that.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com