Title: Judaism of Jesus Day
1Judaism of Jesus Day
2Review of Greek Religion
- Many religions can be true at once
- Religion wasnt central to life didnt demand
constant devotion - Gods were uninterested in how you lived on a
day-to-day basis - Had nothing to do with proper belief or the
afterlife - No set doctrines or books
3Pagan Religion
- Religious observance was about gaining control of
deities for help in - Warfare
- Crops
- Rain
- Health
- Children
4Greco-Roman Afterlife
- Religiously speaking, the most important thing to
do in life is believe in the gods and perform the
proper sacrifices and rituals. This would avoid
reprisals both from gods and fellow human beings
and encourage gifts from the gods. Greek religion
was this-world oriented any postmortem benefits
of religious beliefs and actions were only
peripherally considered, if at all.
(religionfacts.com)
5Judaism of Jesus Day
- Three Main Concerns
- Law
- Temple
- Land
6Law of Moses
- Represented obligations of the covenant
- Not seen negatively but positively
- Simchat Torah
- Included 10 Commandments but other laws designed
to make Jews distinct people - Kosher, Circumcision, Shabbat
7Temple
- 25 football fields could fit inside!
- 1st Temple
- Solomon
- 2nd Temple
- Herod
- ambiguity
8Judaism of Jesus Day - Parties
- Pharisees
- Sadducees
- Essenes
9Pharisees
- Believed in the secondary fence around the law
(sag ha-Torah) - Non-biblical oral laws which provided explanation
to how to keep biblical law - Exactly what constitutes work on Sabbath?
- Exactly what can we eat?
- Exactly what makes for ceremonial cleanliness and
uncleanliness?
10Pharisees
- Precursors to later Rabbinic movement
- Traditions of the elders mentioned in NT
Mishnah in development - Mishnah (law compilation) and Talmud (commentary)
- Babylonian and Palestinian Talmuds
- Midrash rabbinic Biblical Interpretation
11Pharisees and Rome
- Pharisees were not insurrectionists by and large
- Believed that the avenue to freedom was spiritual
fidelity - If all Israel keeps two Sabbaths perfectly in a
row, Messiah will come. - Messiah and political freedom are tied together
12Sadducees
- Did not accept concept of oral law
- Did not believe in resurrection of the dead as
the Pharisees did - Upper-class aristocracy stressed cooperation
with Rome - Stressed temple and sacrifice as the biblical law
prescribed
13Essenes and DSS
- Believed rest of Israel and temple had fallen
away - They were the sons of light and all Israel was
in darkness - Believed God would soon deal a crushing blow on
all sons of darkness. - Established a monastery by the Dead Sea which
was destroyed in 70 BC - Library discovered in caves in 1947
14Jewish Apocalypticism
- Major Tenants
- dualistic view of the world
- Present age of evil and darkness
- This world cannot be improved by human effort
- Coming age of cataclysm and darkness
- Future age of Messianic freedom
- OT Pseudepigrapha visionary texts which are
written in the name of biblical heros (Enoch,
Seth, Moses, Levi)
15Jesus and Apocalypticism
- Some see Jesus as a Jewish preacher of apocalypse
later divinized - Yet - He rejected sign-seeking (Mark 8)
- Claimed not to know the end-times (Mark 13)
- Didnt make this world of evil and coming
world of salvation kinds of distinctions - KOG for Jesus was breaking into history through
his ministry of healing. - - While Jesus uses some apocalyptic language and
ideas, he shaped them also.
16Study of Jesus as a Historical Person
- Big question to what degree does the NT portray
an accurate picture of Jesus? - Tremendous skepticism about the value of the
gospels for history. - Only written to inspire faith in Jesus with no
real concern for history. - Some believe it doesnt matter if they are
accurate to have faith.
17Dates of Gospel Traditions
- Jesus died around 30 AD
- Gospels were written 35 years later
- Mark 65-70 AD
- Matthew and Luke 80-85 AD
- John 90-95 AD
- Dates are a little late in my opinion
- Acts Mark argument
18The Synoptic Problem
- Original Sayings of Jesus floated around for 30
some-odd years - Collection of sayings called Q appeared
- Mark wrote with no knowledge of Q
- Matthew and Luke used Mark, Q, and M and L
- Still a gap of 30 years!
19The Gap
- What is going on during this gap?
- Christianity is growing by leaps and bounds!
- Lots of curiosity about Jesus breeds wild stories
about him (infancy gospels) - Original 12 (or more) are aging
- Most of the new Christians didnt speak Aramaic
but Greek
20Several Factors
- Need arises for some definitive account of Jesus
life - Original 12 are aging
- Gospels which are written are attempting to bring
clarity - Yet there are clear differences between the way
they go about this, their sources, and their
distinct emphases.
21Bart Ehrman believes
- Gospels came to include huge amounts of fiction
- No one could have check with eye-witnesses
- Gospels actually written anonymously and dont
have 1st person narrative - Couldnt have been written by uneducated men like
the original 12 - 30 years is a long time for Jesus to be elevated
from an apocalyptic preacher to son of God.
22One Obvious Discrepancy
- Both Mark and John provide precise day of Jesus
death - In Mark, Jesus is crucified on the morning of the
Passover day after the sacrifice of the lamb,
and the eating of the Passover meal with his
disciples - In John (1914), Jesus was slain on the day of
preparation, the day the passover lamb was slain
Last supper just a meal but no reference to a
Passover meal.
23Passover Discrepancy
- Mark has Jesus crucified on Passover
- John has Jesus crucified the day before Passover
(1914) - Not possible to reconcile things literally
- But John has Jesus crucified exactly when the
Passover lambs were crucified - Shifting the date to make a theological point
Jesus is the Passover Lamb
24Conclusion
- People like Ehrman have over-emphasized the
features of historical inaccuracy - Clearly the biblical writers were not concerned
about absolute historical accuracy as modern
history writers might be - That idea simply hadnt developed yet
- But they are actually seeking to tell a faithful
story to bring clarity to the confusion
25- Gospels do have theological interests, want to
encourage belief, and prop up faith in Jesus - NT does not come off as wildly speculative or
highly mythical like the infancy gospels do. - The gospels were written while people were still
alive who were actually there - Gospels do give us firm enough footing to ground
faith
26Final Thoughts on Historical Jesus
- Scholars sometimes think
- It is the mark of rationality to read from an
agnostic perspective - Read without any assumptions about whether there
is a God or not - Or whether that God might be likely to intervene
in human history - I disagree.
27God and History
- I believe it is a mark of rationality to
- approach any new evidence armed with what I
already believe to be true about the world. - I believe my belief in God is rational
- I believe that God might want to intervene in
life periodically to reveal self - that may be what happened in the NT
- authors clearly think that is exactly what
happened.
28Starting Point makes all the difference
- When you start with that set of presuppositions
- you sift and weigh the evidence much differently
- two things humans need are atonement and
revelation - redemption from sin and clarity on purpose
- the NT claims to be just that.
29If there might be a God
- and God has revealed self in Christ
- then miracles were simply ways to bless and
flourish Christs teachings - resurrection was ultimate vindication
- the historical data of the NT points that
direction, even with its flaws - God left the flaws for a purpose (Pascal)
30Acts speak louder than words
- Deeds of Jesus are remembered best
- Several of Jesus deeds had huge implication on
how the rest of the story is understood - choosing 12 disciples
- celebration of the eucharist
- empty tomb
31Choosing the Twelve
- In all gospel accounts, Jesus has 12 main
disciples - if he did historically, this is huge
- it means he was establishing a whole new Israel
- 12 Tribes in ancient Israel
- he would see himself at least on the level of
Moses
32Twelve or 30
- Ehrmans position
- originally 30 some-odd disciples
- the notion of 12 originals is a later accretion
to elevate Jesus new Moses and New Israel - historically they simply followed the teacher in
an amorphous group of unknown size - Real Problems with this position
33Historicity of the 12
- criterion of multiple attestation (Q, Mark, M, L,
John, Paul I Cor. 15) - criterion of embarrassment Judas is one of the
12 - Importance of the 12 fades from history
- early church has very little emphasis on the 12
original disciples - most of the 12 play minor roles even in the NT
34Eucharist and Empty Tomb
- Jesus celebration of the Passover as Lords
Supper is in all early traditions except John - Jesus understood his death as being sacrificial
(Is. 53) - the empty tomb, remembered by all gospel writers,
provides divine vindication of the ministry of
Jesus - justifies the churchs basic claims about Jesus
35The Point of This
- Even if there is some variation in details
- the exact ordering of events
- different emphases among the gospel writers
- different explanations of events
- There is reason still to believe
- we have a core which clearly indicates that Jesus
was much more than apocalyptic preacher - he was new Moses, died sacrificially, vindicated
by God.
36Mark The Suffering Messiah
- A. Each gospel has its own emphases and
uniqueness. - Diatessaron of Tatian
- if you combine them into one gospel, distinctions
are lost. - The choice for four different gospels.
37Mark
- Different doesnt necessarily imply contradictory
- Jesus in Mark during passion events seems
distraught - In Luke, hes calm and under control
- These do not necessarily pose a historical
problem - But it does remind us to read each gospel on its
own terms.
38Mark
- B. Mark is attributed in Christian tradition to
John Mark - personal secretary of the apostle Peter
- the book is technically anonymous
- Author must have been a relatively highly
educated Greek-speaking Jewish Christian
39Mark
- C. Mark begins by calling his account a gospel
(11) - Gospel means good news
- Not a historically accurate account in the modern
sense - but an account that reveals how his life and
death brings good news to those willing to
receive it.
40Mark
- he writes not to narrate events but to explain
their significance. - begins by calling Jesus The Christ, the Son of
God. - this would have been shocking!!
- What does Christ mean? anointed it is the
equivalent to the Hebrew Messiah - Why the shock?
41Mark The Suffering Messiah
- D. Jesus had been crucified! This was well-known.
- people were expecting a Messiah to come in power
and grandeur - a cosmic victor over evil or a King like David
- Jews to this day choose not to believe in Jesus
because he didnt fit the mold. - Mark is designed to show how Jesus could be both
crucified and Messiah - Not only this, he is Messiah because he suffered
and died.
42Mark Who is Jesus?
- II. Mark begins demonstrating Jesus credentials
as the unique Son of God - A. He was announced by John the Baptist (12-3)
- You are My Son . . .. (111)
- Tempted by Satan (112)
- he begins his public ministry by acting in ways
that reveal his power (121-28!)
43Mark Who is Jesus?
- people are amazed and wonder who he is.
- Note that he has new authority in his teaching
- You would think everyone would recognize Jesus as
Messiah - Yet a major theme of Johns gospel is that no one
really recognizes who he is.
44Who is Jesus?
- His family thinks hes insane (321)
- People from his hometown think hes just a
carpenter (61-6) - Jewish leaders think hes possessed by the devil
(322) - Even his disciples do not understand who he is
(651-52 821)
45Mark Who understands Jesus?
- Who knows Jesus is the Christ?
- 1. 111 Thou art my son - God knows
- 2. 314 demons know
- 3. Mark knows because hes writing these things.
46The Shift in the Middle
- Disciples start to catch on
- Man born blind who sees men as trees walking
(822-26) - His gradual healing may refer to gradual opening
of spiritual eyes - Key story 827-31
47Mark 8
- Peter's Confession of Christ
- Â 27Jesus and his disciples went on to the
villages around Caesarea Philippi. On the way he
asked them, "Who do people say I am?" Â 28They
replied, "Some say John the Baptist others say
Elijah and still others, one of the prophets." - Â 29"But what about you?" he asked. "Who do you
say I am?" Â Â Â Â Â Â Peter answered, "You are the
Christ." - Â 30Jesus warned them not to tell anyone about him.
48Why the Big Secret?
- Is this an explanation of why Jesus in his public
ministry didnt make Messianic claims and the
church is explaining how Jesus Christ could have
not actually made that claim? - Or could Jesus simply disagree with the way
others understood the Messiah - Key 831-33
49Mark 831-33
- Jesus Predicts His Death
- Â 31He then began to teach them that the Son of
Man must suffer many things and be rejected by
the elders, chief priests and teachers of the
law, and that he must be killed and after three
days rise again. 32He spoke plainly about this,
and Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him.
 33But when Jesus turned and looked at his
disciples, he rebuked Peter. "Get behind me,
Satan!" he said. "You do not have in mind the
things of God, but the things of men."
50- Messiah must suffer
- To say otherwise is to participate in satanic
opposition - Jesus is Messiah, but the kind of Messiah who
must suffer - From here on, Jesus regularly predicts his
suffering and death (931 1033f) but the
disciples cannot understand new Messianic
understandings.
51III. Mark A Passion Narrative with a Long
Introduction
- 16 chapters deal with the final week of Jesus
life. - After 10 chapters of teaching, healing, etc.,
Jesus goes to Jerusalem for Passover - He spends a week preaching in the Temple.
- last supper with disciples and betrayal
- He was arrested, put on trial before Jewish and
Roman officials. - Pilate condemns him to die on a cross.
52Climax of the Narrative the Cross
- Still, no one really understands who Jesus is.
- Disciples still confused about suffering
- Even Jesus prays that the cup would pass from him
(1435) - He cries out in despair, My God, My God, why
have you forsaken me? (1534). - Is Jesus himself doubting Gods plan? Is this
genuine or rhetorical?
53The Torn Curtain
- The curtain in the temple is torn in half (1538)
- Stood before the Holy of Holies where God dwelled
- No one could enter except the High Priest once a
year - For Mark, God is now available to his people
directly through Jesus death
54The Centurion Believer
- Someone finally recognizes that Jesus, suffering
on the cross, is the Son of God. - 1539 Truly this man was Gods son.
- only a Centurion pagan makes this connection
between suffering and Jesus status as the Son of
God. - For Mark, Jesus suffering proves he is Messiah
55Marks Troubling Ending(s)
- At the end of the story
- Jesus identity has been proven not called into
question - Three days later, Jesus Messiahship is
vindicated again - Jesus women go to the tomb and find it empty
- He has been raised from the dead as he said would
happen (831) - The women flee in terror and dont tell anyone
because they are afraid
56Marks Various Endings
- The ending of Mark is beset with difficulties.
- There are two other endings longer endings
- These texts are clearly later additions meant to
finish the story - Yet the story literally ends mid-sentence -
enclitic - Im inclined to believe we literally are missing
the ending
57Major Points
- 1. Mark moulds his traditions not only to inform
you about Jesus - But to make the point that Jesus was an
unexpected Messiah - His sufferings and death were not accidental but
central
58Jesus Suffering and Messiahship
- Jesus suffered and died because he was Messiah.
- Mark 834Then he called the crowd to him along
with his disciples and said "If anyone would
come after me, he must deny himself and take up
his cross and follow me. - Suffering with Jesus central to discipleship
59Suffering Messiah (Mark 1043f)
- Whoever wants to become great among you must be
your servant, 44and whoever wants to be first
must be slave of all. 45For even the Son of Man
did not come to be served, but to serve, and to
give his life as a ransom for many."
60Jesus, Psalm 110 and Secondary Meanings
61Our Christian Interpretive Challenge
- The NT consistently quotes from the OT in such a
way that seems to completely distort its original
meaning. - Case in Point Jesus' interpretation of Ps. 110
- Mark 1235f, Matt. 2241f, Luke 2041f
62Mark 1235-37 (NIV)
- 35While Jesus was teaching in the temple
courts, he asked, "How is it that the teachers of
the law say that the Christ is the son of David?
63Mark 1235-37 (NIV)
- 36David himself, speaking by the Holy Spirit,
declared    " 'The Lord said to my Lord
      "Sit at my right hand    until I put your
enemies       under your feet." '
64Mark 1235-37 (NIV)
- 37David himself calls him 'Lord.' How then can he
be his son?" Â Â Â Â Â Â The large crowd listened to
him with delight.
65Jesus Argument
- The Messiah would be a descendent of David.
- David could not have called his own descendent
my Lord (Adoni). - David refers to Messiah as my Lord.
- Psalm 1101 must refer to someone who goes beyond
Son of David status. - Implied Messiah is Son of God.
66Christ Pantokrator
Ps 110 is cited by the NT more than any other OT
text!
67Christus Victor
- "For it is essential that he will rule as king
until that time when he places all his enemies
under his feet" (I Cor 1525).
68Its Original Meaning?
Putting an enemy under your feet ANE style!
69What does Ps. 110 mean?
- As Robert and Mary Coote define its meaning as "a
raucous salute to the pretensions of Davidic
imperialism." - this is an ideology which was elaborated by the
ruling class to justify their rule while hiding
their selfish grab for power.
70The Problem for Us
- What is the meaning of Psalm 110?
- Is Jesus misreading Psalms?
71Lewis' Reflections on the Psalms
- Such a doctrine (secondary meanings), not without
reason, arouses deep distrust in a modern mind.
Because, as we know, almost anything can be read
into any book if you are determined enough.
72Lewis continued
- This will be especially impressed on anyone who
has written fantastic fiction (fantasy). He will
find reviewers, both favorable and hostile,
reading into his stories all manner of
allegorical meanings which he never intended.
73Lewis continued
- (Some of the allegories thus imposed on my own
books have been so ingenious and interesting that
I often wish I had thought of them myself.)
74Jon Levenson
- Levenson's experience at Harvard
- "What must be abandoned are (the academy's)
totalistic claims. Room must be made for other
senses of the text, developed by other
traditions, and historical criticism must learn
to interact more creatively with those other
traditions . . .
75Levenson continued
- Critical scholars must no longer pronounce other
interpretations altogether erroneous simply
because they take the texts out of their first
historical context simply because, that is,
they permit the texts to survive the ancient
civilizations in which they originated." - The Hebrew Bible, the Old Testament and
Historical Criticism
76Lewis' Premise
- There are instances in which things are said
which take on new and deeper significance in the
light of later events.
77Lewis and Pagan Prophecy
- Wise words of profound meaning often have
significance that goes beyond their original
intention. - Plato, in his The Republic, claims a truly
righteous man would be hated and treated as a
monster of iniquity and probably impaled. - Socrates or Jesus?
78Plato's Example
- Plato, discussing the death of Socrates,
foreshadowed the crucifixion, not because he was
lucky, but because he was wise.
79Two Suggested Criteria for Faithful Secondary
Readings
- Secondary readings should stand within the
inherited stream of interpretive tradition. - Secondary readings should holistically flow from
the concerns of the text in its historical
context. - How does our text fare?
80The Historical Meaning
- The Psalmist is convinced that Yahweh, and the
earth's true Lord, must be recognized by all. - The Psalmist believes that Yahweh must have
dominion over all other deities. - He is convinced that God has chosen David and his
lineage for this task. - (David's line famously failed.)
81Our Christian Interpretation
- The text had already been read as a promise of
Yahweh's rule being extended on earth through a
coming Messiah. - first criterion fulfilled.
82Christian Interpretation
- Christus Victor, as the Son of David and Son of
Man, extends divine rule throughout the cosmos. - Second criterion fulfilled.
83In Christian Interpretation
- The Psalmist's words find their ultimate
fulfillment when every knee bows and tongue
confesses Jesus' Lordship. - Yahweh's rule is extended throughout the earth
when Christ is worshipped as Lord.
84Secondary Meanings
- The meaning of texts is not bound by the
historical meaning. - Secondary interpretations apply a text's wisdom
to later contexts and situations. - Understand not what a text said but what it is
saying.
85The Purpose of the Argument
- Not to convince skeptics or unbelievers that
Jesus is Lord. - But to show the internal consistency and
rationale of Christian understandings.
86Parable of the Beloved Son
- Mark 121-12
- what roles would the chief priests play in this
parable? - who is the owner of the vineyard in reality?
- who are those sent to collect rent in OT history?
- who is the beloved son?
- why is this parable so important in understanding
Jesus self-conception?