Evolving Glacial Climate Dynamics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Evolving Glacial Climate Dynamics

Description:

... their results suggest that precession responses correlate with modulations in ... period is quantized' into multiples of the precession or obliquity periods. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Cham8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evolving Glacial Climate Dynamics


1
Evolving Glacial Climate Dynamics
  • Ruth Chambers

2
Continuous Obliquity Pacing
  • The Mid-Pleistocene transition (MPT) is when
    there was a shift from 40 to 100kyr glacial
    cycles.
  • Huybers (2006) believes that there wasnt really
    a shift but the observed change was due to an
    increase in the skipping of obliquity beats.
  • This resulted in 80 or 120kyr cycles which on
    average gives the 100kyr variability.

3
Evidence
  • Major deglaciation features are identified over
    the last 2Myr and a remarkable 33 out of 36 occur
    when the Earths obliquity is anomalously large.

4
  • During the early Pleistocene, the stability of
    the obliquity phase is significant at the 99
    level (R0.7), as expected, given that early
    Pleistocene glacial cycles are known to have a
    40ka timescale.
  • Late Pleistocene deglacial events have R0.8
  • Thus, the late Pleistocene 100ka world actually
    shows greater obliquity phase stability than the
    40ka world. Mental.
  • R Rayleighs R measure of phase coupling.

5
(No Transcript)
6
Why does obliquity skip?
  • There does not appear to be any systematic
    relationship between the time when obliquity
    beats are skipped and the amplitude of obliquity
    cycles
  • Obliquity cycle skipping results from internal
    climatic factors

7
The Pleistocene Progression
  • Changes in glacial variability are not marked by
    any single transition so much as they exhibit an
    approximately linear trend over the last 2Ma.
  • Because
  • 1) As is true for nearly all geophysical
    measurements, Pleistocene climate records show
    variability at all times and timescales.
  • 2) There were 80kyr cycles before the MPT and
    40ka cycles as late as 0.6Ma.
  • 3) The d18O stack reflects aggregate changes in
    both ice volume and temperature.
  • i.e. It was a gradual rather than sudden
    transition.

8
  • The mean, variance, skewness, and timescale
    associated with the glacial cycles all exhibit an
    approximately linear trend over the last 2Myr.

9
Trends and Transitions in Glacial Cycle Dynamics
  • However, Lisiecki and Raymo (2006) believe that
    there were significant changes in the dynamics of
    the climate system.
  • They identify two major transitions in climate
    dynamics
  • 1) The onset of the Northern Hemisphere
    glaciation at approximately 2.7Ma.
  • 2) The Early Pleistocene transition, 1.4Ma.
  • But, the causes still remain uncertain.

10
  • Also, their results suggest that precession
    responses correlate with modulations in forcing
    for the last 5Myr, but 41kyr response is
    sensitive to obliquity modulation only before
    1.4Ma.
  • They say that glacial cycles are orbitally forced
    rather than being self sustained or paced by
    orbital changes

11
(No Transcript)
12
Asymmetry
  • Changes in climate dynamics are also suggested by
    changes in the shapes of glacial cycles.
  • The development of this asymmetry is most likely
    due to a change in the internal dynamics of the
    climate system because asymmetry is not found in
    any orbital or insolation curves.

13
  • But, Huyber says
  • 1) This could be the result of sediment
    composition or accumulation rates covarying with
    other climate changes
  • 2) Or, numerous explanations have been put
    forward for the asymmetry between rates of
    glaciation and deglaciation e.g. ice-sheet
    instabilities, decreases in the albedo of aging
    snow and changes in accumulation caused by rapid
    expansion of sea ice - and there appears no
    fundamental reason why any of these physical
    mechanisms could not evolve gradually.

14
Milankovitch Forcing the Pacemaker of Glacial
cycles
  • Tziperman et al 2006, put forward the theory that
    Milankovitch cycles drive Glacial cycles via
    nonlinear phase locking.
  • Nonlinear phase locking can determine the timing
    of major deglaciations, nearly independently of
    the specific mechanism or model that is
    responsible for these cycles as long as the
    mechanism is suitably nonlinear.
  • A consequence of this is that the fit of a
    certain model output to the observed ice volume
    record cannot be used as an indication that the
    glacial mechanism in this model is necessarily
    correct.
  • i.e it doesnt matter what initial conditions you
    have, the pacemaker will cause glacial cycles
    to develop in accordance to Milankovitch forcing.

15
(No Transcript)
16
  • The most important condition for nonlinear phase
    locking to occur is that oscillations may change
    their period as a function of their amplitude.
  • E.g in the case of a pendulum the period of the
    oscillation is longer when it makes larger
    swings.
  • We have some idea of the nonlinearities in the
    equations governing the oceans, atmosphere, ice
    sheets and even vegetation dynamics. However, we
    cannot determine which is any of these
    nonlinearities is the critical one.

17
  • Raymo (1997) and Ridgewell et al (1999) suggested
    that the glacial period is quantized into
    multiples of the precession or obliquity periods.
    This result arises from the phase locking
    condition, which states precisely that the
    glacial oscillation period is quantized by that
    of the Milankovitch forcing.
  • This explains the relatively recent skipping of
    cycles.
  • This may be due to the non uniform character of
    the Milankovitch forcing.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com