Title: Information design for cultural documentation
1Information design for cultural documentation
- Chryssoula Bekiari1, Panos Constantopoulos1,2,
Martin Doerr1 - 1 Institute of Computer Science, FORTH
- 2 Athens University of Economics and Business
- DELOS Workshop on
- Digital Repositories Interoperability and Common
Services - Heraklion, Crete, 11-13/5/2005
2Digital cultural inventory
- Cultural goods
- Physical and informational objects
- Digitization
- Document and image scanning
- Digital photography
- Conversion of analog audio and video recordings
- Digital transcription
- Digital surrogates
- ?
- Born digital cultural objects
- Digital information recordings
- ?
- Digital cultural inventory
3Virtually unified digital space
- Generated by virtue of the capability for unified
access to independent digital collections - Value multiplier
- Realization conditions
- syntactic and semantic interoperability
- Preservation
- procedures, metadata
4Creating a Greek digital cultural inventory
- Current main framework
- Information Society Operational Programme,
Measure 1.3 - Highlights of previous actions
- POLEMON National Monuments Record System
- MUSE and ARISTIDES systems, Peloponnesian
Ethnographic Foundation - POLYDEUKES term thesaurus, Ministry of Culture,
on-going - Byzantine monuments recording system, European
Centre for Byzantine and Post-byzantine Monuments - Historical documents management system, Vikelea
Library - Open access thematic databases, Foundation for
the Hellenic World (e.g., genealogies, Olympic
Games, Greek History, etc.)
5Challenges
- Expected results
- Very large aggregate digital material
- Infastructures
- Organizational and technical experiences
- Challenges
- Massiveness and decentralization
- Most institutions involved lack adequate
experience - Heterogeneity (organizational and informational)
- Criteria quality indices
- validity, accuracy and completeness of data
- ease of access
- interoperability of the various information
repositories - preservability of the inventory
6Support actions
- Develop a common set of general guidelines for
the design and implementation of digitization and
documentation projects, and for promoting common
practices. - Digitization methods and procedures
- Organization, integration and preservation of
information - Web design and educational applications
- Intellectual property rights management
7The FORTH-ICS project
- Objective Develop a guide for designing and
applying information structures for cultural
documentation and for supporting the preservation
and interoperability of digital information - Unit in charge Centre for Cultural
Informatics - Project leader Prof. Panos Constantopoulos
- Editors Chryssoula Bekiari, Panos
Constantopoulos, Martin Doerr
8Content and contribution
- Focus Interoperability
- Approach Employ common ontological layer
- Results
- Normative framework recommendations and
suggestions for conformance with standards and
guidelines - Documentation a family of digital record types
with respective XML DTDs to support - recording, description and conservation of
physical and informational objects - Digital preservation
- Publication of digital material
- Interoperability Guidelines for applying
- an ontology for cultural documentation
- technologies and standards for interoperability,
information resource access - technologies and standards for terminology
management - Novelty
- A new, comprehensive, common XML DTD for moveable
objects and site monuments compatible with the
ontology provided by the CIDOC CRM. - First edition of CIDOC CRM (ISO/DIS 21127) in
Greek.
9Documentation from objects to data
physical and informational objects
data (digital)
recording, description
records photos designs analog recordings ...
digital repositories
digitization
metadata
digital surrogates
recording, description
10General structure of an object documentation
record
- Record identification
- Metadata concerning the record as a digital
object in itself. - Object identification
- The minimum data necessary to identify the object
and uniquely refer to it independently from any
particular context. - Scientific documentation
- Description of the object as it is in our hands
- Classifications, physical constituency and
condition, symbolic content, etc. - History of the object as reported by witnesses or
inferred from traces and evidence - Descriptions of events and activities, such as
construction, use, discovery, conservation, etc.,
in which the object took part. - Associations of the object with other objects
(e.g., similarity) and events. - Administration
- Data pertaining to the current handling of the
object in a museum or collection, e.g.
acquisition, location, exhibition, loan, etc.,
and which may later be regarded as relevant to
the object history or not. - References
- Metadata about sources of documentation and
related bibliography.
11Nature of documentation data - 1
- They describe
- Entities
- Physical the object being documented and,
possibly, others related to it. - Conceptual they appear in the context of their
relation to the object being documented. - Events
- Determined by their kind, persons, organizations
and objects involved in specific roles, their
limits in place and time, and constituency from
other sub-events. - An important specialization of events are
activities, which are further characterized by
actor, purpose and technique. - Events are only recorded in the context of their
relationship to the object being documented. - Associations
- Represent comparisons between objects (e.g.
similarity) or cultural context (e.g. joint use
of objects, depiction or copy making, witness).
12Nature of documentation data - 2
- Temporal validity
- permanent unlimited validity
- volatile limited over a specific time interval
- data should normally be tagged with their
validity time
13Nature of documentation data - 3
- Information in a record as a set of logical
propositions - May refer to
- specific situations or occurrences
- the pen with which Eleftherios Venizelos signed
the Protocol of the Sevres Convention - the necklace worn by Queen Amalia on her wedding
- categories
- wedding dress, flag carried in the battlefield,
clay pot - May convey
- part of the history of a particular object
- a frame of hypotheses about part of the history
of an object, which refers to categories of
events and other entities - categorical knowledge, i.e. knowledge about the
kinds of objects and events, not about a
particular object
14Information patterns
- Information of the same nature may be contained
in - different parts of an object record
- different records even concerning objects of
different kinds - e.g. time, place, object composition, event, etc.
- Information patterns specializable types of
information units - Designing documentation records
- Reduced to designing a set of information
patterns and a general, flexible record structure
- Design and conformance with relevant standards
much better controlled
15Examples of information patterns
16Data entry
- Naturally follows the sequence of object handling
acts, but certain autonomy of the data entry
process is desirable - Data entry rule
- necessary value omission disallowed
- compulsory value must be entered if it exists and
is known - optional
- Favours breadth over depth
- Value uncertainty
- Conventional policy least binding
- Date unknown or before 1900 AD
- Effective policy most precise values within the
limits of the documenters knowledge - A personal computer of unknown production date
could be safely dated after 1980 AD - Value multiplicity multiple values by default,
unique if specified
17Object record types
- In practice desirable to have a controlled
variety of records thus supporting uniform
documentation practices. - Criteria for record type definition
18Integration of the digital cultural inventory
- The digital cultural inventory is required to
- remain available and safe despite future failures
of equipment or technological changes
(preservation objective) - support integrated access and use (integration
objective) - Economic dependencies
- preservation costs of recovery, re-creation and
permanent loss of information - integration costs of access and re-use of
distributed and heterogeneous information - Decisive technical factors
- portability across platforms
- data and system interoperability among
repositories - Web access
- Syntactic and semantic interoperability
19Syntactic interoperability
- Common external data represenations
- Individual repositories maintain the freedom to
use different encodings for internal
representation and processing - XML
20Semantic interoperability
- Employ a common conceptual model in formulating
semantic descriptions of objects and digital
resources to support uniform access to them
21Semantic interoperability
22Ontology for semantic interoperability
- ICOM/CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model, ISO/CD
21127. - An ontology for the cultural domain, which
formally describes the concepts and relations
involved in cultural documentation - Provides a common base for the interpretation of
various forms of documentation - Does not dictate the documentation elements
- Use of the ontology
- framework for designing information structures
for documentation systems - communication medium, at the semantic level,
between heterogeneous systems - CIDOC CRM plays an indispensable role in building
an integrated digital cultural inventory.
23Conclusion
- An approach to developing and employing
information structures for cultural documentation
and for the integration and preservation of a
digital cultural inventory aiming at long-term
validity and exploitation. - Dual strategy
- propose specific standard (meta)data structures
for specific application areas - all those structures are related to the common
core ontology of the CIDOC CRM, which provides
semantic interoperability in the long term - Finding aids, such as Dublin Core, can be
incorporated at schema level.