Psychology 203 2 Chi Square SEMESTER 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Psychology 203 2 Chi Square SEMESTER 2

Description:

Chi square is a ... as a test of Goodness of Fit or as a test of association ... This time, unlike the goodness of fit test we might not know the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: dav0
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Psychology 203 2 Chi Square SEMESTER 2


1
Psychology 203?2 (Chi Square) SEMESTER 2
2
Levels of Measurement
  • Categorical (e.g., blue vs green eyes)
  • Ordinal (rank, magnitude of differences not
    apparent e.g., attitude scaling)
  • Interval (arbitrary zero can do most arithmetic
    operations e.g., IQ)
  • Ratio (absolute zero, can do all arithmetic
    operations e.g., Reaction times)

3
Statistical Tests and levels of measurement
  • ANOVA and t-tests
  • interval and ratio data (people also use these
    for attitudes too)
  • Correlation
  • specific formulae for ranked (Spearman) and
    interval or ratio (Pearson) data
  • ?2 (Chi Square)
  • Categorical or frequency data

4
Non-parametric tests
  • Chi square is a non-parametric test
  • Hypotheses are not specified in terms of a
    specific parameter
  • Sometimes referred to as a distribution-free test
  • Such tests do not use or compute means and
    variances
  • They are less sensitive and you should use a
    parametric test as a test of choice.

5
?2 (Chi Square)
  • Like t and F, ?2 tells us how unlikely it is a
    relationship has occurred by chance.
  • Like t and F, ?2 does not tell us about the
    magnitude of the relationship
  • ?2 tests the relationship between variables by
    assessing the discrepancy between the observed
    data and the expected data given the null
    hypothesis of no relationship.
  • Can be used as a test of Goodness of Fit or as a
    test of association (independence)

6
?2 as a test of goodness of fit
  • Tests how well the obtained sample proportions
    fit the proportions specified by the null
    hypothesis.
  • It compares the observed proportions against
    expected proportions
  • Typical question might be to what extent are
    students of different socio-economic backgrounds
    accepted into UWA
  • If there is no bias (either direct or indirect)
    then the proportions accepted from different
    backgrounds should mirror the proportions from
    the community

7
A fictitious example
Expected frequency .25 68 17
8
?2 FORMULA
9
?2 Distribution
  • When the data and the expectation are close Ho is
    true
  • You can never have a negative value
  • Like F, the distribution of ?2 positively skewed
  • Also like F there are a set of distributions
    depending on the degrees of freedom
  • Degrees of Freedom determined by the number of
    categories the sum of the expected proportions
    must come to 1 (or 100). So, every category is
    free to vary except 1 in this example.

10
?2 Distribution
11
?2 Distribution with different DFs
12
Some example tables
13
?2 Test of Independence
  • A question you might ask is there a link
    (association) between sex and smoking?
  • Alternatively Do women smoke more than men?
    might also be asked as a specific question.
  • From what you know already you might apply a
    correlational approach to the first and a t-test
    to the latter.
  • But . Its really the same question are smoking
    (or not) and sex independent?
  • This time, unlike the goodness of fit test we
    might not know the expected frequencies.

14
?2 for 2x2 tables
EXAMPLE 2
Note independence of categories
N143
15
?2 FORMULA
16
?2 for 2x2 tables
EXAMPLE
e (8185)/143
e (8158)/143
e (6258)/143
e (6285)/143
e48.15
e32.85
e36.85
e25.15
143
17
e48.15
e32.85
e36.85
e25.15
143
18
?2 (50-48.15)2/48.15 (31-32.85)2/32.85
(35-36.85)2/36.85 (27-25.15)2 /25.15
?2 .43 with 1 df pgt05
19
Test of Significance
  • Big differences between the observed and expected
    frequencies make it likely there is an
    association
  • Like t or F as ?2 increases the more unusual the
    data become and once a critical value has been
    reached for a given degrees of freedom (df) then
    we say we have a significant effect.
  • df (rows-1) (columns-1) The sums of the data
    in the rows must add up to the total number of
    data points for the analysis. The same for the
    columns.
  • In a 2x2 table we therefore have 1 degree of
    freedom

20
A bigger Contingency table ExampleEffective Use
of CBT
df (Rows 1) (Columns -1)
R1
R2
R3
Total Obs
C1
C2
C3
21
?2 and Effect Size
  • Like t and F, the ?2 test the test of
    significance (p-value) confounds the size of the
    effect and the sample size.
  • The effect size (an association) can be
    calculated from

22
And Finally (almost)
  • We can calculate confidence intervals around the
    effect size
  • Convert reffect into Fisher Zr
  • Then calculate
  • The confidence limit of Zr is the value in 2
    added and subtracted to the value in 1
  • The confidence limit of reffect is determined by
    translating Zr back into reffect using tables

(1/v N-3)1.96
23
Cramers V
  • When the contingency table is greater than a 2x2
    a minor modification to the formula is needed.
  • Where df is the smaller of (R-1) or (C-1)

24
Standards for interpreting Cramérs V as proposed
by Cohen (1988).
25
The Final Lab Report
  • Its a challenge deliberately so
  • No references have been given to you. Why?
  • This is the way research gets done
  • You develop a question
  • You seek guidance from researchers who have asked
    a similar question
  • What did they find
  • What were the issues
  • How does what you are doing build on what went
    before
  • The video has been set up on the web site and you
    can use it as often as you want.
  • Work collaboratively you help someone else
    collect the data they need and theyll help you
    (hopefully). This might be a useful way of
    getting inter-rater reliability.
  • BUT if you work collaboratively the extent of
    the collaboration should be limited to deciding
    what the research question is and what the
    dependent measure is
  • Literature reviews and the rest of the write up
    must be done independently.

26
The Course
  • Emphasised statistical decision making and
    experimental design
  • The laboratories set the context for the
    measurement and statistical methods

27
The Exam
  • 2 sections
  • 80 Multiple Choice questions
  • 10 Short Answer Questions over 2 hours
  • Tables provided
  • No calculators allowed
  • Within each section each question equally
    weighted
  • Each component within a question in the short
    answer section has the mark weight indicated
  • All material is examinable

28
Hints for Study
  • Do not get bogged down on context
  • Look at what it was that the labs were trying to
    get across (what was the teaching point?)
  • You will be asked about material covered in the
    Statplay exercises
  • The material in Gravetter and Wallnau will be
    covered specifically the recommended chapters
    listed in the Laboratory Manual
  • You may be asked to illustrate or explain a point
    that was contained in certain laboratories

29
Statistical Concepts Covered in the Unit During
Semseter 2
  • Summary descriptive statistics
  • Sampling distributions
  • Statistical estimation (confidence intervals
    standard error (sampling distribution of the
    mean, standard error of estimate)

30
More Statistical Concepts
  • Statistical decision making
  • Inferential statistics and hypothesis testing
    (t-tests, ANOVA, ?2)
  • Covariation of scores (correlation)
  • Regression
  • Effect size of an experimental variable
  • Interactions between factors
  • Research Design

31
GOOD LUCK!
32
And thats it!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com