Diapositiva 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Diapositiva 1

Description:

Progress report on the determination of absolute magnitudes using ... least-squares fit with 3-sigma clipping. Mv( )- Mv = 0.08 6.78. mo Dec 5-9, 2005 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: rssd
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diapositiva 1


1
Progress report on the determination of absolute
magnitudes using Strömgren photometry.
C. Jordi, E. Solano Universitat de
Barcelona LAEFF, Madrid
COROT week 9 Dec-2005
2
Contents of COROTSKY seismology programme
  • Stars brighter than V9, centre anticentre
    directions.
  • 12000 stars. 6820 stars later than A5.
  • Hierarchical criteria for assigning Mv to a
    target.
  • ? The criteria was reviewed in COROT week 7 (see
    Jordi,
  • Solano Ribas).
  • ? Already adopted in COROTSKY (see Charpinets
  • presentation in CW8.

3
(No Transcript)
4
(5) Absolute magnitude from Strömgren / Physpar
  • Stars with Strömgren photometry in the Physpar
    windows not having ??/? lt 0.1.
  • 12 stars of region1 (O-B)
  • 3 stars of region 2 (A0-A2)
  • 249 stars of region 3 (late A) post-Hipp.
    calib (CW7)
  • Mv 1.88 5.2 (b-y) o 9.1 ?co 4.9 ?mo
    2.7 10-6 vsini2
  • 278 stars of region 4 (F0-G2) post-Hipp. calib
    (CW7)
  • Mv Mv(ZAMS,?) - 0.13 1.57 ?b - (8.929.6 ??)
    ?co 0.22 Fe/H
  • Stars of region 5 (from G2) PENDING
  • 50 stars of regions 6-8 (B0-G5 supergiants)

5
G2-K type stars Mv calibration
6
Definition of a well-controlled stellar sample
7
How do the pre-Hipparcos calibrations behave?
8
Olsen(1984)
9
COROTSKY
10
Lets see an example
  • HD46241. ?(Mv)-6.809. Classified by Physpar as
    K0V.
  • p 6.3
  • s(p)/ p 0.149 ? d 159 pc. ? Av 0
  • V 5.83 ? Mv(p) -0.18
  • ? It cannot be a MS star

11
COROTSKY
T T T T T t
  • GKM giants have Mv in the range 0.0, -0.5
  • GKM MS have Mv gt 5
  • Stars having ?Mv lt -5 are giants wrongly
    classified.

12
COROTSKY
T T T T T t
  • GKM Main Sequence stars with V lt 9.5 are nearby
    stars ? they have good parallaxes ? classified in
    group (2) s(p)/plt0.1
  • Stars with V lt 9.5 not having good parallaxes
    must be far ? they must be giants.

13
Building the new calibration ...
14
(No Transcript)
15
Same approach as for F0-G2 calibration
1) stars with ??/? lt 5 (104 stars, small bias,
unreddened) least-squares fit with 3-sigma
clipping Mv(?)-Mv(ZAMS, (b-y) o) 0.238 5.49
18.89?(b-y)o ?co
  • 2) stars with ??/? lt 15 (272 stars, unreddened)
  • least-squares fit with 3-sigma clipping
  • Mv(?)- Mv 0.08 6.78 ?mo

16
(No Transcript)
17
The new calibration ... Mv Mv(ZAMS,?) 0.238
5.49 18.89?(b-y)o ?co 6.78 ?mo
0.018 0.58 7.36
0.40 Valid for -0.10 lt
?co lt 0.25 ? 0.11 mag -0.05
lt ?mo lt 0.11 0.36 lt (b-y)olt
0.60
18
24 stars ??/?lt6
COROTSKY
19
Conclusions
  • A new Strömgren calibration has been derived for
    the G Main Sequence stars.
  • Both systematic and random errors have been
    reduced.
  • 249 late-A 278 F0-G2 30 G2-K0 MS stars with
    Mv derived from Strömgren photometry using
    post-Hipparcos calibrations ready to be delivered
    to COROTSKY.
  • BUT still too many stars without information on
    Mv
  • New method Spectral type luminosity s(Mv)
    1 subtype
  • - SIMBAD has been explored but VizieR has not.
  • - To explore all the catalogues contained in
    VizieR using VO-like tools (e.g. vizquery).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com