Title: Overview - Software Lifecycles, Processes, Methods and Tools
1Overview - Software Lifecycles, Processes,
Methods and Tools
- Software lifecycle basics
- Software lifecycles
- build-and-fix
- waterfall
- rapid prototype
- incremental
- spiral
- Process improvement
- CMM ISO9000
- Methods and Tools
2Software Lifecycle
- A series of steps through which a software
product progresses - Lifetimes vary from days to months to years
- Consists of
- people!
- overall process
- intermediate products
- stages of the process
3Software Production Personnel
- Client (customer)
- individuals or organizations that want the
solution - to a problem they have
- Developer(s)
- (members of) an organization producing the
solution - to THAT problem
- User(s)
- person who authorizes client to contract with
developer - person(s) who will utilize the software solution
- Internal software development vs external
contract - and all the shades of gray!
4What is a process?
- Device for producing a product (get job done)
- Level of indirection
- Process description describes wide class of
instances - Humans create process descriptions to solve
classes of problems - Thus
- software processes are devices for creating and
evolving software products - what is this about?
5Intermediate Software Products
- Objectives
- Mark the end of phases
- Enable effective reviews
- Specify requirements for next phase
- Note the abstract requirements/design cycle
- Form
- Rigorous
- Machine processible (highly desirable)
- Content
- Specifications, Tests, Documentation
6Phases of a Software Lifecycle
- Standard Phases
- Requirements Analysis Specification
- Design
- Implementation and Integration
- Operation and Maintenance
- Change in Requirements
- Testing throughout
- Phases promote manageability and provide
organization
7Requirements Analysis and Specification
- Problem Definition gt Requirements Specification
- determine exactly what is the client (and user)
problem - in their environment - with their environmental
constraints - develop a contract with client
- exactly what the software/computer solution will
do - Difficulties
- client asks for wrong product or developer knows
better (want vs need) - client is computer/software illiterate or
developer domain illiterate - specifications will be ambiguous, inconsistent,
incomplete (adequacy?) - Validation
- extensive specification reviews check that
requirements satisfy client wants - look for ambiguity, consistency, incompleteness
- check for feasibility, testability
- develop system/acceptance test plan
8Design
- Requirements Specification gt Design
- develop architectural design (system structure)
decompose software into modules with module
interfaces - develop detailed design (module specifications)
select algorithms and data structures - maintain record of design decisions and
traceability - how the product is to do its task
- Difficulties
- cant design one of those (feedback to
requirements?) - miscommunication between module designers
- design may be inconsistent, incomplete,
ambiguous - question when can the programmer make this
decision for the client? with all that entails - Verification
- extensive design reviews (inspections with
checklists) to determine that design conforms to
requirements - check module interactions
- develop integration test plan
9Implementation and Integration
- Design gt Implementation
- implement modules and verify they meet their
specifications - combine modules according to architectural design
- how the product does its task
- Difficulties
- cant build one of those (feedback to design or
requirements?) - module interaction errors
- order of integration has a critical influence on
product quality and productivity - Verification and Testing
- extensive code reviews (inspections with
checklists) to determine that implementation
conforms to requirements and design - develop and test on unit/module test plan focus
on individual module functionality - test on integration test plan focus on module
interfaces - test on system test plan focus on requirements
and determine whether product as a whole
functions correctly
10Operation and Maintenance
- Operation gt Change
- maintain software after (and during) user
operation - integral part of process
- determine whether product as a whole still
functions correctly - Difficulties
- design not extensible
- lack of up-to-date documentation
- personnel turnover
- Verification and Testing
- extensive review to determine that change is
made correctly and all documentation updated - test to determine that change is correctly
implemented - test to determine that no inadvertent changes
were made to compromise system functionality
(check that no affected software has regressed)
11Build-and-Fix
Build First Version
Modify until Client is satisfied
Operations Mode
Retirement
12Waterfall
Req. Change
Operations
Retirement
13Rapid Prototyping
Req. Change
Operations
Retirement
14Incremental
For each build Perform detailed design,
implement. Test. Deliver.
Operations
Retirement
15The Spiral Model Boehm,1988
16(Extremely) Simplified Spiral Model
Risk Assessment
Req. Change
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
Add a Risk Analysis step to each phase!
Operations
Retirement
17Capability Maturity Model (CMM) Watts
Humphrey,1989, author of PSP
- CMM is not a software lifecycle model ...
- Strategy for improving the software development
process regardless of the process model
followed - Basic premise the use of new software methods
alone will not improve productivity and quality,
because software management is, in part, the
cause of problems - CMM assists organizations in providing the
infrastructure required for achieving a
disciplined and mature process () - Includes
- technical aspects of software production
- managerial aspects of software production
18Capability Maturity Model (continued)
- Five maturity levels
- 1. initial ad hoc process
- 2. repeatable process basic project management
- 3. defined process process modeling and
definition - 4. managed process process measurement
- 5. optimizing process process control and
dynamic improvement - to move from one stage to the next, the SEI
provides a series of questionnaires and conducts
process assessments that highlight current
shortcomings
19ISO 9000
- Further attempt to improve software quality based
on International Standards Organization (ISO) - ISO 9000 series of five related standards
- within ISO 9000 standard series ISO 9000-3
focuses on software and software development - Basic features
- stress on documenting the process in both words
and pictures - requires management commitment to quality
- requires intensive training of workers
- emphasizes measurement
- Adopted by over 60 countries (USA, Japan,
European Union, ...) - To be ISO 9000 compliant, a companys process
must be certified
20Software Methods and Tools
- Methods provide a means or procedure for
accomplishing a task - Tools are devices for performing some task
- analytical tools
- software tools
- Methodology guides the proper use of methods and
tools - Process helps to enact a methodology
- Environments are a synergistic collection of
tools with process support
21Analytical Tools
- Problem solving techniques that help in software
development - cost-benefit analysis
- compare expected benefits against estimated costs
- stepwise refinement
- divide and conquer
- abstraction
- focus on some important property and ignore (for
the time being) irrelevant details - Analytical tools underlie many software
development methods
22Software Tools
- Software tools are an automated implement for
performing a task - Tools facilitate work because they are
- fast, immune to boredom and "cheating"
- Software Tools should be ...
- powerful, effective, convenient, natural,
reliable, robust - Most are not
- exceptions compilers, editors, loaders
- these have been polished, refined, and debugged
through long-term use and hence made reliable and
robust - these have been made natural and effective
through extended exposure and maintenance
23 Tool Obstacles
- Tool use obstacles
- developers tend to be like hammer and screwdriver
carpenters - tools are not powerful and/or effective
- tools are unreliable and/or not robust
- comes with time and money
- tools are inconvenient and/or unnatural
- comes from successful use
- Tool building obstacles
- Short history of large-scale software development
- Limited success in
- developing software well
- exploiting tools successfully
- Few software techniques have had time and use
required to achieve tool status - No tools at all in some key areas (e.g.,
real-time analysis)
24Requirements Focus
- Requirements determine the What of a software
products functionality. (But see Jackson!) - Requirements analysis and specification
transforms - informal product definition
- into
- formal requirements specification
- A step in between is transforming the product
definition into a natural language statement of
the systems functionality - precise, yet abstract (how do we do this?!?)
25What about Reality?
- Is a rational process of software development
possible? (desirable?) - Parnas No! We should fake it, though (1986)
- people dont know what they want?
- dont know everything at outset, backtracking
inevitable? - human beings not good at big, complex problems?
- changes occur in the environment (out of our
control)? - human errors only avoidable if we avoid the use
of humans - can we?
- preconceived notions (favorite ideas, like
language wars) - reuse and other economic factors
- Rank order these (most often, most expensive
during development, most costly in later use?)
26What does the sincere developer do?
- Parnas says fake the rational process... -
- designers need guidance - helps us proceed
- better than ad hoc - we can at least aim high
- organizational advantages to standard procedure
- reviews, transfer of workers, ideas and software
- if we agree on an ideal process, we can measure
progress along that dimension - external reviews made possible and useful
- because others will understand the standards
27Why have a Requirements Document?
- Record desired behavior of system build the
solution the the right problem - that user or customer can review for adequacy
- we dont want a random variation on the correct
solution - Avoid making customer decisions by programming!
- what can happen here? consider systems
engineering - Avoid duplication and inconsistency
- many would argue, the requirements doc can answer
questions - a masters thesis prototype AS requirements
28Why? (continued)
- A complete requirements doc is necessary to make
good estimates (not sufficient though!) - Valuable insurance against staff turnover
- Test plan development
29More
- Can be used, long after system in use, to define
constraints for future changes - senior project never too late to do
requirements
30Synchronization
- Read Wiegers
- Read Yourdon
- Read Jackson
- Develop questions you might ask customer
- dynamically develop questions during customer
presentations to review later and refine - if you get a good answer, record it as well as
you can
31 (continued)
- each team member should keep notes
- team meeting afterwards to gather notes to make a
preliminary report of - questions asked
- answered obtained
- overview of domain
- overview of problem as described
- other comments of note