Title: Ethnic minority status and breast cancer screening practices:
1Ethnic minority status and breast cancer
screening practices A meta-analytic review
Table 2. Relationship Between Race and
Mammography Screening
Rebecca Purc-Stephenson Kevin M. Gorey,
University of Windsor
Abstract Regular use of breast cancer screening
has been shown to be associated with reduced
breast cancer incidence among women. Although
rates of cancer screening have increased
dramatically in the United States and Canada,
ethnic minority women are at particular risk for
not adhering to recommended cancer screening
guidelines. While it is widely cited that ethnic
minority women are less likely be screened for
breast cancer than their non-Hispanic white
counterparts, estimates of breast cancer
screening among ethnic minority women show a
great deal of variability across studies. This
study explores the association of breast cancer
screening with ethnic minority status in women by
integrating the findings of existing studies
using meta-analytic techniques. A total of 72
conceptually and empirically relevant studies
that compared breast cancer screening practices
among ethnic minority (i.e., African American,
Hispanic and/or Asian) women and non-Hispanic
white women were selected for systematic review
from social scientific and bio-medical research
literature databases (1975-2005). Preliminary
analyses indicate differential rates of
mammography compliance among African American,
Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, and Native
American/Alaskan Native and non-Hispanic white
women aged 40 years and older. In addition to
observation of such main effects, this review
explores their moderation by key characteristics
of study participants, methods and contexts.
Table 1 Descriptive Characteristics of the 72
Studies Included in the Meta-Analysis Percentage
Distributions
Introduction Breast cancer is the most common
form of cancer affecting women worldwide and is
the major killer of women between the ages of 35
and 55 (Baum, 1988). However, vulnerable
populations such as racial ethnic minorities, the
elderly, and the poor experience a
disproportionate burden of breast cancer (Glanz,
Croyle, Chollette, Pinn, 2003 Gotzsche
Olsen, 2000). Research over the past two decades
has shown that whereas ethnic minority women have
a lower overall incidence of breast cancer, they
experience later stage at diagnosis, greater
incidence for multiple cancer sites, differential
treatments, greater mortality and morbidity than
do their white non-Hispanic counterparts
(Ashing-Giwa, 2005 Heeden White, 2001 Lannin,
et al., 1998 Randolph, Goodwin, Mahnken,
Freeman, 2002), presumably due to less screening
mammography (Heeden White, 2001 Lannin et al.,
1998). The objective of this review is to
empirically investigate the relationship between
screening mammography and ethnicity by
integrating the findings of existing studies
using meta-analytic techniques.
- Method
- In February 2006, the following peer-reviewed
research literature databases were searched
(1975-2005) ERIC, PsychINFO, Medline, Social
Services Abstracts, and Sociological Abstracts. - We used the key word search terms (ethnic,
minorit, race) and (breast cancer, breast
neoplasm, breast carcinoma) and (screen,
preventi, mammography), augmented by
bibliographic reviews of retrieved manuscripts
and previous published reviews 123 conceptually
relevant articles were uncovered. - After applying our inclusion and exclusion
criteria, 72 relevant studies were retained. - Meta-Analysis
- The selected sample of 72 studies approximated a
case-control search design, with 17 studies
observing if respondents had ever had a
mammography, and 69 studies observing if
respondents had obtained a mammography in the
past two years (14 studies included both
observations). - The odds ratio, which is an estimate of the
relative odds of an ethnic minority women having
a mammography versus white non-Hispanic women
having a mammography, was selected as this
studys central meta-analytic statistic (Cooper,
1998 Greenland, 1987). - The Mantel-Haenszel procedure was used to
calculate a weighted OR from the individual
studies, with 95 percent confidence intervals
around the primary study as well (Mantel
Haenszel, 1959). - Separate pooled analyses were conducted for each
ethnic group comparison for each aspect of
mammography under study (ever had a mammogram
and had a mammogram in the past two years)
African American (14 and 69 outcomes), Hispanic
(13 and 39 outcomes), Asian/Pacific Islander (5
and 22 outcomes), and Native American/Alaskan
Native (0 and 5 outcomes). - As a control for publication bias, one-tailed
fail-safe Ns were computed for each domain. - Tests of Moderation
- Heterogeneity analyses were conducted using
Cochrans Q. - If significant heterogeneity was observed (p lt
.05), its potential sources were systematically
explored.
- Results
- Sample Description
- Descriptive characteristics are presented in
Table 1. - Of the 72 studies, 57 compared non-Hispanic
whites to African Americans, 37 to Hispanics, 16
to Asian/Pacific Islanders, and 5 to Native
American/Alaskan Natives. - 36.1 of the studies used population-based
surveys (36.1), with the National Health
Interview Survey the most common type (17.8). - 50.8 of the studies collected data from
urban/metropolitan regions few focused on women
from rural regions (8.2). - Meta Analysis
- The results from the meta-analysis are presented
in Table 2. - The results show that, compared to non-Hispanic
white women, fewer ethnic minority women have - ever had a screening mammography
- had a mammogram in the past two years.
- These differences tend to
- be larger across age categories
- be larger in Southern US compared to the Midwest
or Northeast US. - The differences in screening appear to decrease
over time.
- Discussion
- Systematically integrating 72 studies on
screening mammography, this meta-analysis found
consistent and meaningful racial differences. - Overall, the results found that ethnic minority
women get screening mammography less often
compared to non-Hispanic white women. - There was significant heterogeneity in most of
our pooled samples which we attempted to identify
through tests of moderation.
Note. AA African American His Hispanic
As/PI Asian/Pacific Islander Na/AN Native
American/Alaskan Native. OR Odds ratio CI
Confidence intervals. p-value for heterogeneity
between studies, Cochrans Q.