Platter Planning Tool For Trusted Electronic Repositories - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Platter Planning Tool For Trusted Electronic Repositories

Description:

Trust is demonstrated fitness for purpose. Trust must be ... Manage obligation to ensure preservation of material beyound the lifetime of the repository ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: colinro
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Platter Planning Tool For Trusted Electronic Repositories


1
PlatterPlanning Tool For Trusted Electronic
Repositories
  • Meeting the challenge of technological change
  • Developing Trust
  • WePreserve 2009

2
What is Platter
  • Developed by the DPE in 2008 by Colin Rosenthal
    and associates
  • Platter is a guide to making a new repository or
    archive
  • The future of Platter is linked with the future
    of DPE and/or DRAMBORA

3
What Is Trust?
  • Trust is demonstrated fitness for purpose
  • Trust must be achieved
  • Trust must be demonstrated
  • Trust must be maintained
  • Platter achieves this in combination with
    auditing tools such as DRAMBORA, nestor and
    CRL/TRAC

4
From Platter to Trust
  • The Strategic Objective Plans have largely been
    created from the requirements from Nestor and
    TRAC checklist
  • Following PLATTER covers all the major points
    from these checklists
  • The documentation strategy in Platter corresponds
    well to DRAMBORA
  • The availability of all the documentation will
    make a DRAMBORA audit much easier

5
The components of Platter
  • Repository Classification
  • The Platter Planning Cycle
  • Strategic Objective Planning

6
Platter Stage 1 Classifying Your Repository

7
Axis 1 Purpose Function
  • Where does your mandate come from?
  • Are you a profit-making body?
  • Are you an existing or new organisation?

8
Axis 2 Scale of Repository
  • What amount of digital materials do you archive?
  • How many digital objects?
  • How many staff do you (expect to) employ
  • How many users

9
Axis 3 Operation
  • How do you acquire material?
  • How complex are your data?
  • How specialised are your data?
  • How sensitive are your data?
  • What are the access rights?

10
Axis 4 Technical Implementation
  • What is the source of your metadata?
  • Which interoperability standards do the
    repository employ?
  • Which storage strategy do you use?
  • Which stragety is used for software management?

11
Platter Stage 1 Classifying Your Repository

12
Platter Stage 2 The Planning Cycle
13
  • Broad organisational focus
  • Function and Goals
  • Basis for detailed planning

14
Platter Stage 2 The Planning Cycle
15
Platter Stage 2 The Planning Cycle
16
Platter Stage 2 The Planning Cycle
17
Platter Stage 3 The Strategic Objective Plans
  • Self-defined objectives
  • All areas of repository operation
  • Cyclic planning process

18
Strategic Objective Plans
  • Business Plan
  • Financial planning, monitoring, and reporting
  • Staffing Plan
  • Acquisition and maintenance of relevant skillset
    for managing repository
  • Data Plan
  • Specification of data and metadata objects,
    formats, and structures for ingest, storage, and
    dissemination, together with the relevant
    transformations and mappings

19
Strategic Objective Plans
  • Acquisition Plan
  • Management of the relationship with depositors
    and other data providers. Appraisal policy
  • Access Plan
  • Management of relationship with end users. Access
    Policy.
  • Preservation Plan
  • Ensure that the access and usability of material
    in repository is not adversely affected by
    technological change and obsolescence

20
Strategic Objective Plans
  • Technical System Plan
  • Specifies goals for hardware, software and
    networking
  • Succession Plan
  • Manage obligation to ensure preservation of
    material beyound the lifetime of the repository
  • Disaster Plan
  • Respond the rapid changes to the repository
    enviroment

21
Access Plan An example
  • Create, Maintain and Review a Mission Statement
    which reflects the Repositorys mandate
  • Our mission is to provide a trustworthy archive
    for the games developed for the early computer
    platforms. Games in the public domain should be
    made available to the public, while protected
    games should be held until such a time where the
    license is no longer valid.
  • This mission statement should be reviewed each
    year

22
Access Plan An example
  • Develop and maintain a definition and
    understanding of your Designated Communities
  • First community is people who remember the games,
    and would like to reexperience them. The target
    community is quite large, but shrinking, and
    extremely diverse. They are technical skilled,
    but will expect detailed instructions on how to
    get the games working. They will not expect to be
    able to access games that they have no memory of.
  • The designated community definition should be
    reviewed every 6 months

23
Access Plan An example
  • Create and implement a Repository Access Policy
  • The repository handles to kinds of material,
    those in the public domain, and those that are
    not. All public domain material should be freely
    available.
  • There should be a complaints mailbox for
    take-down notices and other legal problems.
    Material should be taken down within 24 hours,
    and without negotiation.
  • Access to material should always be granted,
    until complaints are recieved

24
Access Plan An example
  • Specify and fulfill technical requirements for
    dissemination and access
  • Repository should have a webpage, and contents
    should be available for download.
  • A basic search system should allow for resource
    discovery
  • The webpage should be search engine friendly
  • Metadata should not be downloadable, only online
    accessible.

25
Ten Core Principles
Repository Characterisation
Business Plan
Staffing Plan
Disaster Plan
Repository Profile
..........................
Business Actions Goals
Staffing Actions Goals
Disaster Actions Goals
Realisation
Reformulation
Review
26
  • Visit Platter at
  • http//www.digitalpreservationeurope.org/platter/

27
  • This work is licensed under the Creative Commons
    Attribution 2.5 DenmarkLicense. To view a copy
    of this license, visithttp//creativecommons.org/
    licenses/by/2.5/dk/
  • or send a letter toCreative Commons, 171 Second
    Street, Suite 300, San Francisco,
  • California, 94105, USA.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com