The University of Maryland, College Park Institutional Review Board - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

The University of Maryland, College Park Institutional Review Board

Description:

the benefits and risks of research must be distributed fairly (e.g. the ... that encountered in everyday life or routine medical or psychological exam) and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: marcr3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The University of Maryland, College Park Institutional Review Board


1
The University of Maryland, College
ParkInstitutional Review Board
  • The IRB

March 7th, 2007
Roslyn Edson
2
Use of Humans in Research
HISTORY
Ethically Questionable Biomedical Studies (e.g. the Tuskegee study)
Ethical Codes The Nuremberg Principles Declaration of Helsinki The Belmont Report
The Common Rule (45 CFR 46) The Federal Wide Assurance
3
Definition of a Human Subject
  • A human subject means a living individual about
    whom an investigator conducting research obtains
  • data through intervention or interaction with
    the individual
  • identifiable private information

4
Basic Ethical Principles
  • Respect for Persons
  • individuals treated as autonomous agents
  • persons with diminished autonomy protected
  • Beneficence
  • do no harm
  • maximize benefits/minimize risks
  • Justice
  • the benefits and risks of research must be
    distributed fairly (e.g. the selection of
    subjects must be equitable)

5
I Read the News Today, Oh Boy !
  • Healthy Volunteer Dies in Hopkins Asthma Study.
    June 01
  • Fathers Complaints Shuts Down Research at VCU.
    Jan. 00

6
The Federal Regulations for the Protection of
Human Subjects
  • The Common Rule (45 C.F.R. 46) is the regulation
    pertaining to the use of human subjects for
    research funded by 16 Federal agencies.
  • This regulation requires that approval by an
    Institutional Review Board be obtained before
    research involving the use of human subjects can
    be initiated. This applies to research funded or
    supported by these 16 Federal agencies.

7
The Federal Wide AssuranceFWA 00005856
  • Assures protections for human subjects
  • Designates the UMCP IRB (IRB00000474)
  • All activities, regardless of the source of
    funding, will be guided by the Belmont Report
  • Applies The Common Rule (45 CFR 46) to all human
    subjects research, regardless of source of
    support
  • Applies the Subparts (B,C D) of 45 CFR 46 to
    all human subjects research, regardless of source
    of support

8
UM System Policy on Human Subjects in Research
  • All UM System research activities which involve
    human subjects, regardless of the level of risk,
    require review and approval, prior to the
    initiation of the activity.
  • An IRB shall have jurisdiction over all reviews
    and approvals.

9
UM System Policy
  • Policy applies to all research activities
    performed on the premises of the UM System or its
    constituent institutions or elsewhere by faculty,
    students, or employees under UM System auspices
  • An IRB will have the authority to determine
    whether or not any activity is covered by the
    policy or whether it requires review.

10
Definition of Research
  • A systematic investigation, including research
    and development, testing and evaluation, designed
    to develop or contribute to generalizable
    knowledge.

11
Level of Research Review
  • Exempt (IRB Manager or IRB Co-chair)
  • Some surveys, educational tests, and interviews
  • Some research involving existing data
  • Some research on educational practices
  • Doe not apply if the data is person-identifiable
    and the disclosure of the data outside the
    research could be damaging to the subject
  • Expedited Review (IRB Chair or other designated
    IRB members)
  • not more than minimal risk (e.g. risk is to
    that encountered in everyday life or routine
    medical or psychological exam) and
  • Activities involve only procedures listed in
    expedited review categories (63 FR 60364-60367,
    November 9, 1998)
  • Full Board Review
  • gt than minimal risk
  • Clinical trials

12
Human Subjects Research Review
13
What should be included in a consent form ?
14
Elements of an ICF
  • Institutional research statement
  • Age statement
  • Purpose
  • Procedures
  • Confidentiality
  • Risks
  • Benefits
  • Freedom to withdraw statement
  • Contact info for the investigator and the IRB
  • Signature and date line

15
Upcoming Changes
  • electronic IRB submission and approval system
    (currently in pilot phase)
  • Mandatory online IRB training for all
    investigators (faculty, staff and students)
  • A second IRB to handle the increasing volume of
    IRB applications that require full Board review

16
For Further Information and Inquiries
  • IRB Staff
  • Roslyn Edson, IRB Manager x 50678
  • Roxanne Freedman, IRB Coordinator x 54212
  • Pankaja Dakhane, Graduate Assistant
  • IRB Co-Chairs
  • James Hagberg
  • J. Dennis OConnor
  • IRB Acting Co-Chair
  • - Robert Brown

  • http//www.umresearch.umd.edu/IRB
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com