Title: Economic Impacts of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) on
1Economic Impacts of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
on Paddy Farming Community in Anuradhapura
District of Sri Lanka
By Amaranayake, P.W.P. Department of
Agricultural Systems Faculty of
Agriculture Rajarata University of Sri Lanka
2Introduction
- Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
- Condition in which the kidney function gradually
declines until the kidneys are unable to filter
waste from the body and maintain the proper
balance of water and chemicals. - 200 in every one million of the population in Sri
Lanka, are afflicted with renal failure. - Proportion is much higher in North Central
Province - emerging health scourge - Around 80 of cases from Anuradhapura district .
-
- 1st leading cause of death in Anuradhapura
district -
- Worrying increase of CKD in certain DS divisions
3Prevalence of CKD cases in the NCP
Year No. of CKD cases in NCP No. of CKD cases in Sri Lanka of CKD cases in NCP out of total Sri Lanka
1996 921 5475 16.8
1997 1029 4827 21.3
1998 1390 5526 25.1
1999 1608 6194 25.9
2000 1699 5841 29.1
Source Epidemiological Unit, Colombo
Dissanayake W.
4- Cases of CKD by districts in NCP
1996-2003(Cases/Deaths)
Year Anuradhapura Polonnaruwa Sri Lanka
1999 1267/167 341/47 6194/1095
2000 1354/202 345/39 5841/1035
2001 1405/184 395/41 6113/1075
2002 858/137 390/52 6204/1150
2003 1098/143 291/55 6345/1170
Source Department of Health Services NCP
5Number of CKD deaths in General Hospital
Anuradhapura from 1993 to 2002
Source Statistic division, renal clinic,
Anuradhapura
6(General hospital, statistic division
,Anuradhapura ,2003)
7Background of the Research problem
- Past researches on CKD mainly addressed on CKD
of unknown etiology in Sri Lanka. - Instances of economic Impact estimations on
other Chronic diseases except CKD are available
(In other countries).
8Problem Statement
- CKD is a life threatening disease in Sri Lanka
especially in North Central Province. - Any of Economic impact analysis of CKD has not
been conducted in Sri Lanka yet. - Lack of scientific identification and estimation
of economic burden of CKD and joint action for
CKD prevention, from a perspective of agriculture
and health are occurred.
9General Hypothesis
10Specific hypotheses
- Presence of end stage CKD is likely to have
negative impacts on natural socio-demographical
pattern and economic performances of paddy
farming community in Anuradhapura district. - It may be adversely affect on family and
exchange labor inputs, operated paddy extent,
yield performances, income from paddy, farming
system and labor migration. - Prevalence of CKD likely to have association with
source and nature of drinking water, type of
materials used for drinking water storage and
cooking ,habit of smoking, alcohol use and
irrational behaviors in agrochemical use.
11Hypothesis Statement
12Occupational distribution of CKD in Anuradhapura
district -2002
Category Number
Farmer 174 56.3
House wife 29 9.4
Laborer 15 4.9
Traders 05 1.6
Carpenters 05 1.6
Post man 03 1.0
Gramasewaka 02 0.6
Others 13 3.9
Missing data 63 20.4
Source Renal clinic, General Hospital
Anuradhapura -2002
13Age distribution of CKD in Anuradhapura district
-2002
Age Number
0 10 00 00.0
11 20 04 1.3
21 30 29 9.4
31 40 57 17.4
41 50 73 23.6
51 60 73 23.6
61 70 51 16.5
71 80 10 3.2
Data not available 12 3.9
Source Renal clinic GH Anuradhapura -2002
14- Objectives
- General objective
-
- To determine the economic impact of End stage
CKD on paddy farming community in Anuradhapura
district of Sri Lanka. - Specific objectives
- To analyze the costs and returns of paddy farming
for affected and non-affected samples. - To compare the differences of costs and returns
of paddy farming between two samples. - To analyze the additional burden of hired labor
due to CKD on affected paddy farmers.
15Methodology
- Study area
- Padaviya and Medawachchiya (high prevalence of
CKD) DS divisions in Anuradhapura district. - Data and sampling
- Cross sectional type data
- Pre tested structured questionnaire survey
- Random sampling
- Affected sample size 100
- Non affected sample 100
16Map of the Anuradhapura district
17Analytical methods
- 01) Analysis of costs returns- (objective 01
02) - Main costs and returns of two samples were
calculated for an hectare of cultivation. - The difference between estimated mean values of
main cost and returns of two samples were
statistically compared for any significant
difference. - 02) Analysis of additional burden of hired labor
-(objective 03) - Additional cost of hired labor for the affected
group was compared to that of the non affected
ones. -
18Results and discussion
- 01)Analysis of costs and returns for paddy Farming
Item Affected sample Non-affected sample
Total Cost (Excluding Imputed Cost for labor) (Rs/ha) 44037.79 40234.97
Average price per acre (Rs/kg) 14.12 14.62
Gross Income from Paddy (Rs/ha) 64255.78 68171.97
Net Income Excluding Imputed Cost for labor (Rs/ha) 20217.99 27937.00
19 02) Comparison of differences of cost and return
values between two samples
Variable Z calculated Z table Significance
Cost of family and exchange labor input (man days/season/ ha) 13.197 1.96 Significant
Cost of hired labor input (man days/season/ ha) 8.582 1.96 Significant
Total Cost (Excluding Imputed Cost)(Rs/ha) 3.088 1.96 Significant
Net Income Excluding Imputed Cost (Rs/ha) 3.258 1.96 Significant
2003) Analysis of Additional burden of Hired labor
due to CKD on affected paddy farmers
- The additional hired labor requirement for a
affected farmer 11. 01 man days/ha - Average additional burden of hired labor
Rs 3734.40 Rs/ha/Farmer - Additional burden of hired labor borne by the
farmers who are affected by CKD - Rs 2.84 millions per season
- (Rs 5.69 millions per year )
- Under estimation of severity of real burden due
to limitations in the study
21Descriptive analysis
- a) Demographic characteristics
Majority of affected farmers, Male -
(97) Between 41- 60 age group - (76) 4-7
family members - (76) Married -
(87) Relatively less educated (1-5 years) -
(44)
22b) Information related to risk factors
- Majority of affected farmers
- - Use non-boiled and non-filtered well water
as the main source of drinking water. - - Use Al utensils for drinking water storage
and cooking purposes. - - Smokers and Alcohol users
- - Use more hired labor for agrochemical
application after getting affected from CKD - Majority of affected and non-affected farmers
- - Use agrochemicals for paddy farming.
- - Didnt use safety precaution in agrochemical
application
23- Family, Exchange and hired labor inputs
Comparison of Family and Exchange and hired labor
inputs between affected and non-affected samples
24Comparison of Family and Exchange and hired labor
inputs between affected and non-affected samples
25- Operated and non operated paddy extents
Comparison of Operated non operated paddy
extents between affected and non-affected samples
26- Labor migration after CKD
Comparison of Labor migration after CKD between
affected and non-affected samples
27Comparison of yield and prices between affected
and non-affected samples
28Comparison of Farming systems between
non-affected and affected samples
Farming System Non affected Non affected Affected (Before CKD) Affected (Before CKD) Affected (After CKD) Affected (After CKD)
Farming System Number Number Number
Chena 36 36 47 47 4 4
Home gardening 68 68 61 61 39 39
29Conclusions
- Use of family and exchange labor was
significantly less in the affected sample. - Net income excluding imputed cost of labor of
affected farmers was significantly less than the
non-affected farmers. - Value of additional burden of hired labor borne
by the CKD affected farmers in selected DS
divisions is Rs 2.84 millions/season. - Presence of end stage CKD is negative impacts on
the economic performance of the paddy farming
community in the Anuradhapura district.
30Recommendations
- Implications to prevent CKD
- Entire population in the identified risky areas
should undergo screening for a basic renal
investigations. - Community based awareness programs on CKD risk
factors should be launched. - Implication to increase the income from paddy
- Work out a system for encouraging use of
exchange labor. - 3. Implications to develop the household income
and status - Well organized counseling programs should be in
place to advice and help affected farmers and
other family members - Home gardening should be promoted with the
support of all family members and experiences of
affected farmers.
31Limitations of the Research study
- Unavailability of well organized up dated
computerized or at least a manual database. - Difficulties in obtaining accurate facts in
detail from end stage kidney disease patients
since they do not keep records and suffering from
illness. - Time Budgetary constraints.
- Conventional objections, arguments and rules and
regulations of some authorized people in related
institutes as well as in farming community. - Difficulties in contacting resource persons
32Suggestions for further research
- Further Research work to confirm the suspected
causal factors, habits and behaviors for CKD
(Unknown aetiology). - Further analysis of role of hired, family and
exchange labor inputs under the categories of
men, women and children. - Further research works to verify the link between
occupation and CKD prevalence (occupational
relationships). - Research works which focus on the socio economic
impact of CKD on farmers household income by
considering all three fiscal costs.
33References
- Foreign medical experts to investigate rise in
kidney disease, The official government news
portal of Sri Lanka,lthttp//www.news.lkgt Accessed
on 08 Feb 2008 - Grimm P. C, Ettenger R, 1992. Pediatric renal
transplantation. Ad1, ances in Pediatrics, 39,
441-493. - Koch-Hattern A, Berlozheimer N, Thrower S. M,
(1988). Working with, families. In P. D. Sloane,
L. M. Slatt, R. M. Baker (Eds.), Essentials of
family medicine (pp. 1-13). Baltimore Williams
Wilkins. - Lev E. L, Owen S. V, (1998). A prospective study
of adjustment to hemodialysis. American
Nephrology Nursing Association Journal, 25,
495-504. - Survey done by department of Health and National
Water Storage and Drainage Board on CKD, 2002. - Winsett R. P, (1999). Living with renal disease
Rehabilitation perspectives. E, rceptional
Parent, 29, 26-29. - A Case Control Study of Chronic Renal Disease of
Medawachchiya, North Central province, Sri Lanka,
2004, The Faculties of medicine Sciences,
University of Peradeniya Nephrology unit,
Kandy. - A Baseline Study on Early Renal Disease in a
Selected Community of the North Central province
of Sri Lanka , 2003 , The Faculties of medicine
Sciences , University of Peradeniya , Renal
Unit , General (Teaching) Hospital Kandy ,
Provincial Ministry of Health , North Central
Province , Sri Lanka.
34- Central Bank of Sri Lanka, 2005, Annual report.
- Department of Census and Statistics, 2006
- Athuraliya T.N.C , Abeysekera T , Amarasinghe P.H
, kumarasiri R , Rathnathunga N, Dissanayake D ,
Bandara P , Chronic Renal Disease in
Medawachchiya , Sri Lanka Some Risk factors ,
Bio chemical profile and Renal histology , 2004 - Patterson. J. M.. Garwick, A. W. (1994). The
impact of chronic illness on families A family
systems perspective. Annals of Behavioral
Medicine, 16,131-142. - Todaro Michael. P., Stephen .C. Smith. Human
Capital Education and Health in Economic
development in Economic development 8th Ed - A Case Control Study of Chronic Renal Disease of
Medawachchiya, North Central province, Sri Lanka,
2004, The Faculties of medicine Sciences,
University of Peradeniya Nephrology unit,
Kandy. - A Baseline Study on Early Renal Disease in a
Selected Community of the North Central province
of Sri Lanka , 2003 , The Faculties of medicine
Sciences , University of Peradeniya , Renal
Unit , General (Teaching) Hospital Kandy ,
Provincial Ministry of Health , North Central
Province , Sri Lanka. - Dele Abegunde, Anderson Stanciole, 2006, An
estimation of the economic impact of chronic
noncommunicable diseases in selected countries,
World Health Organization Department of Chronic
Diseases and Health Promotion - Suzanne R. Smith Elizabeth Soliday, 2001, The
Effects of Parental Chronic Kidney Disease on the
Family, Family Relations, Vol. 50, No. 2. pp.
171-177.
35Acknowledgements
- Dr. Fredrick Abeyratne, Senior Programme Analyst,
UNDP,Colombo. - Miss. Sumali Dissanayake, Lecturer, Department of
Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Rajarata
University of Sri Lanka,Anuradhapura. - Mr. S. J. Herath,Department of Agricultur
Economics and Business management, Faculty of
Agriculture, University of Peradeniya. - Mr. Y. M. Wickramasinghe ,Senior lecture,
Department of Agriculture, Faculty of
Agriculture, Rajarata University of Sri
Lanka,Anuradhapura. - Mr. A.M.J.B Adhikari ,Head of the Department of
Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Rajarata
University of Sri Lanka,Anuradhapura. - Dr. W.M. Palitha Bandara, Medical officer(
Primary health), Officer of the PDHS (North
Central Province), Anuradhapura. - Dr. Navarathnasingam Janakan ,Consultant
Epidemiologist , Epidemiological Unit/Ministry of
Health,Colombo 10. - Dr. Upul Karunarathne, Medical officer-
Nephrology , Renal Care Research Centre,
General hospital ,Anuradhapura. - Dr. W. Athapaththu, P.D.H.S(NCP) , Office of
PDHS,Anuraradhapura.
36- Mr. B.P.S. W. Pathirana, Assistant Director of
Agriculture, Provincial Department of
Agriculture, North Central province ,
Anuradhapura. - Dr. K.L.P.N. Samarawickrama, District Medical
Officer ,District Hospital ,Medawachchiya. - W.M. Karunarathna, Nursing officer, Renal Clinic
In charge, District Hospital , Medawachchiya. - Dr. Mahinda Uyangoda, District Medical Officer,
District Hospital,Padaviya. - H.G.Nimal Jayasinghe, Nursing officer, Renal
Clinic In charge, District Hospital , Padaviya - Mr. H.C.N.Darmapala ,Assisit. Divisional
secretary , Medawachchiya DS office ,
Medawachchiya. - Mr. M.Samarathunga, Assist agriculture research
officer ,Walpolagama. - Mr. Nimal Abeysinghe, Assist. agriculture
research officer , Kadawathgama.
37Thank you.