Economic Impacts of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) on - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Economic Impacts of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) on

Description:

American Nephrology Nursing Association Journal, 25, 495-504. ... of medicine & Sciences, University of Peradeniya & Nephrology unit, Kandy. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:375
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Jaya8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Economic Impacts of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) on


1
Economic Impacts of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
on Paddy Farming Community in Anuradhapura
District of Sri Lanka
By Amaranayake, P.W.P. Department of
Agricultural Systems Faculty of
Agriculture Rajarata University of Sri Lanka
2
Introduction
  • Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
  • Condition in which the kidney function gradually
    declines until the kidneys are unable to filter
    waste from the body and maintain the proper
    balance of water and chemicals.
  • 200 in every one million of the population in Sri
    Lanka, are afflicted with renal failure.
  • Proportion is much higher in North Central
    Province - emerging health scourge
  • Around 80 of cases from Anuradhapura district .
  • 1st leading cause of death in Anuradhapura
    district
  • Worrying increase of CKD in certain DS divisions

3
Prevalence of CKD cases in the NCP
Year No. of CKD cases in NCP No. of CKD cases in Sri Lanka of CKD cases in NCP out of total Sri Lanka
1996 921 5475 16.8
1997 1029 4827 21.3
1998 1390 5526 25.1
1999 1608 6194 25.9
2000 1699 5841 29.1
Source Epidemiological Unit, Colombo
Dissanayake W.
4
  • Cases of CKD by districts in NCP
    1996-2003(Cases/Deaths)

Year Anuradhapura Polonnaruwa Sri Lanka
1999 1267/167 341/47 6194/1095
2000 1354/202 345/39 5841/1035
2001 1405/184 395/41 6113/1075
2002 858/137 390/52 6204/1150
2003 1098/143 291/55 6345/1170
Source Department of Health Services NCP
5
Number of CKD deaths in General Hospital
Anuradhapura from 1993 to 2002
Source Statistic division, renal clinic,
Anuradhapura
6
(General hospital, statistic division
,Anuradhapura ,2003)
7
Background of the Research problem
  • Past researches on CKD mainly addressed on CKD
    of unknown etiology in Sri Lanka.
  • Instances of economic Impact estimations on
    other Chronic diseases except CKD are available
    (In other countries).

8
Problem Statement
  • CKD is a life threatening disease in Sri Lanka
    especially in North Central Province.
  • Any of Economic impact analysis of CKD has not
    been conducted in Sri Lanka yet.
  • Lack of scientific identification and estimation
    of economic burden of CKD and joint action for
    CKD prevention, from a perspective of agriculture
    and health are occurred.

9
General Hypothesis
10
Specific hypotheses
  • Presence of end stage CKD is likely to have
    negative impacts on natural socio-demographical
    pattern and economic performances of paddy
    farming community in Anuradhapura district.
  • It may be adversely affect on family and
    exchange labor inputs, operated paddy extent,
    yield performances, income from paddy, farming
    system and labor migration.
  • Prevalence of CKD likely to have association with
    source and nature of drinking water, type of
    materials used for drinking water storage and
    cooking ,habit of smoking, alcohol use and
    irrational behaviors in agrochemical use.

11
Hypothesis Statement
12
Occupational distribution of CKD in Anuradhapura
district -2002
Category Number
Farmer 174 56.3
House wife 29 9.4
Laborer 15 4.9
Traders 05 1.6
Carpenters 05 1.6
Post man 03 1.0
Gramasewaka 02 0.6
Others 13 3.9
Missing data 63 20.4
Source Renal clinic, General Hospital
Anuradhapura -2002
13
Age distribution of CKD in Anuradhapura district
-2002
Age Number
0 10 00 00.0
11 20 04 1.3
21 30 29 9.4
31 40 57 17.4
41 50 73 23.6
51 60 73 23.6
61 70 51 16.5
71 80 10 3.2
Data not available 12 3.9
Source Renal clinic GH Anuradhapura -2002
14
  • Objectives
  • General objective
  • To determine the economic impact of End stage
    CKD on paddy farming community in Anuradhapura
    district of Sri Lanka.
  • Specific objectives
  • To analyze the costs and returns of paddy farming
    for affected and non-affected samples.
  • To compare the differences of costs and returns
    of paddy farming between two samples.
  • To analyze the additional burden of hired labor
    due to CKD on affected paddy farmers.

15
Methodology
  • Study area
  • Padaviya and Medawachchiya (high prevalence of
    CKD) DS divisions in Anuradhapura district.
  • Data and sampling
  • Cross sectional type data
  • Pre tested structured questionnaire survey
  • Random sampling
  • Affected sample size 100
  • Non affected sample 100

16
Map of the Anuradhapura district
17
Analytical methods
  • 01) Analysis of costs returns- (objective 01
    02)
  • Main costs and returns of two samples were
    calculated for an hectare of cultivation.
  • The difference between estimated mean values of
    main cost and returns of two samples were
    statistically compared for any significant
    difference.
  • 02) Analysis of additional burden of hired labor
    -(objective 03)
  • Additional cost of hired labor for the affected
    group was compared to that of the non affected
    ones.

18
Results and discussion
  • 01)Analysis of costs and returns for paddy Farming

Item Affected sample Non-affected sample
Total Cost (Excluding Imputed Cost for labor) (Rs/ha) 44037.79 40234.97
Average price per acre (Rs/kg) 14.12 14.62
Gross Income from Paddy (Rs/ha) 64255.78 68171.97
Net Income Excluding Imputed Cost for labor (Rs/ha) 20217.99 27937.00
19

02) Comparison of differences of cost and return
values between two samples
Variable Z calculated Z table Significance
Cost of family and exchange labor input (man days/season/ ha) 13.197 1.96 Significant
Cost of hired labor input (man days/season/ ha) 8.582 1.96 Significant
Total Cost (Excluding Imputed Cost)(Rs/ha) 3.088 1.96 Significant
Net Income Excluding Imputed Cost (Rs/ha) 3.258 1.96 Significant
20
03) Analysis of Additional burden of Hired labor
due to CKD on affected paddy farmers
  • The additional hired labor requirement for a
    affected farmer 11. 01 man days/ha
  • Average additional burden of hired labor
    Rs 3734.40 Rs/ha/Farmer
  • Additional burden of hired labor borne by the
    farmers who are affected by CKD
  • Rs 2.84 millions per season
  • (Rs 5.69 millions per year )
  • Under estimation of severity of real burden due
    to limitations in the study

21
Descriptive analysis
  • a) Demographic characteristics

Majority of affected farmers, Male -
(97) Between 41- 60 age group - (76) 4-7
family members - (76) Married -
(87) Relatively less educated (1-5 years) -
(44)
22
b) Information related to risk factors
  • Majority of affected farmers
  • - Use non-boiled and non-filtered well water
    as the main source of drinking water.
  • - Use Al utensils for drinking water storage
    and cooking purposes.
  • - Smokers and Alcohol users
  • - Use more hired labor for agrochemical
    application after getting affected from CKD
  • Majority of affected and non-affected farmers
  • - Use agrochemicals for paddy farming.
  • - Didnt use safety precaution in agrochemical
    application

23
  • Family, Exchange and hired labor inputs

Comparison of Family and Exchange and hired labor
inputs between affected and non-affected samples
24
Comparison of Family and Exchange and hired labor
inputs between affected and non-affected samples
25
  • Operated and non operated paddy extents

Comparison of Operated non operated paddy
extents between affected and non-affected samples
26
  • Labor migration after CKD

Comparison of Labor migration after CKD between
affected and non-affected samples
27
Comparison of yield and prices between affected
and non-affected samples
  • Yield Performances

28
  • Farming systems

Comparison of Farming systems between
non-affected and affected samples
Farming System Non affected Non affected Affected (Before CKD) Affected (Before CKD) Affected (After CKD) Affected (After CKD)
Farming System Number Number Number
Chena 36 36 47 47 4 4
Home gardening 68 68 61 61 39 39
29
Conclusions
  • Use of family and exchange labor was
    significantly less in the affected sample.
  • Net income excluding imputed cost of labor of
    affected farmers was significantly less than the
    non-affected farmers.
  • Value of additional burden of hired labor borne
    by the CKD affected farmers in selected DS
    divisions is Rs 2.84 millions/season.
  • Presence of end stage CKD is negative impacts on
    the economic performance of the paddy farming
    community in the Anuradhapura district.

30
Recommendations
  • Implications to prevent CKD
  • Entire population in the identified risky areas
    should undergo screening for a basic renal
    investigations.
  • Community based awareness programs on CKD risk
    factors should be launched.
  • Implication to increase the income from paddy
  • Work out a system for encouraging use of
    exchange labor.
  • 3. Implications to develop the household income
    and status
  • Well organized counseling programs should be in
    place to advice and help affected farmers and
    other family members
  • Home gardening should be promoted with the
    support of all family members and experiences of
    affected farmers.

31
Limitations of the Research study
  • Unavailability of well organized up dated
    computerized or at least a manual database.
  • Difficulties in obtaining accurate facts in
    detail from end stage kidney disease patients
    since they do not keep records and suffering from
    illness.
  • Time Budgetary constraints.
  • Conventional objections, arguments and rules and
    regulations of some authorized people in related
    institutes as well as in farming community.
  • Difficulties in contacting resource persons

32
Suggestions for further research
  • Further Research work to confirm the suspected
    causal factors, habits and behaviors for CKD
    (Unknown aetiology).
  • Further analysis of role of hired, family and
    exchange labor inputs under the categories of
    men, women and children.
  • Further research works to verify the link between
    occupation and CKD prevalence (occupational
    relationships).
  • Research works which focus on the socio economic
    impact of CKD on farmers household income by
    considering all three fiscal costs.

33
References
  • Foreign medical experts to investigate rise in
    kidney disease, The official government news
    portal of Sri Lanka,lthttp//www.news.lkgt Accessed
    on 08 Feb 2008
  • Grimm P. C, Ettenger R, 1992. Pediatric renal
    transplantation. Ad1, ances in Pediatrics, 39,
    441-493.
  • Koch-Hattern A, Berlozheimer N, Thrower S. M,
    (1988). Working with, families. In P. D. Sloane,
    L. M. Slatt, R. M. Baker (Eds.), Essentials of
    family medicine (pp. 1-13). Baltimore Williams
    Wilkins.
  • Lev E. L, Owen S. V, (1998). A prospective study
    of adjustment to hemodialysis. American
    Nephrology Nursing Association Journal, 25,
    495-504.
  • Survey done by department of Health and National
    Water Storage and Drainage Board on CKD, 2002.
  • Winsett R. P, (1999). Living with renal disease
    Rehabilitation perspectives. E, rceptional
    Parent, 29, 26-29.
  • A Case Control Study of Chronic Renal Disease of
    Medawachchiya, North Central province, Sri Lanka,
    2004, The Faculties of medicine Sciences,
    University of Peradeniya Nephrology unit,
    Kandy.
  • A Baseline Study on Early Renal Disease in a
    Selected Community of the North Central province
    of Sri Lanka , 2003 , The Faculties of medicine
    Sciences , University of Peradeniya , Renal
    Unit , General (Teaching) Hospital Kandy ,
    Provincial Ministry of Health , North Central
    Province , Sri Lanka.

34
  • Central Bank of Sri Lanka, 2005, Annual report.
  • Department of Census and Statistics, 2006
  • Athuraliya T.N.C , Abeysekera T , Amarasinghe P.H
    , kumarasiri R , Rathnathunga N, Dissanayake D ,
    Bandara P , Chronic Renal Disease in
    Medawachchiya , Sri Lanka Some Risk factors ,
    Bio chemical profile and Renal histology , 2004
  • Patterson. J. M.. Garwick, A. W. (1994). The
    impact of chronic illness on families A family
    systems perspective. Annals of Behavioral
    Medicine, 16,131-142.
  • Todaro Michael. P., Stephen .C. Smith. Human
    Capital Education and Health in Economic
    development in Economic development 8th Ed
  • A Case Control Study of Chronic Renal Disease of
    Medawachchiya, North Central province, Sri Lanka,
    2004, The Faculties of medicine Sciences,
    University of Peradeniya Nephrology unit,
    Kandy.
  • A Baseline Study on Early Renal Disease in a
    Selected Community of the North Central province
    of Sri Lanka , 2003 , The Faculties of medicine
    Sciences , University of Peradeniya , Renal
    Unit , General (Teaching) Hospital Kandy ,
    Provincial Ministry of Health , North Central
    Province , Sri Lanka.
  • Dele Abegunde, Anderson Stanciole, 2006, An
    estimation of the economic impact of chronic
    noncommunicable diseases in selected countries,
    World Health Organization Department of Chronic
    Diseases and Health Promotion
  • Suzanne R. Smith Elizabeth Soliday, 2001, The
    Effects of Parental Chronic Kidney Disease on the
    Family, Family Relations, Vol. 50, No. 2. pp.
    171-177.

35
Acknowledgements
  • Dr. Fredrick Abeyratne, Senior Programme Analyst,
    UNDP,Colombo.
  • Miss. Sumali Dissanayake, Lecturer, Department of
    Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Rajarata
    University of Sri Lanka,Anuradhapura.
  • Mr. S. J. Herath,Department of Agricultur
    Economics and Business management, Faculty of
    Agriculture, University of Peradeniya.
  • Mr. Y. M. Wickramasinghe ,Senior lecture,
    Department of Agriculture, Faculty of
    Agriculture, Rajarata University of Sri
    Lanka,Anuradhapura.
  • Mr. A.M.J.B Adhikari ,Head of the Department of
    Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Rajarata
    University of Sri Lanka,Anuradhapura.
  • Dr. W.M. Palitha Bandara, Medical officer(
    Primary health), Officer of the PDHS (North
    Central Province), Anuradhapura.
  • Dr. Navarathnasingam Janakan ,Consultant
    Epidemiologist , Epidemiological Unit/Ministry of
    Health,Colombo 10.
  • Dr. Upul Karunarathne, Medical officer-
    Nephrology , Renal Care Research Centre,
    General hospital ,Anuradhapura.
  • Dr. W. Athapaththu, P.D.H.S(NCP) , Office of
    PDHS,Anuraradhapura.

36
  • Mr. B.P.S. W. Pathirana, Assistant Director of
    Agriculture, Provincial Department of
    Agriculture, North Central province ,
    Anuradhapura.
  • Dr. K.L.P.N. Samarawickrama, District Medical
    Officer ,District Hospital ,Medawachchiya.
  • W.M. Karunarathna, Nursing officer, Renal Clinic
    In charge, District Hospital , Medawachchiya.
  • Dr. Mahinda Uyangoda, District Medical Officer,
    District Hospital,Padaviya.
  • H.G.Nimal Jayasinghe, Nursing officer, Renal
    Clinic In charge, District Hospital , Padaviya
  • Mr. H.C.N.Darmapala ,Assisit. Divisional
    secretary , Medawachchiya DS office ,
    Medawachchiya.
  • Mr. M.Samarathunga, Assist agriculture research
    officer ,Walpolagama.
  • Mr. Nimal Abeysinghe, Assist. agriculture
    research officer , Kadawathgama.

37
Thank you.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com