Restoration Ecology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Restoration Ecology

Description:

There are some legal underpinning such as the Clean Water Act which requires restoration ... have been charismatic megafauna (e.g. wolf, CA condor, buffalo, beaver) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: informa67
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Restoration Ecology


1
Restoration Ecology
2
Restoration Ecology
  • Chrissy Field, SF

3
Restoration Ecology
  • Due to the severe impact humans have already
    inflicted on the landscape and the expensive cost
    of real estate, restoring a landscape may be more
    feasible than other options
  • This is a relatively new field and many advances
    have been made
  • However, we rarely restore something to its
    former glory and functionality

4
Restoration Ecology
  • May be able to trace restoration back to Aldo
    Leopold in the 1930s at the UW arboretum (120 ha
    forest)
  • RE draws upon many disciplines and subdisciplines
    of the natural sciences including landscape
    ecology, hydrology, geomorphology, soil science,
    geochemistry, animal behavior, pop biology,
    theoretical biology, invasion ecology and
    evolutionary ecol

5
Restoration Ecology
  • Specifically, RE is the process of intentionally
    altering a site to establish a defined,
    indigenous, historic ecosystem
  • The goal is to emulate the structure, function,
    diversity and dynamics of the specific ecosystem
  • Ormoving a degraded system back towards one of
    greater structural and functional diversity

6
Restoration Ecology
  • It is an iterative process
  • 1) examines preexisting, historic, and current
    reference conditions prior to designing the plan
  • 2) developing a restoration plan
  • 3) obtain permits, do the work
  • 4) implementing plan, although complex (e.g.
    hydrology, soil, plant animal responses)
  • 5) monitoring the site

7
Restoration Ecology
8
Restoration Ecology
  • RE may take many forms restoration, enhancement,
    reclamation, re-creation, rehabilitation,
    augmentation, and translocation
  • Rehabilitation is simply improving degraded
    habitat, maybe not restoring it
  • Reclamation may be stabilization of the land
    and/or minimizing further degradation

9
Restoration Ecology
  • Re-creation is an attempt to return to historic
    condition, accuracy
  • Replacement may recreate a site, which may not be
    historically accurate
  • Enhancement or augmentation are attempting to add
    to the degraded condition, but not fully
    functional

10
Restoration Ecology
  • The majority of restoration activities target the
    plant communitywhy?
  • When might animals be involved?
  • Full restoration at all levels has never been
    attempted, although it is the goal

11
Restoration Ecology Conservation
  • RE is a relatively young science and as such, has
    both advocates and critics
  • Some argue it is important and a good compromise
    while others suggest it is wasteful and expensive
  • There are some legal underpinning such as the
    Clean Water Act which requires restoration

12
Restoration Ecology Conservation
  • A potential benefit of RE is the opportunity to
    conduct ecological studies, especially in
    community ecology, invasive biology, succession
    biology
  • A potential negative is that many systems are now
    viewed as expendable or replaceable on
    another site

13
Restoration Ecology Conservation
  • Steps in designing and implementing ecological
    restorations
  • Goals and design should be reviewed and revised
    as data on site conditions are collected,
    community concerns addressed, and as the
    constructed restoration evolves

14
Restoration Ecology Conservation
15
Restoration Ecology
  • Site assessment is the first step, usually in the
    form of surveys and then exploring the literature
    (published papers, maps, reports)
  • Legalities must be determined
  • Assess environmental history of site
  • If not available, contemporary comparisons maybe
    appropriate

16
Restoration Ecology
  • RE is an inherently subjective process and
    determining success may require the
    establishment of goals
  • Goals will depend upon local constraints,
    objectives, and context of participants
  • Restored wetlandfarmer vs. duck hunter

17
Restoration Ecology
  • Restoration design requires multidisciplinary
    approach (genes to ecosystem, as well as natural
    sciences)
  • Plans should dictate the physical transformation
    proposed for the site and the desired outcome
    (target species)

18
Restoration Ecology
  • There are many ways to implement a design,
    depending on time, money, labor, practicality
  • Getting as many people involved in the
    implementation will get locals to buy into the
    restoration effort
  • Proper documentation and design can subsequently
    serve as an experiment

19
Restoration Ecology
  • ER are long-term propositions and proper
    monitoring becomes less-likely
  • For adaptive management, it is necessary
  • Frequently disturbing site will release or open
    community to weedy species
  • Compliance vs. scientific

20
Restoration Ecology
  • Restoration challenges are numerous as we are
    generally dealing with dynamic, complex, and
    unique systems
  • Furthermore, the site may have many limitations
    (landscape context, size, heterogeneity, plus
    more)

21
Restoration Ecology
  • It may be difficult to properly address
    restoration because we lack knowledge
  • BM have relatively good databases, but most
    other groups lack good information
  • Even when we know the organisms (e.g. clapper
    rail) we can screw up (CS 15.1)

22
Restoration Ecology
  • When we identify knowledge gaps, we may be able
    to then fill them

23
Restoration Ecology
  • For example, what if herbivory was limiting
    reestablishment of native sp in a grassland? What
    measures could we take?
  • What about if N is limiting?

24
Restoration Ecology
  • Restoration is frequently restricted to the plant
    community
  • However, even if animals are the focus of the
    conservation effort, restoring habitat may be the
    best action (but see CS 15.4 15.5)
  • Furthermore, a functioning ecosystem should
    trickle-up and eventually affect the entire
    community

25
Restoration Ecology
  • Population genetics can play an important role in
    RE. How?
  • Does this change with a relatively large
    disturbance and large distribution project?

26
Restoration Ecology
  • Restoration effects that focus on a small scale
    may succeed in the short term, but fail in the
    longer because the larger ecological context
    required to allow these restoration efforts to be
    self-sustaining is either not present, too
    degraded, operating at too small a scale
  • Some times, some things may not even be able to
    be addressed (e.g. hydrology)

27
Restoration Ecology
  • Many local restoration projects cannot draw on
    larger or regional populations to recruit from
    and consequently, may not reflect historical
    conditions
  • It may be necessary to restore them to a stable,
    but less diverse current state

28
Restoration Ecology
  • While RE claims to be interdisciplinary, in
    reality it may focus on a single sp or single
    environmental factor

29
Restoration Ecology
  • Most animal restoration attempt to bring
    individuals back to a site rather than foster or
    enhance a preexisting pop(n)
  • Most animal reintroductions have been charismatic
    megafauna (e.g. wolf, CA condor, buffalo, beaver)
  • The Reintroduction Specialist Group of the World
    Conservation Unions (IUCN) created guidelines
    for reintroductions

30
Restoration Ecology
  • Step 1 conduct a feasibility study (autecology,
    availability of stockers, fulfilling same
    functional role)
  • Step 2 select sites w/in historic range, but
    habitat not vulnerable to same threats, and is
    protected
  • Step 3 ID and evaluate stock (genetics)
  • Step 4 evaluate social, political, and economic
    conditions for long-term survival

31
Restoration Ecology
  • Step 5 involve all stakeholders and get proper
    financing design as experiment to judge success
  • Step 6 post-release monitoring should be done
    using an adaptive model

32
Restoration Ecology
  • Some of the common problems associated with
    reintroductions include high juvenile mortality,
    loss of rare alleles and genetic diversity,
    reproductive dysfunction, and other problems
    associated with inbreeding of small populations

33
Restoration in Marine Habitats
  • Marine restoration has received very little
    attention but there are a number of efforts
    (where?)

34
Restoration in Marine Habitats
  • Mangrove systems are strongly being addressed
    previously the major threat had been clearing for
    shrimp ponds

35
Restoration in Marine Habitats
  • In many coral reef restoration projects, physical
    structure is placed on bottom

36
Restoration in Marine Habitats
37
Restoration in Marine Habitats
  • Unfortunately, many projects stop at this point
    and assume if structure is provided, the reef
    will comehow?
  • Sometimes restoration will include translocation
    of healthy fragments

38
Environmental Regulations and Restoration
  • Restoration can be expensive (e.g. 3ft2 or
    130K/acre) and many potential pitfalls exist
  • Regulation in the US
  • Inspired by the dust bowl, the Natural
    Resources Conservation Service develops and
    disseminates comprehensive info on management
    techniques for soil and water

39
Environmental Regulations and Restoration
  • In 1969, NEPA was passed and proactively
    established environmental standards
  • Nixon created the EPA to coordinate and oversee
    NEPA
  • Wetland restoration is in large part a result of
    the Clean Water Act (72) which dictated no net
    loss of areas and/or function

40
Environmental Regulations and Restoration
  • Other significant laws ESA (73)
  • to provide a means whereby the ecosystems upon
    which endangered ad threatened species depend may
    be conserved and to provide a program for the
    conservation of such endangered and threatened
    species
  • Unfortunately, the ESA allows the taking of
    plants, but not animals (unless endangered animal
    present)but there are some state laws protecting
    end plants

41
Environmental Regulations and Restoration
  • For those projects that are expected to impact
    endangered species, mitigation of impacted
    habitat may be required

42
Environmental Regulations and Restoration
  • Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (1977)
    attempt to protect the adverse impact of
    environmental surface mining (particularly coal)
  • In theory, mines must commit to returning the
    land to pre-mine conditions
  • Unfortunately, this does not apply to any
    pre-1977 site, as well as many other types of
    minerals (e.g. gold, silver, lead)

43
Environmental Regulations and Restoration
  • There is a great deal of variation from one
    country to another regarding the regulations of
    mining
  • The United Nations Conference on Human
    Environment (1972) attempted to stop the impact
    of mining
  • In the Rio de Janeiro (92) summit they
    specifically addressed reclamation of degraded
    habitats

44
Restoration Ecology
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com