Basis of Presentation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Basis of Presentation

Description:

Two rail companies and six of their. executives and staff have been charged ... Hatfield rail crash. Four fatalities and 100 injured. John Freeman Associates 2005 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: free177
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Basis of Presentation


1
Basis of Presentation
  • The following notes are based on experience of
    audits in the Chemical Industry both
    operational audits and acquisition due diligence.
  • Much of the experience in this field has been for
    a multi-site international manufacturer based in
    Australia, and has covered sites in the UK,
    France, Spain, Austria, The Netherlands, Egypt,
    the USA, and Canada.
  • The plants concerned involve medium scale organic
    synthesis, are not large, but are complex, and
    use a wide range of flammable, toxic, corrosive
    and environmentally sensitive materials.
  • Based on a multi-site organisation, it is
    nevertheless relevant to any large industrial
    enterprise with multiple operations.
  • It is not unusual to combine such audits with a
    simultaneous audit of environmental issues.

2
Preamble
A gentle disclaimer
  • The author has little knowledge of, and no
    experience of High Energy Physics facilities. It
    is hoped however that the audience can draw
    something useful from experience in a world where
    molecules are of more concern than are particles.

3
Typical factory layout
4
A selection of typical plant details
5
What is it?
Its a bit like a financial audit
  • Similarities
  • It provides an external overview
  • It aims to confirm due propriety of internal
    procedures
  • Differences
  • It is Management initiated not a regulatory
    imposition
  • A principal aim is improvement, training and
    development
  • The downside is human suffering not negative
    dollars!

6
Why do we have them?
  • To justify fine words in policy statements
  • A duty of care to employees and neighbours
  • To reduce risks to the business of untoward
    events
  • Management being seen to be serious about safety
  • For consistent interpretation of management
    policy
  • To improve safety by training and development
  • Internal cross-fertilisation of experience and
    ideas

7
Corporate Concerns
Hatfield UK
High Speed Derailment Oct. 2000
July 10 2003 Two rail companies and six of their
executives and staff have been charged with
manslaughter following a police investigation
into the 115 mph Hatfield rail crash.
Four fatalities and 100 injured
8
Where in the overall safety scheme of things?
  • Tools for Ensuring Safety

MAJOR HAZARDS
OPERATIONAL INTEGRITY
WORKPLACE SAFETY
DESIGN Hazard Analysis Risk Analysis HAZOP Protect
ion Systems
SYSTEMS Procedures Reporting Statistics
Support
ACTIVITIES Housekeeping Vigilance Notificatio
n Compliance
Inspection Tour
Design Team
Health and Safety Audit
9
Who is involved?
Typical Organisation Structure
Group Management
Group HSE Manager
Third Party Independent (Occasional)
Data and Statistics
Site A Management
Site B Management
Audit Team Site B Group HSE Manager
(Chair) Safety Manager Operations rep
(varies) Management rep Site A rep
(option) (Third Party Independent)
Safety Officer
Safety Officer
Operations
Operations
10
How do we go about it?
Typically annual, the main steps are
1 Collation of statistics and comparative
performance review
2 Circulate self-audit questionnaire to each
site
3 On-site review of responses and Action
Progress
4 Site tour by Audit Team
5 Round up discussion and Action Plan
11
What is the Auditor looking for?
  • Throughout the process, the Audit Team should be
    asking itself
  • Are Systems and Procedures appropriate and
    adequate?
  • Are Systems and Procedures correctly followed?
  • Are the correct Documentary Records available?
  • Are the HS Facilities and Equipment appropriate
    and adequate?
  • Is there a general awareness of Safety as an
    issue?
  • Is there a programme for safety training?
  • Could the organisation respond to a serious
    emergency?

12
Typical Audit Team
  • Leader Senior Safety Manager
  • Responsible directly to Top Management (e.g.
    Group Board)
  • Not responsible for operations
  • Local personnel
  • Local safety officer and a management
    representative
  • Operating supervisor of a specific area under
    review
  • Visiting representative from another site/area
  • Others (if needed)
  • To give full experience cover of specialist
    technology and general operation/engineering
    (e.g. Chemist Engineer)
  • Independent Neutral (Say every third audit or so)

13
Actions and Feedback
  • Action Programme to correct deficiencies
    identified
  • Agreed actions (Where the team has authority to
    decide)
  • Recommended Actions (If 0ther authorisation is
    needed)
  • Include Target dates
  • Progress Reviews of previous action programme
  • Record Completions
  • Provide early prompts
  • Highlight missed dates
  • Record decisions not to proceed with reasons

14
Safety Statistics
To be meaningful, statistics must be consistent
and accurate
  • Typical statistical analysis would include
  • Injury Frequency Rates Lost time, Medical
    treatment
  • Injury Severity Index extent of lost time
  • Injury analysis - by type, location, worker group

Central recording and analysis ensures
consistency Care with definitions such as
Lost-time injury how many days? Figures are
only useful if lessons are learned and
improvement targets imposed Rigorous recording is
essential
15
Procedures availability and adherence
Defined procedures must be set down
  • Standard Operating Procedures
  • Default procedures for all main operations
  • Are they Available, Accessible and Clear
  • Use them or change them dont ignore them
  • Obtain user views
  • Maintenance Safety Procedures
  • Permit to Work System hot work, confined
    spaces, heights
  • Isolation and Lock-off arrangements a critical
    area
  • Authority to sign training essential

16
Training Procedures
  • Safety Training
  • Management, Factory workers, Office workers
  • Specialist functions (e.g. Fire, Rescue)
  • Induction programmes
  • New Employees
  • Temporary Employees
  • Contractors personnel
  • Visitors

17
Safety Systems
Some of the more important Systems to check
  • Change Control System
  • Design vetting of any modification to plant,
    process or alarm and trip functions
  • Accident Reporting, Investigation and Remedial
    Actions
  • Abnormal Incident Reporting
  • Reporting, Investigation and Remedial Actions as
    for Accidents
  • Inspection and Testing programmes
  • Pressure Systems, Lifting Equipment, Access
    Equipment, etc.

18
Change Control
Flixborough UK 1974
Plant modification destroys original design
integrity
Failed flexible connector
Aftermath
19
Emergency Procedures
Investigate preparedness for emergencies
  • Response Plan for a major emergency
  • Does it exist and is it well known and understood
  • Liaison with local services e.g. Fire Service?
  • Internal Emergency Actions
  • Fire fighters trained? equipped?
  • First aiders availability and training
  • Evacuation drill clearly posted? practiced?
  • Notifications to management, authorities, local
    services
  • Nominated person? Standard routine?

20
Health and Safety Facilities
  • First aid
  • Location and Equipment
  • Trained personnel and call-out arrangements
  • Fire fighting and Rescue
  • Extinguishers, breathing equipment, trained
    personnel
  • Security
  • Visitor control record of people on the site
  • Intruder prevention

21
Health monitoring policy
Requirements depend on local circumstances
  • Occupational Health Issues
  • General medical checks and hearing tests
  • On first employment
  • At regular intervals
  • Specific Risk Areas
  • Exposure to chemicals measurement of ambient
    levels
  • Known potential health hazards
  • Biological checks

22
Some general comments
  • Avoid a blame culture
  • Encourage positive approach
  • Inter site participation helps
  • Numerical basis for performance assessment
  • Not generally successful unless based on
    objective measures
  • Subjective assessment is not usually satisfactory
  • Site visits help to reinforce comments
  • Photographs of areas of concern
  • Review meetings are as much about Training as
    Communication

23
Especially Vulnerable Situations
  • Growth by Acquisition
  • High Staff Turnover
  • Regular use of Temporary Staff
  • Extensive use of Contractors
  • Language Differences

24
In Conclusion
A systematic and regular audit of Safety Systems
and Performance can lead to significant
improvements.
Benefits include Consistent and effective
implementation of policy. Protection against
corporate exposure. Reductions in accident
rates. Improvements in Safety Training and
Development. Cross fertilisation in Safety
thinking. Increased awareness of the importance
attaching to Safety issues.
25
Dont be like this guy!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com