Some Considerations on Yield Stress: A Modeler's Perspective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Some Considerations on Yield Stress: A Modeler's Perspective

Description:

... 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77 7 7 7 7'7'777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 77777 ... O8P8Q8R8S8T8U8V8W8X8Y8Z8[88]8^8_8` ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: bfrl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Some Considerations on Yield Stress: A Modeler's Perspective


1
Some Considerations on Yield StressA Modeler's
Perspective
  • Nicos Martys
  • NIST

2
(No Transcript)
3
Why study the rheology of concrete?
  • Concrete is the most widely used building
    material.
  • Ease of flow and placement can significantly
    reduce costs.
  • Architectural benefits Improving workability and
    mechanical properties allows for more
    flexibility in design.

4
Viscosity
F/A
V/L
F/A
F applied force A area V velocity L gap
width
V
L
5
Yield Stress
F/A
V0
L
6
(No Transcript)
7
Interaction potential
8
ModelMeasurement
  • Bingham model
  • Hershel Buckley
  • Modified Casson Equation

.
9
Stress Growth
v
100 10 1 .1 .01 .005
10
Bingham Model
11
Low Shear Rate Limit
12
Comparison of models
Casson qp2
Brinkman
Hershel Buckley
13
Role of force vs. potential
14
Stress Growth-Raw Data
V/KT
40 40 10
5
15
Scaled Data (I)
16
Scale Data (II)
17
Radial distribution functionV(r)
18
Radial distribution function for scaled
potential V(3r)
19
Observations on Yield Stress
  • 1)Over small strains (ltlt1) stress growth
    simulation data can be collapsed using maximum
    force and interaction potential width as scaling
    parameters (at fixed concentration).
  • 2)Over larger strains (0.1) entropic barriers
    begin to complicate analysis.

20
Mean Squared Displacements Volume
fraction0.52
Conrad and Weitz
21
Yield Stress?
V1 V.01
22
Some possible questions
  • 1)Further validation steps?
  • 2)What are the most reliable measurements to
    compare to?
  • 3)Other improvements?
  • 4)Potential use of AFM or other methods to
    determine inter-particle forces.

23
Realistic interaction forcesNonat et al.
24
Cement Particles
25
Cement Particles
N N
26
Yield Stress vs. Volume Fraction
Flatt and Bowen
27
Acknowledgements
  • Ray Mountain Numerical algorithms
  • Julien Lancien, Jim Sims and Bill George
    parallel code development
  • Steve Satterfield, John Hagedorn and Tere
    Griffin visualization
  • Ed Garboczi realistic aggregate shapes
  • Clarissa Ferraris, Robert Flatt (Sika),Vijay
    Gupta (W.R. Grace), David Fowler (ICAR), John
    Winpigler, Daniel Constantiner (Degussa)
  • VCCTL, ACBM
  • NASA

28
Sheared Cubes
29
Spheres and Cubes
Open symbolssimulation Filled symbolsExperiment
Koehler and Erdogan
30
Revisit Bingham Model
Y8 Y3 Y1.6
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com