Title: Genes and Variation
1Genes and Variation
- This group of ladybug beetles illustrates a
population with a number of inherited traits - Darwin recognized such variations as the raw
material for evolution
2Genes and Variation
3Genes and Variation
- As Darwin developed his theory of evolution, he
worked under a serious handicap - He didn't know how heredity worked!
- Although Mendel's work on inheritance in peas was
published during Darwin's lifetime, its
importance wasn't recognized for decades - This lack of knowledge left two big gaps in
Darwin's thinking - First, he had no idea how heritable traits pass
from one generation to the next - Second, although variation in heritable traits
was central to Darwin's theory, he had no idea
how that variation appeared
4Genes and Variation
- Evolutionary biologists connected Mendel's work
to Darwin's during the 1930s - By then, biologists understood that genes control
heritable traits - They soon realized that changes in genes produce
heritable variation on which natural selection
can operate - Genes became the focus of new hypotheses and
experiments aimed at understanding evolutionary
change - Another revolution in evolutionary thought began
with Watson and Crick's studies on DNA - Their model of the DNA molecule helped
evolutionary biologists because it demonstrated
the molecular nature of mutation and genetic
variation
5Genes and Variation
- Today, molecular techniques are used to test
hypotheses about how heritable variation appears
and how natural selection operates on that
variation - Fitness, adaptation, species, and evolutionary
change are now defined in genetic terms - We understand how evolution works better than
Darwin ever could, beginning with heritable
variation
6How Common Is Genetic Variation?
- We now know that many genes have at least two
forms, or alleles - Animals such as horses, dogs, and mice often have
several alleles for traits such as body size or
coat color - Plants, such as peas, often have several alleles
for flower color - All organisms have additional genetic variation
that is invisible because it involves small
differences in biochemical processes - In addition, an individual organism is
heterozygous for many genes - An insect may be heterozygous for as many as 15
percent of its genes - Individual fishes, reptiles, and mammals are
typically heterozygous for between 4 and 8
percent of their genes
7Variation and Gene Pools
- Genetic variation is studied in populations
- A population is a group of individuals of the
same species that interbreed - Because members of a population interbreed, they
share a common group of genes called a gene pool - A gene pool consists of all genes, including all
the different alleles, that are present in a
population
8Variation and Gene Pools
- The relative frequency of an allele is the number
of times that the allele occurs in a gene pool,
compared with the number of times other alleles
for the same gene occur - Relative frequency is often expressed as a
percentage - Example
- In the mouse population in the figure at right,
the relative frequency of the dominant B allele
(black fur) is 40 percent, and the relative
frequency of the recessive b allele (brown fur)
is 60 percent - The relative frequency of an allele has nothing
to do with whether the allele is dominant or
recessive - In this particular mouse population, the
recessive allele occurs more frequently than the
dominant allele
9Variation and Gene Pools
10Variation and Gene Pools
- When scientists determine whether a population is
evolving, they may look at the sum of the
populations alleles, or its gene pool - This diagram shows the gene pool for fur color in
a population of mice - Here, in a total of 50 alleles, 20 alleles are B
(black), and 30 are b (brown) - How many of each allele would be present in a
total of 100 alleles?
11Variation and Gene Pools
- Gene pools are important to evolutionary theory,
because evolution involves changes in populations
over time - In genetic terms, evolution is any change in the
relative frequency of alleles in a population - For example, if the relative frequency of the B
allele in the mouse population changed over time
to 30 percent, the population is evolving
12Sources of Genetic Variation
- Biologists can now explain how variation is
produced - The two main sources of genetic variation are
mutations and the genetic shuffling that results
from sexual reproduction
13Mutations
- A mutation is any change in a sequence of DNA
- Mutations can occur because of mistakes in the
replication of DNA or as a result of radiation or
chemicals in the environment - Mutations do not always affect an organism's
phenotypeits physical, behavioral, and
biochemical characteristics - For example, a DNA codon altered from GGA to GGU
will still code for the same amino acid, glycine - That mutation has no effect on phenotype
- Many mutations do produce changes in phenotype,
however - Some can affect an organism's fitness, or its
ability to survive and reproduce in its
environment - Other mutations may have no effect on fitness
14Gene ShufflingÂ
- Mutations are not the only source of heritable
variation - You do not look exactly like your biological
parents, even though they provided you with all
your genes - You probably look even less like any brothers or
sisters you may have - Yet, no matter how you feel about your relatives,
mutant genes are not primarily what makes them so
different from you
15Gene ShufflingÂ
- Most heritable differences are due to gene
shuffling that occurs during the production of
gametes - Recall that each chromosome of a homologous pair
moves independently during meiosis - As a result, the 23 pairs of chromosomes found in
humans can produce 8.4 million different
combinations of genes!
16Gene ShufflingÂ
- Another process, crossing-over, also occurs
during meiosis - Crossing-over further increases the number of
different genotypes that can appear in offspring - Recall that a genotype is an organism's genetic
makeup - When alleles are recombined during sexual
reproduction, they can produce dramatically
different phenotypes - Thus, sexual reproduction is a major source of
variation within many populations
17Gene ShufflingÂ
- Sexual reproduction can produce many different
phenotypes, but it does not change the relative
frequency of alleles in a population - To understand why, compare a population's gene
pool to a deck of playing cards - Each card represents an allele found in the
population - The exchange of genes during gene shuffling is
similar to shuffling a deck of cards - Shuffling leads to different types of hands, but
it can never change the relative numbers of aces,
kings, or queens in the deck - The probability of drawing an ace off the top of
the deck will always be 4 in 52, or one
thirteenth (4/52 1/13) - No matter how many times you shuffle the deck,
this probability will remain the same - Similarly, sexual reproduction produces many
different combinations of genes, but in itself it
does not alter the relative frequencies of each
type of allele in a population
18GENE POOL
- The entire genetic content of a population is
called the gene pool - Contains all the genes for all the
characteristics of a population - Example all the marbles in the barrel represent
the gene pool for coat color - The fraction of marbles that represents a
particular allele is called the gene frequency
which may be expressed as a decimal or as a
percent - The sum of all the allele frequencies for a gene
within a population is equal to 1.0 or 100 - In the following illustration 40 of the marbles
are white and 60 of the marbles are brown (the
frequencies can be expressed as 0.40 and 0.60
respectfully) - Dominant allele B (brown fur) (brown marble)
- Recessive allele b (white fur) (white marble)
19(No Transcript)
20GENE POOL
21Single-Gene and Polygenic Traits
- Heritable variation can be expressed in a variety
of ways - The number of phenotypes produced for a given
trait depends on how many genes control the trait - Among humans, a widow's peaka downward dip in
the center of the hairlineis a single-gene trait - It is controlled by a single gene that has two
alleles - The allele for a widow's peak is dominant over
the allele for a hairline with no peak - As a result, variation in this gene leads to only
two distinct phenotypes
22Single-Gene and Polygenic Traits
23Single-Gene and Polygenic Traits
- Single-Gene Traits
- In humans, a single gene with two alleles
controls whether a person has a widow's peak or
does not have a widow's peak - As a result, only two phenotypes are possible
- The number of phenotypes a given trait has is
determined by how many genes control the trait
24Single-Gene and Polygenic Traits
- As you can see, the frequency of phenotypes
caused by this single gene is represented on the
bar graph - This graph shows that the presence of a widow's
peak may be less common in a population than the
absence of a widow's peak, even though the allele
for a widow's peak is the dominant form - In real populations, phenotypic ratios are
determined by the frequency of alleles in the
population as well as by whether the alleles are
in the dominant or recessive form - Allele frequencies may not match Mendelian ratios
25Single-Gene and Polygenic Traits
- Many traits are controlled by two or more genes
and are, therefore, called polygenic traits - Each gene of a polygenic trait often has two or
more alleles - As a result, one polygenic trait can have many
possible genotypes and phenotypes
26Single-Gene and Polygenic Traits
- Height in humans is one example of a polygenic
trait - You can sample phenotypic variation in this trait
by measuring the height of all the students in
your class - You can then calculate the average height of this
group - Many students will be just a little taller or
shorter than average - Some of your classmates, however, will be very
tall or very short - If you graph the number of individuals of each
height, you may get a graph similar to the one
shown below - The symmetrical bell-like shape of this curve is
typical of polygenic traits - A bell-shaped curve is also called a normal
distribution
27Single-Gene and Polygenic Traits
- Polygenic Trait
- The graph shows the distribution of phenotypes
that would be expected for a trait if many genes
contributed to the trait
28Evolution as Genetic Change
- A genetic view of evolution offers a new way to
look at key evolutionary concepts - Each time an organism reproduces, it passes
copies of its genes to its offspring - We can therefore view evolutionary fitness as an
organism's success in passing genes to the next
generation - In the same way, we can view an evolutionary
adaptation as any genetically controlled
physiological, anatomical, or behavioral trait
that increases an individual's ability to pass
along its genes
29Evolution as Genetic Change
- Natural selection never acts directly on genes
- Why?
- Because it is an entire organismnot a single
genethat either survives and reproduces or dies
without reproducing - Natural selection, therefore, can only affect
which individuals survive and reproduce and which
do not - If an individual dies without reproducing, the
individual does not contribute its alleles to the
population's gene pool - If an individual produces many offspring, its
alleles stay in the gene pool and may increase in
frequency
30Evolution as Genetic Change
- Now recall that evolution is any change over time
in the relative frequencies of alleles in a
population - This reminds us that it is populations, not
individual organisms, that can evolve over time
31Natural Selection on Single-Gene Traits
- Natural selection on single-gene traits can lead
to changes in allele frequencies and thus to
evolution - Imagine that a hypothetical population of
lizards, shown in the figure at right, is
normally brown, but experiences mutations that
produce red and black forms - What happens to those new alleles?
- If red lizards are more visible to predators,
they might be less likely to survive and
reproduce, and the allele for red coloring might
not become common
32Natural Selection on Single-Gene Traits
33Natural Selection on Single-Gene Traits
- Natural selection on single-gene traits can lead
to changes in alleles frequencies and thus to
evolution - Organisms of one color, for example, may produce
fewer offspring than organisms of other colors
34Natural Selection on Single-Gene Traits
- Black lizards, on the other hand, might absorb
more sunlight and warm up faster on cold days - If high body temperature allows them to move
faster to feed and to avoid predators, they might
produce more offspring than brown forms - The allele for black color might then increase in
relative frequency - If a color change has no effect on fitness, the
allele that produces it would not be under
pressure from natural selection
35Natural Selection on Polygenic Traits
- When traits are controlled by more than one gene,
the effects of natural selection are more complex - As you learned earlier, the action of multiple
alleles on traits such as height produces a range
of phenotypes that often fit a bell curve - The fitness of individuals close to one another
on the curve will not be very different - But fitness can vary a great deal from one end of
such a curve to the other - And where fitness varies, natural selection can
act - Natural selection can affect the distributions of
phenotypes in any of three ways - Directional selection
- Stabilizing selection
- Disruptive selection
36Directional SelectionÂ
- When individuals at one end of the curve have
higher fitness than individuals in the middle or
at the other end, directional selection takes
place - The range of phenotypes shifts as some
individuals fail to survive and reproduce while
others succeed - To understand this, consider how limited
resources, such as food, can affect the long-term
survival of individuals and the evolution of
populations
37Directional SelectionÂ
- Among seed-eating birds such as Darwin's finches,
for example, birds with bigger, thicker beaks can
feed more easily on larger, harder,
thicker-shelled seeds - Suppose a food shortage causes the supply of
small and medium-sized seeds to run low, leaving
only larger seeds - Birds whose beaks enable them to open those
larger seeds will have better access to food - Birds with the big-beak adaptation would
therefore have higher fitness than small-beaked
birds - The average beak size of the population would
probably increase
38Directional SelectionÂ
39Directional SelectionÂ
- Directional Selection   Directional selection
occurs when individuals at one end of the curve
have higher fitness than individuals in the
middle or at the other end. In this example, a
population of seed-eating birds experiences
directional selection when a food shortage causes
the supply of small seeds to run low. The dotted
line shows the original distribution of beak
sizes. The solid line shows how the distribution
of beak sizes would change as a result of
selection.
40DIRECTIONAL NATURAL SELECTION
- Type of Natural Selection in which individuals
with one of the extreme forms of a trait have an
advantage in terms of survival and reproduction
41DIRECTIONAL NATURAL SELECTION
42Stabilizing SelectionÂ
- When individuals near the center of the curve
have higher fitness than individuals at either
end of the curve, stabilizing selection takes
place - This situation keeps the center of the curve at
its current position, but it narrows the overall
graph
43Stabilizing SelectionÂ
- The mass of human infants at birth is under the
influence of stabilizing selection - Human babies born much smaller than average are
likely to be less healthy and thus less likely to
survive - Babies that are much larger than average are
likely to have difficulty being born - The fitness of these larger or smaller
individuals is, therefore, lower than that of
more average-sized individuals
44Stabilizing SelectionÂ
45Stabilizing SelectionÂ
- Stabilizing selection takes place when
individuals near the center of a curve have
higher fitness than individuals at either end - This example shows that human babies born at an
average mass are more likely to survive than
babies born either much smaller or much larger
than average
46STABILIZING NATURAL SELECTION
- Type of Natural Selection in which individuals
with the average form of a trait have an
advantage in terms of survival and reproduction - Extreme forms of the trait confers a disadvantage
to the organism
47STABILIZING NATURAL SELECTION
48Disruptive SelectionÂ
- When individuals at the upper and lower ends of
the curve have higher fitness than individuals
near the middle, disruptive selection takes place - In such situations, selection acts most strongly
against individuals of an intermediate type - If the pressure of natural selection is strong
enough and lasts long enough, this situation can
cause the single curve to split into two - In other words, selection creates two distinct
phenotypes
49Disruptive SelectionÂ
- For example, suppose a population of birds lives
in an area where medium-sized seeds become less
common and large and small seeds become more
common - Birds with unusually small or large beaks would
have higher fitness - The population might split into two subgroups
- One that eats small seeds
- One that eats large seeds
50Disruptive SelectionÂ
51Disruptive SelectionÂ
- When individuals at the upper and lower ends of
the curve have higher fitness than individuals
near the middle, disruptive selection takes place - In this example, average-sized seeds become less
common, and larger and smaller seeds become more
common - As a result, the bird population splits into two
subgroups specializing in eating different-sized
seeds.
52DISRUPTIVE NATURAL SELECTION
- Type of Natural Selection in which individuals
with either of the extreme forms of a trait have
an advantage in terms of survival and reproduction
53DISRUPTIVE NATURAL SELECTION
54Genetic Drift
- Natural selection is not the only source of
evolutionary change - In small populations, an allele can become more
or less common simply by chance - Recall that genetics is controlled by the laws of
probability - These laws can be used to predict the overall
results of genetic crosses in large populations - However, the smaller a population is, the farther
the results may be from what the laws of
probability predict - This kind of random change in allele frequency is
called genetic drift - How does genetic drift take place?
- In small populations, individuals that carry a
particular allele may leave more descendants than
other individuals do, just by chance - Over time, a series of chance occurrences of this
type can cause an allele to become common in a
population
55Genetic Drift
- Genetic drift may occur when a small group of
individuals colonizes a new habitat - These individuals may carry alleles in different
relative frequencies than did the larger
population from which they came - If so, the population that they found will be
genetically different from the parent population - Here, however, the cause is not natural selection
but simply chancespecifically, the chance that
particular alleles were in one or more of the
founding individuals - A situation in which allele frequencies change as
a result of the migration of a small subgroup of
a population is known as the founder effect - One example of the founder effect is the
evolution of several hundred species of fruit
flies found on different Hawaiian Islands - All of those species descended from the same
original mainland population - Those species in different habitats on different
islands now have allele frequencies that are
different from those of the original species
56Genetic Drift
- In small populations, individuals that carry a
particular allele may have more descendants than
other individuals - Over time, a series of chance occurrences of this
type can cause an allele to become more common in
a population - This model demonstrates how two small groups from
a large, diverse population could produce new
populations that differ from the original group
57Genetic Drift
58Evolution Versus Genetic Equilibrium
- To clarify how evolutionary change operates,
scientists often find it helpful to determine
what happens when no change takes place - So biologists ask Are there any conditions under
which evolution will not occur? - Is there any way to recognize when that is the
case? - The answers to those questions are provided by
the Hardy-Weinberg principle, named after two
researchers who independently proposed it in 1908
59Hardy-Weinberg Principle
- The Hardy-Weinberg principle states that allele
frequencies in a population will remain constant
unless one or more factors cause those
frequencies to change - The situation in which allele frequencies remain
constant is called genetic equilibrium - If the allele frequencies do not change, the
population will not evolve
60GENE POOL
- Hardy-Weinberg Principle
- Demonstrates how the frequency of alleles in the
gene pool can be described by mathematical
formulas - Shows that under certain conditions the frequency
of genes remains constant from generation to
generation - States that the frequency of dominant and
recessive alleles remains the same from
generation to generation
61HARDY-WEINBERG PRINCIPLE
- Useful in population genetics
- 1 p2 2(pq) q2 (1 B2 2(Bb) b2)
- Previous example
- When rabbits mate and produce offspring, each
parent contributes one allele for coat color to
each gamete (randomly reach in the barrel and
remove one marble) - Offspring are produced when two gametes fuse to
form a zygote (represented by a pair of marbles
each randomly removed individually) - Chance of removing a particular color marble
depends on the frequency of different marbles in
the gene pool - The probability of drawing a particular genotype
is the product of the probabilities of the two
alleles - Probabilities can be demonstrated with a
Cross-Multiplication Table
62 CROSS-MULTIPLICATION TABLE
63HARDY-WEINBERG PRINCIPLE
- As long as any color rabbit is allowed to mate
with any other color rabbit, the probability of
drawing each genotype will remain constant - After 15 or even after 40 generations, there will
be 84 brown rabbits and 16 white rabbits - Recessive genes will not be lost in a population
over time - Some diseases are homozygous recessive and their
frequencies in the population can be calculated - Phenylketonuria (PKU) autosomal recessive
disease caused by an error in human metabolism - Results from the inability to break down
phenylalanine, an amino acid that is common in
many foods - Most people produce an enzyme that converts
phenylalanine to another amino acid - Production of this enzyme is governed by a
dominant allele (recessive allele does not
produce this enzyme) - Without the enzyme, phenylalanine builds up
poisoning the brain and causing severe
retardation - Babies appear normal at birth
- Damages begins when the baby drinks milk which
contains phenylalanine - Most USA hospitals tests for PKU and if found a
special diet must be followed for the first few
years of life while the brain is developing
(after a few years a normal diet can be resumed) - Babies with PKU are born once in every 10,000
births in USA (homozygous phenotype frequency is
1/10,000 0.0001 or 0.01) (gene frequency is 1)
64HARDY-WEINBERG PRINCIPLE
- States that under certain conditions, gene
frequencies will remain constant from generation
to generation - A population in which there is no change in gene
frequency over a long period is said to be in
genetic equilibrium - In order to maintain genetic equilibrium five
assumptions are necessary - 1. No mutations occur
- 2. The population is large
- 3. Mating between males and females is random
- 4. Individuals do not leave the population or
enter from outside - 5.No phenotype is more likely to survive and have
offspring than any other phenotype - In natural populations, these conditions are
rarely met - The Hardy-Weinberg Principle is used to compare
natural populations with an ideal situation - When gene frequencies change from one generation
to the next, the change is usually caused by a
departure from one of these five assumptions
65Hardy-Weinberg Principle
- Under what conditions does the Hardy-Weinberg
principle hold? - Five conditions are required to maintain genetic
equilibrium from generation to generation - (1) There must be random mating
- (2) The population must be very large
- (3) There can be no movement into or out of the
population - (4) No mutations
- (5) No natural selection
66Hardy-Weinberg Principle
- In some populations, these conditions may be met
or nearly met for long periods of time - If, however, the conditions are not met, the
genetic equilibrium will be disrupted, and the
population will evolve
67Random MatingÂ
- All members of the population must have an equal
opportunity to produce offspring - Random mating ensures that each individual has an
equal chance of passing on its alleles to
offspring
68Random MatingÂ
- In natural populations, however, mating is rarely
completely random - Many species, including lions and wolves, select
mates based on particular heritable traits, such
as size or strength - Such nonrandom mating means that the genes for
those traits are not in equilibrium but are under
strong selection pressure
69HARDY-WEINBERG PRINCIPLE
- Assumption Mating between males and females is
random - The Effect of Nonrandom Mating
- Assortative Mating Some organisms are more
likely to mate with similar organisms than with
dissimilar organisms (same nationality) - Frequency of recessive alleles will appear to be
higher - Does not alter the gene frequency in a
population, but does change the frequency of
phenotypes
70Large PopulationÂ
- A large population size is also important in
maintaining genetic equilibrium - Genetic drift has less effect on large
populations than on small ones - That is because the allele frequencies of large
populations are less likely to be changed through
the process of genetic drift
71HARDY-WEINBERG PRINCIPLE
- Assumption The population is large
- The Effect of Small Population
- Flipping of a coin is a 50-50 chance of heads or
tails - But in a small sampling you might get a higher
percentage of one or the other - In a small population a rare allele may be lost
or may become unusually common - Genetic drift a change in gene frequency due to
random variations in a small population - Amish community tend to marry among themselves
- High frequency of a severe enzyme-deficiency
disease
72HARDY-WEINBERG PRINCIPLE
73HARDY-WEINBERG PRINCIPLE
74No Movement Into or Out of the PopulationÂ
- Because individuals may bring new alleles into a
population, there must be no movement of
individuals into or out of a population - In genetic terms, the population's gene pool must
be kept together and kept separate from the gene
pools of other populations
75HARDY-WEINBERG PRINCIPLE
- Assumption Individuals do not leave the
population or enter from outside - The Effect of Migration
- Genetic equilibrium will be altered if organisms
can move in or out of a particular breeding
population (migration) - North America population of today very different
from the original population of American Indians
76HARDY-WEINBERG PRINCIPLE
77No MutationsÂ
- If genes mutate from one form into another, new
alleles may be introduced into the population,
and allele frequencies will change
78HARDY-WEINBERG PRINCIPLE
- Assumption No mutations occur (ideal)
- The Effect of Mutations (reality)
- Mutations are the original source of variations
in populations - All genes are subject to mutations
- Mutations change the frequency of alleles in a
population - Example
- mutations continually add genes for hemophilia
to the human gene pool - Mutations for hemophilia gene occur about 3 times
in every 100,000 gametes - Are we weakening our gene pool?
79HARDY-WEINBERG PRINCIPLE
80No Natural SelectionÂ
- All genotypes in the population must have equal
probabilities of survival and reproduction - No phenotype can have a selective advantage over
another - In other words, there can be no natural selection
operating on the population
81HARDY-WEINBERG PRINCIPLE
- Assumption No phenotype is more likely to
survive and have offspring than any other
phenotype - No genotype is more advantageous to an individual
than any other genotype - The Effect of Harmful Genes
- Organisms that are homozygous for harmful genes
are less likely to survive and produce offspring
than those that do not carry such genes - Over many generations harmful genes will become
less frequent in the population - True Today ????? Are we weakening the gene pool
????? - The Hardy-Weinberg Principle states that for a
population to remain in genetic equilibrium
natural selection must not occur - But in naturally occurring populations, one
allele is often more advantageous to an organism
than another allele (natural selection does
occur) - This violation of the Hardy-Weinberg assumptions
is so common that it is the basis of EVOLUTION
82Should the Use of Antibiotics Be Restricted?
- Natural selection is everywhere
- One dramatic example of evolution in action poses
a serious threat to public health - Many kinds of disease-causing bacteria are
evolving resistance to antibioticsdrugs intended
to kill them or interfere with their growth
83Should the Use of Antibiotics Be Restricted?
- Antibiotics are one of medicine's greatest
weapons against bacterial diseases - When antibiotics were discovered, they were
called magic bullets and wonder drugs because
they were so effective - They have made diseases like pneumonia much less
of a threat than they were about sixty years ago - However, people may be overusing antibiotics
- Doctors sometimes prescribe them for diseases for
which they are not effective - Commercial feed for chickens and other farm
animals is laced with antibiotics to prevent
infection
84Should the Use of Antibiotics Be Restricted?
- This wide use has caused many bacteriaincluding
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which causes
tuberculosisto evolve resistance to antibiotics - This resistance is a prime example of the
evolution of a genetically controlled
physiological trait - Resistance evolved because bacterial populations
contained a few individuals with genes that
enabled them to destroy, inactivate, or eliminate
antibiotics - Descendants of those physiologically similar
individuals survived and reproduced, and became
today's resistant strains - Once-powerful antibiotics are now useless against
resistant bacteria - Given this risk, should government agencies
restrict the use of antibiotics?
85The Viewpoints
- Antibiotic Use Should Be Restricted
- The danger of an incurable bacterial epidemic is
so high that action must be taken on a national
level as soon as possible - Doctors overuse antibiotics in humans because
patients demand them - The livestock industry likes using antibiotics in
animal feeds and will not change their practice
unless forced to do so
86The Viewpoints
- Antibiotic Use Should Not Be Restricted
- Researchers are coming up with new drugs all the
time - These drugs can be reserved for human use only
- Doctors need to be able to prescribe antibiotics
as they choose, and our food supply depends on
the use of antibiotics in agriculture - The medical profession and the livestock industry
need the freedom to find solutions that work best
for them
87NATURAL SELECTION
- Process by which organisms with favorable
variations survive and reproduce at higher rates
than those without such variations - Ongoing process
- Single most significant factor disrupting genetic
equilibrium - Results in higher reproductive rates for
individuals with certain phenotypes, and, hence,
certain genotypes - Some members of a population are more likely to
contribute their genes to the next generation
than others are - Allele frequencies change from one generation to
the next - Four types of Natural Selection Stabilizing,
Directional, Disruptive, Sexual - Cause changes in the gene pool
88The Process of Speciation
- Factors such as natural selection and chance
events can change the relative frequencies of
alleles in a population - But how do these changes lead to the formation of
new species, or speciation?
89The Process of Speciation
- Recall that biologists define a species as a
group of organisms that breed with one another
and produce fertile offspring - This means that individuals in the same species
share a common gene pool - Because a population of individuals has a shared
gene pool, a genetic change that occurs in one
individual can spread through the population as
that individual and its offspring reproduce - If a genetic change increases fitness, that
allele will eventually be found in many
individuals of that population
90Isolating Mechanisms
- Given this genetic definition of species, what
must happen for a species to evolve into two new
species? - The gene pools of two populations must become
separated for them to become new species - As new species evolve, populations become
reproductively isolated from each other - When the members of two populations cannot
interbreed and produce fertile offspring,
reproductive isolation has occurred - At that point, the populations have separate gene
pools - They respond to natural selection or genetic
drift as separate units - Reproductive isolation can develop in a variety
of ways, including - Behavioral isolation
- Geographic isolation
- Temporal isolation
91Behavioral IsolationÂ
- One type of isolating mechanism, behavioral
isolation, occurs when two populations are
capable of interbreeding but have differences in
courtship rituals or other reproductive
strategies that involve behavior - For example, the eastern and western meadowlarks
shown to the right are very similar birds whose
habitats overlap in the center of the United
States - Members of the two species will not mate with
each other, however, partly because they use
different songs to attract mates - Eastern meadowlarks will not respond to western
meadowlark songs, and vice versa
92Behavioral IsolationÂ
93Behavioral IsolationÂ
- Behavioral Isolation
- The eastern meadowlark (left) and western
meadowlark (right) have overlapping ranges - They do not interbreed, however, because they
have different mating songs
94SEXUAL NATURAL SELECTION
- Preferential choice of a mate based on the
presence of a specific trait
95SPECIATION
- Reproductive Isolation
- Inability of formerly interbreeding organisms to
produce offspring - May result from disruptive natural selection of
breeding times (early spring / early summer times
favored while middle times fell prey to
predation) - A population that breeds in May is effectively
isolated from one that breeds in July - Eventually different selection pressures led to
different mating times and different
morphological variations (frogs of different
colors)
96REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION
97REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION
98REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION
99REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION
100REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION
101SPECIATION
- Formation of a new species
- Often occurs when part of a population becomes
isolated from the rest of the population - Since no two environments are identical,
selective pressures that occur in one location
may be different from the pressures in another
location
102SPECIATION
- Geographic Isolation
- Occurs when a physical barrier develops between a
segment of two populations - Squirrels at Grand Canyon
- Honeycreepers (finches) of the Hawaiian Islands
- Finches / Tortoises of the Galapagos Islands
- Death Valley fish
103Geographic IsolationÂ
- With geographic isolation, two populations are
separated by geographic barriers such as rivers,
mountains, or bodies of water - The Abert squirrel, for example, lives in the
Southwest - About 10,000 years ago, the Colorado River split
the species into two separate populations - Two separate gene pools formed
- Genetic changes that appeared in one group were
not passed to the other - Natural selection worked separately on each group
and led to the formation of a distinct
subspecies - The Abert and Kaibab squirrels have very similar
anatomical and physiological characteristics,
indicating that they are closely related - However, the Kaibab squirrel differs from the
Abert squirrel in significant ways, such as fur
coloring
104Geographic IsolationÂ
105Geographic IsolationÂ
- When two populations of a species become
reproductively isolated, new species can develop - The Kaibab squirrel evolved from the Abert
squirrel - The Kaibab squirrels were isolated from the main
population by the Colorado River
106GEOGRAPHIC ISOLATION
107GEOGRAPHIC ISOLATION
108GEOGRAPHIC ISOLATION
109Geographic IsolationÂ
- Geographic barriers do not guarantee the
formation of new species, however - Separate lakes may be linked for a time during a
flood, or a land bridge may temporarily form
between islands, enabling separated populations
to mix - If two formerly separated populations can still
interbreed, they remain a single species - Also, any potential geographic barrier may
separate certain types of organisms but not
others - A large river will keep squirrels and other small
rodents apart, but it does not necessarily
isolate bird populations
110Temporal IsolationÂ
- A third isolating mechanism is temporal
isolation, in which two or more species reproduce
at different times - For example, three similar species of orchid all
live in the same rain forest - Each species releases pollen only on a single day
- Because the three species release pollen on
different days, they cannot pollinate one another
111Testing Natural Selection in Nature
- Now that you know the basic mechanisms of
evolutionary change, you might wonder if these
processes can be observed in nature - The answer is yes
- In fact, some of the most important studies
showing natural selection in action involve
descendants of the finches that Darwin observed
in the Galápagos Islands
112Testing Natural Selection in Nature
- Those finch species looked so different from one
another that when Darwin first saw them, he did
not realize they were all finches - He thought they were blackbirds, warblers, and
other kinds of birds - The species he examined differed greatly in the
sizes and shapes of their beaks and in their
feeding habits - Some species fed on small seeds, while others ate
large seeds with thick shells - One species used cactus spines to pry insects
from dead wood - One species, not shown here, even pecked at the
tails of large sea birds and drank their blood!
113Testing Natural Selection in Nature
- Detailed genetic studies have shown that these
finches evolved from a species with a
more-or-less general-purpose beak
114Testing Natural Selection in Nature
115Testing Natural Selection in Nature
- Once Darwin discovered that these birds were all
finches, he hypothesized that they had descended
from a common ancestor - Over time, he proposed, natural selection shaped
the beaks of different bird populations as they
adapted to eat different foods
116Testing Natural Selection in Nature
- That was a reasonable hypothesis
- But was there any way to test it?
- No one thought so, until the work of Peter and
Rosemary Grant from Princeton University proved
otherwise - For more than twenty years, the Grants have been
collaborating to band and measure finches on the
Galápagos Islands - They realized that Darwin's hypothesis relied on
two testable assumptions - First, in order for beak size and shape to
evolve, there must be enough heritable variation
in those traits to provide raw material for
natural selection - Second, differences in beak size and shape must
produce differences in fitness that cause natural
selection to occur
117Testing Natural Selection in Nature
- The Grants tested these hypotheses on the medium
ground finch on Daphne Major, one of the
Galápagos Islands - This island is large enough to support good-sized
finch populations, yet small enough to enable the
Grants to catch and identify nearly every bird
belonging to the species under study
118VariationÂ
- The Grants first identified and measured as many
individual birds as possible on the island - They recorded which birds were still living and
which had died, which had succeeded in breeding
and which had not - For each individual, they also recorded
anatomical characteristics such as wing length,
leg length, beak length, beak depth, beak color,
feather colors, and total mass - Many of these characteristics appeared in
bell-shaped distributions typical of polygenic
traits - These data indicate that there is great variation
of heritable traits among the Galápagos finches
119Natural SelectionÂ
- Other researchers who had visited the Galápagos
did not see the different finches competing or
eating different foods - During the rainy season, when these researchers
visited, there is plenty of food - Under these conditions, finches often eat the
most available type of food - During dry-season drought, however, some foods
become scarce, and others disappear altogether - At that time, differences in beak size can mean
the difference between life and death - To survive, birds become feeding specialists
- Each species selects the type of food its beak
handles best - Birds with big, heavy beaks, for example, select
big, thick seeds that no other species can crack
open
120Natural SelectionÂ
- The Grants' most interesting discovery was that
individual birds with different-sized beaks had
different chances of survival during a drought - When food for the finches was scarce, individuals
with the largest beaks were more likely to
survive - Beak size also plays a role in mating behavior,
because big-beaked birds tend to mate with other
big-beaked birds - The Grants observed that average beak size in
that finch population increased dramatically over
time - This change in beak size is an example of
directional selection operating on an anatomical
trait
121Natural Selection
122Natural Selection
- Survival Rate
- This graph shows the survival rate of one species
of ground-feeding finches, the medium ground
finch, Geospiza fortis.
123Rapid EvolutionÂ
- By documenting natural selection in the wild, the
Grants provided evidence of the process of
evolution - The next generation of finches had larger beaks
than did the generation before selection had
occurred - An important result of this work was their
finding that natural selection takes place
frequentlyand sometimes very rapidly - Changes in the food supply on the Galápagos
caused measurable fluctuations in the finch
populations over a period of only decades - This is markedly different from the slow, gradual
evolution that Darwin envisioned
124Speciation in Darwin's Finches
- The Grants' work demonstrates that finch beak
size can be changed by natural selection - If we combine this information with other
evolutionary concepts you have learned in this
chapter, we can show how natural selection can
lead to speciation - We can devise a hypothetical scenario for the
evolution of all Galápagos finches from a single
group of founding birds - Speciation in the Galápagos finches occurred by
founding of a new population, geographic
isolation, changes in the new population's gene
pool, reproductive isolation, and ecological
competition
125Founders ArriveÂ
- Many years ago, a few finches from the South
American mainlandspecies Aflew or were blown to
one of the Galápagos Islands, as shown the
activity at right - Finches are small birds that do not usually fly
far over open water - These birds may have gotten lost, or they may
have been blown off course by a storm - Once they arrived on one of the islands, they
managed to survive and reproduce
126Geographic IsolationÂ
- Later on, some birds from species A crossed to
another island in the Galápagos group - Because these birds do not usually fly over open
water, they rarely move from island to island - Thus, finch populations on the two islands were
essentially isolated from each other and no
longer shared a common gene pool
127Changes in the Gene PoolÂ
- Over time, populations on each island became
adapted to their local environments - The plants growing on the first island may have
produced small thin-shelled seeds, whereas the
plants on the second island may have produced
larger thick-shelled seeds - On the second island, directional selection would
favor individuals with larger, heavier beaks - These birds could crack open and eat the large
seeds more easily - Thus, birds with large beaks would be better able
to survive on the second island - Over time, natural selection would have caused
that population to evolve larger beaks, forming a
separate population, B
128Reproductive IsolationÂ
- Now, imagine that a few birds from the second
island cross back to the first island - Will the population-A birds breed with the
population-B birds? Probably not - These finches choose their mates carefully
- As part of their courtship behavior, they inspect
a potential partner's beak very closely - Finches prefer to mate with birds that have the
same-sized beak as they do - In other words, big-beaked birds prefer to mate
with other big-beaked birds, and smaller-beaked
birds prefer to mate with other smaller-beaked
birds - Because the birds on the two islands have
different-sized beaks, it is likely that they
would not choose to mate with each other - Thus, differences in beak size, combined with
mating behavior, could lead to reproductive
isolation - The gene pools of the two bird populations remain
isolated from each othereven when individuals
live together in the same place - The two populations have now become separate
species
129Ecological CompetitionÂ
- As these two new species live together in the
same environment (the first island), they compete
with each other for available seeds - During the dry season, individuals that are most
different from each other have the highest
fitness - The more specialized birds have less competition
for certain kinds of seeds and other foods, and
the competition among individual finches is also
reduced - Over time, species evolve in a way that increases
the differences between them - The species-B birds on the first island may
evolve into a new species, C
130Continued EvolutionÂ
- This process of isolation on different islands,
genetic change, and reproductive isolation
probably repeated itself time and time again
across the entire Galápagos island chain - Over many generations, it produced the 13
different finch species found there today - Use the steps in the activity Speciation in
Galápagos Finches to explain how other Darwin
finches, such as the vegetarian tree finch that
feeds on fruit, might have evolved
131Studying Evolution Since Darwin
- It is useful to review and critique the strengths
and weaknesses of evolutionary theory - Darwin made bold assumptions about heritable
variation, the age of Earth, and relationships
among organisms - New data from genetics, physics, and biochemistry
could have proved him wrong on many counts - They didn't
- Scientific evidence supports the theory that
living species descended with modification from
common ancestors that lived in the ancient past
132Limitations of ResearchÂ
- The Grants' research clearly shows the effects of
directional selection in nature - The Grants' data also show how competition and
climate change affect natural selection - The work does have limitations
- For example, while the Grants observed changes in
the size of the finches' beaks, they did not
observe the formation of a new species - Scientists predict that as new fossils are found,
they will continue to expand our understanding of
how species evolved
133Unanswered QuestionsÂ
- The studies of the Grants fit into an enormous
body of scientific work supporting the theory of
evolution - Millions of fossils show that life has existed on
Earth for more than 3 billion years and that
organisms have changed dramatically over this
time - These fossils form just a part of the evidence
supporting the conclusion that life has evolved - Remember that a scientific theory is defined as a
well-tested explanation that accounts for a broad
range of observations - Evolutionary theory fits this definition
- To be sure, many new discoveries have led to new
hypotheses that refine and expand Darwin's
original ideas - No scientist suggests that all evolutionary
processes are fully understood - Many unanswered questions remain
134Unanswered QuestionsÂ
- Why is understanding evolution important?
- Because evolution continues today, driving
changes in the living world such as drug
resistance in bacteria and viruses, and pesticide
resistance in insects - Evolutionary theory helps us understand and
respond to these changes in ways that improve
human life
135RATES OF SPECIATION
- Sometimes requires millions of years but some
species can form more rapidly - Divergence of organisms and thus speciation may
not occur smoothly and gradually but in spurts - Fossil record suggests that rapid speciation may
be the norm rather than the exception - Punctuated Equilibrium
- Indicates that many species existed without
change for a long periods of time (close to
genetic equilibrium) - The periods of stability were separated by an
instant change in terms of geological time (a
few thousand rather than a few million years) - Punctuated part of this term refers to the sudden
shift in form that is often seen in the fossil
record - Equilibrium may be interrupted by a brief period
of rapid genetic change in which speciation
occurs - If it was gradual, there should be intermediate
forms (none in the fossil record)
136RATES OF SPECIATION
137EXTINCTION
- Just as new species form through natural
selection, species also die off (become extinct) - Changes in climate and competition has an effect
- Destruction of habitats
- Natural process but humans have accelerated it