Title: Practical Information about Anaerobic Digesters
1Practical Information about Anaerobic Digesters
- Presentation to the Ohio Public Utilities
Commission - Joseph M. Kramer
- Energy Center of Wisconsin
- March 9, 2006
2Energy Center of Wisconsin
- Non-profit energy efficiency and renewable energy
research organization - Energy and the Environment linking energy,
environment and economy - Industrial Best Practices increasing energy
efficiency for industry - Building Performance residential, commercial
- Energy Literacy education and outreach
3Primary Sources Cited
- Agricultural Biogas Casebook 2004 Update
- Great Lakes Biomass State and Regional
Partnership - AgSTAR Handbook
- US EPA AgSTAR Program
4Biogas Systems - Background
- Components
- Manure collection
- Anaerobic digester
- Solids separation (optional)
- Effluent storage
- Gas handling
- Gas use
5Conditions for Installing AD
- Farm characteristics (per AgSTAR)
- Manure collection equivalent to 500 cows or 2000
swine - Stable manure production and frequent collection
- Manure collected as liquid, slurry, or semi-solid
- Single point collection
- Minimal bedding and other materials
6Digestion Benefits to Farm
- Odor reduction
- On-farm energy source
- Improved fertilizer quality of manure
- Reduced surface and groundwater contamination
- Pathogen reduction
- Other products offset costs
7Systems as of July 2004
AD Systems as of July 2004 Farms 21 Digesters
29 FB Grants (2003-4) New AD 37 Change
system 3
8Farm Types
- 21 farms 29 digesters
- 19 dairies (gt30,000 head)
- 1 swine finishing (8,300 head)
- 1 duck (500,000 head)
- Farm Bill Grants (new systems)
- 36 dairies (including 3 ethanol/dairy/beef)
- 1 poultry
- Not included in this group are 3 awards from
2003 that were withdrawn and awarded again in
2004, 3 grant awards for modifications to or
replacement of existing systems covered in the
casebook.
9Herd Sizes for Dairies
10Digester Types
- Covered Lagoon Emerald Dairy (1999)
- psychrophilic
11Digester Types (continued)
- Complete Mix Lagoon Apex Pork (1998)
- mesophilic
12Digester Types (continued)
- Complete Mix Tank (German Design)Vir Clair
Farms (2004) - mesophilic
Photo Biogas Direct
13Digester Types (continued)
- Complete Mix Tank Five Star Dairy (2004)
- thermophilic
14Digester Types (continued)
- Plug-Flow Haubenschild Farms (1999)
- mesophilic
15Digester Types (continued)
- Mixed Plug-Flow Loop
- Gordondale Farms (2001)
- mesophilic
16Digester Types (continued)
- Vertical Plug-Flow Tank (x4)
- Fair Oaks Dairy (2004)
- mesophilic
17Digester Performance
- Once stabilized, systems generally functioned as
intended - For some, biogas applications were problematic
- Engine generator set electricity/heat
- Microturbine electricity/heat
- Boiler - heat
18Issues with Electricity Generation
- Low rates for electricity sales
- High cost of energy generation equipment
- Increased maintenance demand
- Costs of interconnection and line upgrades WI
has rules for interconnecting DG facilities PSC
119.02 - Alternative Biogas Use
- Gas cleanup and sales - Emerald Dairy, Intrepid
Technology and Resources, Microgy
19Herd Size and Generation Capacity
20Costs of Dairy Digester Systems
- Dairy plug-flow and mixed plug-flow(includes
energy generation) - 417-763 per cow (design capacity)
- Other dairy systems cost information not
available
21Benefits Reported by Owners (Annual)
- Electricity Sales 23,000 to 66,000
(32-78/head) - Bedding Cost Offsets 29,000 to 75,000
(32/head) - Com. Fertilizer Rpl 30,000 to 50,000
(41-60/head) - Odor Control quality of life, avoided lawsuits
and complaints, continuing operation or ability
to site new, increased operational flexibility - Others reduced herbicide use, reduced pest
control need, propane replacement, reduced lime
for fields, systems and practices
22Business Models
- Farm Owns All most common
- Utility Owns Generation less risk for farm,
less income potential from electricity sales and
less farm control over generation - No Farm Outlay (Microgy/Dairyland model) farm
owns digester but non-recourse financing, utility
owns generation, gas purchase agreement
23Business Models (cont.)
- Shared Facilities
- Centralized digester manure trucked or piped in
- Centralized gas processing plant gas piped in
- Shared Expertise multiple farms and digesters
shared support crew, contract administration,
financing support, possibly marketing of solids - Combined with Ethanol Production use process
heat and other products
24AD in Summary
- AD systems solve many (not nutrient management)
issues - Provide income streams, cost offsets,
non-monetized benefits - Commercial technology with many operating systems
in the field
25Wisconsin Biobased Industry Development
Initiative 2005
- What is needed to increase use?
- Reduce up-front costs or improve payback
- Provide technology information to public
- Internalize externalities market mechanisms
- Explore non-electrical biogas uses
- Explore options for smaller farms
- Clarify funding of line upgrades
26More Information
- Agricultural Biogas Casebook
- http//www.cglg.org/biomass/pub/AgriculturalBiogas
Casebook.pdf - AgSTAR Handbook and Software
- www.epa.gov/agstar/
- Wisconsin Biobased Industry Development
Initiative - http//bioeconomy.wi.gov/
Joe Kramer Energy Center of Wisconsin Madison,
Wisconsin 608-238-8276 jkramer_at_ecw.org