ARCHITECTENGINEERING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

ARCHITECTENGINEERING

Description:

SAS has very large MILCON and OMA programs with projects than run the complete ... PUT YOURSELF IN THE REVIEWER'S SHOES - READING STACKS OF PROPOSALS IS THOROUGHLY ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: USA9154
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ARCHITECTENGINEERING


1
ARCHITECT-ENGINEERING CONTRACTING
2
A-E Contracting
At any given time, Savannah District has between
35
and 45 active A-E Contracts with as many as 700
Task Orders We make a lot of A-E Selections to
help execute a huge construction program!
3
A-E Selection Process
Savannah District U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
4
  • Guidance
  • Brooks Architect-Engineer Act
  • FAR 36.602 and associated DFARS, AFARS EFARS
  • EP 715-1-7 A-E Contracting

5
A-E Selection Process
Goal of Selection Boards The primary goal of
all selection boards is to make the best match of
an A-Es capability/capacity to the specific
contract requirements.
6
  • Premise
  • SAS has very large MILCON and OMA programs with
    projects than run the complete gamut from large
    Battalion Training Complexes to small building
    upgrades
  • All contracts are unique A-E services required
    vary greatly

7
  • Announcement
  • Synopsis consists of the following four part
    Corps of Engineers format
  • 1. Contract Information
  • 2. Project Description/Services Required
  • 3. Selection Criteria
  • 4. Submission

8
  • Selection Criteria
  • Built around general FAR and DFARS criteria
  • Services required must be specific
  • Must indicate order of importance of criteria and
    sub criteria
  • Uses criteria that will be important
    discriminators
  • Must not be unnecessarily restrictive

9
  • Selection Criteria
  • FAR 36.602-1 / DFARS 236.602-1
  • Primary
  • Specialized Experience and Technical Competence
  • Key Personnel Professional Qualifications
  • Work Management/Capacity
  • Past Performance
  • Secondary
  • Knowledge of Locality (mostly for installation
    contracts)
  • Geographic Proximity
  • Volume of Recent DOD Work
  • Participation of Small Businesses and Small
    Disadvantaged Businesses

10
  • A-E Evaluation Boards
  • Pre-selection and Selection (FAR 36.602)
  • Composed of in-house professional personnel with
    experience in engineering, architecture,
    construction, project management and acquisition
  • Using agency invited to participate if
    appropriate
  • Reviews and grades firms qualifications using
    criteria in the synopsis
  • Must be reasonable, consistent and fair

11
  • Pre-selection Board
  • Usually held when responses are greater than 10
  • Reviews only primary criteria, does not consider
    secondary criteria
  • Recommends to the selection board the highly
    qualified firms which have a reasonable chance of
    being considered as most highly qualified
  • Submits report to selection board no separate
    approval required

12
  • Selection Board
  • Reviews and back checks both primary and
    secondary criteria
  • Through group discussion and consensus,
    determines most highly qualified firms, in order
    of preference (minimum of 3)
  • Report produced which clearly states rationale
    for ranking of most highly qualified firms and
    reasons other firms were eliminated

13
  • Evaluation Factors
  • Adequate depth in all disciplines cited in
    synopsis
  • Key personnel must have
  • Degree and registration as called for in
    announcement
  • Pertinent experience
  • Worked on example relevant projects
  • Prime and subs must have
  • Relevant recent experience (last 3-5 years) in
    the required type of work
  • Worked together recently on similar projects
  • Clearly delineated roles

14
  • Evaluation Factors (cont.)
  • Prime and subs must have (cont)
  • Established quality work management program
  • Excellence in past performance through ACASS,
    repeat business, design awards, etc.
  • All factors rated on performance risk as follows
  • Outstanding Very low performance risk
  • Above Average Low performance risk
  • Average Moderate performance risk
  • Below average High performance risk
  • Poor Unacceptable performance risk

15
Submission Protocol
  • Do not visit the District between submission and
    final selections
  • Unfair advantage over other firms
  • Do not send in a test submittal
  • It might count as the official submittal!

16
  • Submission Protocol
  • Do not send submissions several hours before
    closing
  • Time outs
  • Password resets

17
  • Notification of Unsuccessful Firms
  • All firms are notified of their selection status
    within 10 days after approval of selection report
  • No notifications provided after pre-selection
  • Simple letter do not give reasons
  • May release name of firm with which a contract
    will be negotiated
  • Advise firm they have 10 days to request a
    debriefing

18
  • A-E Debriefing
  • A-E must request in writing or electronically
  • Debrief within 14 days of A-E's request either
    by phone or in person
  • Based on pre-selection/selection report
  • Discuss significant weak or deficient
    qualifications as well as positive aspects of
    submittal
  • May not discuss other firms
  • Prepare summary of discussion for contract file

19
  • Types of Opportunities
  • For larger firms
  • IDCs for district use usually require work on
    multiple task orders simultaneously
  • Larger firms typically have the capacity,
    technical expertise and depth of experience for
    these types of contracts
  • However, with the right team, small businesses
    can win (and have won) on unrestricted
    competitions.

20
  • Types of Opportunities (cont.)
  • For smaller firms
  • IDCs for Value Engineering, Master Planning, GIS
  • Design support to the District
  • IDCs for use by installations
  • Complex or technical contracts requiring specific
    expertise (I.e. Life Safety, structural
    evaluations, etc)
  • SAS strongly encourages partnerships between
    large and small firms so that the smaller firms
    can compete in the future for those contracts
    requiring greater technical expertise and depth
    of experience.

21
A-E Contracting Trends
  • A-E IDIQ Contracts will be the typical method of
    executing RFP/Designs
  • Project specific contracts will rarely be used
  • Typically 5 to 8 Solicitations annually
  • Typically 3 to 6 Contracts per Solicitation
  • Contracts will typically consist of a base year
    and four one-year options with a maximum limit of
    up to a total of 12 Million

22
THINGS TO REMEMBER WHEN MAKING SUBMISSIONS
23
The Announcement
Things to Remember
  • READ EVERYTHING
  • CAREFULLY!
  • RESPOND TO EVERYTHING COMPLETELY!

24
Things to Remember
  • BUILD YOUR NEXT PROPOSAL BASED ON LESSONS
    LEARNED.
  • SCHEDULE A DEBRIEF EVEN
    IF YOU ARE SUCCESSFUL
  • THE BOARD TAKES NOTHING FOR GRANTED - YOU MUST
    DEMONSTRATE ALL OF YOUR QUALIFICATIONS.
  • THE BOARD MAY NOT MAKE ASSUMPTIONS THAT WILL HELP
    YOU.

25
Things to Remember
  • PUT YOURSELF IN THE REVIEWERS SHOES - READING
    STACKS OF PROPOSALS IS THOROUGHLY
    EXHAUSTING!
  • BE COMPLETE, BE CLEAR, BE CONCISE!

26
Things to Remember
MOST BOARD MEMBERS ARE OVER 40 YEARS OLD. DONT
USE SMALL PRINT IN ORDER TO PUT MORE INTO YOUR
PROPOSAL. USE FONT SIZE AS STATED IN ANNOUNCEMENT!
27
Things to Remember
TRY TO AVOID PUTTING FLUFF IN YOUR PROPOSAL. IT
COULD BE MISUNDERSTOOD AND COULD HURT YOU!
28
Things to Remember
MAKE YOUR PROPOSAL EASY TO READ AND EMPHASIZE
YOUR CRITICAL INFO. FOLLOW THE FORMAT OF THE
ANNOUNCEMENT! (AND ABOVE ALL, DONT CHANGE THE SF
330 FORMAT!)
29
In a Nutshell
  • Reviewers dream proposal - Its all there, in
    logical, easy to find order.
  • No two contracts are identical look at each
    submission with new eyes.
  • No magic formula for good, honest content!

30
Not a Game of Chance
  • No matter how well you complete the government
    forms there are no substitutes for
  • Having designed similar facilities
  • Experienced team that have worked together
  • Good Past Performance
  • Valid work plan
  • Customer Satisfaction
  • Etc.

31
Contacts
  • Charles N. McGee, Acting Chief, Engineering
    Technical Specialties Branch
  • charles.n.mcgee_at_usace.army.mil
  • 912-652-5621
  • Les Zuniga, AE Selection Coordinator
  • leslie.a.zuniga_at_usace.army.mil
  • 912-652-5574
  • Sherry Turner, AE Selection Assistant
  • sherry.a.turner_at_usace.army.mil
  • 912-652-5703

32
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com