Executive Authority - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Executive Authority

Description:

Executive Authority. Executive Orders & Gays in the Military. Case Study Analysis ... Executive Orders ... proposed an Executive Order suspending policy ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: cwsl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Executive Authority


1
Executive Authority
  • Executive Orders Gays in the Military

2
Case Study Analysis
  • Approach in evaluating a case study or problem
  • What is the problem or need and why is it
    important?
  • Can the problem or need be addressed under
    existing statutory authority?
  • Are the interests of the parties mutually
    exclusive?
  • If not, what are the common interests that can
    lead to a process for resolving other issues.

3
Executive Powers
  • Article II Powers
  • Oversight of Executive Departments
  • Hire Fire
  • Reporting
  • Appointment of Agency heads (w/Senate
    confirmation)
  • Inferior officers (Indep. Counsel)
  • Veto of legislative actions
  • OMB Reporting for agency budgets.

4
Branch System-Check Balance

5
Legislative vs. ExecutiveLegislative Veto vs.
Line Item Veto
  • Congress reserves power in itself after
    delegation.
  • Effect is to void agency action without the need
    for legislation.
  • Used to assure accountability over executive and
    independent agencies.
  • Found to be counterprooductive and is essentially
    dead or sever veto provision.
  • Power of the President to veto a line of a bill,
    or discrete sections.
  • 1998-- Struck down as unconstitutional delegation
    to Executive to amend laws enacted by Congress.
  • Bills can only be amended via
  • Bicameralism
  • Presentment

6
Appointment Powers
  • All principal and inferior officers as stated by
    Congress
  • Include heads of all of the executive dept. and
    members of independent agencies in executive
    branch.
  • Article III judges, including Justices of Supreme
    Court, federal judges on court of appeals and
    district courts. N/a to employees or inferior
    offices.

7
Removal Powers
  • Article II appointees can only be removed by
    impeachment, although seldom impeached.
  • Congress cant remove executive heads but can
    require for cause removal.
  • Independent agency heads-Only for cause. Look at
    Congressional intent re
  • 1) Commission was nonpartisan and intended to be
    impartial
  • 2) Duties are quasi judicial and legislative in
    nature.

8
OMB Budget Oversight
  • Power to review and revise budgetary and
    legislative requests through Office of Info and
    Regulatory Affairs.
  • Advance notice and impact report on agency
    actions and compatibility with executive goals.
  • Interagency review is usually frequent and
    diverse to ensure broad policy coordination.
  • Justice Dept. auth. to conduct litigation for
    agencies--defend and bring suit.

9
Executive Orders
  • Interpret law and have the force and effect of
    law in the absence of congressional action.
  • Give direction to agency re enforcement,
    implementation of law, narrow or broaden scope.
  • Permanent action would require legislation. Often
    used to provide interpretation of how it should
    be enforced.
  • E.O. does not create any right or benefit
    enforceable in law or equity against the
    government.
  • Designed to prevent direct judicial review of
    violations of EO.

10
Case Study Gays in the Military
  • Homosexual (per Websters) is a person "of or
    characterized by sexual desire for those of the
    same sex.
  • What is the Dont Ask-Dont Tell Policy?
  • How did Clinton use the E.O. to fulfill a
    campaign promise?
  • Was it an abuse of discretion to use E.O. to
    change policy?

11
Facts
  • Approximately 200K of 2 million in the military
    are gay.
  • Of 2700 men and women surveyed, about 3-9 of men
    and 5 of women regularly have sex with someone
    from the same gender.
  • 2 of men and .7 of women admit that they have
    had sex with the same person at least once.

12
Chronology
  • May 19, 1992 Meinhold, an enlisted officer in
    Navy, admits gay. Military seeks to sever him
    from navy. He sues.
  • Nov. 1992-- Clinton elected President. Campaign
    promise to eliminate ban on gays in the military.
  • January 1993--Clinton proposed an Executive Order
    suspending policy against discrimination in the
    military.
  • January 29, 1993--Clinton and Armed Services
    agree to 6 mo time out from action against gays.
  • D.Ct. judge invalidates ban against Meinhold as
    unconstitutional.
  • Congress wants to seek a compromise rather than
    let the court decide. Issue status (don't ask)
    or conduct (can discharge).
  • September 29, 1993 -House voted for modified
    policy 301-134
  • August 31, 1994 Ninth Circuit affirmed that part
    striking it down as it relates to Meinhold, but
    reversed that judgment was overbroad.
  • April 1996 After remand, Ninth Circuit upheld the
    policy as not a violation of Free Speech rights.

13
10 USC 654
  • (a) Findings Congress makes the following
    findings
  • (1) Sect. 8 of art 1commits exclusively to the
    Congress the power to raise and support armies.
  • (2)There is no constitutional right to serve in
    the armed forces.
  • (4) The primary purpose of the armed forces is to
    prepare for and to prevail in combat should the
    need arise.
  • One of the most critical elements in combat
    capability is unit cohesion
  • (13) The prohibition against homosexual conduct
    is a longstanding element of military law that
    continues to be necessary in the unique
    circumstances of military service.

14
Policy (10 USC 654)
  • (b) A member of the armed forces shall be
    separated under regulations prescribed by the
    Secretary of Defense if one or more of the
    following findings is made
  • (1)That the member has engaged in, attempted to
    engage in, or solicited another to engage in a
    homosexual act, unless there are further
    findings
  • (B) such conductis unlikely to recur
  • (C) ..was not accomplished by use of force,
    coercion intimidation
  • (D) members continued presence is consistent
    with the interests of the armed forces
  • (E) member does not have a propensity or intent
    to engage in, homosexual acts.
  • (2) That the member has stated that he or she is
    a homosexual or bisexual.
  • (3) person has married or attempted to marry a
    person of the same biological sex.

15
Definition of a Homosexual
  • (f)(1) means a person, who engages in,
    attempts to engage in, has a propensity to engage
    in, or intends to engage in homosexual acts, and
    includes the term gay and lesbian.

16
Definition of a Homosexual 10 USC 644
  • (3)the term homosexual act means
  • (A) any bodily contact, actively undertaken or
    passively permitted between members of the same
    sex for the purpose of satisfying sexual desires
    and
  • (B) any bodily contact which a reasonable
    person, would understand to demonstrate a
    propensity or intent to engage in an actin
    subparagraph (A).

17
Free Speech Association
  • First Amendment or liberty interest to be free to
    engage in common occupation and maintain a good
    reputation.
  • Other person's liberty interest not to have
    persons around them in close quarters which may
    invade a reasonable sphere of privacy.

18
Constitutional Protections
  • Due process right to a Pretermination hearing
    before discharge.
  • Post-termination hearing subjects person to
    stigma so get full trial-type hearing
    w/cross-exam.
  • Equal protection right distinguishes conduct from
    label.
  • Gov. can legislate morality if necessary to
    maintain order, cohesion combat readiness.
  • No property right to continued service in
    military.
  • Obligation if conscription (draft) imposed.

19
Case Study Gays in the Military
  • What is the Dont Ask-Dont Tell Policy? On the
    application, not ask not required to tell if
    you are gay/
  • How did Clinton use the E.O. to fulfill a
    campaign promise? Used E.O. to modify military
    guidelines re information sought from applicants.
  • Was it an abuse of discretion? No, because
    Congress had the right to act and threatened to
    codify ban unless compromise reached.

20
Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional
Rights
  • S.Ct. ruled (8-0 vote )federal government can
    withhold federal funds from colleges that bar or
    restrict military recruiting on their campuses.
  • 3rd Cir. Ruled gov. failed to show needs
    justified intrusion into Free Speech rights.
  • Campuses have no First Amendment right to exclude
    recruiters who discriminate against gays.
  • Solomon Amendment allows government to withhold
    federal funds, e.g., work study, financial aid.
    contracts. (passed in 1994)

21
Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional
Rights
  • SCT The Solomon amendment neither limits what
    law schools may say nor requires them to say
    anything.
  • "Law schools remain free under the statute to
    express whatever views they may have on the
    military's Congressionally mandated employment
    policy, all the while retaining eligibility for
    federal funds."
  • (Roberts wrote majority opinion)

22
Discussion Questions
  • 1) How do you identify a homosexual person under
    the policy? To what extent should the Military
    Board rely upon a person's characterization of
    themselves vs. labels attached to a person as a
    "homosexual" in deciding on the application of
    the regulation ban. If someone denies or fails to
    acknowledge his or her homosexuality, but someone
    else "outs" him or her, would that be sufficient
    to establish that they are a homosexual?
  • 2) Should this issue be resolved by Executive
    Order, congressional legislation, or by Judicial
    review. What are the policy and legal arguments
    to support the claim that the regulation is
    required to maintain discipline, good order and
    morale?
  • 3) What effect should congressional or state
    action failing to recognize the rights of gay
    persons to marry or be entitled to benefits have
    on military policy regarding gays in the
    military.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com