ENERGY EFFICIENT WINDOWS AND BUILDING DESIGN - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

ENERGY EFFICIENT WINDOWS AND BUILDING DESIGN

Description:

HOW MUCH LESS ENERGY THAN CONVENTIONAL METHODS WE ARE ... Venetian Blinds. External The best Method. Internal. Horizontal. Vertical. Special Window Glass ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: cee6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ENERGY EFFICIENT WINDOWS AND BUILDING DESIGN


1
ENERGY EFFICIENT WINDOWS AND BUILDING DESIGN
  • ARCHITECTS AND CONSULTANTS POINT OF VIEW.
  • BY K.V.PRADEEP
  • MANAGING DIRECTOR
  • DVP CONSULTING PVT. LTD.
  • BANGALORE,

2
WHAT DO WE MEAN BY ENERGY EFFICIENCY?
  • WE MEAN
  • HOW EFFICIENTLY WE ARE USING ENERGY FOR VAROIUS
    SERVICES IN THE BUILDING
  • IN OTHER WORDS.

3
HOW MUCH LESS ENERGY THAN CONVENTIONAL METHODS WE
ARE USING TO ACHIEVE SAME OR BETTER RESULTS
  • AIR CONDITIONING IS ONE OF THE MAJOR CONSUMER OF
    ENERGY IN ANY AIR CONDITIONED BUILDING

4
AIR CONDITIONING LOAD INCREASES DUE TO
  • SOLAR HEAT GAIN THROUGH
  • WALLS
  • WINDOWS
  • ROOF
  • ETC.

5
IN A COMFORT AIR CONDITIONING APPLICATION
  • SOLAR HEAT GAIN ACCOUNTS FOR AS HIGH AS 30 40
    OF THE AIR CONDITIONING LOAD
  • HENCE IT IS ESSENTIAL TO REDUCE THIS HEAT GAIN TO
    REDUCE AIR CONDITIONER SIZE AND COST OF BUYING
    AND OWNING.

6
EFFECTS OF SOLAR RADIATION ENTERING BUILDING
  • Increased Heat and Hence stress on people
  • Reduces working efficiency of people.
  • Reduces Efficiency Life of machines
  • Direct sunlight induces glare making visual tasks
    difficult to accomplish
  • Create unsafe working conditions
  • And others

7
HOW DOES THIS ENTER THE BUILDING?
  • SOLAR ENERGY ENTERS BUILDING BY
  • CONDUCTION ( OUTER TO INNER WALL, GLASS)
  • CONVECTION ( FROM INNER SURFACE TO THE
    CONDITIONED AREA)
  • RADIATION ( THROUGH WINDOWS ETC.)

8
THE PROBLEM IS MORE AGGRAVATED WHEN.
  • Outdoor temperatures are very high
  • People work in fixed postures / desks
  • Ventilation is poor in the area
  • Already other heat sources are in the area like
    computers etc.

9
HOW TO REDUCE SOLAR GAIN?
  • Solar Heat Gain can be reduced by
  • Proper orientation of the building / walls /
    windows
  • Control unwanted sunlight
  • Choose right material for construction
  • Provide Insulation for exposed Roof

10
ORIENTATION
  • Avoid West facing glass
  • North facing glass preferred
  • Prefer shading by other structures / trees etc.
  • Prefer Longer south North Facing walls
    Windows

11
CONTROL UNWANTED SUNLIGHT
  • Retractable Sunshades
  • Adjustable Louvers
  • Light colored Louvers
  • Projecting Roof Balcony
  • Venetian Blinds
  • External The best Method
  • Internal
  • Horizontal
  • Vertical
  • Special Window Glass

12
Special Type of Glasses
  • Reflective Glass acts as one way mirror
    reflecting incident light backwards
  • Heat Absorbing Glass Heavy tinted- absorbs and
    reradiates later
  • Double Glazed windows
  • Neutral Tinted glass for glare reduction

13
OTHER IMPORTANT POINTS
  • 10 of Floor Area should be Windows for natural
    Lighting
  • 5 10 floor area should be fully open able
    windows for natural ventilation.
  • Forced ventilation though can not cool the area,
    can keep the area comfortable in non A/c areas.

14
CASE STUDY
  • SOFTWARE FACILITY GR. 3 UPPER FLOORS.
  • TOTAL AREA 120,000 SFT
  • EACH FLOOR 30,000 SFT
  • BUILDING SHAPE 1)175 x 175 SQUARE
  • 2) 300 x 100
    RECTANGULAR

15
CASE STUDY
  • ASSUMPTIONS
  • OCCUPANCY ONE PERSON / 100 SFT
  • FRESH AIR 20 CFM / PERSON
  • COMPUTERS 150 W / PC
  • LIGHTING 1.5 W / SFT

16
CASE STUDY
  • COOLING LOAD (20 GLASS AREA)
  • ROOF IS INSULATED
  • FOR SQUARE BLDG. - 100 TR / FLOOR
  • FOR RECT. BLDG. - 98 TR / FLOOR
  • COOLING LOAD (20 GLASS AREA)
  • ROOF IS NOT
    INSULATED
  • FOR SQUARE BLDG. - 138 TR / FLOOR
  • FOR RECT. BLDG. - 136 TR / FLOOR

17
CASE STUDY
  • COOLING LOAD (80 GLASS AREA)
  • ROOF IS INSULATED
  • FOR SQUARE BLDG. - 119 TR / FLOOR
  • FOR RECT. BLDG. - 114 TR / FLOOR
  • COOLING LOAD (80 GLASS AREA)
  • ROOF IS NOT
    INSULATED
  • FOR SQUARE BLDG. - 158 TR / FLOOR
  • FOR RECT. BLDG. - 152 TR / FLOOR

18
CASE STUDY
  • COOLING LOAD FOR THE ENTIRE RECT. BLDG. (20
    GLASS AREA)
  • 356 TR
  • COOLING LOAD FOR THE ENTIRE RECT. BLDG. (80
    GLASS AREA)
  • 432 TR
  • THEREFORE, WE REQUIRE AN ADDITIONAL 17.5
    COOLING CAPACITY IF GLASS AREA IS 80

19
CASE STUDY
  • RUNNING COST / YEAR
  • 20GLASS AREA BLDG.
  • 356TRX8HRX5DX52WX1KW/TRX RS.5X0.7
  • RS. 25.9 LAKHS
  • 80GLASS AREA BLDG.
  • 432TRX8HRX5DX52WX1KW/TRX RS.5X0.7
  • RS. 31.4 LAKHS

20
CONCLUSION
  • THE CASE STUDY SHOWS THAT IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT
    THE GLASS AREA BE KEPT TO A MINIMUM OR IF THIS IS
    NOT POSSIBLE DUE TO ARCHITECTURAL REASONS, TO
    SELECT A GLAZING CAPABLE OF REDUCING THE SOLAR
    HEAT GAIN.

21
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME
22
CASE STUDY
  • COOLING LOAD (80 GLASS AREA)
  • ROOF IS INSULATED
  • FOR SQUARE BLDG. - 119 TR / FLOOR
  • FOR RECT. BLDG. - 114 TR / FLOOR
  • COOLING LOAD (80 GLASS AREA)
  • ROOF IS
    UNINSULATED
  • FOR SQUARE BLDG. - 158 TR / FLOOR
  • FOR RECT. BLDG. - 152 TR / FLOOR
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com