Title: LARVAL TRANSPORT
1LARVAL TRANSPORT
Eileen E. Hofmann Center for Coastal Physical
Oceanography Old Dominion University
- Potential for Spread
- Rate of Spread
2Outline of Presentation
- Can it happen example of transport
- Conditions that affect larval survival
- Environmental conditions climate change
- How fast/far can transport occur
- Suggestions for consideration by panel
3- Distance of 1700 km
- Larval life of about six
- to eight months
- Krill populations at
- South Georgia not
- self-sustaining
- South Georgia system
- dependent on an
- upstream source
Fach et al. (2002, MEPS)
4Sea ice extent determines winter survival
Food Availability
Sea Ice Concentration and Extent
Fach et al. (2002, MEPS)
Environmental Conditions Affect Larval Survival
Fach et al. (2002, MEPS)
5- Larval transport happens over large scales
- Environmental control on survival during
transport - Importance of knowing what sustains larvae
- as they are moved from spawning area
- Larval transport can sustain populations far
removed - from the initial spawning area
- Implication Distribution of the
adults/population is - larger than the distribution
of the brood - stock
6Conditions that Affect LarvalTransport in
Chesapeake Bay
- Temperature
- Timing of Food Availability
- Food Quantity
- Food Quality
- Food Composition
7Dekshenieks et al. (1993, JSR)
8Longest larval times occur in northern bays
Dekshenieks et al. (1993, JSR)
9Early bloom extends larval time
Summer bloom shortens larval time
Fall bloom extends larval time
Spring and fall blooms provide optimal conditions
Dekshenieks et al. (1993, JSR)
10Ratio of neutral lipid to polar lipid is
important in determining successful metamorphosis
Bocheneck et al. (2000, JSR))
11High protein diet results in unsuccessful metamorp
hosis at all egg sizes and respiration rates
Low protein diet results in successful
metamorphosis at essentially all egg sizes and
respiration rates
Bochenek et al. (2001, JSR)
12Short-term fluctuations in food supply can
have large effects on larval survival
Bocheneck et al. (2000, JSR)
13Potomac River
Used environmental data sets from the EPA
monitoring stations
Oyster data available from a nearby reef
14Predicted Salinity Change for Chesapeake Bay
from the Hadley Center Climate Model
Amount of Salinity Decrease
Najjar et al. (2000, LO)
15Potomac River Future
Potomac River becomes less saline with a warming
climate
Potomac River - Present
16Potomac River - Present
Potomac River - Future
Overall oyster biomass decreases with
climate warming
17York River
Used the EPA monitoring data sets for
environmental conditions
Used oyster data sets from nearby reef
18York River - Future
Becomes less saline with a warming climate
York River - Present
York River - Present
19York River - Present
Some reduction in oyster biomass but still an
increasing trend with climate warming
York River Future
Implication is that oyster populations in
southern Chesapeake Bay may provide larvae for
the entire Bay if climate warming occurs
20How Far Can Larvae BeTransported?
- Larval life span of 20 days and a current
- velocity of 10 cm/s 173 km
- Larval life span of 25 days and a current
velocity of 10 cm/s 216 km - Larval life span of 20 days and a current
velocity of 5 cm/s 86 km - Chesapeake Bay is about 250 km in length
21Summary
- Larvae are transported from spawning areas over
large distances - Environmental conditions are important in
determining larval survival - Climate warming is an issue to consider because
it will alter the habitat and possible source
regions for larvae
22Considerations
- Oysters are transplanted world wide on purpose
- Number of oyster species have been moved
culture and wild populations - No cases where transplanted oysters have
out-competed native populations - Implication Oysters are not good invaders
23- Why are oysters not good invaders?
- High rates or reproduction
- Do not seem to be selective feeders
- Suggestion Evolved to fit a particular type of
habitat and are not able to exploit a range of
habitats
24Models of Invading Species
- Traveling wave model (black plague)
- Propagation model (leap frog seeds)
- Wave model slower than dispersion rate
- Propagation model not applicable as currently
formulated - Suggestion Need new modeling approach that uses
hydrodynamically driven transfer functions and
includes biology of species of interest
25What Needed?
- Long-term monitoring of the habitat that includes
measurements of food quantity as well as quality - Development of a schematic circulation pattern
for Chesapeake Bay from models and measurements - Studies of the basic biology of the species
within the context of its environment - Development of modeling approaches that include
the life history of the species and its
environment - Focus on post-settlement population as well as
larvae