Title: P1249945246LydhX
1Stress induced instabilities in material science
and biology
C. Misbah, CNRS and Univ. J. Fourier Grenoble I
Los Angeles October. 2005
2Uniaxial stress
Biaxial stress
3Questions
Melt, vapor
1) Front growth or recession?
Solid
2) Planar front stable?
Solid
3) Ultimate stage?
4time
Coarsening or fixed ?
Stranski-Krastanov?
Size selection?
Perpetual coarsening?
5ATG Intability (Asaro-Tiller,1972 -Grinfeld, 1986)
Quantum dots formation
pyramid-shaped quantum dots grown from indium,
gallium, and arsenic. Each dot is about 20
nanometers wide and 8 nanometers in height.
6Swelling or shrinkage of gels
Clamped at bottom
Gel swelling
T. Tanaka, H. Tanaka, Kawasaki, Sekimoto, Onuki
7Misbah C., Renard F., Gratier J.P., Kassner K.,
Geoph. Res. Lett., 31, L6618 (2004). J.
Schmittbuhl, F. Renard, J. P. Gratier, and R.
Toussaint Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 238501 (2004)
8Misbah C., Renard F., Gratier J.P., Kassner K.,
Geoph. Res. Lett., 31, L6618 (2004). J.
Schmittbuhl, F. Renard, J. P. Gratier, and R.
Toussaint Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 238501 (2004)
9Stylolithes formation
(exlimestone, queensland, Australia)
dissolution
Stress- induced corrugation
10ATG instability comes to life!
Actin-assisted cell motility
11L. A. Cameron et al., PNAS, 96, 4908 (1999).
J. van der Gucht et al. PNAS, 102, 7847 (2005)
12Actin Polymerization at bead/layer interface
P. Peyla, C. Misbah, preprint (2005)
13Physical picture of the instability
solid
14Physical picture of the instability
solid
Instability unavoidable
15Typical lengthscales of the pattern
Strain due to protuberance
Strain energy gain
Surface energy loss
16(No Transcript)
17For
For
18Yang and Srolovitz (1993) Kassner and Misbah
(1994)
Spencer Meiron (steady-states, 1994)
19Surface tension effect
Stress effect
Close to a crack
Sound speed, finite interface width
20Simple ansatz
Cycloid (Chui,Gao, 1993)
Double cycloid (conformal mapping, Kassner,
Misbah, 2001)
, derivation of groove velocities
Multicycloids (Kohlert, Kassner, Misbah, 2003)
(good agreement with numerics with few modes)
21Phase-field approach singularity?
22Phase field models
Sharp interface
Diffuse interface
23Reference state
Reference state 1 stress0 when strain0
Ref. state 2
Zero strain is no stress free
24If equilibrium
If ref. state strain is zero when when stress is
BC
For z0
There is no stress a all!
Because
25If equilibrium
If ref. state strain is zero when when stress is
BC
Plays the role of a unixial stress
26Viewed as the work of external force
Gas (liq., vac.)
Diffuse
Solid
27gas
solid
28Sharp interface limit, asymptotics
Is a Singular perturbation
29Outer solution (regular)
Inner solution (singular)
Matching inner-outer solutions
30 Lamé
Outer solutions
Inner solutions
(1) Zeroth order
(at all orders)
And BC
(2) First order
31Main Results
1) Increase of the amplitude without bound
2) Phase-field supresses finite time singularity
3) Perpetual coarsening
4) A finite interface width
 Yield stressÂ
5) Final groove velocity
321D dynamics
Stress accumulation in the grooves, fracture?
33Coarsening
Mass flux
34Coarsening
Mass flux
If non conserved
Exceptions in 1d with no noise!
35Contact coalescence
Volume variation surface
36Coarsening dominated by elasticity
conserved
nonconserved
(cycloids show driving force independent of R)
In progress
Agreement with the experiment of Koehn et
al.,Geochimica and Cosmochimica Acta, 2004
37Heteroepitaxy
38Partial relaxation
Stressed film
Oswald ripening?
Narrow size observed InGaAs/GaAs, InAs/inP,
InAS/InGaAs, ...
39Monoatomic films
substrate
Elastic monopoles
step energy/elastic energy
coverage
Marchenko-Parshin (1980) and Marchenko
1992 Alerhand et al. 1989.
40(Tersoff, Villain, Müller, Kern.)
Coasening should be inevitable!
Gain in elastic energy and in surface energy
41Open questions
1) In the pure thermodynamical limit, does
coarsening persist? 2) Is it thermodynamical or
kinetical? In the first case which ingredients
would supress coarsening? Coarsening is subtle
(Politi, Misbah, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004) 3) In
Dynamical simulations coarsening stops or
slowed down? 4) Some systems QD form under
compression but not under tension! 5) Cell
motility bead-gel friction decisive?