Title: Chapter 011 - Managing Conflict
1(No Transcript)
2Managing Conflict and Negotiations
11
3For any organization to perform effectively,
interdependent individuals and groups must
establish working relationships across
organizational boundaries, between individuals,
and among groups. Such interdependence may foster
either cooperation or conflict.
4A Contemporary Perspective
- Conflict is neither inherently good nor bad, but
is inevitable - In dealing with conflict the critical issue is
how it is managed - Conflict is defined in terms of the effect it has
on the organization - functional conflict
- dysfunctional conflict
5Functional Conflict (1 of 2)
- A confrontation between groups that enhances and
benefits the organizations performance - Without this type of conflict in organizations
- there would be little commitment to change
- most groups likely would become stagnant
6Functional Conflict (2 of 2)
- Functional conflict can
- lead to increased awareness of problems that need
to be addressed - result in broader and more productive searches
for solutions - generally facilitate positive change, adaptation,
and innovation
7Dysfunctional Conflict
- Any confrontation or interaction between groups
that harms the organization or hinders the
achievement of organizational goals - Management must seek to eliminate dysfunctional
conflict
8Relationship Between Intergroup Conflict and
Organizational Performance
Level of Intergroup Conflict
Level of Organizational Performance
Probable Impact on Organization
Organization Characterized By
Low or none
Slow adaptation to environment Few changes
Little stimulation of
ideas Apathy Stagnation
Low
Dysfunctional
Situation I
Optimal
Functional
High
Situation II
Positive movement toward goals Innovation and
change Search for problem solutions Creativity
and quick adaptation to environmental changes
Disruption Interference with
activities Coordination difficulties Chaos
Low
Dysfunctional
High
Situation III
9Stages of Conflict
Perceived Conflict
Intergroup conflicts develop over a period of time
Felt Conflict
Manifest Conflict
10What Causes Intergroup Conflict?
- Work Interdependence
- Pooled interdependence
- Sequential interdependence
- Reciprocal interdependence
- Goal Differences
- Mutually exclusive goals
- Perceptual Differences
- Status incongruency
- Inaccurate perceptions
11Group A
Types of Interdependence
POOLED
Goals
Group B
Group A
Group B
SEQUENTIAL
Goals
Group A
Group B
Goals
Goals
RECIPROCAL
12Problems Related to Goal Differences
- Groups with mutually exclusive goals can find
themselves in conflict - Allocating limited resources between groups
increases mutual dependencies and differences in
goals are more apparent - Different time horizons needed by groups to
achieve their goals can be a source of conflict
13Minimizing Perceptual Bases for Conflict
- Communicate effectively!
- Help develop a groups social sensitivity.
- Emphasize behavioral flexibility.
- Communicate effectively!
14The Consequences of Dysfunctional Intergroup
Conflict
- Changes Within Groups
- Increased group cohesiveness
- Emphasis on loyalty
- Rise in autocratic leadership
- Focus on activity
- Changes Between Groups
- Distorted perceptions
- Negative stereotyping
- Decreased communication
15Managing Intergroup Conflict Through Resolution
16Conflict-Resolution Grid
Accommodating or Smoothing
Problem Solving or Collaboration
Allowing other group to win
Working together to solve problems
HIGH
Compromising
Finding acceptable solution so everyone feels good
EXTERNAL FOCUS
Avoiding
Dominating
LOW
Ignoring or steering clear of other group
Working to dominate and control
HIGH
LOW
INTERNAL FOCUS
17When to Use the Different Conflict-Resolution
Approaches (1 of 3)
- Dominating approach use on important issues
- where you are certain you are right, and
- where the benefit of a resolution outweighs the
drawback of possible negative feelings by the
dominated group - Accommodating approach use in disputes that are
of far greater importance to the other group than
they are to your group
18When to Use the Different Conflict-Resolution
Approaches (2 of 3)
- Problem-solving approach use when both groups
are willing to invest time and effort to reach a
resolution that maximizes everyones outcome - Avoiding approach use primarily as a temporary
expedient to buy more time
19When to Use the Different Conflict-Resolution
Approaches (3 of 3)
- Compromising approach use as a middle ground
- Good backup approach when other approaches fail
to resolve the issue
20Stimulating Constructive Intergroup Conflict
- Bringing outside individuals into the group
- Altering the organizations structure
- Stimulating competition
- Making use of programmed conflict
21Negotiations (1 of 2)
- Negotiations a process in which two or more
parties attempt to reach acceptable agreement in
a situation characterized by some level of
disagreement
22Negotiations (2 of 2)
- In an organizational context, negotiation may
take place - 1. between two people
- 2. within a group
- 3. between groups
- 4. over the Internet
23Elements of Negotiations
- Some disagreement or conflict exists
- There is some degree of interdependence between
the parties - The situation must be conducive to opportunistic
interaction - There exists some possibility of agreement
24Win-Lose Negotiating
- Classical view that negotiations are a form of a
zero-sum game - i.e., to whatever extent one party wins
something, the other party loses - Also known as distributive negotiating
- i.e., the process of distributing scarce
resources
25Win-Win Negotiating
- A positive-sum approach
- i.e., situations where each party gains without a
corresponding loss for the other party - Does not mean that everyone gets everything they
wanted - An agreement has been achieved which leaves all
parties better off than they were prior to the
agreement
26Negotiation Tactics
27Variables That Affect Negotiations
- There is no one best way to negotiate
- The selection of specific negotiation strategies
and tactics depends on - 1. The nature of the issues being negotiated
- 2. The environment in which the negotiations take
place - 3. The nature of the outcomes desired from the
negotiations
28Negotiations Desired Outcomes
- Substantive Outcomes
- Have to do with how the specific issue is settled
- To strive to end up with a bigger piece of the
pie than the other party
- Relationship Outcomes
- To negotiate in a manner designed primarily to
maintain good relations between the parties - Desired irrespective of the substantive result
29Mastenbroeks Model to Increase Negotiating
Effectiveness Key Activities
- Obtaining substantial results
- Influencing the balance of power
- Promoting a constructive climate
- Obtaining procedural flexibility
30Using Third-Party Negotiations
31Negotiating Globally
- Negotiating with individuals from different
countries and cultures poses a number of issues - Showing knowledge about a persons culture is one
way to establish rapport and respect with another
negotiator
32Suggestions to Improve Negotiations(1 of 2)
- Begin the bargaining with a positive overture and
then reciprocate the opponents concessions - Concentrate on the negotiation issues and the
situational factors, not on the opponent or his
or her characteristics - Look below the surface of your opponents
bargaining and try to determine his or her
strategy
33Suggestions to Improve Negotiations(2 of 2)
- Do not allow accountability to your constituents
or surveillance by them to spawn competitive
bargaining - If you have power in a negotiation, use it to
guide the opponent toward an agreement - Be open to accepting third-party assistance
- In a negotiation, attend to the environment and
be aware that the opponents behavior and power
are altered by it