Title: WHAT PLANES
1WHAT PLANES?
- by
- Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D.
- Madison Wisconsin
- August 5, 2007
2Or, An Inquiry into the Suspension of Newtonian
Physics on 9/11
3Nomoregames.net
- Texas AM Professor Emeritus, economics
- Former Chief Economist US DOL 2001-2
- Former Director Criminal Justice Center at
Dallas-based NCPA
4Why are we here?
- Victims (from their non-graves), their families,
the nation, the world cry out for justice
5(No Transcript)
6- Perpetrators must be stopped
- This means criminal convictions
- Convictions require proof the accused committed
crimes as charged (proof is our burden) - Only one chance because No Double Jeopardy, clean
evidence first time
7Principle Cannot prove a lie, only a truth
- Govt-Media-Pundit complex cannot prove OCT,
including Boeing fraud - Takes only one fact to refute official plane
theory and we have dozens (NPT) - Convictions demand proof, including truth about
no planes - Perps need story of hijacked airliners for Arab
blood libel and wars
8- Media 9/11 complicity enforcement arm of the PTB
- Media example In largest manhunt in history FBI
took 17 years to apprehend Unabomber (his brother
gave him up) - Yet within 45 seconds of second hit Fox News
anchor solved 9/11 OBL, OBL, OBL, OBL, OBLdrink
the Kool Aid, swallow the SOMA - OSAMA NINETEEN YOUNG ARABS ONYA, ONYA,
ONYAcemented in American Mindkill somebody in
Afghanistan, anybody, kill, kill,
9(No Transcript)
10Plane Facts Background
- No Arab names on Passenger Manifests
- No final manifests, many fake names
- Media reported 10 hijackers alive
- No verified security videos
- AA flights 11 and 77 not in BTS, officially never
happened - AA tail numbers deregistered
- January 14, 2002
- UA tail numbers deregistered September 28 2005
11Plane Fact 1 No Plane Flew into the Pentagon
- Hole too small to disappear a plane--757 nearly
1/2 football field - Hole in Pentagon not plane-shaped yet holes at
WTC were. Gee, no Roadrunner silhouette of
passage at Pentagon?
12- Impossible physics, 3-foot thick wall
- No verified debris from Boeing 757 with 3 million
parts--four cleanest crash sites in aviation
history - In a 45-degree-angle crash, starboard wing/engine
would hit first, spin plane clockwise (leftward),
fling tail section off - Yet straight 45-degree line allegedly sustained
through three rings--SIMPLY MARRRRRRRVELLLLL0US!
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18Plane Fact 2 No Plane Crashed at Shanksville
- Beamer/Bush Lets roll script worked while
patriotic lies about Jessica Lynch, Pat Tillman
failed - Hole a wee bit small 20x10x6
- Witnesses reported low flying, struggling
jetliner, versus absurd vertical crash imprint
as if plane would remain intact during a wipe-out
crash (meep, meep!) - No grass burned despite alleged thousands of
gallons of jet fuel - No plane debris, bodies, blood
19- No witnesses to alleged crash
- Cell phone calls impossible
- Fake dialogue Hello mom, this is your son, Mark
Bingham. - No cvr or fdr available to public 4x
- Shoot down stories a distraction without
evidence--an arbitrary claim, a nullity - FBI destroyed evidence, no comprehensive crash
report (no crash, so save taxpayers ?)
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24Plane Fact 3 No Plane Crashed at WTC
- TABOO subject? According to gatekeepers, ops,
ignoramuses, et.al. - YET NO SUCH CRASHES COULD HAVE OCCURRED as
depicted because physics are impossible - 9/11 WAS A HOAX, REMEMBER?
- YET MAJORITY REASON GOVT/MEDIA LIED TO ME
ABOUT A,B,CBUT NOT D! Oh no. I saw it on TV - HOAX CENTRAL WAS PLANE FRAUD
- NO STEP wing markings
25- Aluminum airliner cannot disappear into a
heavy steel/concrete tower - Plane must smash to pieces, crumple at wall,
break off flaps, panels, actuators, wing tips,
wings, almost certainly rotate and break off tail
- Steel walls/floors/cores offering no resistance?
Gimme a break! - Plane does not decelerate? Absurd violation of
Newtons first law of motion - No plane debris below impact zones--whered it
go? - No plane debris in gashes--whered it go?
- Holes undersized, obstructed
26- Plane-shaped holes--silhouettes of
passage--impossible ( contrary to Pentagon and
Shanksville holes) - Video Fakery Run any WTC 2 penetration video
frame-by-frame and no crash occurs - Smoke from both WTC hits too gray, not
black/charcoal enough - Building heals itself up during penetration
- Impossible butter-smooth entry with no
deceleration, NIST agrees no deceleration - Explosions delayed until plane disappears
- WTC 2 plane image turning left, banking 38
degrees yet flush hit (perpendicular). The
wrecking ball would hit port wing first, spin
plane counterclockwise, fling tail section off
east/northeast, etc.
27(No Transcript)
28- Invincible plane upon entry yet fragile inside
tower (plane changes physical character) - Two experienced pilots on flight simulators the
morning of 9/11 could not hit towers at 500 mph
in six attempts (fit wingspan of 156 into 208
width) - Can a 767 fly that fast at sea level?
29HOW STRONG ARE PLANES ANYWAY?
- Do Airplanes Have Crash Test Ratings?
- Should you fly only 5-star crash-rated planes?
- Fly only steel airplanes?
- No crash test ratings because Airplanes Are
Fall-Apart Fragile (FAF)--duh! - Airplane Over-Design factor is approximately 1
because planes are built to be light, carry
payload and meet stress of flying, landing and
taking off - Mundane fact Airlines worry about what your
luggage weighs (no lead luggage) and its
distribution aboard
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33(No Transcript)
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36(No Transcript)
37(No Transcript)
38(No Transcript)
39(No Transcript)
40(No Transcript)
41(No Transcript)
42(No Transcript)
43(No Transcript)
44(No Transcript)
45(No Transcript)
46(No Transcript)
47(No Transcript)
48(No Transcript)
49(No Transcript)
50(No Transcript)
51(No Transcript)
52(No Transcript)
53(No Transcript)
54(No Transcript)
55(No Transcript)
56(No Transcript)
57(No Transcript)
58(No Transcript)
59 60(No Transcript)
61(No Transcript)
62(No Transcript)
63(No Transcript)
64(No Transcript)
65(No Transcript)
66f
67(No Transcript)
68(No Transcript)
69(No Transcript)
70(No Transcript)
71(No Transcript)
72(No Transcript)
73(No Transcript)
74- http//www.cnn.com/WORLD/9611/26/comoros.crash/cra
sh.really.large.14sec.mov
75How Strong is Steel Anyway?
76Let me up on a 767 with my sledge hammer (9 lbs.
steel)and see how long it stays flyable
77(No Transcript)
78(No Transcript)
79(No Transcript)
80STEEL VS. ALUMINUM STRENGTH
- A36 Steel vs. 6061-T6 Aluminum
- Yield Strength 36 vs. 37
- Modulus (Stiffness) 29.0 vs. 10.0
- Specific Weight (x100) 28.4 vs. 9.8
- Ultimate Strength 58 vs. 42
- Source R.C. Hibbeler, Mechanics of Materials,
6th edition.
81Newtons Laws of Motion, 1687
- Every body continues in its state of rest, or of
uniform motion in a right line, unless it is
compelled to change that state by forces
impressed on it. - The change of motion is proportional to the
motive force impressed and is made in the
direction of the right line in which that force
is impressed. (In modern terms, acceleration is
directly proportional to applied force). - To every action there is always opposed an equal
reaction or, the mutual actions of two bodies
upon each other are always equal, and directed to
contrary parts.
82More on Newtons Third Law
- "For every action, there is an equal (in size)
and opposite (in direction) reaction. - Q An unfortunate bug strikes the windshield of a
bus moving down the road. Quite obviously, this
is a case of Newton's third law of motion. The
bug hit the windshield and the windshield hit the
bug. Which of the two forces is greater the
force on the bug or the force on the bus
windshield?
83- A Each force is the same size. For every action,
there is an equal ... (equal!). The fact that the
bug splatters only means that with its smaller
mass and strength, it is less able to withstand
the force resulting from the interaction.
84- Q A speeding plane strikes the wall of a
("motionless") Tower. Obviously this contact
between objects is a case of Newton's third law
of motion. An aluminum plane hits the steel
building and the building hits the plane. Which
of the two forces is greater the force on the
plane or the force on the building?
85- A Each force is the same size. For every action,
there is an equal and opposite reaction. It
matters not which object is moving. - The fact that the WTC steel beams, belts, and
steel-reinforced concrete floors across 5-6
stories broke up, shattered, fragmented and
formed an airplane-shaped gash...huh? You're
kiddin! Welcome to Islamic/Hoffman/Jones/
OReilly 9/11 physics.
86- Correction an aluminum plane must crumple,
shatter and cannot leave an "airplane-shaped
silhouette of passage" in a collision with mass
quantities of structural steel because the
plane--with lower mass, density and strength
than the building--would be less able to
withstand the equal force exerted on both bodies.
- The impact did nothing, the airplane did not do
much damage, said A. Astaneh-Asl, UC Berkeley
engineering professor - Massiveness matters in collisions What if the
tower fell on the plane? - Mass estimation 1 22,727 tons (5 floors divided
by 110 floors 4.5 percent of 500,000 tons).
87- A Boeing 767 would weigh approximately 140 tons
if it flew as reported, 0.6 percent of the mass
of five floors in a Tower (140/22,757) or 1/163. - A plane's material strength (resistance to forces
like bending, failure, etc.) would also be vastly
inferior to those of a Tower. Conclusion bye-bye
airplane. - Ok, shrink the estimated weight of the upper five
stories by one-third, yielding 15,152 tons. The
mass of a 767 would be 0.9 percent of the mass of
five floors it theoretically hit. Still a
MISMATCH.
88- To restate In addition to vastly superior
strength, the mass of the tower segment
allegedly hit by an aluminum tube with engines
and wings would be 100 times that of the plane.
Damage inflicted scores Tower 100, aluminum can
2. - What if the mass of the plane were lower?
- Same answer bye-bye squashed beer can, errr,
small plane. - What if a plane flew faster (speeded up) into a
tower? Kinetic energy increases as the square of
speed
89- So what? Impact force would be greater because
of 4 billion joules of energy but remains equal
for both plane and tower at any speed. - The tower is immensely stronger, heavier and
harder than the plane. Upshot bye-bye beer can,
errr, plane.
90SIZE MATTERS
91(No Transcript)
92(No Transcript)
93(No Transcript)
94- Notice how debris from the little object and big
object remain in plane sight?
95Plane Huggers Last Resort (My Daddy Told Me
There Were Plane Crashes!)
- The belief that fragile objects with sufficient
speed (kinetic energy) can penetrate massive,
hard objects, e.g., tornados drive straws into
trees - Has this feat been reproduced in experiments?
Where? Twice within 17 minutes?
96- This oddity (apparent exception to implications
of Newtons 3d law) can happen because "intense
winds can bend a tree or other objects, creating
cracks in which debris (e.g., hay straw) becomes
lodged before the tree straightens and the crack
tightens shut again. - Source National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA)
97Plane Fact 4 No Official Crash Reports on the
Four Incidents
- FAA regulation 121 requires a comprehensive
investigation of all crashes of scheduled
commercial flights - NTSB transferred its responsibility to the FBI,
reason foul-play - FBI response to FOIA enforcement proceedings and
privacy concerns prevent release
98Why Not Use Real Planes?
- Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy
theories concerning the attacks of September the
11th
99- Bush told us the conspiracy was is outrageous
and used outrageous methods to slow
pursuers--years of planning and control of
post-9/11 cover up--truth movement - KISS, too many things could would go wrong with
real suicide planes - No planes eliminates need for DoD stand down
orders because no risk of airliner interceptions
by rogue patriots in the military - Planes could miss towers and crash in wrong
place, exposing the fraud - Planes could hit towers but perps knew physics
of fragile planes crashing into steel towers
100- Not exactly the psy-op effect desired shock,
awe, fear, disorientation - Wherever real crashes occurred, outsiders would
discover faked airliners and missing hijackers
(Muslims required!) - THE PSY-OP GOAL made special effects (fakery)
vastly superior to real crashes, namely, convince
traumatized America that hijacked airliners
crashed and jet fuel fires caused WTC destruction
- Distract America from real cause
disintegration/dustification/dissociation by the
U.S. military-industrial-intelligence complex
(Lookie, we got a new toy!)
101- Ace in the hole media poodles can sell any faked
story to the gullible and cover up glitches - The perps always can count on the lapdogs of the
scientific/engineering establishment, bought and
paid for by U.S. government